|
Sergey Brin: All Hollywood anti-piracy legislation are misguided
|
|
The following comments relate to this news article:
article published on 15 April, 2012
Google co-founder Sergey Brin has said the entertainment industry is "shooting themselves in the foot, or maybe worse than the foot" by trying to push anti-piracy legislation.
Brin said the recently killed PIPA and SOPA legislation would have led to the U.S. becoming more like Iran and China, who censor their people.
Even more importantly, Brin hit the nail on the head in regards to ... [ read the full article ]
Please read the original article before posting your comments.
|
|
Mysttic
Senior Member
|
16. April 2012 @ 09:40 |
Link to this message
|
In this generation, no words could be more true. It is scary, just how bad Uncle Sam is going to watch us all. I always stated that when Canada (my country) starts doing it, off with the net I go. I'll keep a very very basic account open with the lowest of bandwidth caps and speeds for basic use like banking online.
But then I'd just pretty much boycott everything in media at that point. Currently I buy what I or my family likes and I don't deny being a pirate for other things. However, this method has worked for generations since we made copies of VHS, cassette tapes, cds for our family and friends; I see no reason why it should change now.
It's more than just media industries protecting their IPs. The government doesn't even really care about that, they just mask behind it because it's the best damn mask to stand behind in the digital age. Really their justifications for a close internet is simply to be able spy on people's routines. Both media, and government will be able to take advantage of the things we like and dislike. They want to be able to flawlessly be tracked wherever we go, when we go and how we get there. It's not only scary, it's down right creepy as governments around the globe contemplate that humans have no rights the minute they are logged into a connection.
And its us citizens to be blamed. Although we keep up the good fight and took down bills like PIPA and SOPA. The offering came back to the table again with very little reforms in place that were key issues to fighting those bills to begin with. All they really did was change the name, with the intent on implementing those policies not just to US but as much as global scale as they can.
It's reading articles like this where I take greater enjoyment in life by taking my kids outside to play.
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
|
16. April 2012 @ 11:34 |
Link to this message
|
Thank the Gods the EU will not accept the ACTA secret aggreement made by a majority of western governments as it infringes on personal rights and freedoms in favour of companies and governments, so back to the drawing board with that one APPLE and the rest of the companies I consider EVIL !
|
|
Blessedon
Member
1 product review
|
17. April 2012 @ 18:36 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by Mysttic:
In this generation, no words could be more true. It is scary, just how bad Uncle Sam is going to watch us all. Really their justifications for a close[d] internet is simply to be able spy on people's routines.
The offering came back to the table again with very little reforms in place that were key issues to fighting those bills to begin with. All they really did was change the name, with the intent on implementing those policies not just to US but as much as global scale as they can.
The object of censorship is tyranny in the guise of fairness. Students have been brainwashed in liberal socialist education centers, and now the World Order (probably the Bilderbergs) is beyond desperate to shut down the conservative media before they find out there was another side.
It's easy to figure out if we follow the breadcrumbs; It started with The "Fairness" Doctrine that would have made conservative media too expensive to operate. Then (and ongoing) liberal media pump hate into the masses with "Hush Rush", THEN came SIPA, SOPA, ACTA, now CISPA.
Look at the WH visitor log for; Soros' Tide's Foundation, Media Matters, ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, and 30 other Soros-funded media shills, and the conclusion is unavoidable of the intent to shut down dissent so they can control the access of the masses anything other than state-controlled media.
Pure totalitarianism with a willing, megalomaniac puppet President.
|
|
nbfreak2
Member
|
20. April 2012 @ 08:40 |
Link to this message
|
|
Black boxes in our cars?Were is it going to stop?
|
|
Zoo_Look
Suspended permanently
|
20. April 2012 @ 09:40 |
Link to this message
|
|
Am I the only person who thinks that,if you are unhappy with how (for example) Facebook operate, instead of using it and complaining it's actually easier to just not use it?
So what if they (quote) "lock down their software"? Just don't use it!!
Or is he implying that Facebook is a necessary evil that can't be avoided?
|
|
Mez
AfterDawn Addict
|
20. April 2012 @ 09:49 |
Link to this message
|
|
Brin is right. Innovation makes much more money than trying to squeeze blood from a stone. That is what the media has been trying to do squeeze instead of creating. Music artist don't want to perform because they are too rich to be bothered. In the 50s and 60s music artist were not gods. They hung out with one another and young budding artists. They learned from one another and the up and coming artists were able to learn from the greats. All the money has destroyed the music industry but the industry can't see that.
I still can't figure how a patent costing a minimum of tens of thousands of dollars is only good for 17 yrs but an idea is protected for 100 yrs in the US and 75 in the UK. It had been 50 but a huge lobbing took place a few years ago and it was raiser to 75.
I am surprised that at least the 'free' governments have not put their hooks into the internet yet. Google did help Obama to be elected.
Brin was right again when you can pirate a great deal more than what you can buy. The industry could care less about producing old black artists music but will sue you if you pirate it. They are pigs!
|
|
ximwoem
Newbie
|
20. April 2012 @ 10:53 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by Zoo_Look:
Am I the only person who thinks that,if you are unhappy with how (for example) Facebook operate, instead of using it and complaining it's actually easier to just not use it?
So what if they (quote) "lock down their software"? Just don't use it!!
Or is he implying that Facebook is a necessary evil that can't be avoided?
fuck facebook and all the other socialial networking crap for brain dead morons, i don't have an account and never will have an account. i'm sticking with usenet, that way i can say what i want and do what i want.
|
|
Zoo_Look
Suspended permanently
|
20. April 2012 @ 11:01 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by ximwoem:
fuck facebook and all the other socialial networking crap for brain dead morons, i don't have an account and never will have an account. i'm sticking with usenet, that way i can say what i want and do what i want.
Exactly the point I am making, it's a non problem yet he bigs it up in his statement... it seems more like an attempt to deflect attention from the inadequacies/failings of his own company instead of a highlighting of potential problems that other companies contribute too.
I would suggest he looks closer to home before preaching others to get their houses in order.
|
Junior Member
|
20. April 2012 @ 11:58 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by Zoo_Look:
Am I the only person who thinks that,if you are unhappy with how (for example) Facebook operate, instead of using it and complaining it's actually easier to just not use it?
So what if they (quote) "lock down their software"? Just don't use it!!
Or is he implying that Facebook is a necessary evil that can't be avoided?
It is a significant part of life for many people - there are alternative social networks but would you join a social club to mix with your friends if your friends were all in different clubs. The fact is that FB currently has the largest user base by far - some of my friends are on other platforms but almost all on Facebook.
I also think that "vote with your feet" is a very negative concept whether for something social or 100% commercial because they dont know why you leave. Whether its a product or web service I think it is better to stay and try to influence change than to just throw in the towel.
Newbie with Panasonic NV-BS60B
"There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarrely inexplicable.
There is anothe
|
Junior Member
|
20. April 2012 @ 12:05 |
Link to this message
|
|
Sure there is an element of some governments seeking more control (UK gov feel they have that right after last summers riots!) but by far the biggest influence is commercial lobbyists becasue they now want to find a way to erradicate piracy in a way that doesnt reflect on them. They have learned one lesson in that prosecuting their own customers, or potential customers, brings bad publicity. Unfortunately they havent quite learned that what they ought to be doing is generating a better public image for themselves and offer consumers much fairer deals. I would be surprised if piracy directly causes more than 5% loss of sales - what does cause loss of sales is restrictive practice (such as controlling what is released where), recession, high prices and poor service. I feel particularly strongly that it should be considered discriminatory and preferably illegal to restrict sales to particular countries.
Newbie with Panasonic NV-BS60B
"There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarrely inexplicable.
There is anothe
|
|
GernBlan
Junior Member
|
20. April 2012 @ 12:46 |
Link to this message
|
|
His comment about Facebook was purely for the sake of defending the (currently) inferior Google+. I'm pretty active on Facebook and haven't really found it limiting in any way. I mean, no, you're not going to be able to distribute pirated movies/music on it or post porn videos of yourself with the neighbor's daughter, but for normal day-to-day use I'm not really seeing it as being Hitler's Social Network.
The whole problem with the internet is the same problem technology has had all along -- the vast majority doesn't understand it, so its easy to fear monger and get things limited and nailed down in the name of safety. I'm just surprised the US government hasn't shut down the internet citing that it aids terrorists. About 90% of the world would believe it, too.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 20. April 2012 @ 12:47
|
|
kersmere
Newbie
|
20. April 2012 @ 13:04 |
Link to this message
|
|
ITS TIME YOU ALL STARTED TO WAKE UP ABOUT AMERICA WHO DOES SHE THINK SHE IS THEY HAVE NEVER HAD FREEDOM SINCE THE INDEPENDANCE
CHARTER WAS MADE.....
WE WHERE STOPED BY THEM IN THE SECOND WORLD WAR THE GREEN BACK WAS CONTROLLED BY THE FEDERAL BANK OF AMERICA ITS PRIVATE NOT BELONGING TO THE PEOPLE THE NEW WORLD ORDER AS BEEN HERE SINCE THE EGYPTION TIMES AND MOVED OVER TO EUROPE AND ARE THE RAPTILIANS
READ THE INFO WHILE THE INTERNET IS OPEN
OPEN YOUR EYES AMERICA OPEN YOUR EYES....WE ARE WHATCHING OUR GOVERMENT HERE IN THE UK TOO AND WILL ACT AS THEY TRY .BUT NO CHANCE READ THOSE BOOKS FROM DAVID IKYE..... DIANA PAID THE PRICE BECAUSE SHE WAS HER SELF AND TOLD THE PEOPLE WHAT WAS REALLY GOING ON... WHY IS THE EURO BANK IN GERMANY ...2WW WAS USED TO AQUIRE MORE CONTROL ON OUR FREDOOM.... THE INTERNET IS MORE POWERFUL THAN THE DESIGNERS COULD EVER FORSEE.....LOVE YOU ALL FREEDOM TO U ALLL////////// UK UK UK UK UK UK UK UK
u4276161rmk
|
Junior Member
|
20. April 2012 @ 13:10 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by GernBlan:
His comment about Facebook was purely for the sake of defending the (currently) inferior Google+. I'm pretty active on Facebook and haven't really found it limiting in any way. I mean, no, you're not going to be able to distribute pirated movies/music on it or post porn videos of yourself with the neighbor's daughter, but for normal day-to-day use I'm not really seeing it as being Hitler's Social Network.
The whole problem with the internet is the same problem technology has had all along -- the vast majority doesn't understand it, so its easy to fear monger and get things limited and nailed down in the name of safety. I'm just surprised the US government hasn't shut down the internet citing that it aids terrorists. About 90% of the world would believe it, too.
That is as maybe, however my point is still valid in that I do not like a lot of facebook policies and am fighting an uphill struggle to keep timeline off my pages - the problem is that some apps now require it. It should in my view be a wholly optional choice. The point I am making is - that leaving doesnt change anything, other than depriving ME of using it!
Newbie with Panasonic NV-BS60B
"There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarrely inexplicable.
There is anothe
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 20. April 2012 @ 13:12
|
|
Zoo_Look
Suspended permanently
|
20. April 2012 @ 13:21 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by gbswales:
That is as maybe, however my point is still valid in that I do not like a lot of facebook policies and am fighting an uphill struggle to keep timeline off my pages - the problem is that some apps now require it. It should in my view be a wholly optional choice. The point I am making is - that leaving doesnt change anything, other than depriving ME of using it!
So because the people who own and run it, make a living from it, and provide YOU with a service (as opposed to you paying for it), they should not feel able to do with it what they see fit?
Not sure that makes sense, but lets go with that... So next time you get in your car, you'll be giving me a lift to work ... right?
|
Newbie
|
20. April 2012 @ 16:17 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by gbswales:
Originally posted by Zoo_Look:
Am I the only person who thinks that,if you are unhappy with how (for example) Facebook operate, instead of using it and complaining it's actually easier to just not use it?
So what if they (quote) "lock down their software"? Just don't use it!!
Or is he implying that Facebook is a necessary evil that can't be avoided?
It is a significant part of life for many people - there are alternative social networks but would you join a social club to mix with your friends if your friends were all in different clubs. The fact is that FB currently has the largest user base by far - some of my friends are on other platforms but almost all on Facebook.
I also think that "vote with your feet" is a very negative concept whether for something social or 100% commercial because they dont know why you leave. Whether its a product or web service I think it is better to stay and try to influence change than to just throw in the towel.
I recognize FB's community nature but I too look upon it as a walled garden like in the bad old days of AOL, Compuserve, etc. where all you saw or read was approved by someone else. The little and not so little 'gotchas' like the endless games and stupid little 'pokes' and 'gifts' are there to keep you there. The almost mandatory 'like' additions in order to do this or that or read about this promotion or get that info seems to me to keep you there.
Calvin: Sometimes, when Im talking, my words cant keep up with my thoughts. I wonder why we think faster than we can speak.
Hobbes: Probably so we can think twice.
|
|
Mez
AfterDawn Addict
|
20. April 2012 @ 17:46 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by kersmere:
ITS TIME YOU ALL STARTED TO WAKE UP ABOUT AMERICA WHO DOES SHE THINK SHE IS THEY HAVE NEVER HAD FREEDOM SINCE THE INDEPENDANCE
CHARTER WAS MADE.....
READ THE INFO WHILE THE IN
You are not supposed to post in all caps.
|
|
Zoo_Look
Suspended permanently
|
20. April 2012 @ 18:20 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by dikbozo:
Originally posted by gbswales:
Originally posted by Zoo_Look:
Am I the only person who thinks that,if you are unhappy with how (for example) Facebook operate, instead of using it and complaining it's actually easier to just not use it?
So what if they (quote) "lock down their software"? Just don't use it!!
Or is he implying that Facebook is a necessary evil that can't be avoided?
It is a significant part of life for many people - there are alternative social networks but would you join a social club to mix with your friends if your friends were all in different clubs. The fact is that FB currently has the largest user base by far - some of my friends are on other platforms but almost all on Facebook.
I also think that "vote with your feet" is a very negative concept whether for something social or 100% commercial because they dont know why you leave. Whether its a product or web service I think it is better to stay and try to influence change than to just throw in the towel.
I recognize FB's community nature but I too look upon it as a walled garden like in the bad old days of AOL, Compuserve, etc. where all you saw or read was approved by someone else. The little and not so little 'gotchas' like the endless games and stupid little 'pokes' and 'gifts' are there to keep you there. The almost mandatory 'like' additions in order to do this or that or read about this promotion or get that info seems to me to keep you there.
Except they are not mandatory in any way. In point of fact you can set your account to ignore all that kinda stuff if you want to use it as a pure social network for people you know and want to stay in touch with. Just use the groups if you want to find like-minded people. The games and apps are in no way compulsory no matter what you have been led to believe.
Nowadays, to give an app access to your profile, you need to go through 2 confirmation pages which clearly set out what it needs to do in order to function correctly. Conversely, if a 'friend' uses an app to post to your account, you can block that app completely, block that friend completely, or block that friend from using that app on your profile - all by using the little x next to that post.
DRAMA! You have successfully prevented app/friend/whatever from pestering you for all eternity. And as a bonus (?), Facebook hasn't crashed... why would it? Oh yeah, because the apps are compulsory according to ill-informed users *rolls eyes*
|
Senior Member
|
21. April 2012 @ 04:12 |
Link to this message
|
facebook is becoming a big problem because or the games and apps are requiring more of your info if you want to use them,which i wont allow.People that have little experience with the internet just click things and then wonder why there identify was stolen and there bank accounts cleaned out.
Quote:
So because the people who own and run it, make a living from it, and provide YOU with a service (as opposed to you paying for it), they should not feel able to do with it what they see fit?
Not sure that makes sense, but lets go with that... So next time you get in your car, you'll be giving me a lift to work ... right?
the operators should do with facebook what the users want otherwise they wont have any users and it will be shut down.
as for google plus havnt tryed it yet and dont plan to.
custom built gaming pc from early 2010,ps2 with 15 games all original,ps3 500gbs with 5 games all original,yamaha amp and 5.1channel surround sound speakers,46inch sony lcd smart tv.
|
|
Zoo_Look
Suspended permanently
|
21. April 2012 @ 06:42 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by xboxdvl2:
facebook is becoming a big problem because or the games and apps are requiring more of your info if you want to use them,which i wont allow.People that have little experience with the internet just click things and then wonder why there identify was stolen and there bank accounts cleaned out.
That would be user error then... The only way to stop stupid people from clicking themselves to oblivion is to stop them from using the internet. Any website cannot be held accountable for the stupidity of its users. Its like blaming McDonald's for burning yourself with a hot drink, or a camper van dealership for a crash because you decided to leave the drivers seat to make coffee. How about blaming condom manufacturers for the rise in teenage pregnancies... Of course, blaming others is the way to go nowadays, I am old school and think people should be accountable for their own actions however... my bad lol.
Additionally, no matter what permissions they require, THEY ARE NOT MANDATORY, so thinking they are a problem is misleading. They are not. Don't accept the permissions and they are a non issue... Is that a hard concept to grasp? Again, its user stupidity and ignorance that turns them into a problem. People need to take accountability for their own actions. Period.
Quote:
the operators should do with facebook what the users want otherwise they wont have any users and it will be shut down.
Yet just a quick read of the whole thread indicates at least 1 person who thinks 'voting with feet' in that way does not help, and another who does not see why he should 'deprive' themselves of the service.
|
|
Mez
AfterDawn Addict
|
21. April 2012 @ 08:05 |
Link to this message
|
Facebook demands a birth date. If you give it your real one you have already put your head in the noose.
You do not have to click on anything. Mouseovers are plenty good enough. Even with extreme care I have down loaded malware. The only reason I know that is my browser is always sand boxed. I was not even moving the mouse when I got a request from sandboxie did I want to recover what I just downloaded. I said no then destroyed the complete session.
Anyone that thinks they can avoid malware by abstaining clicking on suspicious items probably has an infected computer right now.
|
|
Zoo_Look
Suspended permanently
|
21. April 2012 @ 08:41 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by Mez:
Facebook demands a birth date. If you give it your real one you have already put your head in the noose.
Hm... perhaps the worlds compulsory and voluntary are mixed up in your dictionary. Where I come from, compulsory means something that you absolutely must do with no way of avoiding it. I would suggest that participating in Facebook sign-up isn't compulsory since I have never been forced to do it. Maybe things are different where you live, and if your government forces you to do that then I suggest a change of government or civil revolt pretty sharp...
Quote:
Anyone that thinks they can avoid malware by abstaining clicking on suspicious items probably has an infected computer right now.
Anyone who confuses compulsory sign-up and completely voluntary sign-up isn't in a position to make such assumptions quite frankly.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 21. April 2012 @ 08:41
|
|
Mez
AfterDawn Addict
|
21. April 2012 @ 10:30 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by Zoo_Look:
Originally posted by Mez:
Facebook demands a birth date. If you give it your real one you have already put your head in the noose.
Hm... perhaps the worlds compulsory and voluntary are mixed up in your dictionary. Where I come from, compulsory means something that you absolutely must do with no way of avoiding it. I would suggest that participating in Facebook sign-up isn't compulsory since I have never been forced to do it. Maybe things are different where you live, and if your government forces you to do that then I suggest a change of government or civil revolt pretty sharp...
Quote:
Anyone that thinks they can avoid malware by abstaining clicking on suspicious items probably has an infected computer right now.
Anyone who confuses compulsory sign-up and completely voluntary sign-up isn't in a position to make such assumptions quite frankly.
Maybe it was when you signed up. Years ago that might not have been mandatory but it is now. The reason I put a false date was the save button was 'greyed out' until the birth date field was filled. Now where I come from we consider that as a mandatory field. What would you call it?
|
Senior Member
|
21. April 2012 @ 11:54 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by Zoo_Look:
Originally posted by xboxdvl2:
facebook is becoming a big problem because or the games and apps are requiring more of your info if you want to use them,which i wont allow.People that have little experience with the internet just click things and then wonder why there identify was stolen and there bank accounts cleaned out.
That would be user error then... The only way to stop stupid people from clicking themselves to oblivion is to stop them from using the internet. Any website cannot be held accountable for the stupidity of its users. Its like blaming McDonald's for burning yourself with a hot drink, or a camper van dealership for a crash because you decided to leave the drivers seat to make coffee. How about blaming condom manufacturers for the rise in teenage pregnancies... Of course, blaming others is the way to go nowadays, I am old school and think people should be accountable for their own actions however... my bad lol.
Additionally, no matter what permissions they require, THEY ARE NOT MANDATORY, so thinking they are a problem is misleading. They are not. Don't accept the permissions and they are a non issue... Is that a hard concept to grasp? Again, its user stupidity and ignorance that turns them into a problem. People need to take accountability for their own actions. Period.
Quote:
the operators should do with facebook what the users want otherwise they wont have any users and it will be shut down.
Yet just a quick read of the whole thread indicates at least 1 person who thinks 'voting with feet' in that way does not help, and another who does not see why he should 'deprive' themselves of the service.
its not mandatory for you to argue on an internet forum but you are.I live in australia not a 3rd world country if i wanna play games or use apps on facebook i should be able to without them trying to invade my privacy.
heres a question on a personal level for you.if you signed up for an internet forum and were hacked as a result would it be your fault for signing up or the sites admin for giving your info away????
as for banning people from using the internet you try and do that to someone who is an adult with money and a credit card and a computer.its kinda hard.my aunty has a problem with spammers and viruses her son fixes her computer every week.legally we cant stop her using the internet or doing stupid things on it.
custom built gaming pc from early 2010,ps2 with 15 games all original,ps3 500gbs with 5 games all original,yamaha amp and 5.1channel surround sound speakers,46inch sony lcd smart tv.
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
Mez
AfterDawn Addict
|
21. April 2012 @ 12:51 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by xboxdvl2:
heres a question on a personal level for you.if you signed up for an internet forum and were hacked as a result would it be your fault for signing up or the sites admin for giving your info away????
I am not a lawyer but I am sure that would be up to the courts to decide. Both sides will blame the other.
Facebook uses the birth date for various tasks. It emails all your friends to announce upcoming birth days. It also provides a face recognition, probably used by interpol. Having the birth date is important for that use. I read the white paper for that app before Facebook bought it. It may also be used if you forget your password. Therefore they may have a good excuse to demand a birth date if used by law enforcement.
|
