x360 vs ps3 game screenshots compared?
|
|
J_Bone
Suspended permanently
|
19. November 2006 @ 10:12 |
Link to this message
|
i have heard alot of talk about the 2 systems and which 1 has the better graphics but i have not seen a sight that puts 2 of the same screen shot s for both systems side to side to determine which is better if anyone has a link or r comments let us all know
i have a 360 and the graphix for gow look GREAT but if ps3 graphics are already better i might need to convert
|
Advertisement
|
  |
|
goman007
Member
|
19. November 2006 @ 10:25 |
Link to this message
|
Jbone,
what program did you make your picture in?
|
gracie17
Junior Member
|
19. November 2006 @ 11:37 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by J_Bone: i have heard alot of talk about the 2 systems and which 1 has the better graphics but i have not seen a sight that puts 2 of the same screen shot s for both systems side to side to determine which is better if anyone has a link or r comments let us all know
i have a 360 and the graphix for gow look GREAT but if ps3 graphics are already better i might need to convert
You don't have to worry about that. Nothing on PS3 comes close to GOW at the moment. Both machines are very close to one another in terms of power. Sony has a more powerful CPU while 360 has a better graphics chip. But in the end there is not much difference. Maybe 360 will come out on top, maybe PS3 will. However if they are both the same 360 will always be a generation ahead on Sony.
I'm still pissed at Sony for bull$!ting about the PS3.
|
Member
|
19. November 2006 @ 12:07 |
Link to this message
|
Quote: However if they are both the same 360 will always be a generation ahead on Sony.
How the hell does that work?
If they are both the same then that would mean that they are both the SAME generation. How the hell would they be ahead if it's the same?
V12 PS2 - DMS4 SE PRO, Diode Fix, HDconnect, 320gb HD
----------------
Tall Israeli: For anyone who doesn't smoke, this is like your mom taking your dreamcast away.
Wagh: god you're an idiot.
|
emachine
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
19. November 2006 @ 12:26 |
Link to this message
|
Quote: [quote]However if they are both the same 360 will always be a generation ahead on Sony.
How the hell does that work?
If they are both the same then that would mean that they are both the SAME generation. How the hell would they be ahead if it's the same?[/quote]Hes on crack.
|
SonicS
Account closed as per user's own request
|
19. November 2006 @ 12:28 |
Link to this message
|
probably coz it came out a year early. In due time, PS3 might catch up
|
DamonDash
Suspended permanently
|
19. November 2006 @ 12:45 |
Link to this message
|
Why would you compare first Gen games to a system that been on the market a year now..Cmon at least wait about 6 or 7 months.
|
mrfinke
Newbie
|
19. November 2006 @ 12:45 |
Link to this message
|
If they're the same I'd just buy an 360. I mean its cheaper and its been out for a year, so all the bugs should be fixed by now, right? And I suppose they are starting to get better games.
Idk, I just saw a PS3 running at Walmart (when I was standing in line for a Wii), and it looked really pretty, but I'm concrened bc I watched X-play and they reviewed 5 games and only 1 (Resistance Fall of Man) got a 5/5. Madden was a 3/5 and the others were 2/5 and there was one 1/5. It's kind of depressing, as of now, that the PS3 doesn't seem to be living up to the hype.
|
KoOkOo67
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
19. November 2006 @ 13:52 |
Link to this message
|
Quote: Nothing on PS3 comes close to GOW at the moment
Well im not so sure about that, FFXIII is starting to look pretty nice, i m not sure if this picture is realtime or not, it looks realtime to me because you have the actions on, it looks pretty sweat though.


Metal gear solid is lookign pretty nice aswell, I don't think we will see good looking games for a while from the PS3, maybe 4 more months?
>_<
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 19. November 2006 @ 13:54
|
mrfinke
Newbie
|
19. November 2006 @ 14:00 |
Link to this message
|
Yeah, that does look good. FF and MGS4 are the games everyone keeps talking about, but I've never been a big FF or MGS fan. So, I don't plan on investing in a PS3 just bc of those 2 games. Until I see some more quality games coming out, I think I'll hold off. Besides, I couldn't get one now even if I wanted to. :(
|
Senior Member
|
19. November 2006 @ 14:36 |
Link to this message
|
here's what I think , the Ps3 will be pretty amazin just give them time I dont think its fair to Sony to compair them to Micro since they haven even got the chance to play there cards . I also dont think its their fault those other games were not so good its those cats that made the games not Sony they just make the consoles for us . Well for me the Ps3 already has a buyer because I'm a fan of Devil May Cry that alone will make me fork up the money to get one .
Kitty Kung Fu Hustle !
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 19. November 2006 @ 14:37
|
Junior Member
|
19. November 2006 @ 17:29 |
Link to this message
|
If microsoft is a generation ahead of sony (which they're not) dont u think they would have atleast included net-gen discs for their games not just movies
|
jeray
Member
|
19. November 2006 @ 19:11 |
Link to this message
|
both are amazing machines.all it comes down to is if you're a sony or microsoft guy.
|
Member
|
19. November 2006 @ 19:54 |
Link to this message
|
Also what type of gamer you are.
If you love metal gear solid, devil may cry, or a lot of rpg's then chances are you're going for the PS3.
Likewise if you love fps's such as halo then you're goin to the 360.
V12 PS2 - DMS4 SE PRO, Diode Fix, HDconnect, 320gb HD
----------------
Tall Israeli: For anyone who doesn't smoke, this is like your mom taking your dreamcast away.
Wagh: god you're an idiot.
|
mrfinke
Newbie
|
19. November 2006 @ 20:02 |
Link to this message
|
I love games like Zelda and Shadow of the Colossus, so I guess those are considered action-adventure games. I really want to try out Fable I & II, Oblivion, and Assassin's Creed, those games are very appealing to me.
|
gracie17
Junior Member
|
19. November 2006 @ 20:09 |
Link to this message
|
Quote: [quote][quote]However if they are both the same 360 will always be a generation ahead on Sony.
How the hell does that work?
If they are both the same then that would mean that they are both the SAME generation. How the hell would they be ahead if it's the same?[/quote]Hes on crack.[/quote]Umm...they would a GAMES generation ahead. Developers would be a generation of game development ahead of PS3 because its been out longer. Thats how the hell that works. Think before you speak.
|
Member
|
19. November 2006 @ 21:08 |
Link to this message
|
That being the case if we set aside the fact that all these third gen game developers that produce games for all consoles would have already made the ps3 version.
V12 PS2 - DMS4 SE PRO, Diode Fix, HDconnect, 320gb HD
----------------
Tall Israeli: For anyone who doesn't smoke, this is like your mom taking your dreamcast away.
Wagh: god you're an idiot.
|
Senior Member
|
20. November 2006 @ 16:12 |
Link to this message
|
While the graphics on FFXIII do look pretty, it just doesn't look as appetizing as previous FF's have, and definitely isn't high up on my list. As for MGS4, it was recently revealed that Kojima was being made to work on a 360 version of it side-by side with the PS3 version. There are a list of reasons that they might have kept quiet about it; but the most likely seeming one is that Sony has been paying them in the same way they paid UbiSoft to not talk about their new Thief/Prince of Persia style action game being released on the 360. I'm not saying that it's confirmed Sony paid Konami to keep a 360 version hush; but it has been made public that they did it with UbiSoft.
And please don't get me wrong, I'm not bagging on Sony, they all do it. Odds are M$ had a lot to do with Bethesda keeping so quiet about Oblivion being released for the PS3. It's simple business and marketing strategy, and I don't blame M$, $ony or Nintendo for it in the least, why? Because making it LOOK like your system exclusively has that hot new game everyone wants, is a great way to make people buy your system.

"Its not stupid, its advanced!" - The Almighty Tallest, Invader Zim
|
Senior Member
|
20. November 2006 @ 18:40 |
Link to this message
|
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 20. November 2006 @ 19:24
|
Xpressor
Member
|
20. November 2006 @ 21:31 |
Link to this message
|
remember E3 2005 they had the trailer or clip
for ps3 KILLZONE.. was debated if it was
real time or rendered video....
wonder how come it didnt come as a launch game
my 2 pennies
SONY SXRD 60inch HIGH-DEF
XBOX 360
XBOX 1 xbox media in HD
PSP 3.52m33-4
|
silver112
Member
|
22. November 2006 @ 00:03 |
Link to this message
|
how in the hell do you show pictures
|
Member
|
22. November 2006 @ 01:00 |
Link to this message
|
we all know the ps2 had way more titles then xbox and most of xbox titles are copyed from the ps2. the way i see it, if u have good taste in games u would go for the ps3.
goodmen
|
Member
|
22. November 2006 @ 01:04 |
Link to this message
|
and goman007
i think jbone is using photo shop or paint shop pro.
if ur into make good images they are good ones to use.
goodmen
|
Senior Member
|
22. November 2006 @ 02:17 |
Link to this message
|
@silver- you upload ur pic to a hosting site such as imageshack.us or photobucket.com . then you copy the direct link and put it in between [img][/img]
Intel C2D E8400|Asus P5Q Pro|Diamond Radeon HD 4850|WD 640GB SATA 2| Pioner DVR-215BK|2GB Corsair PC 6400| Corsair HX-520|Antec Three Hundred
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 22. November 2006 @ 02:18
|
Advertisement
|
  |
|
silver112
Member
|
23. November 2006 @ 01:27 |
Link to this message
|
Thanks sukhvail

This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 23. November 2006 @ 01:38
|