|
Post your Nero cd/dvd speed quality scans here
|
|
Senior Member
|
11. May 2007 @ 20:25 |
Link to this message
|
Here's something interesting.
Same movie, same disks but burned at 2.4x. You'd think it would be a better burn than the one above.
Here's the same disk rescanned with the forced Hyper tuning turned off for the scan only.
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
|
MichaelP1
Suspended permanently
|
11. May 2007 @ 23:01 |
Link to this message
|
|
hobbit112, its not unusual ar all to get a better score with a higher burn speed. to a point that is
We shall go to the end,we shall fight in France,we shall fight on the seas and oceans,we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength in the air,we shall defend our Island,whatever the cost may be,we shall fight on the beaches,we shall fight on the landing grounds,we shall fight in the fields and in the streets,we shall fight in the hills;we shall never surrender
|
Senior Member
|
12. May 2007 @ 04:37 |
Link to this message
|
|
Considering these are 2.4x rated disks I was surprised that the 4x burn scanned out better. My past results with overburning disks hasn't been good. But then, these are Verbs.
BTW, the 57 scan disk played fine with only one stutter which I thought was at the layer break.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 12. May 2007 @ 04:38
|
Senior Member
|
18. May 2007 @ 11:55 |
Link to this message
|
No posts since the Twelveth!
Here's some new scans:
Lite-On scan:
Benq Scan (same disk):
Lite-On Scan:
Benq scan (same disk):
I'm still grappling with the issue of different scores for different drives. Apparently, CD Speed has some sort of table in it's coding that tells it how to interpret the information it receives from the various drives. It appears that CD Speed thinks my Benq drive understates the total PIFs compared to the Litey but overstates the peaks?
I'd think that CD Speed would be able to adjust their internal table to more evenly report the Quality Score across the various drive manufacturers so that the Score has more meaning.
|
|
Unjust2u
Member
|
18. May 2007 @ 16:10 |
Link to this message
|
Hello All !
Here's a post of a scan on some Office Depot 16x +R Media, Not to bad. Hey Hobbit would those be Office Depot disks you are using as well? Just wondered? /Unjust
Unjust |
Senior Member
|
18. May 2007 @ 16:23 |
Link to this message
|
|
No.
Actually they are 8x Imations. No idea what store they came from, my brother sent them to me so I could compete a project for him which he couldn't do. He was trying to convert 2+ hour VHS tapes into single 4.7Gig DVDs on a Sony standalone machine and had no sucess so I received a package on my doorstep without warning filed with VHS tapes, the cake box of Imations, and about 1/2 dozen crappy Memorex printable DVDs.
What a guy.
Nice scan BTW, Unjust. What did you use to burn it and @ what speed?
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 18. May 2007 @ 16:59
|
|
Unjust2u
Member
|
19. May 2007 @ 11:36 |
Link to this message
|
WoW , Nice media for 8x Imations you got lucky on those:) Great scans on that media! Here's another Office Depot 16x, Ripped with dvdfab and burned with Nero 7 at 8x, bought this for my daughter thought I better back it up before it gets all scratched up ;) .........
Unjust
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
20. May 2007 @ 17:22 |
Link to this message
|
well it has been awhile for me and a scan.. been busy lately and no good movies to burn.
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
20. May 2007 @ 18:37 |
Link to this message
|
Been busy lately but I'm still doin a movie now and then. :)
Here's Arthur and the invisibles, it got bad reviews but the kiddies have watched it 3 times today and I don't think it's that bad. :)
On a TDK 003 and very low PIE's. Not bad for this media. Burned with the Pioneer DVR-112L. :)
Hope all is going well for everyone. ;)
Nice scans hobbit, Unjust, and cincyrob!!! :)
...gm
|
|
aabbccdd
Suspended permanently
|
20. May 2007 @ 18:39 |
Link to this message
|
|
man its the slowest two months i seen for good new releases in a long time
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
20. May 2007 @ 18:43 |
Link to this message
|
|
How are you buddy? Good to see you visit and grace us with your woman. hehehe. I was going to mention you and Ms Lima but thought naw he doesn't come here much. Scans aren't his thing. AND here you are. hehehe. Hope all is well with you and yours. :)
...gm
edit: yep the releases have been less than spectacular lately and therefore a slow few weeks in the scan thread. :)
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 20. May 2007 @ 18:44
|
|
aabbccdd
Suspended permanently
|
20. May 2007 @ 18:52 |
Link to this message
|
|
doing good bro. thanks for asking . don't post scans very often since they all end up being a 93 . but at least you get to see Adriana lol
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 20. May 2007 @ 18:52
|
Moderator
|
20. May 2007 @ 19:04 |
Link to this message
|
|
I actually watched Arthur and the Invisibles - but I have no little kiddies as an excuse :)
I really liked it - very cute movie.
Here's one I liked recently but not for kids at all - Pan's Labyrinth.
Maybe I'll do a scan soon :)
|
|
aabbccdd
Suspended permanently
|
20. May 2007 @ 19:08 |
Link to this message
|
|
binkie7 watch Catch and Release you will like that one for sure
|
Moderator
|
20. May 2007 @ 19:26 |
Link to this message
|
|
lol - watched it. You're right I did like it - the main actor (don't know his name) was hot!
|
|
aabbccdd
Suspended permanently
|
20. May 2007 @ 20:00 |
Link to this message
|
|
i really liked it to Jennifer Garner isn't to bad either lol
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
21. May 2007 @ 09:43 |
Link to this message
|
well looks like we got some action in here again..lol very slow time for sure,plus this great weather isnt keeping alot of people inside either..lol.
aabbccdd very good to see ya back again and your right jennifer garner was the highlight to that movie..lol sorry Binkie..lol
Binkie good to see you in here again too.
heres 1 i just did for my son
gotta love these 16x verbs...i cant beleive the results i have been getting with them on this 18x litey. i wont burn the 8x media to well but it eats up the 16x
i hope i can get some more time in here. but im kinda glad i have missed alot of the DRAMMMA...lol
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
21. May 2007 @ 19:03 |
Link to this message
|
Hey cincyrob! Yep the kiddies do take up some of our precious blank DVD's but it's better than buying new originals. :)
I had to post this movie again. It's a new burn with the same media, burner, and image. Amazing how one little spike can affect the outcome so much.
More to come later. Been doing some transcoding/encoding lately. :)
|
Senior Member
|
23. May 2007 @ 18:26 |
Link to this message
|
Here's a new scan of a TY burn. Not too great of a score for TY media, but it's the first burn of this media on this drive.
Think it was an ImgBurn @ 8x. If I remember correctly, ImgBurn stated it could be burned upto 20x, but I decide to be conservative.
Suggestions on how I should burn this media?
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 23. May 2007 @ 18:28
|
Senior Member
|
23. May 2007 @ 18:38 |
Link to this message
|
Here's another one, but a Ritek DL burn. Again, burned with ImgBurn, but @2.4x
Still think there Ritek has a problem with the media after the layer break.
I have a weird scan of a DL burn where the peaks are reverse, i.e., on the first layer. Will have to find that scan and post (it's on another computer).
Got some Verb DL's coming, looking forward to those burns.
Can't find any decent specials on Verb DL inkjet printables though. They are EXPENSIVE!
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 23. May 2007 @ 18:42
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
23. May 2007 @ 18:47 |
Link to this message
|
|
hobbit,
conservative me: I would stick with the 8X burn for now. I'm not saying going to 12, 16, or even 20 times burning won't give you decent results but I KNOW for sure that burning at 8X normally gives you better burns. :)
daring me: NOW going outside of the norm, I would try some experimentation with speeds on your burns. I've seen good results as high as 20X but not every burn. I look at the average when burning.
The TYG03 media is one of the best to push to the limit fyi. Try some at 12X and 16X to see what you get. :) We all have different puters and therefore different results so only you can determine which speed is best for you, your burns, and your puter. :)
...gm
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
27. May 2007 @ 05:50 |
Link to this message
|
yea burn baby burn!!!!!!lol
got a few scans i have done over the last week or so that i havent had time to post.
a couple 16x verbs and a 8x+r TY cant ask for much better.. well ya can but the odds of getting it is slim..lmao..
|
Moderator
|
27. May 2007 @ 10:50 |
Link to this message
|
|
Good scans cincy - looks like this drive is really doing a good job!
Hubby trying to be nice just picked me up some Fuji's 16x -R.
I'll have to burn one in a bit and post the scan.
|
Senior Member
|
27. May 2007 @ 12:19 |
Link to this message
|
hello everybody,
well my first scan should be a good one
Here is my 8x TY scan
Here is another nice scan courtesy of my +R 16x Verbs, this one burned almost a year ago
here are not so great scans of my -R 16x Verbs the MAP6 kind, horrible scores but they still play without any problems
"When I look at the smiles on all the childrens faces, I just know theyre about to jab me with something."- Homer Simpson |
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
Moderator
|
27. May 2007 @ 13:41 |
Link to this message
|
Hey there 30bowler
Awesome 1st scan!
Love the skins too - which ones are you using?
Here's the Fuji - id as Ritek but was hoping for ProDisc since I haven't burn them lately. Not the best scan but not bad - kid is watching it now :)
|
