|
Michael Jackson NOT GUILTY What do you think ?
|
|
|
ScubaPete
AfterDawn Addict
|
13. June 2005 @ 13:29 |
Link to this message
|
|
The verdict is in; Michael is not guilty on all charges.
What do you think ?
Was justice served ?
What's your opinion of the accusers ?
Was it all, for the money ?
Step up, state your views ~
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
13. June 2005 @ 13:46 |
Link to this message
|
|
I'm suprised, I thought he would get guilty on at least one of the dozen charges. He's a freak in my book and should be banned from being around little kids. There's always the civil suit though...
|
Moderator
|
13. June 2005 @ 14:00 |
Link to this message
|
|
I could care less really but the next asshole that cries about him molesting their kid should be prosecuted for being stupid enough to let their kid around that freak after all this.
My killer sig came courtesy of bb "El Jefe" mayo.
The Forum Rules You Agreed To! http://forums.afterdawn.com/thread_view.cfm/2487
"And there we saw the giants, and we were in our own sight as grasshoppers, and so we were in their sight" - Numbers 13:33 |
Member
|
13. June 2005 @ 14:18 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
Michael Jackson NOT GUILTY What do you think ?
is this true or just a hypothetical question? sorry, i missed the news tonight..
Anyway, i think most of the other parents like meself here on aD would agree that you would not let your kid sleep overnight in a 40-odd-year-old man's bedroom, whatever the circumstances.
|
Senior Member
|
13. June 2005 @ 14:31 |
Link to this message
|
|
I wish that he was put in jail, he needs to be there.
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
13. June 2005 @ 14:34 |
Link to this message
|
|
I say unless you have met the man in person you cannot judge him.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 13. June 2005 @ 14:36
|
Member
|
13. June 2005 @ 14:39 |
Link to this message
|
|
I believe that he should of been found guilty on most or all charges. I was 99.9% sure that he would be found not-guilty from the beginning because he is Michael Jackson and when the jurors say that they "treated him like anyone else, and being a celebrity didn't play a part in their decision" is total BS.
Justice was not served
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
13. June 2005 @ 14:45 |
Link to this message
|
|
ken said it all for me.
weazel200.... cool gif but im guessing the mods wont let you keep it.
|
|
Gringle
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
13. June 2005 @ 14:45 |
Link to this message
|
|
after OJ; I really don't think you guys' have got it right! You're more interested in putting economic sanctions. Than hanging the 'bad guys'.
That attitude puts pressure, on us 'normal' folk...
gringle
El gringle..
|
|
Doggy_Bot
Suspended permanently
|
13. June 2005 @ 14:53 |
Link to this message
|
|
Yeah, I was watching Canada AM (A Canadian news broadcaster) and they interviewed this guy that came from Ireland to the U.S. to cheer Michael on... And some girl from a middle east country who also came, she wanted to support him all the way. In my point of view Michael Jackson is weird...but not too much. I really think he should have been proven guilty for atleast one of those charges...
|
Member
|
13. June 2005 @ 15:06 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
I say unless you have met the man in person you cannot judge him.
so true weazel200.
My rendition of its better to have loved and lost to have never loved before...."Its better to have gotten some action and lost some self esteem than to never have gotten any action at all." http://www.usfguy.netThis message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 13. June 2005 @ 15:07
|
AfterDawn Addict
6 product reviews
|
13. June 2005 @ 15:06 |
Link to this message
|
|
Well Michael Jackson Free!!!
what can i say??
being a fan of his from childhood I loved his music and his aurror.
but with time things and perceprtions change.
A man at his age should not b around kids regardless of him not havin a childhood thats a lame excuse. If he did it theres no justice but if he didnt he should not b round kids anyways and if kids come over kids should b with parents AT ALL TIMES!!!
Micheal Jackson should stick to music thats wat he does best or did its been lackin the past few yrs after blood on the dance floor
stick to music and performance and kids u have 3 b a parent and look after them
ciao
Edited by DVDBack23
"the mediocre teacher tells. the good teacher explains. the superior teacher demonstrates. the great teacher inspires."- William Aruthur Ward
Website: http://www.ampleblaze.com |
AfterDawn Addict
|
13. June 2005 @ 15:18 |
Link to this message
|
|
Thanks c4iscool.
We only see 1 side to the story. I also believe that people and the media are taking advantage of him because he had plastic surgery. If he was still black would he be caught up in a high profile court case. I also think that the Arvizo family are a bunch of low life scroungers. As was proven by the defence they are just after the money. If it was just a normal family who had no secret agenda then the case might of seem more open.
@jim_dandy
Is my sig breaching afterdawn rules. If it is i'll wait for confirmation by one of the admins before I remove it.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 13. June 2005 @ 15:21
|
|
DVDeviant
Junior Member
|
13. June 2005 @ 15:22 |
Link to this message
|
If you ask me, I always thought the charges were BS. A pedophile doesnt just take a break for 10 yrs(1993-2003)The first time they tried to burn his azz was 1993...and they settled out of court for $$$$$. Who in the fk that has children would settle out of court for money, if their child were molested?!?!? They bs'ed their way into Michael's pockets. Same thing here with this case, IMO. Sure, Michael may be a weird dude...the weirdest on the planet even. Hell, he may even be an alien...but that doesnt mean that he's a friggin pedophile. We didnt hear/see all of the evidence...but the jury did...and they say not guilty. I dont agree with Michael's way of thinking...wanting to hang out w/ kids and sh*t...and no one else does either...which is why its so easy for everyone to brand him a pedophile. No one understands his logic. You people that pass judgement when not knowing the facts are like damn neanderthals...apes. You spit out words that have no reasoning behind them. Ya'll just wanna see a hangin'.
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
13. June 2005 @ 15:32 |
Link to this message
|
@weazel200...it's not the subject matter of your gif,it's the size.I had one smaller than yours, and I had to change it.Here is the one I was asked to change to a smaller one.
good luck with keeping yours.
Back on the subject of this thread...."it's all about the Benjamin's baby"..any of us other "Joe Shmoe's" would be somebody's prison bitch by now.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 13. June 2005 @ 15:49
|
Senior Member
|
13. June 2005 @ 15:50 |
Link to this message
|
|
i agree that he was not guilty on the mulestation becuase the freakin kid was poor, his mom was a drunk whore, and the kid was cancer and need finacial aid. but the other charges were interesting in the verdicts.
|
|
mikeyb25
Junior Member
|
13. June 2005 @ 16:05 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
I could care less really but the next asshole that cries about him molesting their kid should be prosecuted for being stupid enough to let their kid around that freak after all this.
Perfectly said. I think he's guilty as hell and the next family who uses their child as a prostitute to whore money (which wasn't the case with all the children involved) should go to jail. All the parents seen these red flags and they just ignored them and destroyed their kids lives. I have two kids and I could never do such a thing. If a 40yo asked me if my kids could sleep in the same room overnight I would have to restrain myself from beating his a**.
|
Moderator
|
13. June 2005 @ 16:06 |
Link to this message
|
|
Previous posters have summed it for me:
1. Don't know him except what is said in the press. We all know how they can twist things.
2. I wasn't at the trial or in the jury - all I heard was what the press gave out.
3. He is extremely weird - and lives in his own world.
4. Any parent willing to let their child stay with MJ without thier supervision is nuts.
Unfortunately this is all the news is going to carry for at least the next week. Thank god I have cable and DVD's.
|
|
Gringle
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
13. June 2005 @ 16:10 |
Link to this message
|
|
Jim it's a bad old day, when folk don't have the time 'ter see a great arse rise out the water'
Jackson, another money Pedo, that slipped the noose.
El gringle..
|
|
need_for
Suspended permanently
|
13. June 2005 @ 16:12 |
Link to this message
|
I think that he molested one of those 12,but whose to say, the familys just wanted Jacksons money and thought that the molesting was away to get money!!
A couple good things about my girlfriend is that i can shut it off and turn it back on when i feel like it. Also it never yells or screems at me i get to do that to my girlfriend!!! Man i love my girlfriend!!!(Its my pc)lol
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 13. June 2005 @ 16:15
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
13. June 2005 @ 16:18 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
Jim it's a bad old day, when folk don't have the time 'ter see a great arse rise out the water'
Aint that the truth gringle my friend he he he he
|
|
need_for
Suspended permanently
|
13. June 2005 @ 16:35 |
Link to this message
|
i hope that all of those kids who got "melested" that thre family sees this,it might make them think a little more!!
A couple good things about my girlfriend is that i can shut it off and turn it back on when i feel like it. Also it never yells or screems at me i get to do that to my girlfriend!!! Man i love my girlfriend!!!(Its my pc)lol
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 13. June 2005 @ 16:37
|
|
squizzle
AfterDawn Addict
|
13. June 2005 @ 16:35 |
Link to this message
|
|
I agree with most other people here, parents are just as guilty by letting their kids hang out with MJ, let alone any adult but MJ, COME ON!!
I thought it was just a ploy to get money, I may be wrong, but I'll bet any money that this won't be the last time he gets accused of this crap. Unless he gets smart and stops hanging out with kids.
Could you imagine how life would be for him in the big house?? He wouldn't last a second but then again maybe he'd like it.
Convert PAL to NTSC or NTSC to PAL------>http://forums.afterdawn.com/thread_view.cfm/167922
ScubaPete's guides------>http://www.dvdplusvideo.com/tutorial007.html
Bbmayo's guides------>http://home.comcast.net/~bbmayo/index.html
My ever-growing movie collection------>http://www.intervocative.com/dvdcollection.aspx/squizzle
|
|
ddp
Moderator
|
13. June 2005 @ 17:01 |
Link to this message
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
Senior Member
|
13. June 2005 @ 17:05 |
Link to this message
|
|
I had my doubts they would be able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt he was guilty. I was pretty sure his money would buy him "justice". Of course if it was a normal person charged with the same crime, with the exact same evidence you know what would have happend.
Wako Jacko makes me sick, but parents who let their kids sleep in a bed with a grown man that looks like gay dracula, and thinks he's Peter Pan, make me even sicker.
|
