User User name Password  
   
Saturday 20.12.2025 / 11:43
Search AfterDawn Forums:        In English   Suomeksi   Pĺ svenska
afterdawn.com > forums > pc hardware > building a new pc > a quick question about quad cores
Show topics
 
Forums
Forums
A quick question about quad cores
  Jump to:
 
Posted Message
hackwolf
Junior Member
_
19. June 2008 @ 16:18 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Hi there. I was wondering if I needed to pick up windows vista 64bit to take full advantage of my quadcore or can I use windows vista 32bit. I appreciate any help. Thanks!!!!
Advertisement
_
__
AfterDawn Addict
_
19. June 2008 @ 17:09 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
quad cores work fine on 32bit systems. you only need to go to 64bit if you're planning on using more than 4gigs of ram, but anything over 4gigs is unnecessary for normal use.

ps2: v7 scph-39001 - independence exploit - hdloader 0.8c - maxtor 300gb hdd
(+[__]%) psp slim ta-085v1: 6.60 PRO B10
wii (powered by bootmii/priiloader): 4.1u - d2x v10beta53-alt (base 56) - configurable usb loader v70r51/devolution r188 - wd scorpio black 7200rpm 320gig w/ ams venus ds2 enclosure

got a whole lot more to list . . .
AfterDawn Addict

4 product reviews
_
19. June 2008 @ 18:14 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Agreed - you're still better off using 32-bit for now, but you do have the option to use 64-bit later if you desire.



Afterdawn Addict // Silent PC enthusiast // PC Build advisor // LANGamer Alias:Ratmanscoop
PC Specs page -- http://my.afterdawn.com/sammorris/blog_entry.cfm/11247
updated 10-Dec-13
Member
_
19. June 2008 @ 19:42 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
After an initial nightmare to get Vista 64 Ultimate not to crash with my selected hardware I would say I agree with the two previous opinions and would like to add that if you do a lot of video enconding(one of my hobbies) then 64 bit is considerably faster (that is after a nightmare to get it stable of course).




*Intel® Core?2 Quad Processor Q9450 (12M Cache, 2.66 GHz, 1333 MHz FSB) laid with Shinetsu Microsis Thermal Paste***** Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme with 2 x Scythe "S-FLEX?" S-FDB 120mm Quiet FAN (SFF21G)(1900 RPM)***** GigaByte EX38-DS4 with F6C AHCI BIOS***** OCZ Reaper PC2-8500 2x2 GB***** 2 x MSI R3870X2-T2D1G in Crossfire Mode***** Antec Twelve Hundred with 2 x Scythe "S-FLEX?" S-FDB 120mm Quiet FAN (SFF21F)(1600 RPM)as optional fans***** PSU Coolermaster Real Power Pro 1250W (RS-C50-EMBA-D2)***** 5 x Samsung Spinpoint 1TB (HD103UJ)(3 on RAID 5 Win 7 X64 and 2 on RAID 0 Win XP X64)***** Pioneer DVR-215D***** Monitor 1 Hannspree Verona 22" Widescreen Monitor (1680x1050)***** Monitor 2 Sony Bravia KDL-46W4500 46" (1920x1080)*
hackwolf
Junior Member
_
19. June 2008 @ 21:49 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
I appreciate the advice. Some advice on these two computer builds then if noone minds. I'm not quite sure on what direction to go. Both are going to run me 900 dollars. Option 1 comes with a 19in 5ms refreshing monitor as well.

Option 1
CPU: Intel QuadCore Q9300 2.5 Gighz

RAM: 4 Gig's of RAM upgradable to 8 Gig's

Hard Drive: 320 Gig 7,200 RPM Hard Drive

Video Card: ATI RADEON HD 3870


Option 2
3ghz intel core xeon dual core
gforce 8800 gts
4gigs ram
500gig hd

Now, I do mostly encoding movies and playing video games. I don't have many applications running at the same time. I was told that the xeon would be best performance wise if doing less things at once. On the other hand, i was also told the quadcore was the way to go. Any opinions on this. Again, thanks a lot for the help.
Advertisement
_
__
 
_
AfterDawn Addict

4 product reviews
_
20. June 2008 @ 03:50 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
If I remember correctly, there's not really much advantage to be had with having the Xeon brand this time round, all you're getting is extra clock speed, and you an overclock your CPU anyway.
If you're only going to be using a 19" monitor, the HD3870 will be plenty fast enough as well. I'd say the first option.



Afterdawn Addict // Silent PC enthusiast // PC Build advisor // LANGamer Alias:Ratmanscoop
PC Specs page -- http://my.afterdawn.com/sammorris/blog_entry.cfm/11247
updated 10-Dec-13
afterdawn.com > forums > pc hardware > building a new pc > a quick question about quad cores
 

Digital video: AfterDawn.com | AfterDawn Forums
Music: MP3Lizard.com
Gaming: Blasteroids.com | Blasteroids Forums | Compare game prices
Software: Software downloads
Blogs: User profile pages
RSS feeds: AfterDawn.com News | Software updates | AfterDawn Forums
International: AfterDawn in Finnish | AfterDawn in Swedish | AfterDawn in Norwegian | download.fi
Navigate: Search | Site map
About us: About AfterDawn Ltd | Advertise on our sites | Rules, Restrictions, Legal disclaimer & Privacy policy
Contact us: Send feedback | Contact our media sales team
 
  © 1999-2025 by AfterDawn Ltd.

  IDG TechNetwork