|
Post your Nero cd/dvd speed quality scans here
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
13. January 2007 @ 10:07 |
Link to this message
|
ok scan #1 here. the illusionist/ on 16x+r printable verb
more to come
|
|
Advertisement
|
 |
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
13. January 2007 @ 11:37 |
Link to this message
|
very sweet burn here low PIE's & PIF's
this was done on a regular 16x+r verb burnt at 8x. last one burnt at 8x also
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 13. January 2007 @ 13:25
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
13. January 2007 @ 13:18 |
Link to this message
|
Scan #3 this one was ripped to HD then burned with clonedvd2. 1 little spike to 3 dropped it to a 93 still a good number.
very very low PIE's very nice. low PIF's also. take away that spike to 3 and its another 95.... or a 98 on a Benq..lol
short movie though
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
13. January 2007 @ 21:18 |
Link to this message
|
@rob
Out of curiosity, how did you get Jitter scanned with that drive (SHW-160P6S) of yours? Is there any button that I should be awared of?
THE NOTEBOOK, another beautiful scanned from Hitachi Maxell (MIJ).
|
Moderator
|
13. January 2007 @ 21:37 |
Link to this message
|
|
@alkohol
Set the speed as 4x (any higher & no go on this test for LiteOn's).
Under 'advanced' have jitter test for DVD checked there too.
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
13. January 2007 @ 21:43 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by binkie7:
@alkohol
Set the speed as 4x (any higher & no go on this test for LiteOn's).
Under 'advanced' have jitter test for DVD checked there too.
Thanks binkie for the note -- I know where/how to set "Jitter" via Advanced button, but I didn't even realized about the speed (worked with 4X only), LOL.
Actually, I've been messing around with the Advanced a while back, but I didn't realized on the speed part because nearly 95% of all my scans are done with 8X.
|
Moderator
|
13. January 2007 @ 21:55 |
Link to this message
|
|
@alkohol
You and me both didn't know about the 4x bit - I need to credit that to wolfy920 from a few pages back.
(advanced thing - yea figured your knew that one but just in case :) )
Nero said the Jitter test was supported for more new LiteOn's w/ this last build but nothing about about the speed setting had to be 4x.
I usually just leave it at the default of 8x.
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
13. January 2007 @ 23:37 |
Link to this message
|
OK, I'm back to post a scan. lol. This is pretty good too. I finally finished my buddies new puter. Had a few difficulties but got everything to work and most of the programs loaded. This is the first burn with his setup on a LITEON LH-18A1P on a YUDEN T02.
Thanks to binkie7 and alkohol for the info on the scan test with Nero CD/Speed.
.........c
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
14. January 2007 @ 03:58 |
Link to this message
|
|
sweet scan greensman....a new low on PIF's 65 thats very sweet..... is that a supped up rig your friend just built?
sorry i didnt get back to ya quick enough Alkohol but Binkie7 got ya the right answer.. good ole wolfy got us hip to the speed to use the jitter test.... guess thats something else i need to read up on to understand what that does for the disc once burnt..
@alkohol
what speed ya burn those MIJ maxells at?
|
Moderator
|
14. January 2007 @ 06:31 |
Link to this message
|
|
@cincyrob
Sounds like a job for the scan man :)
I have a link somewhere going in depth on reading these things - I'll try and find it but you may already have it.
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
14. January 2007 @ 08:53 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by cincyrob:
sorry i didnt get back to ya quick enough Alkohol but Binkie7 got ya the right answer.. good ole wolfy got us hip to the speed to use the jitter test.... guess thats something else i need to read up on to understand what that does for the disc once burnt..
@alkohol
what speed ya burn those MIJ maxells at?
@cincyrob
It's ok and yes binkie to the rescue again, lol :) I burned all of my Hitachi Maxells (MIJ) at 8X and these are the 8X as well. For some reason it's hard to find Hitachi (MIJ) Maxells on the latest 16X, but I've had more lucks with their 8X.
Anyways, here's another pretty re-scanned of THE NOTEBOOK with 4X, Hitachi Maxell (MIJ).
EDITED to insert DVD Identifier picture.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 14. January 2007 @ 08:58
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
14. January 2007 @ 09:12 |
Link to this message
|
@rob and all,
I had to scan the same disc with the BENQ DW-1650 just to see the difference and it's about the same as far as results but the PI errors are much less. Scan-Man why is this, I haven't really looked/researched these scans enough to know the answer myself. I also know these things (scans) are 'eye-candy' according to many so not that worried about it, just curious. lol.
.........c
edit: Sorry forgot to mention my buddies rig. lol.
Not that special really. AMD Opty 175 939 (not OC'd), WD 250 GB HDD w/16MB cache, Pioneer 111D, LITEON LH-18A1P, Abit AN8 32X SLi mobo, EVGA 7600GT X2, Artic Cooler 64 Pro, Adata PC3200 DDR400 512 X4 RAM, Antec Trio 550 SLi PSU, NZXT Lexa-NP Case. Not a power rig but I'd love to have it. lol. Computer ENVY. LOL.....
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 14. January 2007 @ 09:24
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
14. January 2007 @ 10:27 |
Link to this message
|
|
@greensman.
the scans differ cause of which drive you scan them with... each drive reads differntly than the other benq vs liteon vs pioneer ect.... they have differnt variable that casue them to put out the info.dont ask me what they are i dont have a clue... each has there own technology as to how they read each disc.
but one thing thats the same on all is, if you redo the same disc over again and again you will get a different score each time.
hope that makes some sence too ya cause im not totaly sure on why each is different just know what i have been reading about
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
14. January 2007 @ 11:43 |
Link to this message
|
|
hey greensman ya might wanna shrink down your pic in your sig before ya get hit by ddp's lightning..lol
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
14. January 2007 @ 11:53 |
Link to this message
|
|
ROFLMAO.........
Yeh I've been messing with a new photo re-sizer and had some problems getting the settings right. How does it look now? I can't see him giving me any crap for a few minutes tryin to get it right. lol.
.........c
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
14. January 2007 @ 11:57 |
Link to this message
|
|
looks good now but i think it looked better bigger. could see it real good.
ya could actually make it a little bigger and still be ok
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 14. January 2007 @ 11:58
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
14. January 2007 @ 12:21 |
Link to this message
|
|
@rob,
I think this is close to the limits but really don't know how to check to see. Right clicked and from what I can see it's ok. What do you think about the new pic? I liked the cartoon but I really agreed with LOCOENG about the golf course pic, and besides what else would a greensman sig have? Don't answer that one in case someone was thinking about something besides money ($$$$)....lol.
...........c
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
14. January 2007 @ 12:24 |
Link to this message
|
|
yea that one there looks great perfect size.. kinda reminds me of Sawgrass...... yea someone might think you were talking about them little plants with 5 leaves on it
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
14. January 2007 @ 12:34 |
Link to this message
|
|
think its 5 leaves..lol
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
14. January 2007 @ 12:50 |
Link to this message
|
|
maple trees?? conifers??
lol.......5, 7, and 6 if you have a hybrid strain but very rare........LOL
Not that I really know any about those kinda things......
.........c
I really don't.....had a cousin and some friends in the past that did some unbelievably stupid things.....grow and distribute.......:O
|
Senior Member
|
14. January 2007 @ 17:07 |
Link to this message
|
|
@Greensman,
to check the size of your signature,
right click on the picture, go down to properties, and click on it,
will give you the image size in Pixels, and the total file size in Kbytes.
Your current size is fine,
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
16. January 2007 @ 17:41 |
Link to this message
|
|
@all,
Did my first multi-burn session with 2 LITEON burners and will post the scans in a little while. This is really cool and I have to thank the scan-man for walking me through it. Thanks SCAN_MAN!
........c
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
16. January 2007 @ 18:01 |
Link to this message
|
|
no problem greensman.. get those scan up there.. am real curious to see them... well now that ya did 2 at once go ahead and do all four drives.... i'll send ya some of my cheap K-hypermedia 8x-r's to let ya practice on.. thats what i did.. didnt waist the good stuff in case i screwed up...lol whats bad about it.. i ponded them off on my buddies telling them they are good disc..lol
P.S. they are still playing.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 16. January 2007 @ 18:03
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
16. January 2007 @ 19:04 |
Link to this message
|
Ok, enough waiting. lol. I finally finished scanning all the discs and uploading as well. The first 2 scans are with one burner going and both at 4X on Ritek R03 02 (DVD+R) media. Not the best media as far as I'm concerned but not that bad either. The next 2 are with the multi-burner session at 6X and came out ok but not as good as I would like to have seen, at least the SHW-160P6S wasn't. Yes both of them on the same media: Ritek R03 02 (DVD+R).
I didn't post any stat images because I thought this would be long enough of a post without them. If any of you want them they are available and I can post them for you. Just ask. lol.
Now looking at these scans I will say one thing and that is the LITEON LH-18A1P seems to be a really good writer, or at least it scans the images with more favor for the disc. I think this drive (in my system) is a better DVD burner than the SHW-160P6S, and that's saying something because I put the SHW-160P6S up with the BENQ DW-1650 and DW-1655.
I think if any of you were looking at the LH-18A1P, this may influence you to buy it. Just remember this is my system and it works well for me. I also have the BENQ's but they don't perform to these standards. lol. I will have to say they get between 90-95 most of the time but not as consistent as the LH-18A1P. No I don't work for LITEON, but I like them. lol. It also looks like the media and system prefer 6X, so I may need to try the single burner at 6X.
I'll try four (4) at a time tonight, maybe. It's getting late here in the Lone Star State.
...........c
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
16. January 2007 @ 19:10 |
Link to this message
|
|
not as late as it is here in BUCKEYE NATION...lol i cant see the scans here at work for some reason. did you do them threw photobucket.. they web block photobucket here..lol..
for some reason greensman when i do my 2 at a time my top drive which is number 2 inline(my hp740i) it gets the lesser of the scores also... im about done here. gonna go dumpster diving at blockbuster before i go home then i'l look at the scans at home
oh yea i know i want the 18x liteon..lol
|
