Sony has launched its 3D PlayStation display today, with a November 13th release date.
First unveiled at the E3 event this summer, the display is Sony's first "gaming display" for the PlayStation console.
Rather than answer everyone's questions about the display individually, Sony released a huge FAQ which I have posted parts of here:
I pre-ordered the PlayStation 3D Display from ... [ read the full article ]
Please read the original article before posting your comments.
I'm surprised these companies are still backing Active 3D, are they afraid to admit or hurt their pride just because they spent so much money into it? Passive 3D has proven to be superior. Yes you only get half the resolution per eye, but you don’t' even notice it because theoretically your brain puts the two images together, so in reality you're still getting full 1080p video. Not only that, passive 3d glasses are a lot cheaper, a lot less cumbersome and more comfortable, and have less ghosting and crosstalk, and better viewing angles than active 3D. Who cares if you’re getting 1080p per eye if there's major ghosting and screen brightness issues? "oh boy I got a huge headache, but at least I'm getting 1080p per eye".
So, I'm not interested in this TV at all, or in any 3D TV (though "SimulView" is something I'd like to check out), but I read this article and the Sony page and have yet to figure out the damn size of the thing. Gives refresh rate, resolution, and all that other crap, but nowhere do I see a size.
Is this thing like 20" and they're afraid to admit it?
