|
PS3 Emulation
|
|
|
moonslash
Member
|
4. December 2005 @ 02:26 |
Link to this message
|
|
Ok This may sound dumb but
What are the system requirements to Emulate the PS3 Console??
i got an P4 3.0 ghz and an 1GB DDR Ram and a 256 mb 3d card Radeon X300
DON'T DO ILLIGAL THINGS ^^
|
|
Advertisement
|
 |
|
|
|
fewtew
Suspended permanently
|
5. December 2005 @ 14:25 |
Link to this message
|
|
no offense- but that is a really dumb post
ur system is way too slow to emulate ps3- in fact everybody's is. to emulate a system u gotta have a computer like 4 time faster than the system u wanna emulate
the ps1 is the system u can emulate rite now. the minimum specs to emulate ps1 is
3.0ghz p4 or equivalent
768mb RAM
128mb video card
correct me if im wrong
hi people
www.wok.itgo.com
 |
Member
|
5. December 2005 @ 14:51 |
Link to this message
|
|
i have no clue on what you are talking about.
the PS3 is not even out yet and the PS1 will run on any new pc thats decent
PS2 Swap Magic/40GB HD Advance 70+ *Backup* Games
Gateway Celeron M 1.4ghz 512 RAM 60 GB+160GB WD External USB This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 5. December 2005 @ 14:51
|
|
fewtew
Suspended permanently
|
6. December 2005 @ 10:31 |
Link to this message
|
|
the ps1 emulator requires wat i said- it doesn't run on any decent system
hi people
www.wok.itgo.com
|
Senior Member
|
9. December 2005 @ 04:13 |
Link to this message
|
|
Any PS1 Emulator works on my
1.0GHz
160mb
32Mb Gpu Ram
Computer without any problems
But still I cant believe anyone can think about emulating a PS3 when ps2 emulating is still bad
Oh yeah fewtew Id recommend removing your email from your signature
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 9. December 2005 @ 04:14
|
|
moonslash
Member
|
9. December 2005 @ 10:59 |
Link to this message
|
|
Ok thank you for your reply
U can run ps2 emu on A 3.0 gig 1 gb ram and radeon x300 card!!!
so i thought ps3 could too but no :(
well then thank your for your post
DON'T DO ILLIGAL THINGS ^^
|
|
kookoo76
Suspended permanently
|
9. December 2005 @ 17:16 |
Link to this message
|
|
Dude i got amd 3000+ and can run ps2 and gc on my computer.cant say anything about ps3 yett. And the emulators work fine!
ps3:GPU-24 pipelines producing 5.7 ops each
-700mhz ram.
-On par with geforce 7800
-rsx at 550mhz
-rsx is 1.8 tflops
ps3:CPU-Cell processor
-total of 8 spe's running at 3.2 ghz.
Cell is 218GFLOPS.
Computer Hp pavilion a700n
448 mb of ram(upgrading it to 1gb)
amd3000+
(going to have geforce 7800 soon)
Currently(a shitty intergrated via/s3)
Information about ps3's rsx is on:
http://forums.afterdawn.com/thread_view.cfm/265429
Information about The xbox360 and ps3's gpu
http://www.anandtech.com/printarticle.aspx?i=2423
|
|
fewtew
Suspended permanently
|
10. December 2005 @ 03:35 |
Link to this message
|
|
guys- i know that it would be good to remove the email however i have not recieved any spam in the two weeks since I had it there.
so why should i remove it?
any other reasons?
thx
hi people
www.wok.itgo.com
|
Member
|
10. December 2005 @ 16:13 |
Link to this message
|
|
Developing emulators takes time. Also, I remember runing Bleem(PSX Emulator) on my old PC (400MHz, 96MB of Ram and 64MB AGP Video Card) and it ran just fine. I wouldn't expect PS3 emulation to be mastered until late 2007, at least. That considering both the time that home PC's catch up to the PS3 and the time it takes developers to make the emulators
Razengan!!!
|
|
kookoo76
Suspended permanently
|
10. December 2005 @ 16:15 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
guys- i know that it would be good to remove the email however i have not recieved any spam in the two weeks since I had it there.
so why should i remove it?
any other reasons?
thx
Hmm, mabey one day you'll just wake up and find your email full of spam. Maybe you'll open an email with a virus,trojan, spyware on it that can damage your computer. thats why
ps3:GPU-24 pipelines producing 5.7 ops each
-700mhz ram.
-On par with geforce 7800
-rsx at 550mhz
-rsx is 1.8 tflops
ps3:CPU-Cell processor
-total of 8 spe's running at 3.2 ghz.
Cell is 218GFLOPS.
Computer Hp pavilion a700n
448 mb of ram(upgrading it to 1gb)
amd3000+
(going to have geforce 7800 soon)
Currently(a shitty intergrated via/s3)
Information about ps3's rsx is on:
http://forums.afterdawn.com/thread_view.cfm/265429
Information about The xbox360 and ps3's gpu
http://www.anandtech.com/printarticle.aspx?i=2423
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 10. December 2005 @ 16:16
|
Member
|
10. December 2005 @ 16:53 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
Hmm, mabey one day you'll just wake up and find your email full of spam. Maybe you'll open an email with a virus,trojan, spyware on it that can damage your computer. thats why
It's his choice, anyway. Besides he probably not even uses that adress.
Razengan!!!
|
|
moguo25
Junior Member
|
14. December 2005 @ 16:52 |
Link to this message
|
|
Posting an email adress is against the forum rules, thats why you should remove it
|
|
afunguy24
Junior Member
|
14. December 2005 @ 17:21 |
Link to this message
|
|
FOr one ps1 emulator can be run on almost any basic Pc built after year 2000 for two who are you talking bout emulating the ps3 when peeople cant even emulate the ps2 (with ps2 standard graphics and 50 fps plus). SO why are you talking bout the ps3 emulator?
Yes in theroy the ps3 emulator can run on a system with a decent graphics and 2003 plus generation processer with nice ram but the graphics wont do it any justice...so :S::S:S
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 14. December 2005 @ 19:20
|
|
KoOkOo67
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
14. December 2005 @ 18:31 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
the ps1 emulator requires wat i said- it doesn't run on any decent system
LOL!!! the ps1 emulator runs on my p2! With no problems!
>_<
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 14. December 2005 @ 18:31
|
|
KainX
Suspended permanently
|
18. December 2005 @ 11:25 |
Link to this message
|
|
THIS IS A REALLY STUPID POST!
currently have these consoles
Gamecube
Xbox
Ps2
Dreamcast
Phantom
Gba
psp
|
Member
|
20. December 2005 @ 06:24 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
THIS IS A REALLY STUPID POST!
You got that right.
Razengan!!!
|
|
chasmoor
Newbie
|
8. June 2006 @ 11:55 |
Link to this message
|
|
-- Deleted --
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 8. June 2006 @ 12:12
|
|
dr.cool
Suspended permanently
|
9. June 2006 @ 09:17 |
Link to this message
|
|
and why did anyone dig this thread? it shold be closed.
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
9. June 2006 @ 14:32 |
Link to this message
|
|
--deleted--
sorry, i was a bit frustrated here..
But they all do sort of the same thing, and that is rearrange what you thought was real, and they remind you of the beauty of very simple things. You forget, because youre so busy going from a to z, that theres 24 letters in between... You turn on... tune in... and you drop out...
PS3 Username: Anubis66
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 9. June 2006 @ 15:00
|
|
Xenontc
Newbie
|
10. June 2006 @ 02:10 |
Link to this message
|
|
the sad thing is, is that the current ps3 can BARELY run its own games...everything shown at e3 was just rough drafts (cant think of the word =/). And gt4...yea that was shown on a pc. But anyway, yea ur pc really isnt anywhere near where you need to be, expect to have minimal AMD x2 4400+, 2gb DDR2 pc5400, and either a 512mb gfx card or SLI 256mb/SLI 512mb.
|
Senior Member
|
10. June 2006 @ 10:23 |
Link to this message
|
|
ummm...ps3 was playable at this year's E3. im not sure why you say it can barely run ps3 games, heavenly sword and fall of man...were both playable and seemed to not only run fine, but looked pretty good. yes all the games are still in development..never heard of the term "rough drafts" in the gaming biz.
|
|
Xenontc
Newbie
|
10. June 2006 @ 15:59 |
Link to this message
|
" The next slide goes on to say "Don't read from local memory, but write to main memory with RSX(tm) and read it from there instead", and repeats the table numbers. This is very very bad. The number of times the presentation goes on to say that it is correct, and the lack of anything like "this will be fixed by production steppings, so take measures X, Y and Z" say to me that it is not a fixable snafu. Remember at E3 when I said that the PS3 demos there were object sparse? Any guesses why?
Someone screwed up so badly it looks like it will relegate the console to second place behind the 360. All the devs I talked to were lukewarm on the 360 architecture but universally negative on the PS3. Revelations like this go a long way to explain why you keep hearing about simmering problems from the Sony devs."
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=32171
|
Senior Member
|
10. June 2006 @ 16:19 |
Link to this message
|
|
man the website "theinquirer" just got sh!t on for their previous article about cell's lack of ability to perform and actually slowing down. like stated before this site is nothing more than entertainment and secondhand information. please show me to a respectible website where you can "flame author!" its a freakin joke, and subpar if you were to ask me
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
10. June 2006 @ 18:55 |
Link to this message
|
|
yeah that site and article were completely disproved.
But they all do sort of the same thing, and that is rearrange what you thought was real, and they remind you of the beauty of very simple things. You forget, because youre so busy going from a to z, that theres 24 letters in between... You turn on... tune in... and you drop out...
PS3 Username: Anubis66
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
KainX
Suspended permanently
|
11. June 2006 @ 07:36 |
Link to this message
|
|
the sad thing is that the ps3 has far more power than the system he thinks of emulating with
3.0 ghz p4 vs the cell
x300(128) vs rsx(512+)
come on now
this just redundant
currently have these consoles
Gamecube
Xbox
Ps2
Dreamcast
Phantom
Gba
psp
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 11. June 2006 @ 07:37
|
