|
If The site Has A Problem Please Post Here,
|
|
|
ddp
Moderator
|
29. July 2007 @ 15:49 |
Link to this message
|
|
ripper, we can always move you sideways!!!
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
30. July 2007 @ 01:01 |
Link to this message
|
|
But then there'd be a huge gaping hole in the side of aD!! :-P
|
Moderator
|
10. August 2007 @ 07:56 |
Link to this message
|
|
the site is like molasses at the moment...
Main PC ~ Intel C2Q Q6600 (G0 Stepping)/Gigabyte GA-EP45-DS3/2GB Crucial Ballistix PC2-8500/Zalman CNPS9700/Antec 900/Corsair HX 620W
Network ~ DD-WRT ~ 2node WDS-WPA2/AES ~ Buffalo WHR-G54S. 3node WPA2/AES ~ WRT54GS v6 (inc. WEP BSSID), WRT54G v2, WRT54G2 v1. *** Forum Rules *** |
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
10. August 2007 @ 08:16 |
Link to this message
|
|
i dont know if this will even post? ive tried to make 3 post in different threads and it wont post. goes to processing message and just stays there... ill try this and see what happens..
also it is taken forever to even get into the site let alone a thread
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
10. August 2007 @ 08:39 |
Link to this message
|
|
I had no problems posting today,but the dvdxcopy form is intermittently working...
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
13. August 2007 @ 10:20 |
Link to this message
|
|
this site been slow all morning,posting is like pulling teeth..
yesterday the site was slow to ok..just trying to get in threads with a ton of posts..seems to take for ever..
processing this message above took over a min..
cheers
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 13. August 2007 @ 10:23
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
13. August 2007 @ 12:22 |
Link to this message
|
|
Taking forever for posts to go thru!
|
|
res2cue
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
13. August 2007 @ 14:30 |
Link to this message
|
|
*phew* I thought it was just my connection
Hiram 319
AF & AM |
|
ddp
Moderator
|
23. August 2007 @ 09:06 |
Link to this message
|
|
seems the site is a bit slow & got a http 500 internal server error at about 12:45pm today. also saw a repetitive 3x post, deleted 2 of them.
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
23. August 2007 @ 10:34 |
Link to this message
|
|
This site hasn't been what it was, in speed, in at least 3 months.
Edit: the processing ring of wasted time is "so over" now.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 23. August 2007 @ 10:36
|
Moderator
|
23. August 2007 @ 10:36 |
Link to this message
|
|
it's been a bit spotty last few minutes, having major delays posting replies.
edit- ddp - yeah, i've seen a handful of double and triple posts (ie not done by the posters intentionally) today
Main PC ~ Intel C2Q Q6600 (G0 Stepping)/Gigabyte GA-EP45-DS3/2GB Crucial Ballistix PC2-8500/Zalman CNPS9700/Antec 900/Corsair HX 620W
Network ~ DD-WRT ~ 2node WDS-WPA2/AES ~ Buffalo WHR-G54S. 3node WPA2/AES ~ WRT54GS v6 (inc. WEP BSSID), WRT54G v2, WRT54G2 v1. *** Forum Rules ***
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 23. August 2007 @ 10:37
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
23. August 2007 @ 10:59 |
Link to this message
|
|
Yep happening to me also today, I post then it freezes I have to log off then back on. If I try to click the page back button it gives me the"web page expired message". I have also noted that the advertisements slot has gone of the thread pages and it just has the word "advertisement", with no adverts, bit strange?
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 23. August 2007 @ 11:02
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
30. August 2007 @ 03:55 |
Link to this message
|
|
is has the posting a link instead of the actual pic/scan ect... helped any? i have noticed a few complaints about posting the link? was just wondering if posting the link was helpful or not?does it matter to posting a link or the actual image itself???
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
30. August 2007 @ 03:59 |
Link to this message
|
|
It should do becos there is less present on the page to cache, no?
|
Moderator
1 product review
|
30. August 2007 @ 05:48 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by Ripper:
It should do becos there is less present on the page to cache, no?
We will need the modern english translation of this statement please. :)
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
30. August 2007 @ 09:40 |
Link to this message
|
|
You mean modern american, no?
"yer it like helps cos the page like doesn't like have as much stuff on it to remember like, init?"
Lol, sorry, that was very inaccurate and crude, but whatever :-P
|
Moderator
1 product review
|
30. August 2007 @ 09:59 |
Link to this message
|
|
That is much better... ;P
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
30. August 2007 @ 10:00 |
Link to this message
|
|
Happy to help :D
lol
|
|
graygit
Junior Member
|
1. September 2007 @ 16:00 |
Link to this message
|
|
hi lads what a grate site,,, but why do you's keep post from last year you should delete post after 3months just an idea
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
1. September 2007 @ 20:42 |
Link to this message
|
|
So what happens when someone comes along having trouble with "Blades Of Glory" in six months? Do we all do this over again or does he search for BOG and read up about what happened last week; thus saving a whole lot of our time and his time?
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
2. September 2007 @ 01:28 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by graygit:
hi lads what a grate site,,, but why do you's keep post from last year you should delete post after 3months just an idea
Not going to happen, but I do think an archive type system would be a great idea for say posts over 3 months old!
|
Senior Member
|
3. September 2007 @ 08:27 |
Link to this message
|
|
Nah, I love trawling through really old out-dated threads that have been made useless by time. Its a great way to spend Friday nights.
On a more serious note, an archive system would be good.
|
I hate titles
35 product reviews
|
6. September 2007 @ 06:16 |
Link to this message
|
|
IMO, its impossible to state what stuff should be archived and what should be left "open". Everything, in my mind, should be available for reading anyway, as the almost three million messages we have here, build up a huge knowledge base and big part of that data is something that can be valuable even years after they were posted.
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
6. September 2007 @ 06:30 |
Link to this message
|
|
Yes, I agree everything should be available for reading.
However, any topics over a certain period of time will become answerable by reading around the forums anyway. And if someone has a question RE it, then much better them make a new thread than drag up one from ages ago and most likely be flamed for it.
Just my opinion though, you da boss ;-)
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
I hate titles
35 product reviews
|
6. September 2007 @ 06:37 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by Ripper:
Yes, I agree everything should be available for reading.
However, any topics over a certain period of time will become answerable by reading around the forums anyway. And if someone has a question RE it, then much better them make a new thread than drag up one from ages ago and most likely be flamed for it.
Just my opinion though, you da boss ;-)
Which is why, newbies can't reply to topics that haven't been updated in 90 days. But we trust that Members and above, when they do post to old threads, they do it on purpose, by answering to some dilemma that has been left unanswered for months, maybe years and suddenly they've bumped to a solution and want to share it with people who had participated to the old thread.
|
