|
sonys blu ray has been hacked
|
|
|
emachine
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
28. October 2006 @ 04:36 |
Link to this message
|
|
I'm buying a 360 and ps3 to.
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
28. October 2006 @ 04:39 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by Ripper:
Sounds to me like someone has more money than sense ;-)
Lol, was only a joke anyway mate.
|
|
dMerc
Junior Member
|
28. October 2006 @ 07:44 |
Link to this message
|
|
No, I just think I'm kidding myself if I think I'm not going to eventually get both systems. Now, buying both BluRay and HDDVD stand alone players...that makes no sense. Right now at least.
|
|
emachine
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
28. October 2006 @ 12:19 |
Link to this message
|
|
Yeah no doubt... I just got my 360 today. I'll get the ps3 next year or idk some time.
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
28. October 2006 @ 12:23 |
Link to this message
|
|
If I was to get one it would be a 360, becos I like driving games for console. And also HD DVD plays in a normal dvd plaer I think so no need for a PS3 to play them :P
|
|
emachine
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
28. October 2006 @ 12:32 |
Link to this message
|
|
Well its not gonna be good quality then.. Also I think you mean no need for 360.
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
28. October 2006 @ 12:37 |
Link to this message
|
|
Meh whatever, to be honest I don't really care :P
And no, I meant ps3 becos it has a hd dvd drive. So...it would apply to both consoles...
Anyway, whatever.
|
|
emachine
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
28. October 2006 @ 12:43 |
Link to this message
|
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
28. October 2006 @ 12:59 |
Link to this message
|
|
Oh yeah, my bad. Not rly keeping tracks on anything console related :P
|
|
emachine
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
28. October 2006 @ 13:06 |
Link to this message
|
|
Yeah no biggie... I am because I like having a game cosole.
|
|
DConrad06
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
29. October 2006 @ 18:51 |
Link to this message
|
Well it looks like they are releasing titles for HD-DVD and Blu Ray.Example tomorrow (Monday) Mission Impossible 3 is being released on DVD,HD-DVD and Blu-ray.So it looks like both formats are here to stay.
|
|
emachine
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
29. October 2006 @ 18:53 |
Link to this message
|
|
Ya think!?!
|
AfterDawn Addict
2 product reviews
|
30. October 2006 @ 11:12 |
Link to this message
|
|
Microsoft should have included the software in there machine, instead of us having to go buy an externel player.
|
|
emachine
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
30. October 2006 @ 11:14 |
Link to this message
|
|
Yeah but I think it was because it was alot more pricey for hd dvd then.
|
Newbie
|
30. October 2006 @ 12:12 |
Link to this message
|
I am wondering that you know when BluRay or HD-DVD or both become mainstream it will be expensive but will DVD get kicked out?
Because if BR and HDDVD have a capacity of 20gig or more and thats how much the movies take up it will kind of hard to be sharing movies then wont it, I mean through p2p apps that is and BT.
|
|
emachine
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
30. October 2006 @ 13:11 |
Link to this message
|
|
As the movies get bigger the net gets faster :) plus a 4 g movie is usally around 700mb but dling movies isn't my thing. The quality is way to bad. I just burn them.
|
Senior Member
|
1. November 2006 @ 09:18 |
Link to this message
|
|
You know they should be finding ways to make things smaller not bigger, why could they not invent something like a 3mb BluRay disc that holds forty movies with super quality?
EDIT; the 3mb thing was an example!
"He who asks is a fool for five minutes, but he who does not ask remains a fool forever." - Chinese Proverb BluRay.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 1. November 2006 @ 09:18
|
|
emachine
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
2. November 2006 @ 05:06 |
Link to this message
|
|
Why? Making things bigger is straight sexy! Then you can laugh at your newb friends. Plus its just impossilbe. Unless you compress and it gets all nubish so you keep your floppys and ill rock my 500 g blu-rays.
|
Senior Member
|
2. November 2006 @ 06:44 |
Link to this message
|
|
gah! you missed the point; imagine this, in the future we got so advanced we found a way to have qaulity better than HD but only takes up a few MB of space, then imagine how much that 500G BluRay disc will hold (probably a million movies and a billion games ;)
"He who asks is a fool for five minutes, but he who does not ask remains a fool forever." - Chinese Proverb BluRay.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 2. November 2006 @ 06:45
|
|
emachine
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
2. November 2006 @ 07:59 |
Link to this message
|
|
I mean yeah that sounds all cool and all, but I don't think its possible. I mean not any type of scale. Because people want better quality and the more quality the more space it takes up. So first I don't think you can make stuff smaller without taking quality away. So thats why we need huge disks. For ultra high res Jessica Simpson booty shakin'
|
Senior Member
|
2. November 2006 @ 09:51 |
Link to this message
|
|
hehe I understand ;)
"He who asks is a fool for five minutes, but he who does not ask remains a fool forever." - Chinese Proverb BluRay.
|
Senior Member
|
2. November 2006 @ 16:00 |
Link to this message
|
|
|
|
emachine
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
2. November 2006 @ 18:32 |
Link to this message
|
|
Thats insane dude!~@@!!!
|
Senior Member
|
3. November 2006 @ 07:19 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by Joshewah:
How about a 50Terabyte disc the size of a normal DVD?
Quore! blimey!
"He who asks is a fool for five minutes, but he who does not ask remains a fool forever." - Chinese Proverb BluRay.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 3. November 2006 @ 10:58
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
Senior Member
|
4. November 2006 @ 14:02 |
Link to this message
|
|
