User User name Password  
   
Wednesday 12.3.2025 / 18:38
Search AfterDawn Forums:        In English   Suomeksi   På svenska
afterdawn.com > forums > digital audio > audio > what is the best format
Show topics
 
Forums
Forums
what is the best format
  Jump to:
 
Posted Message
saqib
Junior Member
_
16. March 2003 @ 11:25 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
is wma the best format for compression
Advertisement
_
__
tigre
Moderator
_
16. March 2003 @ 13:14 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
It depends on your needs. What do you want? Hardware compatibility - or only PC playback? Do you want to archive your CD collection without any quality loss, do you want near to perfect quality with reasonable size or do you want files as small as possible with acceptable quality e.g. for listening while working on PC speakers?

The only situation where wma(9) is (one of the) best I can think of is to use it on a hadware player with small memory (that accepts this format of course) so you're forced to use bitrates arround 80kbps.
cd-rw.org
Senior Member

4 product reviews
_
16. March 2003 @ 14:25 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
WMA is strogly challenged by OGG Vorbis and AAC in low bitrate. Rumours are that AAC+ is very good in this, but we must wait and see.

If high fidelty is desired, the WMA is outperformed by many codecs (MusePack, AAC,LAME VBR, OGG Vorbis..)

The old school is back. All hail the new http://BitBurners.com !
obieobied
Junior Member
_
19. March 2003 @ 08:13 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Compression? Yes WMA compression is better than MP3.
But I say, just stick with MP3!
Unless they start comming out with stuff that only plays WMA, and not MP3, dont go there.
Plus, so you save 20MB over ur whole collection if u convert all MP3 2 WMA...
later u'll want 2 burn with Nero, and u need WMA plugin...
[sure u can get it free by piracy, and so do i, but its not allowed in this forum so, forget what i said]
And to tell you the truth, i dont hear much difference between WMA's Lossless compression [@ 700 kbps] and MP3's 320kbps VBR. Sometimes i dont hear difference between 256 and 320, so whatever.

CPU: Athlon Tbird 1.2 GHz
RAM: 384 MB
HDD: 60 GB + 30 GB [90 GB]
CD : 8x/4x/24x CD-RW, 16x DVD-ROM
SND: 4.1 Cambridge Soundworks Speaker System
VID: nVidia GeForce 4 Ti4600
cd-rw.org
Senior Member

4 product reviews
_
19. March 2003 @ 09:34 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Quote:
Compression? Yes WMA compression is better than MP3.
In most cases (meaning: reasonable bitrates/quality), no it does not.



The old school is back. All hail the new http://BitBurners.com !
maxicow
Suspended due to non-functional email address
_
22. March 2003 @ 08:09 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
What about mp3PRO?
Advertisement
_
__
 
_
cd-rw.org
Senior Member

4 product reviews
_
22. March 2003 @ 13:28 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
MP3Pro is only for low bitrates, which means low audio quality. Pretty useless piece of work. I beleive that OGG Vorbis is a good choice if one wishes to go below 160kbps. Based on what I've been told, the upcoming AAC+ should be sweet.

The old school is back. All hail the new http://BitBurners.com !
afterdawn.com > forums > digital audio > audio > what is the best format
 

Digital video: AfterDawn.com | AfterDawn Forums
Music: MP3Lizard.com
Gaming: Blasteroids.com | Blasteroids Forums | Compare game prices
Software: Software downloads
Blogs: User profile pages
RSS feeds: AfterDawn.com News | Software updates | AfterDawn Forums
International: AfterDawn in Finnish | AfterDawn in Swedish | AfterDawn in Norwegian | download.fi
Navigate: Search | Site map
About us: About AfterDawn Ltd | Advertise on our sites | Rules, Restrictions, Legal disclaimer & Privacy policy
Contact us: Send feedback | Contact our media sales team
 
  © 1999-2025 by AfterDawn Ltd.

  IDG TechNetwork