|
AT&T 'unlimited' plan owners will now get throttled after 22GB of data used
|
|
The following comments relate to this news article:
article published on 16 September, 2015
AT&T, staring down a potential $100 million FCC fine, has changed their policy on throttling 'unlimited' data plan owners.
Back when the first iPhone launched, AT&T was selling unlimited data packages as a perk and there are still millions of customers on the grandfathered package, which should in theory offer completely unlimited data whether you use 100 MB or 100 GB.
Unfortunately ... [ read the full article ]
Please read the original article before posting your comments.
|
|
SoTired
Junior Member
|
16. September 2015 @ 16:30 |
Link to this message
|
|
It is a shame that AT&T has so little regard for its customers.
It is an even greater shame that sheeple are so foolish as to continue giving their business to AT&T.
I abandoned AT&T (both DSL and wireless) years ago when they started throttling wifi and imposing bandwidth caps on their DSL service (which was also the slowest around). I moved to Verizon for wifi, and my coverage improved radically. I moved to Cox for cable internet, and my connection speed improved from AT&T's measley 5 Mbps (max) to over 100 Mbps on Cox, at a CHEAPER price.
Perhaps there are some who have no other options. But if someone has an option and yet stays with AT&T, they have only themselves to blame.
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
Senior Member
2 product reviews
|
16. September 2015 @ 16:37 |
Link to this message
|
|
Dayum..I'd blow through 22 gig in an hour!
:/
|
Junior Member
|
17. September 2015 @ 01:59 |
Link to this message
|
|
I suffered AT&T Internet for 1 year-on the new subscriber rate, along with U-verse TV. What tore it with me is their charging extra for "renting" their gateway---the same gateway that delivers the U-verse TV- without the "rental" fee.
It was good while it lasted, I am still awaiting an answer as to their rational for this rental fee. Of course, that answer will never come.
Back with Cox, all is well.
|
|
ivymike
Member
|
17. September 2015 @ 04:10 |
Link to this message
|
|
If this were a desktop internet service, I'd throw a fit but since it's a mobile phone service, I can understand a little.
You really should switch to a desktop if you're downloading 22 Gb via cell phone.
|
Senior Member
2 product reviews
|
17. September 2015 @ 05:47 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by ivymike:
If this were a desktop internet service, I'd throw a fit but since it's a mobile phone service, I can understand a little.
You really should switch to a desktop if you're downloading 22 Gb via cell phone.
come on man..YouTube videos add up pretty soon.
:/
|
|
hearme0
Senior Member
|
17. September 2015 @ 10:34 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by NHS2008:
Dayum..I'd blow through 22 gig in an hour!
Then you should consider dropping the phone and getting a girlfriend mate!
|
|
SProdigy
Senior Member
5 product reviews
|
17. September 2015 @ 13:57 |
Link to this message
|
|
Pretty common knowledge that after the last few iPhones came out, they were changing everyone's TOS off of those plans, with good reason too, considering all of that bandwidth. Now I dislike the price gouging over a GB of data here and there, but 22gb is pretty freaking generous!
|
|
SoTired
Junior Member
|
17. September 2015 @ 14:13 |
Link to this message
|
2 Originally posted by SProdigy:
Pretty common knowledge that after the last few iPhones came out, they were changing everyone's TOS off of those plans, with good reason too, considering all of that bandwidth. Now I dislike the price gouging over a GB of data here and there, but 22gb is pretty freaking generous!
"Generous" means doing more than is required. And if someone is paying for "unlimited" data, then throttling after 22 GB is not more than required.
|
|
supersaiyaman
Newbie
|
18. September 2015 @ 07:59 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by SoTired:
2 Originally posted by SProdigy:
Pretty common knowledge that after the last few iPhones came out, they were changing everyone's TOS off of those plans, with good reason too, considering all of that bandwidth. Now I dislike the price gouging over a GB of data here and there, but 22gb is pretty freaking generous!
"Generous" means doing more than is required. And if someone is paying for "unlimited" data, then throttling after 22 GB is not more than required.
if they are going to limit the data usage witch in my opinion they should.they should switch it from unlimited to limited and make it clear that their is a cap to their consumers .otherwise unlimited should mean unlimited. 22 gigs on a smart phone is unreasonable in my opinion.get a computer for that kind of data usage.
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
SoTired
Junior Member
|
18. September 2015 @ 20:14 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by supersaiyaman:
Originally posted by SoTired:
2 Originally posted by SProdigy:
Pretty common knowledge that after the last few iPhones came out, they were changing everyone's TOS off of those plans, with good reason too, considering all of that bandwidth. Now I dislike the price gouging over a GB of data here and there, but 22gb is pretty freaking generous!
"Generous" means doing more than is required. And if someone is paying for "unlimited" data, then throttling after 22 GB is not more than required.
if they are going to limit the data usage witch in my opinion they should.they should switch it from unlimited to limited and make it clear that their is a cap to their consumers .otherwise unlimited should mean unlimited. 22 gigs on a smart phone is unreasonable in my opinion.get a computer for that kind of data usage.
I agree they should be clear and honest about what they are doing. Calling something "unlimited" but then throttling arbitrarily is not clear and honest.
I would not necessarily agree that 22 gigs is unreasonable. I don't use anything close to that, ever. However, these plans are not limited to smartphones. Many tablets and hybrid PCs are now coming with LTE connectivity, or you can connect to a wireless network by tethering to your phone. That's a valid use, and it can use a lot of bandwidth. There is demand for it. If AT&T does not want to service that demand, they are free to cap or throttle, but they need to stop calling their service "unlimited."
|
