|
|
|
'Star Wars' films to be re-released in 3D starting in 2012
|
|
The following comments relate to this news article:
article published on 30 September, 2010
20th Century Fox and Lucasfilms are set to re-release Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace in February, 2012, this time in converted 3D.
George Lucas, the man behind Star Wars, says releasing the film early in the year and not during the summer blockbuster season will give the movie a chance to run at the box office.
Furthermore, subsequent Star Wars films will be released annually ... [ read the full article ]
Please read the original article before posting your comments.
|
Senior Member
4 product reviews
|
4. October 2010 @ 01:55 |
Link to this message
|
|
when all your good movies are form the 80's its kinda hard not to be a brainwashed sheeple.
Powered By
 |
|
Advertisement
|
 |
|
|
Senior Member
|
4. October 2010 @ 03:35 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by KillerBug:
I'm not looking forward to seeing Jabba the Hut at 1080P.
I feel sorry for the dudes that have to process Jar Jar Binks into 3d!
So 3d... Matt Stone and Trey Parker (South Park) would be having a fit about now LOL.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Its a lot easier being righteous than right.
DSE VZ300-
Zilog Z80 CPU, 32KB RAM (16K+16K cartridge), video processor 6847, 2KB video RAM, 16 colours (text mode), 5.25" FDD
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 4. October 2010 @ 03:36
|
|
Mez
AfterDawn Addict
|
4. October 2010 @ 08:34 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by i1der:
Really? converted to 3D? wow... shame, besides that most tv already do that. Even then 3D movies now are shittty only couple is worth watching cause they were made with 3D in mind and not just gimmick, the conversion should not be pretty, i'm subject to be wrong though, just my 2 cents.
What planet do do come from? Maybe this is just one of those times you are wrong. 3-D TVs are just coming out on planet earth. Way less than 1% of the house holds on planet earth have 3-D sets. I would say 3-D is as much of a gimmick as color. Not all movies are worth seeing in 3-D but many action movies are. I am sure 3-D has added sales to the cinema. I will not wait for all 3-D movies to come out on DVD, like I usually do. For that reason, 75% of the movies I go to now are 3-D.
Mr Movies...
Your opinion this time is not main stream. Avitar is the highest grossing moving of all time. Pretty good for garbage!
Mind you I don't plan on getting a 3-D TV in fact I don't even have a big HD TV yet. We were putting it off because we will have to revamp the entertainment center, then when I was starting to shop, I got laid off. Still, I go to the movies more often than I did because I like the effect.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 4. October 2010 @ 09:09
|
Senior Member
|
4. October 2010 @ 11:25 |
Link to this message
|
|
Actually, I'm amazed they can do it at all. I keep thinking it will look like cardboard cut outs in a diorama. Like they do with old photos in documentaries.
I did not mind the colourisation fad as much as other people. Of course I can see why they are upset from a purist's point of view. But they used a pallet from early colour films (colour took some time to become the standard) so it didn't look as freaky as many made out. I was impressed they could do it, plus I thought that one could always turn off the colour.
However, 3d movies tire my eyes out. You spend half your time having to figure out where to focus.
Can't people at least admit that the dialogue sucks in Star War films?
I'm still waiting for the truly really great sci-fi film. District 9, the 1st Matrix or Star Trek: First Contact almost did it for me... Anybody got any more, apart from Star War films and Avatar, to add to the list?
Its a lot easier being righteous than right.
DSE VZ300-
Zilog Z80 CPU, 32KB RAM (16K+16K cartridge), video processor 6847, 2KB video RAM, 16 colours (text mode), 5.25" FDD
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
Senior Member
|
4. October 2010 @ 11:25 |
Link to this message
|
|
Actually, I'm amazed they can do it at all. I keep thinking it will look like cardboard cut outs in a diorama. Like they do with old photos in documentaries.
I did not mind the colourisation fad as much as other people. Of course I can see why they are upset from a purist's point of view. But they used a pallet from early colour films (colour took some time to become the standard) so it didn't look as freaky as many made out. I was impressed they could do it, plus I thought that one could always turn off the colour.
However, 3d movies tire my eyes out. You spend half your time having to figure out where to focus. In RL you just focus..... wherever!
Can't people at least admit that the dialogue sucks in Star War films?
I'm still waiting for the truly really great sci-fi film. District 9, the 1st Matrix or Star Trek: First Contact almost did it for me... Anybody got any more, apart from Star War films and Avatar, to add to the list?
------------------------------------------------------------
Its a lot easier being righteous than right.
DSE VZ300-
Zilog Z80 CPU, 32KB RAM (16K+16K cartridge), video processor 6847, 2KB video RAM, 16 colours (text mode), 5.25" FDD
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 4. October 2010 @ 11:28
|
|
