|
power supply
|
|
|
gera229
Member
|
8. November 2008 @ 20:48 |
Link to this message
|
Lol yea i know my parents can't afford 1600 lol, but they can. Oh and what's better ps/2 or usb connector?
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 8. November 2008 @ 20:49
|
|
Advertisement
|
 |
|
|
|
gera229
Member
|
8. November 2008 @ 20:53 |
Link to this message
|
And wth is laser track and optical track? Which is better? And why? Idk about usb and ps/2 people say their game slows down by a few frames per second with the usb and it uses more cpu usage and the reply said that usb is the best way to go with the faster pc's. So that means usb will be faster than ps/2 and slows pc down less and slows fps down less than the ps/2 if it's on a fast computer right? http://www.techspot.com/vb/all/windows/t...SB-or-PS2-.html this is the forum i read it from.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 8. November 2008 @ 21:07
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
9. November 2008 @ 07:36 |
Link to this message
|
USB is plug and play, PS/2 isn't, so USB is the better method.
(and I'll kill you if you ask me what plug and play is, google it!)
That thread is from six years ago, when processors were relatively slow, and Windows XP was rather buggy.
For the record, CPU usage goes up when you drag windows around quickly, on any PC. This because moving windows around is drawn on the screen by the processor, not the graphics card, so your processor has to work relatively hard. However, moving the mouse on its own has no effect on CPU usage, it is not the mouse/keyboard causing the issue, it's the act of moving a window around, and who cares? Doing it doesn't slow your PC down, and you won't be moving windows around when playing games.
|
|
gera229
Member
|
9. November 2008 @ 11:46 |
Link to this message
|
|
I'm tired of googling I want to know what "___________" means. I don't wanna say it and u know what it is.
|
|
spamual
Suspended permanently
|
9. November 2008 @ 12:06 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by gera229:
I'm tired of googling I want to know what "___________" means. I don't wanna say it and u know what it is.
are you seriuos, from what i have been reading, sam IS your google. your lucky hes even bothered to keep up with you.
|
|
gera229
Member
|
9. November 2008 @ 12:42 |
Link to this message
|
|
done worry he's an addict to this site it says lol. yea same ur my google please answer it. please?.
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
9. November 2008 @ 13:47 |
Link to this message
|
|
|
gera229
Member
|
11. November 2008 @ 02:44 |
Link to this message
|
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
11. November 2008 @ 08:23 |
Link to this message
|
I prefer the Tempest because it costs less, is more compact (the 1200 is huge), and does just as good a job at cooling the system. The Twelve Hundred is really quite unnecessary.
|
|
gera229
Member
|
11. November 2008 @ 09:53 |
Link to this message
|
the 1200 may say full tower but when u look at the dimensions their related to the tempest lol. well yea it has less fans though and is worth more. but I would still go for the tempest.
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
11. November 2008 @ 10:05 |
Link to this message
|
It's a much bigger case, trust me. The Antec 900 is similar to the Tempest in Size, and that's not a small case. The 1200 is bigger still.
|
|
gera229
Member
|
11. November 2008 @ 12:11 |
Link to this message
|
And the tempest is what to get out of antect and 1200? If it is then that's what i will get. =P
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
11. November 2008 @ 12:17 |
Link to this message
|
|
You can get whichever you like.
|
|
gera229
Member
|
11. November 2008 @ 12:26 |
Link to this message
|
what's the antec 900 I wanna see it well im not getting 1200 for sure. but lemme see the antec 900 thanx.
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
11. November 2008 @ 12:29 |
Link to this message
|
|
Go to Newegg and search 'Antec nine hundred' - I can't believe that didn't occur to you.
|
|
gera229
Member
|
11. November 2008 @ 12:40 |
Link to this message
|
|
I never searched Oh that one ahh ill just get what u recommended. so yea.
|
|
gera229
Member
|
12. November 2008 @ 00:21 |
Link to this message
|
Should i get the sapphire 512 mb or get the 1gb for 50$ more? well gigabyte i still don't get why it's worth more... can u tell me why exactly it's worth more?
|
|
spamual
Suspended permanently
|
12. November 2008 @ 00:31 |
Link to this message
|
|
what res are you playing at. at 1920 get the 1GB, if not then dont.
|
|
gera229
Member
|
12. November 2008 @ 00:48 |
Link to this message
|
|
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 12. November 2008 @ 00:49
|
|
spamual
Suspended permanently
|
12. November 2008 @ 02:39 |
Link to this message
|
|
why the hell do you not answer questions?
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
12. November 2008 @ 05:23 |
Link to this message
|
I give up.
The Sapphire and Gigabyte are the same card
The Sapphire and Gigabyte are the same card
The Sapphire and Gigabyte are the same card
The Sapphire and Gigabyte are the same card
The Sapphire and Gigabyte are the same card
The Sapphire and Gigabyte are the same card
The Sapphire and Gigabyte are the same card
The Sapphire and Gigabyte are the same card
The Sapphire and Gigabyte are the same card
The Sapphire and Gigabyte are the same card
The Sapphire and Gigabyte are the same card
The Sapphire and Gigabyte are the same card
The Sapphire and Gigabyte are the same card
The Sapphire and Gigabyte are the same card
The Sapphire and Gigabyte are the same card
The Sapphire and Gigabyte are the same card
The Sapphire and Gigabyte are the same card
The Sapphire and Gigabyte are the same card
The Sapphire and Gigabyte are the same card
The Sapphire and Gigabyte are the same card
The Sapphire and Gigabyte are the same card
The Sapphire and Gigabyte are the same card
The Sapphire and Gigabyte are the same card
The Sapphire and Gigabyte are the same card
The Sapphire and Gigabyte are the same card
The Sapphire and Gigabyte are the same card
The Sapphire and Gigabyte are the same card
The Sapphire and Gigabyte are the same card
The Sapphire and Gigabyte are the same card
The Sapphire and Gigabyte are the same card
The Sapphire and Gigabyte are the same card
The Sapphire and Gigabyte are the same card
The Sapphire and Gigabyte are the same card
The Sapphire and Gigabyte are the same card
The Sapphire and Gigabyte are the same card
The Sapphire and Gigabyte are the same card
I'll leave you some time for that to sink in.
|
|
gera229
Member
|
12. November 2008 @ 10:14 |
Link to this message
|
What about that asus is it good is sapphire better than asus? sapphire is the best then and better than gigabyte since it cheaper but their the same. and is HIS good?
|
|
gera229
Member
|
12. November 2008 @ 10:18 |
Link to this message
|
actually gigabyte has more warranty than sapphire but should i waist that money on it which is 25$ more just for the 3 year warranty? well sapphire runs cooler though. I think it would last longer.
|
|
gera229
Member
|
12. November 2008 @ 19:01 |
Link to this message
|
|
anything?
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
13. November 2008 @ 10:01 |
Link to this message
|
I love how you still think the lifetime of the cards depends on how hot they get. It's complete crap, they either run cool enough, or they overheat and crash. Graphics cards don't 'get old' quicker because they get hot. Get whichever card works out the cheapest, as they are all the same product, will last the same amount of time, and none of them will overheat unless your case is crap, in which case they all will. Given that you're getting an NZXT Tempest (or similar), heat will NEVER be an issue.
|
