|
Input On DVD Rebuilder Guide
|
|
Staff Member
2 product reviews
|
15. October 2005 @ 10:06 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
PIV's are supposed to be optimized for MMX, SSE, SSE2, and SSE3. You might have a point regarding Intel's longer pipes whch does affect a P4's overall speed. That's on of the reasons that the Northwood core ran a little faster and cooler than the Prescott core did.
What I actually meant by that was that the P4 supports SSE but since it has to go through the longer pipeline it isn't really optomized for it - basically what you just said ;)
|
|
Advertisement
|
 |
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
1 product review
|
15. October 2005 @ 10:11 |
Link to this message
|
|
vurbal
Sorry I thought I was agreeing with you, hence the words "supposed to be." I just took it a little further. LOL
" Please Read!!! Post your questions only in This Thread or they will go unanswered:
Help with development of BD RB: Donations at: http://www.jdobbs.com/. This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 15. October 2005 @ 10:12
|
Staff Member
2 product reviews
|
15. October 2005 @ 10:29 |
Link to this message
|
|
Ahh, then yes that's what I meant
|
|
UncasMS_3
Member
|
15. October 2005 @ 14:46 |
Link to this message
|
|
good point, vurbal
i never gave a thought to this
now i wish even more that p4 owners would also run a complete test and post their findings!?
|
Staff Member
2 product reviews
|
15. October 2005 @ 14:48 |
Link to this message
|
|
I'll have to put that on my to-do list.
|
|
UncasMS_3
Member
|
15. October 2005 @ 14:54 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
I'll have to put that on my to-do list.
that'll be great
i would if i could, but... ^_~
i will run a test soon comparing speed differences of all AEC modes available in shrink when it comes to low bitrate scenarios - i.e. 150+ min to transcode
|
|
brobear
Suspended permanently
|
15. October 2005 @ 16:49 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
Rumors have it that Intel is looking at this core for future multi core CPU's. We think that dual core was a great advancement but rumors also reveal that Intel is looking to put 4 cores on a single chip.
Would that be 2 upsmanship? LOL
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 15. October 2005 @ 16:50
|
|
64026402
Senior Member
|
15. October 2005 @ 18:07 |
Link to this message
|
I am enjoying dual core bliss with Nero express right now.
I just encoded a DVD from home video in an hour at 2.6 ghz. It use to take me 8 hours for a 4 gig DVD on dual 1.8 Athlons.
Donald
|
AfterDawn Addict
1 product review
|
15. October 2005 @ 18:07 |
Link to this message
|
|
Later
" Please Read!!! Post your questions only in This Thread or they will go unanswered:
Help with development of BD RB: Donations at: http://www.jdobbs.com/. This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 15. October 2005 @ 18:09
|
AfterDawn Addict
1 product review
|
15. October 2005 @ 18:38 |
Link to this message
|
|
64026402
Stop it, you're killing me. LOL
BTW it never took me more than four hours to do a home video including capture.
" Please Read!!! Post your questions only in This Thread or they will go unanswered:
Help with development of BD RB: Donations at: http://www.jdobbs.com/. |
|
64026402
Senior Member
|
15. October 2005 @ 19:01 |
Link to this message
|
It always seemed with the options I chose it would take all day. Maybe I'm just doing it wrong. It was a 20 gig AVI from the camera. Crunched to 4 gigs for the DVD.
Did you do something similar? Did you use Nero or some other program.
Donald
|
AfterDawn Addict
1 product review
|
15. October 2005 @ 19:08 |
Link to this message
|
|
64026402
I captured directly from Hi8mm tape, the longest stretch was getting through the time it took to play the tape, they were never more than two hours in length. The conversions took a little more than hour including burning.
Where did you get a 20 gig avi from. LOL That would be about 8 to 10 Video tapes.
" Please Read!!! Post your questions only in This Thread or they will go unanswered:
Help with development of BD RB: Donations at: http://www.jdobbs.com/. This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 15. October 2005 @ 19:12
|
|
64026402
Senior Member
|
15. October 2005 @ 19:10 |
Link to this message
|
|
I had heard that P4s had a substantial advantage over the old Athlons in this type of encoding.
Donald
|
AfterDawn Addict
1 product review
|
15. October 2005 @ 19:11 |
Link to this message
|
|
64026402
I captured directly from Hi8mm tape, the longest stretch was getting through the time it took to play the tape, they were never more than two hours in length. The conversions took a little more than hour including burning.
" Please Read!!! Post your questions only in This Thread or they will go unanswered:
Help with development of BD RB: Donations at: http://www.jdobbs.com/. |
AfterDawn Addict
1 product review
|
15. October 2005 @ 19:15 |
Link to this message
|
|
64026402
All pentiums had a better compression rates than AMD's did back then (especally PIII) but not that much different.
" Please Read!!! Post your questions only in This Thread or they will go unanswered:
Help with development of BD RB: Donations at: http://www.jdobbs.com/. |
AfterDawn Addict
1 product review
|
15. October 2005 @ 19:15 |
Link to this message
|
|
64026402
All pentiums had a better compression rates than AMD's did back then (especally PIII) but not that much different.
" Please Read!!! Post your questions only in This Thread or they will go unanswered:
Help with development of BD RB: Donations at: http://www.jdobbs.com/. |
|
64026402
Senior Member
|
15. October 2005 @ 19:22 |
Link to this message
|
|
You must have been double sure about that last staement.
Donald
|
|
64026402
Senior Member
|
15. October 2005 @ 19:24 |
Link to this message
|
Did you capture AVI or MPG. How big.
Donald
|
AfterDawn Addict
1 product review
|
15. October 2005 @ 19:35 |
Link to this message
|
It's tape to AVI, to mpeg, but 20 gigs would've required a transfer from hard disk.
" Please Read!!! Post your questions only in This Thread or they will go unanswered:
Help with development of BD RB: Donations at: http://www.jdobbs.com/. |
|
64026402
Senior Member
|
16. October 2005 @ 05:47 |
Link to this message
|
|
I just used Windows movie maker for the capture part. It was 1.5 gigs of MPG or 20 gigs of AVI straight from the camera. The uncompressed AVI looked better so I figured it would give me the best shot at a good outcome. Just an hour and a half of video.
I used a firewire connection.
Donald
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 16. October 2005 @ 05:48
|
|
64026402
Senior Member
|
16. October 2005 @ 05:52 |
Link to this message
|
|
Sophocles,
It was a digital tape. I assume yours was an analog capture. Possibly a lower resolution.
Donald
|
AfterDawn Addict
1 product review
|
16. October 2005 @ 07:08 |
Link to this message
|
|
64026402
Yes my tapes were analog tapes of old home movies, I believe I mentioned Hi8. I've been researching Digital cameras and I can't find one that stores 20 gigs on a single media of anykind except a hard disk. But if your shooting straight to your PC then that explains it.
" Please Read!!! Post your questions only in This Thread or they will go unanswered:
Help with development of BD RB: Donations at: http://www.jdobbs.com/. |
|
64026402
Senior Member
|
16. October 2005 @ 08:10 |
Link to this message
|
|
For the record, the quality is very good doing it this way.
The digital tape cameras hold a lot of uncompressed video. Probably the main advantage to using tape for digital.
Donald
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 16. October 2005 @ 08:12
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
CrisCr0ss
Junior Member
|
1. November 2005 @ 16:59 |
Link to this message
|
|
update it for the new 1.01 pro final
I recomend starting from scratch as much has changed from the current guide
|
