|
|
|
Google to provide Internet access with 180 satellites
|
|
The following comments relate to this news article:
article published on 2 June, 2014
According to a report from the Wall Street Journal, Google is set to spend over $1 billion launching 180 satellites into low-Earth orbit to provide Internet access around the world.
Previously, Google had raised more than a few eyebrows a year ago when it announced Project Loon to deliver Internet access in unconnected areas and disaster zones using balloons high up in the atmosphere. ... [ read the full article ]
Please read the original article before posting your comments.
|
|
rocky38
Newbie
|
2. June 2014 @ 09:45 |
Link to this message
|
|
Hmmm, Skynet anyone?
Oh, and if 1 Billion gets you 180, than 3 Billion should total 580 low orbit satellites.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 2. June 2014 @ 09:48
|
|
Advertisement
|
 |
|
|
Staff Member
|
2. June 2014 @ 10:17 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by rocky38:
Hmmm, Skynet anyone?
Oh, and if 1 Billion gets you 180, than 3 Billion should total 580 low orbit satellites.
Well there's other costs to take into account. In fact, the highest cost of all will be just to launch the sats into orbit, as rockets are SUPER expensive. SpaceX are probably their cheapest choice to hitch a ride to orbit, but even SpaceX' reusable rockets are a few years away from being used, so its still millions of dollars per launch, though with 250lb satellites you could probably deploy a few payloads per launch. I don't know that for sure but 180 separate launches sounds like it would cost a hell of a lot more than $1 billion, or even $3 billion :-)
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
2. June 2014 @ 11:29 |
Link to this message
|
Tim Farrar, the man quoted by WSJ, has updated his recent blog post on the news with a clarification. Here is the paragraph on costings:
Quote:
UPDATE (6/1): The WSJ now has more details of the plan, confirming my supposition that it would start with 180 satellites and add the rest later. I was quoted in that article as stating that ?180 small satellites could be launched for as little as about $600 million? but that should not be interpreted as a total cost for building and launching the satellites. If the target of 100kg could be achieved, the all-in cost for the first 180 satellites would certainly approach $2B, and if the satellites end up being more like 200-300kg, which a satellite designer suggested to me might be easier to achieve, then that all-in cost could reach $3B. The full 360 satellite system would likely cost $3B for the 100kg satellites and $4B-$5B for the 200-300kg satellites.
I would encourage reading the rest of the post too, though.
http://tmfassociates.com/blog/2014/05/29/googles-space-odyssey/
Edit RE the 'Skynet' remark - there are already a lot of satellites in Lower Earth Orbit and beyond, including ones there to serve this exact purpose - provide internet access to remote locations. This is just public interest because, well, it's Google.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 2. June 2014 @ 11:34
|
Staff Member
|
2. June 2014 @ 11:53 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by Ripper:
Tim Farrar, the man quoted by WSJ, has updated his recent blog post on the news with a clarification. Here is the paragraph on costings:
Quote:
UPDATE (6/1): The WSJ now has more details of the plan, confirming my supposition that it would start with 180 satellites and add the rest later. I was quoted in that article as stating that ?180 small satellites could be launched for as little as about $600 million? but that should not be interpreted as a total cost for building and launching the satellites. If the target of 100kg could be achieved, the all-in cost for the first 180 satellites would certainly approach $2B, and if the satellites end up being more like 200-300kg, which a satellite designer suggested to me might be easier to achieve, then that all-in cost could reach $3B. The full 360 satellite system would likely cost $3B for the 100kg satellites and $4B-$5B for the 200-300kg satellites.
I would encourage reading the rest of the post too, though.
http://tmfassociates.com/blog/2014/05/29/googles-space-odyssey/
Edit RE the 'Skynet' remark - there are already a lot of satellites in Lower Earth Orbit and beyond, including ones there to serve this exact purpose - provide internet access to remote locations. This is just public interest because, well, it's Google.
Thanks mate, I'll add that info to the article shortly!
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
2. June 2014 @ 12:27 |
Link to this message
|
|
No problem!
Can't see cost standing in the way of Google's ambition here anyway and I would imagine SpaceX will win this contract, particularly considering the relationship between Larry Page and Elon Musk. The more money being put into the private space industry the better, in my opinion.
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
Senior Member
|
2. June 2014 @ 19:27 |
Link to this message
|
|
I see more futuristic deal:
A FREE Hi-speed Wi-Fi everywhere on small/big business, schools, etc. Than a 1K small satellites falling down 'cos out of orbit.
Just saying.
Live Free or Die.
The rule above all the rules is: Survive !
Capitalism: Funnel most of the $$$ to the already rich.
|
|
