|
Experiencing Difficulty Using DVD RB and CCE? If So, Then Ask Your Questions Here.
|
|
|
brobear
Suspended permanently
|
7. March 2006 @ 21:22 |
Link to this message
|
EclCCE isn't needed with the later versions of CCE, trial or retail.
|
|
Advertisement
|
 |
|
|
|
PikaPuff
Junior Member
|
8. March 2006 @ 02:47 |
Link to this message
|
|
My dvd files output size is 3.99gb but i want 4.36gb.Here is my DVDRB v1081 settings.im sure i inputted the targetsectors correctly.Can someone help me.
[Options]
Mode=1
OneClick=1
ReduceOpt=0
NoWarn=1
AdditionalOutput=1
LogFile=1
QuEncHQ=1
EncoderMinimized=0
RemoveDTS=0
HC_Quality=1
HC_Matrix=1
SkinVersion=12
Skin=Rebuilder Default
AudioDub=1
QuEncodeType=0
iDCT=0
GOP=0
DCPrec=0
MainMatrix=Encoder Default
LowMatrix=Same as Main Feature
VLowMatrix=Same as Main Feature
ExtraMatrix=Same as Main Feature
ProCoder_Quality=4
DVD_Label=VIDEO_TS 1
DVD_Name=VIDEO_TS 1.ISO
MovieOnly=0
HalfD1=000
Convert_16_9=000
DisableInterlace=000
ConvertToYUY2=1
TargetSizeMode=0
TargetSectors=2285000
CCE=3
Completed=1
[Paths]
QuEnc=C:\Program Files\DVD-RB PRO\Encoders\QuEnc\QuEnc.exe
ReJig=C:\Program Files\DVD-RB PRO\Encoders\ReJig\ReJig.exe
HC=C:\Program Files\DVD-RB PRO\Encoders\HC Encoder\HCbatch.EXE
ProCoder=C:\Program Files\DVD-RB PRO\Encoders\EclPro\EclPro.exe
DECOMB=C:\Program Files\AviSynth 2.5\plugins\Decomb521.dll
MPEG2DEC=C:\Program Files\DVD-RB PRO\DGDecode.dll
Working=C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\MY DOCUMENTS\NEW FOLDER (2)\
Output=C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\MY DOCUMENTS\NEW FOLDER\
Source=C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\DESKTOP\VIDEO_TS 1\
CCENEW=C:\Program Files\Custom Technology\CCE SP Trial Version\cctspt.exe
[Audio]
Selected=11
Remapping=
[Subpictures]
Selected=
[CCEOptions]
OPV=0
|
|
jdobbs
Senior Member
|
8. March 2006 @ 03:38 |
Link to this message
|
1. Your targetsectors variable is way too high... where did you get that number? You are much better off to simply delete that line completely. Stay with the default and you will save yourself a lot of headaches.
2. What size is the original disc?
3. What version of CCE are you using?
|
|
L8ter
Suspended permanently
|
8. March 2006 @ 03:56 |
Link to this message
|
|
|
|
PikaPuff
Junior Member
|
8. March 2006 @ 04:44 |
Link to this message
|
|
CCE SP v2.70.02.06
VBR Bias:25
Qual Prec:16
VBR Passes:2
DVD Files Source size = 4.79gb
Final output size after 2hrs = 3.99gb
The targetsectors size from users here and the digital video forums.Ive done it twice and its still 3.99gb.Want a Output size of 4481mb.
|
|
L8ter
Suspended permanently
|
8. March 2006 @ 05:09 |
Link to this message
|
|
have you tried just encoding the extra's as this movie is close to your desired size anyway's
of course you could probably just remove some extra's or audio and get it down to size
if neither of these are desired options you may throw another pass in there or try a differnt encoder.
|
|
jdobbs
Senior Member
|
8. March 2006 @ 07:49 |
Link to this message
|
Somebody gave you bad advice. That targetsectors value is no good... throw it away or you are going to be very disappointed that none of your encodes will fit...
You just happened to be lucky on this one. The source of your problem is one of two things:
1. CCE is based upon Q (for quality). When it reaches a bitrate that will result in a "perfect" Q it won't add any more bitrate. This is the most likely cause.
2. DVD-RB does not allow the reencoded bitrate to exceed the original. That would imply you could make a copy that is better than the original -- which is, of course, impossible.
In either of these cases -- adding additional bitrate and making it larger will not improve the quality of the picture -- so there really isn't a "problem".
Is anything being removed (audio or subpictures)?
|
AfterDawn Addict
1 product review
|
8. March 2006 @ 11:39 |
Link to this message
|
|
PikaPuff
Could you provide a little info about your system, for instance, is it overclocked?
" Please Read!!! Post your questions only in This Thread or they will go unanswered:
Help with development of BD RB: Donations at: http://www.jdobbs.com/. This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 8. March 2006 @ 12:57
|
Senior Member
|
8. March 2006 @ 13:33 |
Link to this message
|
@brobear - Thanks for the quick reply!
@jdobbs - Thanks for a great peice of software. I will be donating very soon so that I can get the PRO version and updates. You do great things.
Being the maker of the software, which encoder do you prefer? QuEnc, Pro Coder 2, HC, CCE? Want your opinion as you have a unique perspective.
All men profess honesty as long as they can. To believe all men honest would be folly. To believe none so is something worse. -John Quincy Adams
 |
|
brobear
Suspended permanently
|
8. March 2006 @ 14:57 |
Link to this message
|
While you're waiting, I'll just put in that CCE is my favorite of the encoders, high quality and quicker than the others. RB isn't meant for speed though, but CCE is still the best for overall quality in my opinion. With some dual core systems, some of the encoders like the HC and ProCoder may be faster than CCE. But for the single core processors, CCE is faster and in some people's opinion the best. Pro Coder is said by some to be better with interlaced video. I haven't seen it. All the CCE encodes I've done have turned out excellent.
|
AfterDawn Addict
1 product review
|
8. March 2006 @ 15:07 |
Link to this message
|
|
brobear
CCE is faster than any of the other encoders with dual core bar none. HC has gotten considerably faster since jdobbs added support for dual encoding (available only with RB Pro) but it's still not as fast as CCE. For those who are interested in making the leap to RB Pro, HC encoder is a great way to start for free until you've decided which encoder you want to go with.
" Please Read!!! Post your questions only in This Thread or they will go unanswered:
Help with development of BD RB: Donations at: http://www.jdobbs.com/. This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 8. March 2006 @ 15:20
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
8. March 2006 @ 15:16 |
Link to this message
|
I bow to both Sophocles and brobear and agree with them. I think the quality of both encoder is exceptional but prefer CCE for speed, but HC has improved and is free. It all comes down to personal choice and your pocketbook.
|
|
jdobbs
Senior Member
|
8. March 2006 @ 15:40 |
Link to this message
|
I personally use CCE for most jobs. It gives the highest quality (along with HC) of any encoder on the market and is by far the fastest. I consider the Basic version to be one of the best $58 I've ever spent. When you're doing 3-4 jobs each night like I am (testing, testing, testing) you really appreciate the speed.
I gotta say, though, that if encoding speed isn't important to you, HC costs nothing and has quality pretty much equal to CCE.
|
Senior Member
|
8. March 2006 @ 16:28 |
Link to this message
|
|
All you guys then pretty much agree. CCE it is then.
I think I will do a job with HC, and then the same with CCE. Just to compare. I will post my thoughts after I have completed the project.
I really apprieciate the replys guys. Y'all (BroBear, arniebear, Sophocles, L8ter, and of course the great jdobbs) are my shining light out of the dark world of one click backup...
LOL
Thanks again!
All men profess honesty as long as they can. To believe all men honest would be folly. To believe none so is something worse. -John Quincy Adams
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 8. March 2006 @ 16:29
|
|
brobear
Suspended permanently
|
8. March 2006 @ 21:48 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
Y'all (BroBear, arniebear, Sophocles, L8ter, and of course the great jdobbs) are my shining light out of the dark world of one click backup...
Sounds like a bit of hyperbole. ;)
As for the software, all you should notice is that HC takes longer than CCE. If using CCE trialware, note that the Basic times out and is unusable and that SP has a logo on the video output. Doing a trial run with SP set to 2 passes shows how the Basic software works. To me it's a waste of time though. Run the HC encoder, if the quality meets your expectations and you want a bit more speed, spring for the CCE Basic. I guess the SP trial would be a good example of the time difference. Just remember to be sure CCE is set to 2 passes in RB. That's the limit for Basic, but that's all you need for good video output. Also, use the same movie in your experiment with the same content. Otherwise, how would you know the difference?
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 8. March 2006 @ 22:29
|
Senior Member
|
9. March 2006 @ 02:33 |
Link to this message
|
BroBear...
I am going to use a project I did using NeroVision4.
I made a Disc, with menus and everything, and burned it to my hardrive. It was about 8.5GB. I just rebuilt with HC, and it looks great. Now I am going to do the same 8.5GB file with CCE.
Does that fit your criteria? lol
Quote:
Sounds like a bit of hyperbole. ;)
Its good to know you are appreciated every now and again, isn't it?
hehehe
Jxp
All men profess honesty as long as they can. To believe all men honest would be folly. To believe none so is something worse. -John Quincy Adams
|
|
jdobbs
Senior Member
|
9. March 2006 @ 04:23 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
Sounds like a bit of hyperbole. ;)
Hmmm.... (scratches head) I reckon that must be the game where two superbole winners play each other.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 9. March 2006 @ 04:24
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
9. March 2006 @ 04:27 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
I reckon that must be the game where two superbole winners play each other
LMAO :)
|
|
brobear
Suspended permanently
|
9. March 2006 @ 08:13 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
Hmmm.... (scratches head) I reckon that must be the game where two superbole winners play each other.
Nope. It's when one of the "bole" players gets hyper. ;)
|
AfterDawn Addict
1 product review
|
9. March 2006 @ 12:04 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
I reckon that must be the game where two superbole winners play each other
Are you guys sure that it's not Hyper-bole-ing with a 7-10 pin split?
" Please Read!!! Post your questions only in This Thread or they will go unanswered:
Help with development of BD RB: Donations at: http://www.jdobbs.com/. This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 9. March 2006 @ 14:12
|
Senior Member
|
9. March 2006 @ 13:51 |
Link to this message
|
THE HYPERBOLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
All men profess honesty as long as they can. To believe all men honest would be folly. To believe none so is something worse. -John Quincy Adams
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 9. March 2006 @ 13:52
|
|
jdobbs
Senior Member
|
9. March 2006 @ 13:57 |
Link to this message
|
|
OH!!! Now I get it... and I here I was thinking it was that place where all those people got trapped after the hurricane.
|
Senior Member
|
9. March 2006 @ 14:04 |
Link to this message
|
|
I redid my little Project using HC (Best quality), and it took over six hours to encode!!! I guess that is what was meant by, and I quote, it takes longer....
Is it normal to take that long?
I have a p4 2.6 ghrz with 1.2 GB of ram.
All men profess honesty as long as they can. To believe all men honest would be folly. To believe none so is something worse. -John Quincy Adams
|
Senior Member
|
9. March 2006 @ 14:16 |
Link to this message
|
Oh and guys, I had to do a google on that word...
Quote:
Hyperbole - A boldly exaggerated statement that adds emphasis without in-tending to be literally true, as in the statement "He ate everything in the house." Hyperbole (also called overstatement) may be used for serious, comic, or ironic effect.
All men profess honesty as long as they can. To believe all men honest would be folly. To believe none so is something worse. -John Quincy Adams
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
1 product review
|
9. March 2006 @ 14:23 |
Link to this message
|
JXP2307
We did say that HC encoder takes a little longer but I haven't experienced a 6 hour encode ever. The longest I've ever had to deal with was about 3 hours with my P4 Northwood overclocked to 3.149 Ghz. Now I complain when it exceeds 65 minutes. CCE should get you to under 4 hours or better (3.5 hours). Use batch encode and you can do a couple DVd's while you're asleep and then a couple more while you're at work. Grab the pro version if you don't have it and you have the choice of doing movie only with menus, which is good for saving and accessing more than one soundtrack, and movie only for when the rest of the crap is not worth keeping.
" Please Read!!! Post your questions only in This Thread or they will go unanswered:
Help with development of BD RB: Donations at: http://www.jdobbs.com/. |
