|
Google: Early adopters cannot sell or loan Glass devices
|
|
The following comments relate to this news article:
article published on 18 April, 2013
Google has revealed the terms of service for the Google Glass augmented reality eyewear, and there are some pretty clear restrictions.
The $1500 glasses are being sent to a select few thousand early adopters.
Reads the ToS: "You may not resell, loan, transfer, or give your device to any other person. If you resell, loan, transfer, or give your device to any other person without Google's ... [ read the full article ]
Please read the original article before posting your comments.
|
|
Red_Forman
Junior Member
|
18. April 2013 @ 20:41 |
Link to this message
|
|
These are going to make porn watching a real treat.
I'll stick my foot up your ass.
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
Member
|
18. April 2013 @ 20:45 |
Link to this message
|
|
$1500 and I can't give it away to anyone I want to. What's the motivation for that TOS? I suppose knowing that up front and I still make the purchase, the onerous is on me to abide by the terms. On the other hand, I don't like being told what I can do with property I bought and paid for with my hard earned money. Guess I'll never own a pair of these.
"Do not underestimate the power of an enemy, no matter how great or small, to rise against you another day." - Atilla
|
|
PraisesToAllah
Member
|
18. April 2013 @ 22:41 |
Link to this message
|
|
I don't want to live on this world anymore.
|
Senior Member
|
18. April 2013 @ 23:10 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by Semperfipal:
$1500 and I can't give it away to anyone I want to. What's the motivation for that TOS? I suppose knowing that up front and I still make the purchase, the onerous is on me to abide by the terms. On the other hand, I don't like being told what I can do with property I bought and paid for with my hard earned money. Guess I'll never own a pair of these.
Just because something is written in a TOS does not make it legal. Just take a look at Apple's "...all sales are final." statement in their App Store TOS... it's complete BS. You can get your money back for an app that does not do what it promises. Apple like you to jump through hoops of course. You should have an app for THAT. Australian ABC's "The Checkout" claim to have written it to simplify the process but f*cked if I can find it.
Its a lot easier being righteous than right.
DSE VZ300-
Zilog Z80 CPU, 32KB RAM (16K+16K cartridge), video processor 6847, 2KB video RAM, 16 colours (text mode), 5.25" FDD
|
Member
|
19. April 2013 @ 06:06 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
If you resell, loan, transfer, or give your device to any other person without Google's authorization...
But, how would they know? Does Google spy on us or what? Oh, wait...
"You know, it seems that quotes on the internet are becoming less and less reliable." -Abraham Lincoln.
|
|
MagengarZ
Newbie
|
19. April 2013 @ 08:07 |
Link to this message
|
|
Well, if what they say in their TOS is true,
then there's your proof that we're being spied on.
Can you say "RFID"? ;-)
In the longrun, I'm sure hackers will come up with
ways to jailbreak this nifty lil gadget.
We'll see.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 19. April 2013 @ 08:08
|
Member
|
19. April 2013 @ 08:36 |
Link to this message
|
|
I think it would be pretty simple if you registered the devices with a new google account created simply to give away. There is a way around everything. I miss the days when you could buy equipment and it was yours and you could do whatever the hell you wanted to do with it.
|
Member
|
19. April 2013 @ 09:35 |
Link to this message
|
|
The Supreme Court case, Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, which turns on the question of whether you have the right to sell things you already own to another party without permission from the manufacture/copyright holder......Not sure where this stands now, but if SCOTUS agrees, I can see a huge increase in black market activity. I'm sure corporate America will want their cut if they give you permission to sell your old washing machine or old rotary telephone!.......So much for living in a free and open society these days.
"Do not underestimate the power of an enemy, no matter how great or small, to rise against you another day." - Atilla
|
|
dEwMe
Senior Member
|
19. April 2013 @ 10:23 |
Link to this message
|
|
Err I just don't see why I would want it in the first place...AND for $1500??? Wow!
Just my $0.02,
dEwMe
|
|
Nosredneh
Junior Member
|
19. April 2013 @ 16:17 |
Link to this message
|
|
Sorry but I am way behind. What do this device do exactly?
|
Newbie
|
19. April 2013 @ 16:30 |
Link to this message
|
|
I'm not so sure that I'd want to buy a pair of glasses used by someone else same goes for headphones. However I'm not going to buy a product that I'm not allowed to re-sell.
There is such a thing as unreasonable terms and conditions in contracts.
Just remind me; Is this the same company that made the graphics program Picassa? which scans your hard disc for graphics files (which it doesn't need to) then locks up your PC big time when it finds a corrupt file.
I don't think I'll be buying anything made by Google.
|
Junior Member
|
19. April 2013 @ 16:52 |
Link to this message
|
|
Considering its basicly a closed beta, it be considered as a part of the non-disclosure agreements. The final version for mass market will probably NOT have such limitations.
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
19. April 2013 @ 19:01 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by Scaldari:
Considering its basicly a closed beta, it be considered as a part of the non-disclosure agreements. The final version for mass market will probably NOT have such limitations.
Yes, exactly this. JFC, people.
|
Newbie
|
19. April 2013 @ 19:09 |
Link to this message
|
|
"Probably" not. So $1500 would be a cut price deal to test this beta to iron out the bugs. We're looking at a retail version that costs $3000-4000 perhaps?
|
Senior Member
|
19. April 2013 @ 20:04 |
Link to this message
|
|
WE ARE GOOGLE... RESISTANCE IS FUTILE. Buy our Google Glass and become one of our Borg. We will use all the information you gather with the device against you and to make money off you.
|
|
Tarsellis
Member
|
19. April 2013 @ 23:54 |
Link to this message
|
|
They just don't want you to know that they're giving these to government agents and powerful banksters ad CEOs and that they'll be able to tie into the FBI and CIA facial recognition server farms, pulling up information on who they're dealing with and giving them tactical advantages in all "new encounter" situations. The agent smith abilities and uses of these glasses would truly terrify everybody if they ever got a gleaning of the power they'll put in the wrong hands.
|
Senior Member
|
20. April 2013 @ 06:06 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by Tarsellis:
The agent smith abilities and uses of these glasses would truly terrify everybody if they ever got a gleaning of the power they'll put in the wrong hands.
"Too late", she cried and waved her wooden leg!
---------------------------------------------------------------
Its a lot easier being righteous than right.
DSE VZ300-
Zilog Z80 CPU, 32KB RAM (16K+16K cartridge), video processor 6847, 2KB video RAM, 16 colours (text mode), 5.25" FDD
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 20. April 2013 @ 06:07
|
Junior Member
|
20. April 2013 @ 09:28 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by TekPete:
"Probably" not. So $1500 would be a cut price deal to test this beta to iron out the bugs. We're looking at a retail version that costs $3000-4000 perhaps?
Maybe, or they could just be @ cost for prototype construction. Mass production than would bring down costs with the economies of scale. I still have a hard time imagining the first two generations being below a grand a device though. I predict by 2016 we will see them at 499.95 christmas special.
Account Created Saturday 12 January 2008. After 13 years I consider myself a Sr. Member no matter WHAT my post count says.
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
21. April 2013 @ 21:05 |
Link to this message
|
|
Big business really stinks . .
No way on earth I would ever purchase anything from Giggle . . the farther I stay away, the more privacy I'll enjoy
DISCLAIMER: If you find a posting or message from me
offensive, inappropriate, or disruptive, please ignore it.
If you dont know how to ignore a posting, complain to
me and I will be only too happy to demonstrate . . .
|
|
MagengarZ
Newbie
|
22. April 2013 @ 07:00 |
Link to this message
|
|
How about that! For $1.5k you get to guinea-pig the product as a beta tester, and you cannot sell it nor loan it to anyone; and I'll bet it'll come with just half its potential features...
...so then, is Google even paying people for their Time and Labor to test this gadget? Of course NOT! They're stealing people's Time AND Money!
For $3k or $4k you get the product at it's Full potential... I'll even bet it will include X-ray vision allowing you to see through clothes, as an added "bone-us"... then an implanted RFID chip sends a signal back to Google and Google will turn you in as a level-1 Sex Offender! LMAO
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
Senior Member
|
22. April 2013 @ 10:02 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by MagengarZ:
For $3k or $4k you get the product at it's Full potential... I'll even bet it will include X-ray vision allowing you to see through clothes, as an added "bone-us"... then an implanted RFID chip sends a signal back to Google and Google will turn you in as a level-1 Sex Offender! LMAO
lol
Its a lot easier being righteous than right.
DSE VZ300-
Zilog Z80 CPU, 32KB RAM (16K+16K cartridge), video processor 6847, 2KB video RAM, 16 colours (text mode), 5.25" FDD
|
