User User name Password  
   
Friday 29.8.2025 / 06:18
Search AfterDawn Forums:        In English   Suomeksi   Pć svenska
afterdawn.com > forums > software, operating systems and more > windows - p2p software > azureus vs bitcomet
Show topics
 
Forums
Forums
Azureus vs BitComet
  Jump to:
 
Posted Message
Junior Member
_
11. November 2005 @ 00:18 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
I am using Azureus 2.3.0.4 and am thinking of changing because of the high CPU Az is using .I was wondering if someone is able to tell me ,does BC reload your torrents when you restart it so that you can continue seeding them ?I dont want to change to something that clears my torrents after i shut it down as i have allready encounterd this before when i first started out on torrents a few months back and ended up with a deleted acc because of bad ratio and now i have a very good overall ratio and dont want to loose it .

Any help would be welcome.

Thnx :-)
Advertisement
_
__
MNA
Senior Member
_
19. November 2005 @ 11:06 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
I have Azureus 2.3.0.4 and it doesnt clear my torrents.
Junior Member
_
19. November 2005 @ 13:53 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
yes i know that Az does not clear your torrents until you do it yourself ,.I have started using Bitcomet and it seems ok but i am finding that i do not get as many connections as i did with Az ,,and yes i am connectable ,,as long as my ratio keeps getting better i will continue using Bitcomet but overall i feel that Az is a better client than Bitcomet ,,,its just the CPU that Az uses ,so i will go the comet way for a while,,
thanks for your informative reply :-)
Moderator
_
19. November 2005 @ 15:39 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Quote:
but overall i feel that Az is a better client than Bitcomet
Well if you want a lesser cpu usage, then bitcomet is probably the way to go. Just to note, from personal experience, I have found I get slightly fewer connections and slower speeds on bitcomet (which is what I started with), Whereas Azureus (for me) runs more efficiently and the downloads/uploads are smooth and quick.

You are correct though, it uses up the cpu too much for a bittorrent client. you may want to try this new BT client. 700 or so kb in size and it's the easiest on your RAM out of all the BT clients.

It's called utorrent. This is what it says on the homepage
Quote:
”Torrent is an efficient and feature rich BitTorrent client for Windows sporting a very small footprint. It was designed to use as little cpu, memory and space as possible while offering all the functionality expected from advanced clients.

With BitTorrent, you can download files faster and contribute by sharing files and bandwidth.
Check here for more nfo and download etc...

http://www.utorrent.com/

-Good Luck!

Lethal

This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 19. November 2005 @ 15:41

Junior Member
_
19. November 2005 @ 15:44 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
thanks for the reply and the info obout utorrent ,,,will check it out .:-)
Weycraze
Member
_
19. November 2005 @ 17:07 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Nice little client, However it takes up bandwidth by just running it and not even loading in a torrent!!!!

What's up with that!

My, first thought was who or what was benefitting from that, because it certainly wasn't me!!

Weycraze




...a mind is a terrible thing to waste...
Moderator
_
20. November 2005 @ 00:43 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Are you referring to utorrent, Weycraze? It is the least-bandwidth-consuming of all the clients...


This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 20. November 2005 @ 00:43

Weycraze
Member
_
20. November 2005 @ 16:08 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Yes, I am referring to uTorrent.

I'm in the habit of monitoring any new softwares running processes.

With this one the CPU usage is negligible, HOWEVER, When I run the app my upload and download bandwidth start recording usage...I haven't even put a torrent file into it yet!!

Freaky eh?

So, what I wonder is this...what kind of communication is really going on with little torrent client?

I also noticed this same type of behaviour with another app called Shareaza, which I g-filed right off the bat.

Just my two cents anyways.

Peace,

Weycraze




...a mind is a terrible thing to waste...
Moderator
_
20. November 2005 @ 16:15 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Blimey, that's useful stuff to take not of, weycraze. uTorrent is a very attractive prospect to a lot of people, especially those who need the space for other things. Makes you wonder...smell a hint of RIAA?

Anyhow, good call

Lethal
Weycraze
Member
_
20. November 2005 @ 16:20 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Hey no prob, Lethal_B. I live in Canada where it's still legal to download!!
Advertisement
_
__
 
_
Junior Member
_
21. November 2005 @ 00:16 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
When i first started using torrents i was using Shareaza which i will refer to as Leechaza ,,oh it great for fast download speeds but you can not seed so really i think that if anybody is or thinking of using Shareaza for torrents ,,,think again.
I am using Bitcomet right now but i seem to loose my conections sometimes when i am just seeding and my upload suffers .
I have got SP2 and was wondering about this patch that i have read about ,,would that help with my connections ?,otherwise i think that BitComet is a very easy prog to use and would recomend it to my mother :lol:.I always read in different forums that everybody wants there download speed faster ,,,the need for speed !!!.
As long as i get my download at a reasonable speed and i am able to seed it forever i am happy ,,oh by the way i try to get my ratio as high as i can on every torrent i download ,,i am seeding 3 at the moment and all of them are above 3.X.
Great forum that you have got here ,,i think i will try and participate more ,is there and smileys here ?
ok gotta go and water my seeds ,,lol
thanks all
bye now
Related links
Read AfterDawn.com's guide to Azureus BitTorrent client
Download the latest version of Azureus BitTorrent client from AfterDawn.com
Read AfterDawn.com's guide to BitComet BitTorrent client.
Download the latest version of BitComet BitTorrent client from AfterDawn.com
 
Related forum topics Posts Last post Forum room
bitcomet and port forwarding 5 7. August 2012 Windows - P2P software
listening port for bitcomet 4 8. March 2011 Windows - P2P software
BitComet Problems 1 4. July 2010 Windows - Software discussion
Azureus vuze 1 6. June 2010 Windows - P2P software
Question regarding BitComet 2 16. April 2010 Windows - P2P software
BitComet 0.62 downloads. 9 16. April 2010 Xbox 360 - Modding & Hacking
Upload torrent with Bitcomet no one could connect 1 10. February 2010 Windows - P2P software
Connectivity Issues with Vuze ( Azureus) 6 3. December 2009 Windows - P2P software
Bitcomet issue 4 20. November 2009 Windows - P2P software
burning dvd from bitcomet 5 31. October 2009 DVD±R for newbies

 
afterdawn.com > forums > software, operating systems and more > windows - p2p software > azureus vs bitcomet
 

Digital video: AfterDawn.com | AfterDawn Forums
Music: MP3Lizard.com
Gaming: Blasteroids.com | Blasteroids Forums | Compare game prices
Software: Software downloads
Blogs: User profile pages
RSS feeds: AfterDawn.com News | Software updates | AfterDawn Forums
International: AfterDawn in Finnish | AfterDawn in Swedish | AfterDawn in Norwegian | download.fi
Navigate: Search | Site map
About us: About AfterDawn Ltd | Advertise on our sites | Rules, Restrictions, Legal disclaimer & Privacy policy
Contact us: Send feedback | Contact our media sales team
 
  © 1999-2025 by AfterDawn Ltd.

  IDG TechNetwork