Sprint, after spending billions on bringing the iPhone to their network, has taken a larger than expected loss for the Q4 2011.
The company confirmed it paid $15.5 billion to Apple for a four-year commitment on the iPhone, the first of which, the iPhone 4S, went on sale in October.
During the quarter, which ended at the end of December, Sprint activated 1.8 million of the smartphone. ... [ read the full article ]
Please read the original article before posting your comments.
Hhm... I got into a debate with an individual over whether Target should get into bed with Apple was a good idea. My contention was similar to the Demotivational poster you folks have probably repeatedly seen before; desperation is a stinky cologne...
Even to see Apple's stuff displayed in Walmart (what little they'll sell any more) is as though they're carrion... & no, I'm not trolling, pix can be provided. So, obviously given the parameters of this article, Apple's preceding egocentrics are what's killing Sprint's bottom line here.
Are we to assume had it not been for this huge bite out of Sprint's ass up front that they could have possibly put these funds back into service readiness? Hindsight being 20/20 anything is certainly possible, but I offer that that Sprint shouldn't have let a self centered organization dictate their 'known' business model on an annually changing brand model.
Even Walmart's "sell us your goods at this price or we won't sell your stuff in our store" mentality is wearing thin & might actually be biting them in the ass as well. I.e., a bit of 'conform or die' I suppose.
With regards to Sprint, who cares how many phones you sell if you can't keep them on the air, you can't keep your customers & you give a third of your operating costs to a schizophrenic hoarder on a monthly basis (for that phone manu.); much less $15.5 BILLION on a hunch.
It's more than time folks should be pushing CrApple around as apposed to CrApple dictating the rules. Yeah, Frank Sinatra did it his way, but even he had to obey the laws of gravity & he couldn't just leave up & leave a restaurant w/o paying for a meal either.
Talk about a gambling habit or a victim of a con job...
I think it more like a missed opportunity. Sprint should have bidded on the i-phone early on when it was about to be released.
They were playing catch-up and paid for the lapse in time. I am willing to bet Sprint execs were nervous as to not having the i-phone, as opposed to upgrading their service. I left them, for I couldn't get a signal in most places I was in. I had to move close to a window. Hell, when I visited my partents at their house I was in a dead zone there with Sprint.
