IBM now using Watson supercomputer to save lives
|
|
The following comments relate to this news article:
article published on 12 September, 2011
IBM's supercomputer will now help save lives.
After beating up on lowly humans on 'Jeopardy,' IBM's supercomputer Watson will now help Wellpoint Inc., the health insurer with 34 million members, to diagnose medical problems and authorize the correct treatments.
By integrating Watson's database into its own existing patient information, Wellpoint says they should be able to find the ... [ read the full article ]
Please read the original article before posting your comments.
|
AfterDawn Addict
1 product review
|
12. September 2011 @ 22:43 |
Link to this message
|
Correction: Watson will now be used to minimize costs, regardless of lives lost in the process.
|
Advertisement
|
  |
|
SomeBozo
Member
2 product reviews
|
12. September 2011 @ 23:09 |
Link to this message
|
Why do i hear... "I'm sorry Dave, I can't do that... Open the hatch HAL..."
I agree with KillerBug for the most part, but i think there might be more to the picture than just that. I would assume some of the parameters that will go in will be salary, insurance provider, age say for example:
if age > x or annual income < y)
Limit diagnoses and treatments to nothing (i.e death...)
|
AfterDawn Addict
1 product review
|
12. September 2011 @ 23:55 |
Link to this message
|
For your caclucation, X=17 and Y=50,000,000
|
Member
|
14. September 2011 @ 12:48 |
Link to this message
|
And why do you believe lives will be lost in the process? This is a great advancement in computer technology. It's not like it's just Googling symptoms, it probably has some advanced technology that's impossible to understand by us mere humans.
Of course the computer probably has some ridiculous cost, and treatment with it will be expensive, and some people may not be able to afford the huge price tag. But to say that people who can't afford to use these advances won't receive any treatment at all seems cynical to me.
IBM is an amazing company, and hopefully they'll continue to advance at this ridiculous rate for many years to come. Though I hope I don't wake up to an article that says "Watson fatally misdiagnoses 90% of patients"
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 14. September 2011 @ 16:28
|
SomeBozo
Member
2 product reviews
|
14. September 2011 @ 15:19 |
Link to this message
|
First i would completely agree this is a great improvement in health care awesome to see, no argument there. But capability and ability does not always mean availability, maybe i'm getting hardened the older i get, but i see this and at some point i would think there will be parameters in the system to filter out possible available treatments depending on who will receive the treatment. What insurance provider you have, or who are you such as a street person with no income, or a person with the right political connections, a handicap child or and elderly person. These filters i would argue will in turn filter many treatments available in some way. This is how eventually lives will be lost, i doubt all treatments at any cost will be provided without filtering... I could be wrong but i consider the greed of insurance companies...
|
ronatola
Junior Member
|
17. September 2011 @ 08:08 |
Link to this message
|
i forsee google-ads for cut rate surgeons and meds attached to the diagnosis.
|
Advertisement
|
  |
|
Senior Member
|
17. September 2011 @ 13:45 |
Link to this message
|
wow an advance in data retrieval and conspiracy theories abound.LOL.
|