|
DVD Decrypter vs. IMGBurn
|
|
|
F4HAD
Suspended permanently
|
8. June 2008 @ 06:05 |
Link to this message
|
As the title suggests, what are the pros and cons of using either of the software?
In my opinion, dvd decrypter is better because the "booktype" feature works better, and I dont know any advantages of IMGBurn over dvd decrypter, other than the fact is uses a better burning engine, and a slightly better interface
|
|
Advertisement
|
 |
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
8. June 2008 @ 06:37 |
Link to this message
|
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
9. June 2008 @ 02:54 |
Link to this message
|
Antec 1200 Full-Tower Case/Thermaltake 750-Watt PS/ASUS SABERTOOTH Z77 Mobo/Western Digital Black WD500 500GB 7200 RPM 64MB Cache/NVIDIA GeForce 8800GTX 384-bit GDDR3 PCI Express Video Card/CORSAIR DOMINATOR PLATINUM 16GB DDR3 /Intel Core i7-3770K Ivy Bridge 3.5GHz (3.9GHz Turbo)/CORSAIR Hydro High Performance Liquid CPU Cooler/3-Asus DRW-24B1ST Sata Drives/Samsung 2493HM 24" LCD Monitior 1920x1200 resolution,5ms respone time/OS Windows 10 Pro SP1 64-bit
|
|
varnull
Suspended permanently
|
9. June 2008 @ 07:32 |
Link to this message
|
Different applications with different purposes.. It's like comparing a ferarri to a dumper.. the ferrari is fast, but it's no good for shifting big heaps of building materials over rough ground ;)
imgburn is probably the best burning application there is (after k3b.. which you poor windows kids can't experience).. for burning..
decrypter is old and discontinued.. I think lightnin is trying to keep his rippers and burners in different boxes now since the decrypter fiasco.
|
Moderator
|
9. June 2008 @ 11:04 |
Link to this message
|
Main PC ~ Intel C2Q Q6600 (G0 Stepping)/Gigabyte GA-EP45-DS3/2GB Crucial Ballistix PC2-8500/Zalman CNPS9700/Antec 900/Corsair HX 620W
Network ~ DD-WRT ~ 2node WDS-WPA2/AES ~ Buffalo WHR-G54S. 3node WPA2/AES ~ WRT54GS v6 (inc. WEP BSSID), WRT54G v2, WRT54G2 v1. *** Forum Rules *** |
AfterDawn Addict
3 product reviews
|
9. June 2008 @ 19:47 |
Link to this message
|
Since there are updated programs to handle the ripping, and Imgburn for burning, i honestly don't use Dvd Decrypter much anymore.
Imgburn is the best burn engine out there. IMO...for us lowly Windows users anyway. ;)
|
|
kamarob2
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
27. July 2008 @ 00:38 |
Link to this message
|
DVD DECRYPTER is best for burning dvds...IMGBURN is best for burning blu ray....
|
Senior Member
|
27. July 2008 @ 00:49 |
Link to this message
|
I only use dvd decrypter to rip my copy to the hdd to make an aditional copy. Otherwise, it just sits on my desktop unused.
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
27. July 2008 @ 00:53 |
Link to this message
|
Antec 1200 Full-Tower Case/Thermaltake 750-Watt PS/ASUS SABERTOOTH Z77 Mobo/Western Digital Black WD500 500GB 7200 RPM 64MB Cache/NVIDIA GeForce 8800GTX 384-bit GDDR3 PCI Express Video Card/CORSAIR DOMINATOR PLATINUM 16GB DDR3 /Intel Core i7-3770K Ivy Bridge 3.5GHz (3.9GHz Turbo)/CORSAIR Hydro High Performance Liquid CPU Cooler/3-Asus DRW-24B1ST Sata Drives/Samsung 2493HM 24" LCD Monitior 1920x1200 resolution,5ms respone time/OS Windows 10 Pro SP1 64-bit
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
27. July 2008 @ 00:57 |
Link to this message
|
And Nero Express will do that on the fly if you want to copy a backup fast. Do them @16X without issues.
|
Senior Member
|
27. July 2008 @ 01:39 |
Link to this message
|
As does dvdfab and nti which I normally use, which is why it usually sits on my desktop unused. I don't have nero installed on either my desktop or laptop.
|
AfterDawn Addict
7 product reviews
|
3. December 2008 @ 16:55 |
Link to this message
|
Im curious. Since this is a thread regarding imgburn... will ejecting a disc from a finished burner, screw with a current burners process? I am aware of the checkbox for ejecting after finishing, but... lets say I dont check it but wanna eject it. I know discspeed doesnt like it when your ejecting and loading discs while its busy. I am kinda afraid to test it and create a coaster. Has anyone had any problems attempting this? Is it ok?
To delete, or not to delete. THAT is the question! |
AfterDawn Addict
|
3. December 2008 @ 18:33 |
Link to this message
|
|
@O7
So you are running two ImgBurns simutaneously and burning two different discs and one gets finished first and you want to eject it manually. Never done it but thats what cmcmag cheapies are for. Try it and see? If pc is fast i would imagine it being ok. Let us know.
|
AfterDawn Addict
7 product reviews
|
4. December 2008 @ 01:14 |
Link to this message
|
I dont run multiple instances of imgburn. I LOVE the queue ability of imgburn. I guess thats what im gonna have to do. Try it I mean.
Nero is now the only way I will do simultaneous burning. Burners seem to like undivided access. Ive even tried simultaneous burning from separate HDD's to no avail. Causes buffer underruns. Though ALL burners seem to be ok with buffer underruns now. Oddly I can browse the web, watch movies, etc. without buffer underruns, As long as I dont interupt the HDD that is transfering data to the burner.
To delete, or not to delete. THAT is the question! |
AfterDawn Addict
7 product reviews
|
8. December 2008 @ 16:10 |
Link to this message
|
Success!!! In 2 instances now, ive attempted it with no probs. Once while the other was burning lead-in, and the other attempt was done while 50% was burned on the other burner. So, imgburn isnt bothered by ejecting while busy with another task! Good to know :D
Do not attempt with Discspeed though, :(
To delete, or not to delete. THAT is the question! |
|
RobCarl69
Newbie
|
24. March 2009 @ 07:58 |
Link to this message
|
Regarding Imgburn, is it still available for download, as when I click on run, it goes through the process of downloading, but doesn't actually download the program. Could this be a bad link, or perhaps my laptop (Lenovo N500)?
|
AfterDawn Addict
3 product reviews
|
24. March 2009 @ 09:17 |
Link to this message
|
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
Senior Member
|
24. March 2009 @ 09:19 |
Link to this message
|
|
