|
UK Conservatives want complete Internet porn block, to force users to opt-in
|
|
The following comments relate to this news article:
article published on 21 December, 2010
A British conservative MP is pushing for Internet Service Providers (ISP) to be forced to block Internet pornography by default to its subscribers.
Claire Perry, elected Member of Parliament (MP) for Devizes this year, is using children as usual as an excuse for the government-forced censorship. "We are not coming at this from an anti-porn perspective. We just want to make sure our children ... [ read the full article ]
Please read the original article before posting your comments.
|
AfterDawn Addict
1 product review
|
28. December 2010 @ 00:25 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by DXR88:
Originally posted by ST2006:
Originally posted by ThePastor:
Is that country run by the SyFy Execs? Because they just want to get rid of whatever is most popular?
I wonder. Please help sponsor a first-generation British child leave this country and flee to somewhere with a less scumbag government!! :) :(
Which is where? Somalia? maybe that island in the middle of nowhere?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principality_of_Sealand
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
Senior Member
4 product reviews
|
28. December 2010 @ 00:49 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by KillerBug:
Originally posted by DXR88:
Originally posted by ST2006:
Originally posted by ThePastor:
Is that country run by the SyFy Execs? Because they just want to get rid of whatever is most popular?
I wonder. Please help sponsor a first-generation British child leave this country and flee to somewhere with a less scumbag government!! :) :(
Which is where? Somalia? maybe that island in the middle of nowhere?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principality_of_Sealand
and you don't think the RIAA/MPAA or the British government could take it over...a couple of 125mm cannon fire from a British class destroyer would sink it. an SAS/Seal scuba team could set under water charges and tople it. a high speed bomber could out run the flak cannons given they still work.
trust me if they wanted gone they'd make it happen, and no-one would know.
Powered By
 |
Member
|
28. December 2010 @ 02:09 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by DXR88:
Originally posted by KillerBug:
Originally posted by DXR88:
Originally posted by ST2006:
Originally posted by ThePastor:
Is that country run by the SyFy Execs? Because they just want to get rid of whatever is most popular?
I wonder. Please help sponsor a first-generation British child leave this country and flee to somewhere with a less scumbag government!! :) :(
Which is where? Somalia? maybe that island in the middle of nowhere?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principality_of_Sealand
and you don't think the RIAA/MPAA or the British government could take it over...a couple of 125mm cannon fire from a British class destroyer would sink it. an SAS/Seal scuba team could set under water charges and tople it. a high speed bomber could out run the flak cannons given they still work.
trust me if they wanted gone they'd make it happen, and no-one would know.
Could try pulling a North Korea or Iran.
www.inebriare.com
Xbox Live: Rogue Jello - PSN: bam431 - IGN: bam431
Youtube: electrowaffle - Twitter: bam431
i5 760, P7P55D-E, Vapor-X HD5770, 8GB DDR3, 1TB HDD,
|
|
hermes_vb
Senior Member
|
28. December 2010 @ 14:40 |
Link to this message
|
|
Please I would like some porn...and some grey poupon.
If I always hear voices surrounding me, does it mean Im crazy or that I hear in Dolby 5.1?
 |
|
inhisgrip
Newbie
|
28. December 2010 @ 16:56 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by KillerBug:
Quote:
"We are not coming at this from an anti-porn perspective. We just want to make sure our children aren't stumbling across things we don?t want them to see." she told the Sunday Times.
Sounds like they are looking to block a whole lot more than porn...something tells me that wikileaks would be on the list of things they don't want people to see (they say children, but this is going to be on every account by default, and some will not remove it because they think it makes them look like perverts or something).
So you suggest erring on the side of closet perverts and risking the safety of children than the sad and what if you described? But dont worry YOU get to keep all the perverted images thats been already downloaded...
|
Senior Member
4 product reviews
|
28. December 2010 @ 17:18 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by inhisgrip:
Originally posted by KillerBug:
Quote:
"We are not coming at this from an anti-porn perspective. We just want to make sure our children aren't stumbling across things we don?t want them to see." she told the Sunday Times.
Sounds like they are looking to block a whole lot more than porn...something tells me that wikileaks would be on the list of things they don't want people to see (they say children, but this is going to be on every account by default, and some will not remove it because they think it makes them look like perverts or something).
So you suggest erring on the side of closet perverts and risking the safety of children than the sad and what if you described? But dont worry YOU get to keep all the perverted images thats been already downloaded...
its a monopolistic move. it has nothing to do with closet pervs or the children take out free porn sites, generate more revenue from porn DVD sales its as simple as that.
More sales = more tax.
Remember we're supposed to wake up everyday, work an 8 to 8 job. rinse repeat for the next 55 years of our life assuming one live's long enough to get retirement and aren't cheated from it by a Bank going out of business.
Where there is Money, there is No Freedom.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 28. December 2010 @ 17:20
|
Senior Member
|
30. December 2010 @ 02:04 |
Link to this message
|
|
there nothing wrong with porn aslong as the people in the pic or video are 18years or older.I dont agree with young children watching porn but teenagers have sex usually drunk at partys or in their cars (i was a teenger a while back).think some of the pg rated documentries on nazi german or the documentries on war are far more disturbing then watching a naked couple going at it.
btw what exactly do you mean by closet perverts???its normal to find people of the opposite sex attractive in any position.its normal for people to watch strip shows.its normal for people to have sex.just because they dont give every detail about what porn they've been watching or who they be sleeping with,doesnt mean theres anything wrong with them
custom built gaming pc from early 2010,ps2 with 15 games all original,ps3 500gbs with 5 games all original,yamaha amp and 5.1channel surround sound speakers,46inch sony lcd smart tv.
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
ST2006
Member
|
30. December 2010 @ 08:57 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by KillerBug:
Originally posted by DXR88:
Originally posted by ST2006:
Originally posted by ThePastor:
Is that country run by the SyFy Execs? Because they just want to get rid of whatever is most popular?
I wonder. Please help sponsor a first-generation British child leave this country and flee to somewhere with a less scumbag government!! :) :(
Which is where? Somalia? maybe that island in the middle of nowhere?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principality_of_Sealand
How did you know of this?? I cant believe a place like that exists! :P
And INHISGRIP.. was has blocking porn got to do with perverts and the safety of children.. that's the sort of crud a blind conservative supporter would say! And you do realise "children" (young/pre-teens) are probably the biggest market for porn any way !!
SmokeThis2006
|
