this girl didn't disable sharing and didn't have any protection such as peer guardian, i also bet she used it out of the box so when she closed it it wasn't really closed and it was still sharing the music
after readin this, i completley turned off my file sharin shit, i thot if u null out uploads it would fix this, guess not.anyway, it doesnt matter 2 me cuz lime wire and bitcomet shutooff my internetr whenever i use them.
1. Didn't a judge decide that the ludicris amount of $750 per song was illegal? Sure they are downloading the song but does the RIAA loose $750 per illegally downloaded song?
If they can afford to sell the songs online, "without" DRM, for $1.50 doesn't that mean they really only loose $1.50-$2 per song instead of the blasphemously bloated $750?
2. That allowed anyone who went online looking for one of those songs the chance to get it for free. And Kayla was identified as the on-line distributor through Limewire.
384 songs its not that many, sure its a decent amount but most people have a few thousand songs. I think an "online distributor" would be something closer to 1,000+ songs, not some wimpy 384.
3. Lamy says, "For someone who has 350 songs, that's like taking 35 CDs and basically sitting on a street corner and offering a perfect digital copy of a record to anyone who wants those albums for free."
Wow, has Lamy ever used Limewire? They are NOWHERE near CD-Quailty. Maybe some, but very few. If she was uploading a collection of 35 CDs via a real torrent (i.e. Scene standards where followed) then what Lamy said would make sense.
