|
|
|
AfterDawn versus VideoHelp.com
|
|
|
hamil
Junior Member
|
17. December 2007 @ 08:21 |
Link to this message
|
|
AfterDawn versus VideoHelp
To my opinion, AfterDawn is the BEST video forum out there...
|
|
Advertisement
|
  |
|
|
Moderator
1 product review
|
17. December 2007 @ 15:43 |
Link to this message
|
|
I'm sure many would agree.
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
17. December 2007 @ 20:47 |
Link to this message
|
|
Who needs Videohelp?
|
|
varnull
Suspended permanently
|
18. December 2007 @ 05:05 |
Link to this message
|
|
Prefer videohelp myself...for video related problems... Far better organisation of subjects, easier to find the information you need... and members who know how to use the search and READ the results before posting the same question time and time and time again... my $0.02
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
18. December 2007 @ 08:56 |
Link to this message
|
|
:-)
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 10. February 2008 @ 23:47
|
Member
|
18. December 2007 @ 09:34 |
Link to this message
|
|
Thanks, varnull, For the tip.
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
18. December 2007 @ 10:47 |
Link to this message
|
|
I don't care either way.
|
|
varnull
Suspended permanently
|
18. December 2007 @ 15:53 |
Link to this message
|
Quote: Then why are you "slumming" here? :-)
Maybe because there are things like xbox problems and linux issues I can help with.. instead of being boring and posting lots and lots of technical stuff about the undocumented features of ffmpeg, and how to patch it to do off the wall things such as reversing the audio and video streams in an M4S2 file..? heh heh heh
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 18. December 2007 @ 15:57
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
18. December 2007 @ 15:58 |
Link to this message
|
|
Haha, now now or there'll be tears before bedtime ;-)
|
Moderator
1 product review
|
18. December 2007 @ 16:02 |
Link to this message
|
|
No tears please...
|
Senior Member
|
19. December 2007 @ 20:09 |
Link to this message
|
|
varnull....tears!....no chance....more like crocodile tears to match the teeth LOL
 gif by ireland
we cant help if you wont help yourself
|
Senior Member
|
4. February 2008 @ 04:53 |
Link to this message
|
|
both sites serve the needs of the people who go to the sites, there are great things on both of the sites!
|
|
varnull
Suspended permanently
|
9. February 2008 @ 01:02 |
Link to this message
|
aD is more n00b friendly.. especially with it's primary function.. video and dvd items. usually people will at least get a link to a guide relevant to the issue.. Videohelp is a lot more "RTFM and post a basic beginners question without reading again if you dare".. :lol:
Different sites, different mission statements.
I belong to both, but my work at videohelp is radically different to here, where TBH it would go straight over the heads of the average joe..
Quote: --- ffmpeg-0.4.8/libavformat/asf.c 2003-09-28 17:26:40.000000000 +0200
+++ my_ffmpeg-0.4.8/libavformat/asf.c 2007-10-15 18:18:14.625323030 +0200
@@ -407,21 +423,23 @@
enc = &s->streams[n]->codec;
p = avcodec_find_encoder(enc->codec_id);
+fprintf(stdout,"\n[%s:%s:%d] Stream %d codec_id=%d found=%d\n",__FILE__,__FUNCTION__,__LINE__,n,enc->codec_id,p?1:0);
- put_le16(pb, asf->streams[n].num);
- put_str16(pb, p ? p->name : enc->codec_name);
- put_le16(pb, 0); /* no parameters */
-
-
/* id */
if (enc->codec_type == CODEC_TYPE_AUDIO) {
put_le16(pb, 2);
+ put_str16(pb, p ? p->name : enc->codec_name);
+ put_le16(pb, 0); /* no parameters */
+ put_le16(pb, 2);
if(!enc->codec_tag)
enc->codec_tag = codec_get_tag(codec_wav_tags, enc->codec_id);
if(!enc->codec_tag)
return -1;
put_le16(pb, enc->codec_tag);
} else {
+ put_le16(pb, 1); /* 1..video 2..audio nicht asf->streams[n].num */
+ put_str16(pb, p ? p->name : enc->codec_name);
+ put_le16(pb, 0); /* no parameters */
put_le16(pb, 4);
if(!enc->codec_tag)
enc->codec_tag = codec_get_tag(codec_bmp_tags, enc->codec_id);
###### some settings and notes ######
using mpeg4 as output codec for ffmpeg results in a a fourcc of FMP4 and the camera says "file failed". Using msmpeg4v1 results in a FOURCC of MPG4. Using msmpeg4v2 results in MP42. msmpeg4 results in DIV3 mencoder appears to let you override the fourcc.
Note that undocumented "-vtag M4S2" lets you set the fourcc. with "-vcodec msmpeg4v1 -vtag M4S2" there is no file failed message but you get a blank screen/audio when playing.
This mostly works:
time ffmpeg -i hedwig_and_the_angry_inch.mpg -f asf -b 1680 -s 640x480 -r 29.97 -aspect 4:3 -vcodec mpeg4 -vtag M4S2 -ar 11025 -ab 44 -ac 1 -acodec adpcm_ms /tmp/CLIP0054.ASF
There is some green and pink garbage which probably represents mpeg opcodes that aren't understood. Intermittent crashes, more frequent when using TV out. Some crashes are sticky and persist between playings; playing a short clip that was recorded on the camera often helps to reset. Sometimes the camera hangs and the batteries have to be removed.
With "-vtag M4S2" the mpeg4 codec works (sort of) but not the msmpeg4, msmpeg4v1, msmpeg4v2 codecs.
The manual for the ISDV2 mentions default settings used with ArcSoft MediaConverter:
320x240, ASF, 2.0Mb bideo bitrate, 128Kb audio bit rate, 25 fps.
That's the kind of stuff that gets reserved for videohelp ;)
|
Senior Member
|
9. February 2008 @ 10:03 |
Link to this message
|
|
Both are good, in their own respects.
|
Senior Member
|
12. March 2008 @ 15:51 |
Link to this message
|
|
AD needs a newbie form.
There are just too many posts in the popular forums by people
asking question that don't even know enough to provide the
information necessary for people to answer it.
I've seen some threads, perhaps 8 - 10 posts,
that had yet to establish what the issue is, because of the reason
above.
A newbie forum would help, and gather these kinds of "problems"
together. Just my 2c.
|
Senior Member
|
12. March 2008 @ 17:30 |
Link to this message
|
|
that is why we have something called rules, if the newbies were to read theese, there should be no problems, and there will be some who will not be able to understand no matter what way you put the help! also the guide section covers allmost anything.
|
Senior Member
|
12. March 2008 @ 19:59 |
Link to this message
|
You don't think a newbie forum would help? Then maybe the newbies
would assist each other and pick up a thing or two.
The regular use forums would be better. They would have a higher
percentage of useful posts, questions and answers with some value to
readers.
We were all newbies once, it's just a stage you go through, there's
nothing condescending about it - but hopefully we learn eventually.
It's one of the problems with these all-in-one software types
that are popular now.
It's a black box and you don't learn anything. Now you feed in an avi
or an flv, and out the other end comes an ISO of all things.
Which you're supposed to write to a dvd, and Hey Presto! play it
your dvd player. But what if it doesn't doesn't play?
You never saw, or even knew about the intermediate mpeg 2 files,
so you can't test them to see if they play in VLC or WMP -
in short you're completely lost and you never learned anything.
It would be funny if it wasn't so sad.
And to top it off, they think the ISO is a video file
and they want to know how to "play" it.
(Edited for readability)
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 12. March 2008 @ 20:20
|
I hate titles
35 product reviews
|
13. March 2008 @ 04:01 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by davexnet: You don't think a newbie forum would help? Then maybe the newbies
would assist each other and pick up a thing or two.
The regular use forums would be better. They would have a higher
percentage of useful posts, questions and answers with some value to
readers.
We were all newbies once, it's just a stage you go through, there's
nothing condescending about it - but hopefully we learn eventually.
It's one of the problems with these all-in-one software types
that are popular now.
It's a black box and you don't learn anything. Now you feed in an avi
or an flv, and out the other end comes an ISO of all things.
Which you're supposed to write to a dvd, and Hey Presto! play it
your dvd player. But what if it doesn't doesn't play?
You never saw, or even knew about the intermediate mpeg 2 files,
so you can't test them to see if they play in VLC or WMP -
in short you're completely lost and you never learned anything.
It would be funny if it wasn't so sad.
And to top it off, they think the ISO is a video file
and they want to know how to "play" it.
(Edited for readability)
This same thing happens with all technology -- at first, the stuff is so darn difficult, but if there's enough interest, the guides for it will pop up and even Joe Averages are willing to learn it (or to follow a guide through step by step :-). Then, somebody eases the process by developing a one-click tool for getting rid of couple of extra steps in the process. Then next guy develops even better one-click tool that takes care of the whole process -- and if the quality and ease-of-use are "good enough", the majority of people will simply stop using the difficult-but-high-quality tools and guides.
We've seen it happen several times during the history of our site -- nine years in this business is a long time :-) We started out as a site mostly focused on MP3s... Then, quite rapidly, ripping CDs into good quality MP3s became so damn easy that people didn't want to discuss about stuff like how to get the best possible audio quality out of compressed audio. Then, next big thing was ripping DVDs to VideoCDs. That required originally 5 - 10 different tools and about 8-10 hours of time to rip one DVD. Then it got easier and easier.. Actually before the VCDs managed to become "too easy for guides", DivX and SVCD had already taken its place. And with DivX, same thing .. you needed to rip the DVD, then use stuff like DVD2AVI, VFAPI, VirtualDub, etc. And not too long, we had tools like GKnot, DVD2SVCD, etc that made the whole process so easy that guides and detailed info for those topics became almost obsolete.
Then DVD -> DVDR was next step, at first, it required manual editing of IFOs, etc and helluva lot of tweaking. Along came DVD Shrink & co and nobody cared how to optimize the process for high quality anymore :-)
Currently, the guys who truly love this shit, are building the best methods for making AVC-encoded DVDR discs out of original Blu-ray discs that'll play on Blu-ray players. The process will be at first a painful at best.. But within next 12 months, I'm sure we'll see tools called "Blu-ray2DVD" and "ManyDVDMovies2BDR" etc :-)
But hey, that's progress. There'll be always a certain handful of people who prefer to do things "right" rather than "easy" -- that's why sites like hydrogenaudio, d9 and others have their loyal following and I congratulate them for having that spirit there. Videohelp, in my mind at least, is somewhere in between d9 and AfterDawn in terms of "hard core enthusiasts".. They lack the developers that make d9 so damn unique in some sense, but they still do have guys who "know their stuff" -- and, again, my opinion, sometimes slightly overlook newbies. We... We're maybe positioned somewhere between "hard core" and "newbie friendly".. or have both of them. Dunno. We have guys here who truly, TRULY know their stuff. But we've probably also managed to make the athmosphere here somewhat slightly more n00b friendly (despite having twice-a-year appearing heated debates over the topic how "AfterDawn and its senior members are hostile against new users") than other major video tech sites. Hard to say, as I don't unfortunately frequent forums as often as I used to and I am sometimes very "lost" on what is the general mood in our discussion forums at the time.
But anyway, the topic of this thread is useless :-) You can't compare and you shouldn't. I've always congratulated us and our "competitors" in this "scene" for being able to co-exist for almost a decade now and never, ever having to end up fighting online or throwing silly 15-yr-old -style shit at each others. DDigest, Doom9, Videohelp and us have somehow, dunno really how, managed to each get our own corner of this "digital video" business. Sure, several newcomers have appeared over the years and some of them might even be bigger than some of us "original four", as I don't follow the "scene" too much nowadays. But still. Almost a Decade.. All covering pretty much the same aspects of the same niche market (just everybody from their own angle) and still managing to keep it civil :-) Damn. Australian / Austrian / Swedish / Finnish peace treaty or something, dunno :-) But ye. Don't compare, use all of them.
|
Senior Member
|
13. March 2008 @ 10:46 |
Link to this message
|
verry well put dRD.davexnet if you have looked there is a dvd+r for newbies forum!
|
|
Advertisement
|
  |
|
Senior Member
|
13. March 2008 @ 11:48 |
Link to this message
|
dRD, excellent points. Thanks for taking the time to communicate it.
As you point out, we're not all nerds, some just not interested in
learning all the theory. That's OK.
I never noticed the dvd-r for newbies, but I'll take a look.
Cheers,
Dave
|
|