|
'Slim PS3' revealed in leak?
|
|
The following comments relate to this news article:
article published on 14 May, 2009
Yesterday we reported that rumors were flying that a 'redesigned' PlayStation 3 was to be revealed by Sony at the upcoming E3 event.
Today, pictures of a possible 'Slim PS3' have been leaked, showing off a 120GB hard drive, two USB ports, and a heavily redesigned body that is completely slim-lined.
Sony has added that "We don't know anything about the system in the photos, we currently ... [ read the full article ]
Please read the original article before posting your comments.
|
Senior Member
9 product reviews
|
15. May 2009 @ 18:32 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by tatsh:
They were always screwed on PS3. PS3 graphics for the game suck in comparison to 360. In the marketplace right now, I think developers like EA are more likely to care about 360 support than PS3 support.
This biased statement is relevant to the article because...?
Anyhow... It's most likely to be fake, unless this new Slim PS3 comes with some giant power brick and some other stuff.
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
Senior Member
3 product reviews
|
15. May 2009 @ 18:45 |
Link to this message
|
|
Looks pretty cool, and coming out sooner than I expected. But not interested in it unless it has an internal PS; which looks unlikely.
|
Moderator
16 product reviews
|
15. May 2009 @ 19:28 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by xnonsuchx:
Personally, I hope this pics are fake because it looks UGLY. Hope I never have to replace my 60GB model with one of these!
These are very early pics of which are not the final product (as I stated earlier)
Originally posted by kikzm33z:
Originally posted by tatsh:
They were always screwed on PS3. PS3 graphics for the game suck in comparison to 360. In the marketplace right now, I think developers like EA are more likely to care about 360 support than PS3 support.
This biased statement is relevant to the article because...?
Anyhow... It's most likely to be fake, unless this new Slim PS3 comes with some giant power brick and some other stuff.
Originally posted by canuckerz:
Looks pretty cool, and coming out sooner than I expected. But not interested in it unless it has an internal PS; which looks unlikely.
+1 on relevancy...it is not 100% confirmed but as of right now it's pretty close to it from what I have gathered. But we'll see. As far as the internal PSU I hope so as well but going by previous "PS Slims" I would bet not.
|
|
TheJoxter
Newbie
|
16. May 2009 @ 05:49 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by SgtDavis:
If they whip out a PS3 that thin and it doesn't burst into flames from overheating, I'll eat my socks.
Amen brother.
|
|
xnonsuchx
Senior Member
|
16. May 2009 @ 08:52 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
Originally posted by xnonsuchx:
Personally, I hope this pics are fake because it looks UGLY. Hope I never have to replace my 60GB model with one of these!
These are very early pics of which are not the final product (as I stated earlier)
Oh, I know. I saw the pics several days ago elsewhere. Even though the mobo is smaller, the case almost looks like a LARGER footprint compared to the current model. I don't really care if the power supply is internal or external as some others have commented on...internal PS devices tend to go bad faster than external PS ones. And by the way, it looks like the mobo comparison pics are showing the old 60GB w/ hardware PS2-compatibility mobo as the old mobo. KINDA fishy.
I think it MIGHT be a legit pic of A proposed prototype new model case, but I kinda doubt it's a final new case design. I know Sony mentioned a redesigned PS3 as a set-top box component ('box' case?) back in 2007, which kinda seems more realistic to me.
Also like some have said (at least elsewhere), Sony's USUAL response to rumors are "No comment"-type responses, but for these pics, have said, "Totally bogus," which seems like a more weighty denial.
I'm still waiting for one of these "A PS3 price cut is imminent" claims to come true ("imminent" meaning within the next 6 months...Hell, _I_ could be THAT accurate on a lot of things!).
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 16. May 2009 @ 09:03
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
16. May 2009 @ 10:09 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
Originally posted by inagasake:
I heard that the PS3 uses a lot more electricity than the 360 in some article that compared electricity usage of all 3 consoles (wii uses a lot less than both) so the power brick will be huge probably.
Not entirely correct. The original 60gb mb was 180 (watts) whereas the current 80gb is 110 directly because of the 65nm CPU/GPU. Plus when idling, browsing & other minor usages it is definitely lower...now during gameplay it *might* be higher but I have to double check the 360's power consumption stats. Either way, it shouldn't be drastically more IF it is.
For the record, the Falcon revision of the 360 cut the power usage from 165W to 90W and they kept the power brick the same size. In Microsoft's case they're focusing on keeping the system reliable rather than saving space. I believe the Jasper revision which uses even less power still uses the big power brick.
|
Moderator
16 product reviews
|
16. May 2009 @ 11:44 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by xnonsuchx:
Quote:
Originally posted by xnonsuchx:
Personally, I hope this pics are fake because it looks UGLY. Hope I never have to replace my 60GB model with one of these!
These are very early pics of which are not the final product (as I stated earlier)
Oh, I know. I saw the pics several days ago elsewhere. Even though the mobo is smaller, the case almost looks like a LARGER footprint compared to the current model. I don't really care if the power supply is internal or external as some others have commented on...internal PS devices tend to go bad faster than external PS ones. And by the way, it looks like the mobo comparison pics are showing the old 60GB w/ hardware PS2-compatibility mobo as the old mobo. KINDA fishy.
I think it MIGHT be a legit pic of A proposed prototype new model case, but I kinda doubt it's a final new case design. I know Sony mentioned a redesigned PS3 as a set-top box component ('box' case?) back in 2007, which kinda seems more realistic to me.
Also like some have said (at least elsewhere), Sony's USUAL response to rumors are "No comment"-type responses, but for these pics, have said, "Totally bogus," which seems like a more weighty denial.
I'm still waiting for one of these "A PS3 price cut is imminent" claims to come true ("imminent" meaning within the next 6 months...Hell, _I_ could be THAT accurate on a lot of things!).
From what has been "estimated" over at NeoGaf the case is actually smaller in all dimensions using the size of the DS3 and a BD disc a reference
And it is a 60gb MB for the reference so I don't understand what would be "fishy"? It is intended to show how much smaller the old vs the new size inside of a standard PS3 case (as of today) to help provide an idea of how a PS3 Slim could be easily possible...
I also like the external (for the slim models & the 360) as it does give you the fall back option to easily replace if something goes wrong with it. The price cut is a bit of comedy already but it is going to happen this year (it HAS to as the timing is right).
Originally posted by sammorris:
Quote:
Originally posted by inagasake:
I heard that the PS3 uses a lot more electricity than the 360 in some article that compared electricity usage of all 3 consoles (wii uses a lot less than both) so the power brick will be huge probably.
Not entirely correct. The original 60gb mb was 180 (watts) whereas the current 80gb is 110 directly because of the 65nm CPU/GPU. Plus when idling, browsing & other minor usages it is definitely lower...now during gameplay it *might* be higher but I have to double check the 360's power consumption stats. Either way, it shouldn't be drastically more IF it is.
For the record, the Falcon revision of the 360 cut the power usage from 165W to 90W and they kept the power brick the same size. In Microsoft's case they're focusing on keeping the system reliable rather than saving space. I believe the Jasper revision which uses even less power still uses the big power brick.
Thanx Sam, I had no end of trouble for some reason trying to find recent valid info to add to the comparison. I did find some tests showing how at different stages (idle, browsing, watching, playing etc.) and it showed varied results but for gaming the PS3 definitely consumes more. The only other thing I forgot to add is how the PS3's PSU is a universal one so anyone can use theirs just about anywhere with just a simple prong adapter without the need for a power/voltage converter; but I wonder if that would affect it's consumption in any way? Probably not, plus will it be the same feature if a Slim is released is what I would like to know.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 16. May 2009 @ 11:47
|
|
Morreale
Senior Member
|
16. May 2009 @ 13:45 |
Link to this message
|
|
If it's gonna be that small then it has to be cheaper... Their cuttin' off a lot of crap based on that pic lol
*\\\****//\\\***//\\\*****
**\\\**//**\\\*//**\\\*******
***\\\//****\\\ ****\\\****
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
16. May 2009 @ 14:18 |
Link to this message
|
|
Switching PSUs tend to have a higher leakage current, but power usage should still be pretty indifferent.
|
|
varnull
Suspended permanently
|
16. May 2009 @ 14:48 |
Link to this message
|
worlds largest testicle revealed in dream - daily star
or is it a shopped pic of Dubyah? can we tell.. do we care?
|
Moderator
16 product reviews
|
16. May 2009 @ 22:17 |
Link to this message
|
If you can't add to the discussion properly please refrain from posting.
Back to the topic at hand in discussion...here is some more info of which supports the probability of the Slim
Quote:
MainTek (the manufacturer) requested the removal of these images from the website that originally posted the photographs (LevelUp - Chinese) that stated ~
"We would like to ask you kindly remove the following pages of your pages on your website because the page contains MainTeK Computer Incorporation confidential document and photos, which were illegally released and posted on your website."
Seems like a confirmation to me...
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 16. May 2009 @ 22:41
|
Moderator
16 product reviews
|
18. May 2009 @ 17:47 |
Link to this message
|
Looks like others are believing the validity of these pics...First LevelUp, then Spong, now Engadget and another. If they where fakes why issue cease and desist orders via lawyers? Especially with the odd kicker of "asking" for the C&D letter to be confidential?
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 18. May 2009 @ 17:59
|
|
PandaFire
Account closed as per user's own request
|
19. May 2009 @ 08:22 |
Link to this message
|
If this is real I hope it doesn't have the same problems that the Slim PS2 had.
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
19. May 2009 @ 10:06 |
Link to this message
|
Such as? My brother owned a Slim PS2 and never had any problems with it.
|
|
Morreale
Senior Member
|
19. May 2009 @ 16:03 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by sammorris:
Such as? My brother owned a Slim PS2 and never had any problems with it.
Me too...
|
Senior Member
2 product reviews
|
1. July 2009 @ 08:16 |
Link to this message
|
good stuff. i need to get back on my ps3. website has been keeping me mad busy.
|
|
mcnasta
Newbie
|
16. July 2009 @ 11:51 |
Link to this message
|
Just incase you havnt seen this, a completed one of these was spotted in the philippines.
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/EUBn3_5IbGE&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/EUBn3_5IbGE&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
16. July 2009 @ 11:52 |
Link to this message
|
|
It looks a bit too plain - where's the gloss finish of the original?
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
mcnasta
Newbie
|
16. July 2009 @ 11:54 |
Link to this message
|
|
|
