User User name Password  
   
Thursday 26.2.2026 / 10:43
Search AfterDawn Forums:        In English   Suomeksi   På svenska
afterdawn.com > forums > software specific discussion > nero discussion > which is better?
Show topics
 
Forums
Forums
Which is better?
  Jump to:
 
Posted Message
drock317
Newbie
_
27. June 2006 @ 00:32 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
nero 7 ultra , Nero 7 premium and Nero 7 essentials. out of those three which one is better and whats the diff in them?

»«.[? D-ROCK ?].»«
Advertisement
_
__
guyrus
Suspended due to non-functional email address
_
27. June 2006 @ 01:07 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
for me none of them, prefer 6.6.0.18
AfterDawn Addict
_
27. June 2006 @ 04:05 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
@guyrus......I haven't had a bad problem with Nero 7 premium...... although I must admit I don't use it much but so far so good and it just works for what I want it to do... hahahahahahah which isn't much compared to all my other programs.
AfterDawn Addict
_
27. June 2006 @ 04:23 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
I am with guyrus for now, 6.6.0.18 for me too. I have 7 but it still has that MP3 problem and the slow load for NVE, have not tried the latest update I think I will wait for the time being until I hear some better feedback in these areas.


AfterDawn Addict
_
27. June 2006 @ 04:48 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
@Arniebear..... what MP3 problem..... I just about the Vision problem and some other burning problem but didn't know about an MP3 prob. Then again I haven't burned a CD in a long time. thinking of updating my music in my car with new CDs..... will Nero Express work for MP3 CD? I have the buggy Nero 7 Prem.
AfterDawn Addict
_
27. June 2006 @ 04:54 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
The problem I had was that the CD's would skip. I tried several drives, in fact I thought my new Sony CD burner that came with the comp was defective, but it wasn't. It happened on my BenQ and HP. Went back to 6 and no problems. There are other posts about this, so I know I am not the only one with the problem. Burning them at a slow speed seemed to help with the 7. Plus, I think I may be crazy on this one, but I do believe that Nero Recode seems to be faster in 6 than in 7. All in all I am extremely disappointed in 7, but that is just MHO :)


guyrus
Suspended due to non-functional email address
_
27. June 2006 @ 10:39 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
i always thought along the lines that if it isnt broken why try and fix it.I have 7 but still prefer 6.The recode version in 6 does seem to have a slight edge over that of its counterpart in 7.I wonder if they attempted to tweak it in the upgrade but failed.

This was a reason for staying with 6.I really only use recode after i have converted files to mpeg2 anyway so 6 is fine for that as well
Advertisement
_
__
 
_
AfterDawn Addict
_
27. June 2006 @ 11:50 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
thank you for the clearification, you guys.
afterdawn.com > forums > software specific discussion > nero discussion > which is better?
 

Digital video: AfterDawn.com | AfterDawn Forums
Music: MP3Lizard.com
Gaming: Blasteroids.com | Blasteroids Forums | Compare game prices
Software: Software downloads
Blogs: User profile pages
RSS feeds: AfterDawn.com News | Software updates | AfterDawn Forums
International: AfterDawn in Finnish | AfterDawn in Swedish | AfterDawn in Norwegian | download.fi
Navigate: Search | Site map
About us: About AfterDawn Ltd | Advertise on our sites | Rules, Restrictions, Legal disclaimer & Privacy policy
Contact us: Send feedback | Contact our media sales team
 
  © 1999-2026 by AfterDawn Ltd.

  IDG TechNetwork