|
Post your Nero cd/dvd speed quality scans here
|
|
Moderator
|
9. November 2006 @ 16:12 |
Link to this message
|
|
Just a guess here cincyrob. My thinking is the firmware - sets the write strategies for media & ImgBurn shows you the 'true' write speed. There's is fluxation in the burn speed.
I know it sounds odd but these discs may not be able to be burned at that speed.
Kinda like 16x media not doing well 4x & under on some drives.
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
9. November 2006 @ 16:14 |
Link to this message
|
|
yea i should have just jammed it out @8x its max...couldnt have been worse than what i got...lol but then again i never did check it to see if it plays....
|
Senior Member
|
9. November 2006 @ 16:56 |
Link to this message
|
@Ihoe,
here is the post of the latest Office Depot DL (AKA Ritek D-01 Disk)
This is the movie "Cars" and has been played numerous times without any playback issues. This disk is typical, with scores running around 95-97% until the disk gets at 95% complete, then the PI and PIF numbers start running up. I assume this is due to running towards the outer part of the second layer.
|
Senior Member
|
9. November 2006 @ 17:07 |
Link to this message
|
Same burner, Sony MIT 16D1 disk
and similar disk, with a Sony DRU-800A burner.
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
9. November 2006 @ 17:39 |
Link to this message
|
|
damn Blivet you got a 98.6 on our liteon????im gonna pull my hair out until i get something over 95...lol
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
9. November 2006 @ 18:27 |
Link to this message
|
i just downloaded dvdinfopro. gonna give it a try on this burner my hp wouldnt work with it.
got 2 scans of the same disc. a crc scan and pi/pf
now on this same disc i got a much higer score with Nero cd/dvd (95)
|
|
pahick
Junior Member
|
9. November 2006 @ 19:22 |
Link to this message
|
|
@binkie7
Ty about my grandma. The date puzzled me at first. I always thought it was the date of the scan. That is the date I did the backups with Rebuilder. I guess it "tagged" the .iso by date? If that isnt the case im not sure what it means then.
X2 3800@2.4 Epox MGF6100-M 1G GSkill pc6400 (2)NEC 3550A's 74G Raptor 160G Hitachi Audigy 4 Enermax Liberty 400w PSU MicroFly case
|
Moderator
|
9. November 2006 @ 20:03 |
Link to this message
|
|
I think your right there pahick on the date the backup was created.
In my case - 99% of the time - I automatically burn with Clone, Recode or Shrink when their done transcoding.
So I just assumed it's the date the backup was done (didn't take into account could be burned at a later late :) )
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
9. November 2006 @ 22:29 |
Link to this message
|
|
Lmao, see i didn't know if that scan was rly worth anything to anyone, but it's about all I can do :P
:)
|
|
pazzini
Suspended permanently
|
10. November 2006 @ 02:39 |
Link to this message
|
LG 4167B Burnt @8x
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
10. November 2006 @ 03:06 |
Link to this message
|
|
@ripper..
i was in the same situation you are in now a little over a month ago. my HP740i didnt work with any of the disc scans either. i was only able to do that benchmark test you just did... and i still dont know what it means..lol
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
10. November 2006 @ 05:33 |
Link to this message
|
|
Lol cincyrob, it'a a pain... I can however do the tests with the little green blocks :P
|
Senior Member
|
10. November 2006 @ 06:02 |
Link to this message
|
|
@Cincyrob,
I don't know why our scores are that different, I know you do the same thing, defrag the hard drive often,rip to the hard drive then burn ro the disk using 8X or 12X speed, we have the same burner, same firmware, same basic tastes in movies. I don't think you should sweat the petty numbers if the disk plays in your DVD player. But, one can never have a car that goes from 0-60 fast enough eh?
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
10. November 2006 @ 07:04 |
Link to this message
|
|
@blivetNC. maybe thats what im doing wrong/differnet. i dont rip the movies to the HD i go from disc to disc. wel disc to hd temp to disc..lol
@ripper
i have heard some hear say they go by the CRC test more than the other scan, if the disc is readable you shouldnt have any problem with it playing on your standalone's
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
10. November 2006 @ 07:24 |
Link to this message
|
|
Yeah, thing is it plays on all my dvd players. So i only wanted to post a scan for the "hell of it" :P
|
Senior Member
|
11. November 2006 @ 03:31 |
Link to this message
|
Another scan from the same batch of disks which posted a 96 score earlier.
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
11. November 2006 @ 12:03 |
Link to this message
|
ok now that i got my power back here almost 24 hours without any... i got a bunch of scans here... the 1st 3 are of cars on 3 different test. nero/dvdinfopro, and Kprobe....i took this disc to my inlaws lastnight and we all watched it on there 50in widescreen, i was totally amazed how it looked. for 1, was just awsome on that big of a tv and 2 my burnt copy looks as good as the original, i couldnt see anything wrong with it on that big of a screen..... so for that here are the scans.
better score here than Nero
this is Kprobe i cant make heads or tales out of it..lol
now this one here is of wizard of OZ. the wife found this disc she had from years ago the original OZ. i think this the very first time ever put on dvd. it looks bad(the disc that is), but i got it to rip and used recode to burn it plays great but you can tell its a older movie..
have about 3 more scans of little man and the santa clause i redid...
still nothing over 95. but that copy of cars i am proud of nothing at all wrong with it even on a 50in screen
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
11. November 2006 @ 12:28 |
Link to this message
|
this is the santa clause disc was scratched used ripit4me and did final burn with CloneDVD.
didnt do a Nero scan on this but i will.
this is littleman, didnt have any problems with this one pretty easy. i didn thave any problem with clonedvd2 at all on these 4 movies
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
11. November 2006 @ 12:35 |
Link to this message
|
|
all 4 of those movies were burnt on my new hub printable 8x+r verbs burnt at 8x also.
@blivetNC
i just ripped CARS to my hard drive im gonna use clonedvd2 and use that ripped file instead of going disc to disc.
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
11. November 2006 @ 14:25 |
Link to this message
|
@BlivetNC &Binkie7
ive noticed something about the liteon we all have... the last 4 out of 5 burns i have done on it ive used the 8x+r verbs i just got. i have forgotten to use the booktype software for it to convert +r to dvd-rom when useing clonedvd2. on everyone but 1 i did this to, i ran it through dvdidentifier and it was booktype to dvd-rom on its own. here is one of them disc that it did it on its own.
this is ripped to my HD then burned from there with clondvd2 at 8x.
here is the disc info.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 11. November 2006 @ 14:25
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
11. November 2006 @ 14:32 |
Link to this message
|
|
id say im haven withdraws from this place. not being on for 24 hours..lolsory if im annoying people with my post.
i just noticed the last burn of cars i just did(ripped itto the HD first) got a better score than my first. 95 to a 90. i just went from disc to disc on the first one and ripped to my HD and then burned with clonedvd2,but like i said in my earlier post that first copy looked awsome on that big 50in widescreen of my inlaws..lol
|
Moderator
|
11. November 2006 @ 15:38 |
Link to this message
|
Hey cincyrob
Txs for the type on Clone - I'll check that out next time I use a +R w/ it. I usually use the booktype utility.
Here's why I love TY - older ones burned at 8x - still scan well
Glad you got your power back - that can suck! Reason we got a generator to run the basics - you know PC's and Frig's :0)
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
11. November 2006 @ 15:49 |
Link to this message
|
|
very nice scans there, the one with only 106 PI failure should be a 99.9 in my eyes. im slap happy with the last one i did and only had 510 i think thats my lowest.
|
Moderator
|
11. November 2006 @ 16:14 |
Link to this message
|
|
Not bad for one over 2 years old!!
I'll try and dig up some older ones and see how they scan.
cincyrob you have definitely turned into the scan man :0)
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
11. November 2006 @ 16:26 |
Link to this message
|
|
when i get the time(most the time i get is late at night when im off work and the kids are asleep and i dont want to be up all night messing on here.not that i wouldnt..lol)i need to read and learn more about the numbers gotten on these scans as far as the pi errors and failures... i see some of these scans we have posted and just shake my head.... scan with pi failure up around 9 and 10 gets 97 score and others with pi failures of 2 get 93????? just like your last scan with only 106 total failures and a maximum of 2 how is that not higher than a 95???
|
