User User name Password  
   
Friday 29.8.2025 / 15:02
Search AfterDawn Forums:        In English   Suomeksi   På svenska
afterdawn.com > forums > digital audio > audio > mp3 decoders
Show topics
 
Forums
Forums
MP3 decoders
  Jump to:
 
Posted Message
EsirnuS
Suspended due to non-functional email address
_
9. February 2004 @ 03:41 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
whats the best one around ?
tigre
Moderator
_
9. February 2004 @ 05:06 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
The difference is negliable compared to the difference caused by encoding.

Only thing that can cause an important difference:
Clipping on decoding.

If you encode music recorded at (too) high volume (> 90% of what you find in the charts) to mp3 without changing the volume, you'll get clipping on decoding.

To avoid this you can use mp3gain or replaygain as used by e.g. foobar2000.

On properly mp3gained files foobar2000 decoder will sound like any other decent decoder (winamp, xmplay, lame ...) but if you want all in one without worrying about clipping use foobar2000, apply replaygain (scans files and stores information in a database) and use its diskwriter to decode to .wav with replaygain enabled.

This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 9. February 2004 @ 05:06

afterdawn.com > forums > digital audio > audio > mp3 decoders
 

Digital video: AfterDawn.com | AfterDawn Forums
Music: MP3Lizard.com
Gaming: Blasteroids.com | Blasteroids Forums | Compare game prices
Software: Software downloads
Blogs: User profile pages
RSS feeds: AfterDawn.com News | Software updates | AfterDawn Forums
International: AfterDawn in Finnish | AfterDawn in Swedish | AfterDawn in Norwegian | download.fi
Navigate: Search | Site map
About us: About AfterDawn Ltd | Advertise on our sites | Rules, Restrictions, Legal disclaimer & Privacy policy
Contact us: Send feedback | Contact our media sales team
 
  © 1999-2025 by AfterDawn Ltd.

  IDG TechNetwork