Originally posted by HxCMANIAC:

---

This doesn't sound like anonymous...

---

Originally posted by buxtahuda:

---

Originally posted by HxCMANIAC:

---

This doesn't sound like anonymous...

---

It does when you consider it's a.) random people and b.) anyone can use the name. No telling, but somehow whoever did it will be considered a criminal and get taken down, while the sites go back up and some money flows into some political pockets.

---

Originally posted by DVDBack23:

---

I understand people's arguments for politicians getting kickbacks for deals with media companies, phone carriers, tobacco companies etc, and for the most part I believe that to be certainly true, but to say that politicians are willing to risk their lives and careers for a minor kickback on child porn sites? Ridiculous statements without merit.

---

Originally posted by Interestx:

---

My 2 pennies.....

So long as it doesn't screw up arresting, charging & convicting these scumbags then I am all for this.
Usually the money trail (credit cards etc) indicates the guilty once they get this far.

(they have broken big child porn rings like this before, although not this way obviously, that we know of anyway)

......but if they have done anything which means these guys can't be arrested, charged & sent to trial & they get off scott-free then they've made a terrible mistake & are really little better than the scumabgs supplying the demand for this awful stuff.

---

Originally posted by ruff469:

---

I'm hoping you are commenting out of jest and are not so naive as to believe that some of the higher powers are not backing this kind of activity. No you can't stop all individuals from doing things like this but you can't say that the human politicians that are so called elected by us have yours or my best intention in mind. In fact it makes more sense to say that they have the criminals best intentions in mind because they are the ones with the money. We the masses feed the politicians through our vices. Without us, the Cig co's and porn's co's have no power.

---

Originally posted by DVDBack23:

---

Originally posted by ruff469:

---

I'm hoping you are commenting out of jest and are not so naive as to believe that some of the higher powers are not backing this kind of activity. No you can't stop all individuals from doing things like this but you can't say that the human politicians that are so called elected by us have yours or my best intention in mind. In fact it makes more sense to say that they have the criminals best intentions in mind because they are the ones with the money. We the masses feed the politicians through our vices. Without us, the Cig co's and porn's co's have no power.

---

Not in jest and not naive. I never said politicians have our best intentions in mind, so not sure where you saw that. What I am saying is if you get caught for kickbacks from lobbyists, etc, you maybe lose your position, maybe pay a fine. If you are high enough up, maybe there is a media scandal. However, you can certainly work again. Hell, you can probably write a book. You get caught with child porn or backing child porn, you never work anywhere (legally) again, ever. You also get to have a dot on a map that everyone can check for their own protection. These political "criminals" (unless they are actually pedophiles, whole different story) know that is not worth it when there is so much money to be made elsewhere.

---

Originally posted by DVDBack23:

---

I understand people's arguments for politicians getting kickbacks for deals with media companies, phone carriers, tobacco companies etc, and for the most part I believe that to be certainly true, but to say that politicians are willing to risk their lives and careers for a minor kickback on child porn sites? Ridiculous statements without merit.

---