|
Netflix kills off idea for splitting streaming, DVD-by-mail
|
|
The following comments relate to this news article:
article published on 10 October, 2011
Last month, Netflix outraged subscribers by announcing that they would be splitting the DVD-by-mail and streaming services of their company.
The new company for DVDs, called Qwikster, would have its own login portal and would require subscribers to log in to both Netflix and Qwikster if they want to change their respective queues.
This move came on top of the already unpopular decision ... [ read the full article ]
Please read the original article before posting your comments.
|
|
Wanpa-Kun
Newbie
|
10. October 2011 @ 11:55 |
Link to this message
|
|
*sighs*
What the hell are they doing/thinking over there?
|
|
Advertisement
|
 |
|
|
Junior Member
|
10. October 2011 @ 12:02 |
Link to this message
|
|
Good, they should have realized that was a dumb idea in the first place..
Concordia res parvae crescent
|
AfterDawn Addict
1 product review
|
10. October 2011 @ 12:36 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by Wanpa-Kun:
*sighs*
What the hell are they doing/thinking over there?
That is just the thing...they are not thinking.
I didn't want to lose my que, so I opened a BB account and moved my que over there...then I turned off my 5-at-a-time Netflix disk plan...and I'm not coming back.
|
Member
|
10. October 2011 @ 12:41 |
Link to this message
|
thepohl, shouldn't they? I mean, I can't even consider this as moving too quickly so much as moving in the wrong direction, maybe also too quickly. Couldn't they expect that people don't want to have to do everything twice just to enjoy a well-rounded delivery system of content?
However, at least they've actually listened to customers and paid attention to the fact that they were about to commit suicide. If this were Sony everything would have gone full speed ahead with some terrible, irrelevant blog post first announcing the change a week after fruition, once everyone would have already learned of the change from every news outlet imaginable and the fact that the website was now half of what it was.
~*Livin' Electronicallly*~
|
|
POGK
Junior Member
|
10. October 2011 @ 13:50 |
Link to this message
|
|
I just want to know if they bothered with market research before making this plan up. I would have thought that the small amount of research needed would have told them this was a bad idea from the start. Maybe they were trying to split their stock artificially IDK. How many customers have they lost as a result?
That being said, I am glad they listened and canned the Qwikster thing.
|
Member
|
10. October 2011 @ 14:08 |
Link to this message
|
|
Just shows the power of the consumer if they all stick together. Enough people canceling and complaining did the trick. Now if we could only apply the same tactic to our elected in Congress, Senate and the Executive Branch of the government, imagine what could be accomplished............oh well, just a dream I guess!
|
Staff Member
4 product reviews
|
10. October 2011 @ 14:50 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by POGK:
I just want to know if they bothered with market research before making this plan up. I would have thought that the small amount of research needed would have told them this was a bad idea from the start. Maybe they were trying to split their stock artificially IDK. How many customers have they lost as a result?
That being said, I am glad they listened and canned the Qwikster thing.
Nope, they didn't. Hastings admitted that after 5 years of hitting victory after victory they got "too cocky" and thought they knew what we wanted better than we did. (Paraphrased, of course)
|
AfterDawn Addict
1 product review
|
10. October 2011 @ 15:09 |
Link to this message
|
|
Obviously no one in netflix management ever uses the service...otherwise they would have known what the customers wanted because they would have been customers themselves. I mean...did ANYONE EVER ask them to split the service???
|
|
ntense69
Member
|
10. October 2011 @ 15:14 |
Link to this message
|
|
Customers in the end always will impact a company's rise or fall. Its a good thing they trashed the split it would eventually led to a decrease in sales like has already happened.
|
|
jookycola
Member
|
10. October 2011 @ 17:01 |
Link to this message
|
With band width caps from ISP's on thee rise I can't for the life of me see how they think streaming will be the future. I will only watch Blu-rays or HD programing. You can't get 1080p quality streaming.
EVERYONE I know all says the same thing they rent MOVIES (i.e. DVD's & Blu-ray's) from Netflix, the streaming was just a nice touch for waiting between deliveries and/or catching up on past episodes of TV shows. but none of them want to pay for one or the other let alone pay more for both. They, including me just don't use it (streaming) enough to justify extra cost.
and if I can just be honest for a minute, the streaming quality of Netflix is only marginally better than the quality I get from torrents. I'd rather torrent 2 seasons of Eastbound & Down for free than pay to stream it in similar quality. It's like paying for bottled water when you have water just as good for free at your house....it makes no sense.
|
Senior Member
|
10. October 2011 @ 17:41 |
Link to this message
|
|
I'm still canceling...
Oh, Im sorry... Did the middle of my sentence interrupt the beginning of yours?
|
Member
|
10. October 2011 @ 17:42 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by jookycola:
With band width caps from ISP's on thee rise I can't for the life of me see how they think streaming will be the future. I will only watch Blu-rays or HD programing. You can't get 1080p quality streaming.
EVERYONE I know all says the same thing they rent MOVIES (i.e. DVD's & Blu-ray's) from Netflix, the streaming was just a nice touch for waiting between deliveries and/or catching up on past episodes of TV shows. but none of them want to pay for one or the other let alone pay more for both. They, including me just don't use it (streaming) enough to justify extra cost.
and if I can just be honest for a minute, the streaming quality of Netflix is only marginally better than the quality I get from torrents. I'd rather torrent 2 seasons of Eastbound & Down for free than pay to stream it in similar quality. It's like paying for bottled water when you have water just as good for free at your house....it makes no sense.
Aye, but your tap water isn't considered illegal or copyright infringement. I'm all for yo-ho'ing and all, but if you sit there and torrent every little thing you want to watch (without a proper proxy set-up and all), especially entire seasons at a time, you will get noticed eventually if only because of the amount of data you're downloading.
~*Livin' Electronicallly*~
|
Member
|
10. October 2011 @ 17:58 |
Link to this message
|
|
dumb move in the first place, greedy bastards until they realize they lose money. a little late for that don't you think?
Being nice always has its own consequences
|
|
ronhondo
Junior Member
|
10. October 2011 @ 22:06 |
Link to this message
|
|
Fire the CEO and put in someone that knows what they he or she doing and your company may come back ?? No matter what I will never use you again. I hate being treated like a jerk. I won't allow it again !!
|
|
xtago
Senior Member
|
11. October 2011 @ 02:44 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by thepohl:
Good, they should have realized that was a dumb idea in the first place..
It's called money.
See charging people $9 to get digital videos stream and get DVDs sent in the mail is silly.
Because if you split out the DVD side and charge extra for both services you can then sell off the DVD mail side as it's probably costing them more money all the while it's drop customers anyway.
And you get to keep the streaming side at the much higher charge to boot.
Only problem do people stay and pay extra costs to use the 2 separate services I guess not in this case.
|
|
Mr_Bill06
Member
|
11. October 2011 @ 04:31 |
Link to this message
|
|
It is a dumb idea why the need for 2 sites for them same service what's the point? They listened this time, I guess they got the hint the first time when a lot of there customers walked. They can't afford another giant loss of customers.
|
|
emugamer
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
11. October 2011 @ 19:14 |
Link to this message
|
|
I'm just happy the goofy name "Quikster" is gone. It's bad enough "Twitter" and "Tweeting" caught on.
|
AfterDawn Addict
1 product review
|
13. October 2011 @ 06:14 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by emugamer:
I'm just happy the goofy name "Quikster" is gone. It's bad enough "Twitter" and "Tweeting" caught on.
Yeah...but at least you can call their followers, "Twits"
|
|
SProdigy
Senior Member
5 product reviews
|
13. October 2011 @ 14:52 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by jookycola:
With band width caps from ISP's on thee rise I can't for the life of me see how they think streaming will be the future. I will only watch Blu-rays or HD programing. You can't get 1080p quality streaming.
EVERYONE I know all says the same thing they rent MOVIES (i.e. DVD's & Blu-ray's) from Netflix, the streaming was just a nice touch for waiting between deliveries and/or catching up on past episodes of TV shows. but none of them want to pay for one or the other let alone pay more for both. They, including me just don't use it (streaming) enough to justify extra cost.
and if I can just be honest for a minute, the streaming quality of Netflix is only marginally better than the quality I get from torrents. I'd rather torrent 2 seasons of Eastbound & Down for free than pay to stream it in similar quality. It's like paying for bottled water when you have water just as good for free at your house....it makes no sense.
You are in a select group of people that only watch their content in the highest quality available. That's okay, but most HD feeds via satellite are 720p or 1080i and at best, upconverted to 1080p, IF you have the hardware that will do so. It's a start, but still not pure. I don't think many people care, and I know plenty of people who have HDTV's and watching stretched 480i/p feeds! Heck, one still have a VCR connected to his HDTV!
I get the point you were trying to make, but the HD feeds I get over Netflix are just fine, unless my ISP is acting wonky that day. To compare to torrents is just, uh, bad. You're relying on some pirate to create a suitable compressed file for your viewing pleasure. That's where Netflix is consistent. Plus I don't have to worry about waiting to get said file, it's pretty much on my screen within a minute.
I've actually gotten my money's worth out of the amount of Starz movies and TV series I stream. IMO the TV series are way overpriced to purchase a hard copy on DVD/BD. The small monthly fee from Netflix works just fine and I don't have to worry about letting discs collect dust.
And Eastbound and Down in not available on Netflix, as HBO has their own streaming HBO GO service, which is awfully bad unless you're confined to a small screen to watch.
As for bottled water, hey my water sucks, so we get bottled water and add those Crystal Light packets - so much better.
|
AfterDawn Addict
1 product review
|
14. October 2011 @ 04:58 |
Link to this message
|
I have to agree with the bottled water argument...my last place had wonderful water...my current house has so many deposits in the water that my shower heads only last about 3 months, and that is using pure bleach to clear out the deposits every 2 weeks. All the water I drink comes from 1-gallon jugs...I wouldn't want to drink my tap water if I was in the middle of the desert about about to die.
|
Senior Member
|
14. October 2011 @ 13:09 |
Link to this message
|
|
agree... and there are many types of Netflix users. Many are mindless "i" drones and could care less about the quality of their TV.
Until you show them what they are paying for and not using.
But many Netflix users are "casual" users. Netflix is an "addition" to "other" services. The only value to Netflix is the ease of use and large library.
I only use Netflix if I absolutely have to. For that reason it is just not worth it at current prices.
I have much better options. Options that don't require crappy "streaming".
So, Netflix will survive just fine. They will keep the mindless drones and lose most savvy people. IMO
Oh, Im sorry... Did the middle of my sentence interrupt the beginning of yours?
|
|
SProdigy
Senior Member
5 product reviews
|
14. October 2011 @ 13:17 |
Link to this message
|
I consider myself one of the savvy. I own some nice equipment, newer 47" LED LCD HDTV, Blu-Ray, DirecTV's latest equipment, everything gets connected by best means, ie. HDMI, etc. and also my 5.1 surround, which is getting dated, but alas, better than most.
I still find the value to be there. I probably use the disc service less than anything, but for the $8-10 I'm paying, it's cheaper than buying something off the shelf or wasting half a night picking something out from the chain store down the road. Redbox isn't up to snuff with Blu-Ray selection thus far and I'm largely disappointed in what they have overall.
Funny thing is that I remembered this story when my streaming last night was 3 bars short of "HD" quality. I was angry and hit the stop button immediately. Waited a tick and restarted and got that "HD" to light up. Much better. ISP is more of the hassle in these things.
Side note, DirecTV is really pushing the streaming stuff as well, though theirs downloads direct to your DVR box. Nearly every major network offers some sort of "On Demand" channel through their service and the selection can go from meh to amazing. I find it just as convenient when I forget to record a show, as most of the recent episodes are archived right there.
5 years ago I didn't have any of this at my disposal. Now I have more media available than I can possibly consume!
|
AfterDawn Addict
1 product review
|
15. October 2011 @ 05:19 |
Link to this message
|
I think netflix is a great deal even as it is...the disk plan isn't worth it anymore unless you are a pirate with a crummy internet connection, but the streaming is great...for $8 a month I get all the background noise I would get from a $100 a month cable package that doesn't look any better. I've got a netflix movie paused right now and it looks like a paused DVD...nice and crisp, no pixelation. There are even things on there that are worth actually watching, and I don't have to set my DVR to record them in advance. I wish they had more content, but I have been using it as background noise 8 hours a day for well over a year without running out of new stuff...that is a savings of $92 a month vs the cable company, or $1100 a year!
Plus, I often get stuck places for 20-30 minutes while waiting for someone who is running late while I am running early...and I can watch netflix FROM MY PHONE! Granted, there are other streaming services...but the content is usually lacking (or in some foreign language only)...and the quality is usually so bad that it doesn't even look good on a phone, let alone a 1080P display.
As for on-demand, they charge a fortune for those services...and you need to have a cable subscription too...no dice.
|
|
bratcher
Senior Member
|
22. October 2011 @ 12:47 |
Link to this message
|
Netflix nixed the idea of splitting the DVD & streaming services? Great!! I was going to cancel but this move will keep me as a DVD & streaming customer for a good while.
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey_P
Senior Member
|
22. October 2011 @ 13:27 |
Link to this message
|
Personally I do not like the idea of a monthly fee especially if I cannot justify whatever price the fee may be. Just plain and simple I don't watch Blu-Ray disks that often to offset the cost.
Streaming for me is useless. Poor audio and video. Just wait until service providers start charging what they feel is their fair share. Time will tell if and when streaming isn't such a great deal after all.
Wake me up when quality and content equals or exceeds satellite broadcasts. Not going to happen for a while.
If Redbox had a larger selection it would be almost perfect.
Jeff
Cars, Guitars & Radiation.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 22. October 2011 @ 13:28
|
