|
Michael Jackson NOT GUILTY What do you think ?
|
|
Moderator
|
15. June 2005 @ 13:16 |
Link to this message
|
|
Micheal Jackson did NOT molest those kids!
He "made love" to them!
you know what caviar and MJ have in common?
they both come on little white crackers.
http://www.Lonero.net - friend of the forums, great guitar player
#afterdawn (well i have no idea where it is anymore) |
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
Senior Member
|
15. June 2005 @ 13:29 |
Link to this message
|
|
it would be good if he was to go into prison, imagine the headline, MICHAEL JACKSON DROPS THE SOAP AGAIN!
!!thecraigc!!
|
Junior Member
|
15. June 2005 @ 13:55 |
Link to this message
|
|
Bloddy trash people as usual trying to rob people of there hard earn money.Micheal isnt that kind of guy and that kind of crime is ordly a black crime is it now guys.
|
|
Gringle
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
15. June 2005 @ 14:23 |
Link to this message
|
|
Well I ain't to sure about M Jackson, but if you think you folks, can protect you kids by teaching them Karate...Keep em well away, from {P Spanton} and the Higashi style. seems he's got sites all about.
Yo' Pete and Terry ...fancy a libell action??
micky evans. aka gringle
|
|
Doggy_Bot
Suspended permanently
|
15. June 2005 @ 14:31 |
Link to this message
|
|
What do you guys exspect hes rich & famous... He cant go to Jail!!!there would be soooo many protests if he did.....he probobly did molest atleast 1 of those boys!
|
|
forkndave
Member
|
15. June 2005 @ 14:39 |
Link to this message
|
|
The statement made by one of the jurors expresses my feelings pretty well. He said that he felt they proved that Michael Jackson was a pedophile, but did not prove that he performed this particular act of pedophilia. Since they were trying him for that and not his past actions he was found not guilty. I hope the people that he paid off in the past are happy since they have allowed this to continue. Paying off witnesses is illegal in many states. I read in the paper that Russel Crowe could not pay the guy that he hit with the phone to not testify against him because it would be a felony. It must have been different with MJ, I guess. Maybe paying off the parents of child wittnesses is OK.
Dave
|
|
ScubaPete
AfterDawn Addict
|
15. June 2005 @ 17:00 |
Link to this message
|
|
Nicely put Creaky
|
Moderator
|
15. June 2005 @ 22:47 |
Link to this message
|
|
@Scubapete - cheers. i did get a bit heated there, but hey, i feel strongly about just a couple things in life :)
My hand was actually shaking as i wrote that one, subjects like that do get me riled
Main PC ~ Intel C2Q Q6600 (G0 Stepping)/Gigabyte GA-EP45-DS3/2GB Crucial Ballistix PC2-8500/Zalman CNPS9700/Antec 900/Corsair HX 620W
Network ~ DD-WRT ~ 2node WDS-WPA2/AES ~ Buffalo WHR-G54S. 3node WPA2/AES ~ WRT54GS v6 (inc. WEP BSSID), WRT54G v2, WRT54G2 v1. *** Forum Rules *** |
AfterDawn Addict
|
16. June 2005 @ 03:48 |
Link to this message
|
|
the guy is a freak,and always will be.what a sex case
just like the oj simpson case,the verdict was never in doubt,and was always going to be freed
that bastard was always going to get off,like HE was getting off with those kids
the irony of all this,was the wacko was about skint,.....
and now look what will happen,he will make a bloody fortune out of this,you mark my words
btw,the whole system sucks anyways,i mean,if he was NOT GUILTY,shouldnt he be pressing charges against the claiments???
and shouldnt they be jailed for supposedly wrongly claiming what he did,
because someone is definetly lying
they are both just as bad,what sort of parent lets there sprogs sleep around his pad?
michael jackson is a phaedophile.....he just doesnt know it
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 16. June 2005 @ 03:56
|
|
ScubaPete
AfterDawn Addict
|
16. June 2005 @ 17:46 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
btw,the whole system sucks anyways,i mean,if he was NOT GUILTY,shouldnt he be pressing charges against the claiments???
and shouldnt they be jailed for supposedly wrongly claiming what he did,
Well that's pretty easy to answer.
1. The claimants don't have anything. They are welfare cases. No sense in suing anyone if there is nothing to be had.
2. The boy is still a minor so you would be prosecuting the Mother. She should be held accountable but filing a false police report is a misdemeanor ~ there might be some small jail time BUT then, what to do with the children ? They would be put into foster homes, paid for by tax dollars. The taxpayers would go ballistic about that time, after having spent all the money that they did in prosecuting the case to begin with. A 60-day + trial isn't cheap by any means. All weekends and all evenings were overtime - PLUS witnesses ~ PLUS all the preparation for the trial ~ Man is that a pile of $$$$. It just is not cost effective.
Mom is in trouble anyway ~ a lot of stuff came out about her, the scamming of the welfare system, they aren't going to let that be ~ She'll get a letter saying that she didn't declare all the stuff she got from Jackson i.e. all the time her kids spent there, she was still receiving support BUT Michael was doing the supporting, the feeding the roof over his head, etc. All the time the boy was in Neverland, she was still collecting money. Want to bet that she didn't say, "Hey Welfare pple, my son isn't under my roof and I'm not feeding him. I'll let you know when he comes home.". RIGHT ~ So now they find out, she was ineligible for the help she received. In the mail she'll get a letter that says, "Please send the $$$$ back Mama". Trust me, she'll be awhile trying to get out of the hole she's in.
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
16. June 2005 @ 17:56 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
Trust me, she'll be awhile trying to get out of the hole she's in.
I doubt that since, well im sure interviews book deals and rights to her side of the story will be thrown at her for some major dollars.
Everyone will want to know the again and again how Michael Jackson lives and she had a front row seat to how he lives. And how can she turn down money??? She gave up both her son's for money.
|
|
mcalister
Member
|
16. June 2005 @ 18:05 |
Link to this message
|
|
What do you expect from a guy who thinks he's Peter Pan !
later on
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
16. June 2005 @ 18:27 |
Link to this message
|
|
IMO is Michael Jackson guilty, more than likely. I am a Social Worker and have worked with abused, neglected and dependant kids for over 30 years, and advocated for their rights. I have sat through many a child molestation trial, and it is one of the hardest things to prove. I have had kids who are not even in double digits in age with STD's, and knew who the perps were and could not get any judgments. The toughest thing is to get justice when children are involved, take it from one who has tried. Most kids will suffer in their situations because even a bad parent/guardian/relative is better than none. Children from such homes are easily preyed because they are starved for love and affection from anyone, and the pedophiles of the world are just waiting to take advantage.
|
|
kcdc30
Member
|
16. June 2005 @ 18:41 |
Link to this message
|
|
rapists and pedophiles go free. people who copy movies go to jail.
|
|
Auslander
AfterDawn Addict
|
16. June 2005 @ 19:14 |
Link to this message
|
|
gotta love priorities set by the rich.
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
17. June 2005 @ 02:28 |
Link to this message
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
6 product reviews
|
17. June 2005 @ 14:34 |
Link to this message
|
|
LOL!!!
That was a good one hursty
good to start my day off with a laugh :)
Edited by DVDBack23
"the mediocre teacher tells. the good teacher explains. the superior teacher demonstrates. the great teacher inspires."- William Aruthur Ward
Website: http://www.ampleblaze.com |
AfterDawn Addict
|
20. June 2005 @ 00:10 |
Link to this message
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
6 product reviews
|
20. June 2005 @ 03:00 |
Link to this message
|
|
LMAO!!!! :D
That was sooo apropraite :)
well i would of loved to c that in court :)
MJ and kids dont mix
Jesus Juice its called OJ MJ & OJ sound familiar :)
Edited by DVDBack23
"the mediocre teacher tells. the good teacher explains. the superior teacher demonstrates. the great teacher inspires."- William Aruthur Ward
Website: http://www.ampleblaze.com |
|
ScubaPete
AfterDawn Addict
|
20. June 2005 @ 15:59 |
Link to this message
|
|
Lol, Good one Hursty ~
|
Senior Member
|
22. June 2005 @ 07:20 |
Link to this message
|
|
I got this to say,, first of about hurty's image,, Its funny because those kids have no idea what that sign says...
Second, about MJ, The guy is a freak, and if he doesnt molest childern, he should of learned back in 93 to stay away from them, to prevent that from happening,
third. People do anything for money, im 15, all i have to do is spend the night at MJ's say something happend, and i can get millions of dollars,, thats probably a risk i would take to. all i need is my handy dandy pepper spray. and boom, all the computers i could ever imagine.
 http://pspcrack.tk/
"Rarely is the question asked; is our childern learning?" - G.W.Bush |
Senior Member
|
22. June 2005 @ 09:04 |
Link to this message
|
|
i heard the news quote him when he said that "the most loving thing you can do in life is share your bed with someone" that is his actual filosophy.
|
Moderator
|
22. June 2005 @ 09:38 |
Link to this message
|
|
well yeah i'd agree with that, as long as the person is of legal age.
I think the most loving thing you can do with someone is help them dispose of a body.
http://www.Lonero.net - friend of the forums, great guitar player
#afterdawn (well i have no idea where it is anymore)
|
|
uponthis
Member
|
22. June 2005 @ 09:50 |
Link to this message
|
|
Personally, i think he missed too many ass whoopins when he was younger. Always running from his dad....his brother should have caught him and help him till his dad got there. The man has a screw lose up there. So, he's guilty in my book. He needs to be put in jail where someone can "sleep" with him in a more grown-up way
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 22. June 2005 @ 21:53
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
Senior Member
|
22. June 2005 @ 11:00 |
Link to this message
|
|
@ uponthis, awesome sig man, but you might want to get rid of the Sh** in the website url, try editing it.
|
