User User name Password  
   
Friday 22.11.2024 / 23:20
Search AfterDawn Forums:        In English   Suomeksi   På svenska
afterdawn.com > forums > pc hardware > building a new pc > the official budget-conscious dream machine!
Show topics
 
Forums
Forums
The Official Budget-Conscious Dream Machine!
  Jump to:
 
Posted Message
AfterDawn Addict

15 product reviews
_
24. March 2008 @ 20:53 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
That's true. But it's just an average. I'm sure the HD3850 is faster than the 7900GTX in the games you play.



AMD Phenom II X6 1100T 4GHz(20 x 200) 1.5v 3000NB 2000HT, Corsair Hydro H110 w/ 4 x 140mm 1500RPM fans Push/Pull, Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5, 8GB(2 x 4GB) G.Skill RipJaws DDR3-1600 @ 1600MHz CL9 1.55v, Gigabyte GTX760 OC 4GB(1170/1700), Corsair 750HX
Detailed PC Specs: http://my.afterdawn.com/estuansis/blog_entry.cfm/11388
Advertisement
_
__
AfterDawn Addict

4 product reviews
_
25. March 2008 @ 07:19 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
The HD3850 256MB is unfortunately owned by higher resolutions, but if you only game at up to 1280x1024 you're not likely to encounter big frame drops that are due to the memory alone, since the only games that need more than 256MB at that res aren't going to run smoothly anyway on an HD3850.
If you use 1680x1050, or moreso 1920x1200+ then the 512MB is more important.

Estuansis: We've had the discussion about Crysis before, it's not a valid ATi vs nvidia test. It is useful in the sense that, if you can run Crysis, you can run anything, but as a brand for brand comparison it's once again skewed in nvidia's favour (remember that this is how nvidia operates, landmark titles such as 3DMark, Oblivion and now Crysis are "optimised" to give the highest frame rates regardless of image quality). Given the different rendering techniques used, I avoid using Crysis for card comparisons. There's nothing explicitly wrong with nvidia cards drawing Crysis, hence how they got away with it, but it's missing a large amount of detail compared to how the game was designed to look. "The way it's meant to be played" - what a laugh!

Abuzar: I used to trust the THG VGA charts, and I still trust their articles, but the recent VGA charts are a crock of ***t, because all of the nvidias outperform all of the ATis, a 6600GT beating an HD3870? Give me a break.
Look for the individual articles on the 8800s and HD3800s for better testing.



Afterdawn Addict // Silent PC enthusiast // PC Build advisor // LANGamer Alias:Ratmanscoop
PC Specs page -- http://my.afterdawn.com/sammorris/blog_entry.cfm/11247
updated 10-Dec-13
AfterDawn Addict
_
25. March 2008 @ 15:32 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Originally posted by sammorris:
The HD3850 256MB is unfortunately owned by higher resolutions, but if you only game at up to 1280x1024 you're not likely to encounter big frame drops that are due to the memory alone, since the only games that need more than 256MB at that res aren't going to run smoothly anyway on an HD3850.
If you use 1680x1050, or moreso 1920x1200+ then the 512MB is more important.

Estuansis: We've had the discussion about Crysis before, it's not a valid ATi vs nvidia test. It is useful in the sense that, if you can run Crysis, you can run anything, but as a brand for brand comparison it's once again skewed in nvidia's favour (remember that this is how nvidia operates, landmark titles such as 3DMark, Oblivion and now Crysis are "optimised" to give the highest frame rates regardless of image quality). Given the different rendering techniques used, I avoid using Crysis for card comparisons. There's nothing explicitly wrong with nvidia cards drawing Crysis, hence how they got away with it, but it's missing a large amount of detail compared to how the game was designed to look. "The way it's meant to be played" - what a laugh!

Abuzar: I used to trust the THG VGA charts, and I still trust their articles, but the recent VGA charts are a crock of ***t, because all of the nvidias outperform all of the ATis, a 6600GT beating an HD3870? Give me a break.
Look for the individual articles on the 8800s and HD3800s for better testing.
If you want to whack AA and AF on at those res' you will need more than 256mb.



MGR (Micro Gaming Rig) .|. Intel Q6600 @ 3.45GHz .|. Asus P35 P5K-E/WiFi .|. 4GB 1066MHz Geil Black Dragon RAM .|. Samsung F60 SSD .|. Corsair H50-1 Cooler .|. Sapphire 4870 512MB .|. Lian Li PC-A70B .|. Be Queit P7 Dark Power Pro 850W PSU .|. 24" 1920x1200 DGM (MVA Panel) .|. 24" 1920x1080 Dell (TN Panel) .|.
AfterDawn Addict

4 product reviews
_
25. March 2008 @ 15:45 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Heh, for a pretty large list of games that's true. Of course, it doesn't apply to all games. I've run CS:S at 1600x1200 with 4xAA on only 256MB before, but then unless you use HDR, CS:S isn't really a very demanding game.



Afterdawn Addict // Silent PC enthusiast // PC Build advisor // LANGamer Alias:Ratmanscoop
PC Specs page -- http://my.afterdawn.com/sammorris/blog_entry.cfm/11247
updated 10-Dec-13
AfterDawn Addict
_
25. March 2008 @ 16:55 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Originally posted by sammorris:
Heh, for a pretty large list of games that's true. Of course, it doesn't apply to all games. I've run CS:S at 1600x1200 with 4xAA on only 256MB before, but then unless you use HDR, CS:S isn't really a very demanding game.
i meant newer games not games reaching death :p



MGR (Micro Gaming Rig) .|. Intel Q6600 @ 3.45GHz .|. Asus P35 P5K-E/WiFi .|. 4GB 1066MHz Geil Black Dragon RAM .|. Samsung F60 SSD .|. Corsair H50-1 Cooler .|. Sapphire 4870 512MB .|. Lian Li PC-A70B .|. Be Queit P7 Dark Power Pro 850W PSU .|. 24" 1920x1200 DGM (MVA Panel) .|. 24" 1920x1080 Dell (TN Panel) .|.
AfterDawn Addict

4 product reviews
_
25. March 2008 @ 17:18 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
reaching death? Have you any idea how much CS:S is played?



Afterdawn Addict // Silent PC enthusiast // PC Build advisor // LANGamer Alias:Ratmanscoop
PC Specs page -- http://my.afterdawn.com/sammorris/blog_entry.cfm/11247
updated 10-Dec-13
AfterDawn Addict
_
25. March 2008 @ 17:36 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
notice the ":p" ?



MGR (Micro Gaming Rig) .|. Intel Q6600 @ 3.45GHz .|. Asus P35 P5K-E/WiFi .|. 4GB 1066MHz Geil Black Dragon RAM .|. Samsung F60 SSD .|. Corsair H50-1 Cooler .|. Sapphire 4870 512MB .|. Lian Li PC-A70B .|. Be Queit P7 Dark Power Pro 850W PSU .|. 24" 1920x1200 DGM (MVA Panel) .|. 24" 1920x1080 Dell (TN Panel) .|.
AfterDawn Addict

4 product reviews
_
25. March 2008 @ 17:51 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
then why say it? :P



Afterdawn Addict // Silent PC enthusiast // PC Build advisor // LANGamer Alias:Ratmanscoop
PC Specs page -- http://my.afterdawn.com/sammorris/blog_entry.cfm/11247
updated 10-Dec-13
AfterDawn Addict
_
25. March 2008 @ 18:11 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
as a joke.....

xD



MGR (Micro Gaming Rig) .|. Intel Q6600 @ 3.45GHz .|. Asus P35 P5K-E/WiFi .|. 4GB 1066MHz Geil Black Dragon RAM .|. Samsung F60 SSD .|. Corsair H50-1 Cooler .|. Sapphire 4870 512MB .|. Lian Li PC-A70B .|. Be Queit P7 Dark Power Pro 850W PSU .|. 24" 1920x1200 DGM (MVA Panel) .|. 24" 1920x1080 Dell (TN Panel) .|.

This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 25. March 2008 @ 18:32

AfterDawn Addict

15 product reviews
_
26. March 2008 @ 06:42 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Quote:
There's nothing explicitly wrong with nvidia cards drawing Crysis, hence how they got away with it, but it's missing a large amount of detail compared to how the game was designed to look. "The way it's meant to be played" - what a laugh!
Link please? I'll believe it when I see it.

Crysis and Oblivion look exactly the same on my PC as they did with the X1800XT at the same settings. Only differences I noticed were maybe smoother AA and sharper AF in favor of the ATI card.



AMD Phenom II X6 1100T 4GHz(20 x 200) 1.5v 3000NB 2000HT, Corsair Hydro H110 w/ 4 x 140mm 1500RPM fans Push/Pull, Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5, 8GB(2 x 4GB) G.Skill RipJaws DDR3-1600 @ 1600MHz CL9 1.55v, Gigabyte GTX760 OC 4GB(1170/1700), Corsair 750HX
Detailed PC Specs: http://my.afterdawn.com/estuansis/blog_entry.cfm/11388
AfterDawn Addict

4 product reviews
_
26. March 2008 @ 18:42 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
That's because you haven;t compared them side by side. As I say, you don't notice it directly, because there's nothing explicitly wrong with it, but there's a significant amount missing with the nvidia card. I posted it in one of the threads a little while back. VR-Zone demonstrate the difference in Crysis.



Afterdawn Addict // Silent PC enthusiast // PC Build advisor // LANGamer Alias:Ratmanscoop
PC Specs page -- http://my.afterdawn.com/sammorris/blog_entry.cfm/11247
updated 10-Dec-13
Member
_
26. March 2008 @ 19:04 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
I built my mate a pc a few weeks back, his being a 8800gt, and had it running along side my 3870 and on cod4 you tend to see more detail in the distance than you do with an 8800gt. it is subtle but I think this is one of the 'nvidia traits' they do gain higher frame rates but I agree with sam you can see it when you have them side by side.

plus with the release of ati cat 8.3 the frame rate is upto 25% faster on the 3800 series cards ( well so they report ) I have yet to check this out though. I havent noticed much increase but then my frame rates are high enough not to notice a small increase.

FX8120 @ 4.5Ghz 1.3v,Asrock 970 extreme 3,8 gig crucial ballistix 1600 @ 1866, thermalright true spirit 140, 120gb Sandisk extreme ssd, 3TB second drive. Hd4830. Corsair Hx520 PSU.
AfterDawn Addict

4 product reviews
_
26. March 2008 @ 19:27 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
I'm dubious, but I'd love that to be true. Any official confirmation of that?



Afterdawn Addict // Silent PC enthusiast // PC Build advisor // LANGamer Alias:Ratmanscoop
PC Specs page -- http://my.afterdawn.com/sammorris/blog_entry.cfm/11247
updated 10-Dec-13
Member
_
26. March 2008 @ 19:35 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
The following performance gains are noticed with this release of Catalyst?.

Call of Juarez: Up to 20% improvement is noticed on ATI CrossFireX? configured systems containing an ATI Radeon? HD38x0 series of product
Company of Heroes DX10: Up to 17% improvement is noticed, especially at lower resolutions, on ATI Radeon? HD38x0 products
Crysis DX10: Up to 15% improvement is noticed on all supported ATI Radeon? products
Lost Planet DX9: Up to 36% improvement is noticed across all supported ATI Radeon? products and in ATI CrossFireX? configured systems
Shadermark 2.1: Performance scores increased up to 35% across all supported Radeon? products and in ATI CrossFireX? configured systems
Unreal Tournament 2004: Up to 10% increase in performance is noticed on systems containing an ATI Radeon? HD2400, HD2600, or HD3400 series of products on in ATI CrossFireX? configured systems

thats on the release notes, but I read the 25% gain somewhere on the ati/amd site.

Im moving upto a 790x mobo soon, the Gigabyte GA-M56S-S3 is pretty crap, onboard lan died within 3 weeks as is common with alot of nvidia chipsets.

FX8120 @ 4.5Ghz 1.3v,Asrock 970 extreme 3,8 gig crucial ballistix 1600 @ 1866, thermalright true spirit 140, 120gb Sandisk extreme ssd, 3TB second drive. Hd4830. Corsair Hx520 PSU.
AfterDawn Addict

4 product reviews
_
26. March 2008 @ 19:53 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Yup, onboard LAN died on my Asus nforce 4 board, then the whole chipset went with it.



Afterdawn Addict // Silent PC enthusiast // PC Build advisor // LANGamer Alias:Ratmanscoop
PC Specs page -- http://my.afterdawn.com/sammorris/blog_entry.cfm/11247
updated 10-Dec-13
Member
_
26. March 2008 @ 21:12 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
thus you understand the move to the amd chipset :) the sb600 is far better, mind you im leaving onboard lan alone now, as I get a better ping through my pci gigabit lan card.

ping on the cod4 servers i tend to go on is 19ms compaired to 45 - 70ms before :)

just had a couple games, the drivers are better, but still not 100% there in my eyes, lets see what 8.4 cat brings to the table :)

FX8120 @ 4.5Ghz 1.3v,Asrock 970 extreme 3,8 gig crucial ballistix 1600 @ 1866, thermalright true spirit 140, 120gb Sandisk extreme ssd, 3TB second drive. Hd4830. Corsair Hx520 PSU.
AfterDawn Addict

2 product reviews
_
26. March 2008 @ 21:51 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Well I know it didn't improve 3DMark scores even a small bit.
AfterDawn Addict

15 product reviews
_
27. March 2008 @ 02:14 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
I suppose I don't notice the ATI/Nvidia difference like you guys do. For me, ATI definitely has the edge in image/texture/line quality. But that's where the differences stop for me. I see no wrong in going for a higher performing Nvidia card and sacrificing a few(relatively) minor details.

Quote:
I posted it in one of the threads a little while back. VR-Zone demonstrate the difference in Crysis.
Could somebody find that article for me? I can't seem to track it down.

EDIT:

I'll have to admit though, that I was going to be getting an HD3870. I DO notice the IQ differences, even if you guys notice MORE differences. Heck, the only game the HD3870 struggles on is Crysis. And I suppose you could still come to a happy compromise, seeing as the HD3870 produces impressive performance regardless. All high in DX9 @ 1280 x 960 with 2xAA is easily doable on the HD3870. But since I have the 8800GTS now, it would be a shame to upgrade so soon :P

Plus, here's a kicker for me. They always test Crysis at high resolution in dx10 with very high settings. Of course it's not going to be playable. The game is made to scale forwards more than backwards. It's basically a big tech demo. I've noticed big framerate differences between dx10 and dx9.

Since most gamers are still happily using XP, shouldn't they be testing in the most common conditions? All high(vs very high) dx9 at middling resolutions with some AA is going to get you a more realistic picture of a video card's value and performance. I'd even settle for the very high XP tweak. Vista and dx10 kill performance. Windows XP is for me until they completely resolve those problems(and eliminate DRM).

And as to getting the best IQ? 2x/4x Anti-aliasing cleans up lower resolutions significantly even on my 1920 x 1200 monitor. 1280 x 960 w/ 4xAA looks as good(to me) as 1920 x 1200 w/ no AA AND gets higher performance.

Honestly, I'd rather have had the HD3870 over my 8800GTX even. It just wasn't even announced until after I got the 8800. Crysis aside, there is NO game where there is a significant advantage choosing Nvidia over ATI. FPS of 90+ vs FPS of 120+ makes no difference to me.



AMD Phenom II X6 1100T 4GHz(20 x 200) 1.5v 3000NB 2000HT, Corsair Hydro H110 w/ 4 x 140mm 1500RPM fans Push/Pull, Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5, 8GB(2 x 4GB) G.Skill RipJaws DDR3-1600 @ 1600MHz CL9 1.55v, Gigabyte GTX760 OC 4GB(1170/1700), Corsair 750HX
Detailed PC Specs: http://my.afterdawn.com/estuansis/blog_entry.cfm/11388

This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 27. March 2008 @ 02:57

Member
_
27. March 2008 @ 04:14 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   

FX8120 @ 4.5Ghz 1.3v,Asrock 970 extreme 3,8 gig crucial ballistix 1600 @ 1866, thermalright true spirit 140, 120gb Sandisk extreme ssd, 3TB second drive. Hd4830. Corsair Hx520 PSU.
AfterDawn Addict

4 product reviews
_
27. March 2008 @ 05:42 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
ck5134: Hmm, I have a board with an ATI chipset as well. Whilst it still works, it has its quirks, much like the other Asus boards I've had... The graphics drivers for ATI are nowhere near 100% unfortunately, but neither are they for nvidia either. In short, I'm not really impressed with anyone's graphics drivers, be it for XP or Linux.
Abuzar: Remember though, a 10% frame rate boost from overclocking my card earned me only 500 extra marks from my original 10K+ score. Overclocking it further and getting an extra 1% gave me an extra 200. I wouldn't gauge 3dmark as a measure of performance boosts.
Estuansis: I quite agree with the entirity of that post. Whilst you can say going for an image quality boost that is marginal in some games is purile, so is going for a frame rate boost you're not going to see. Even a frame rate boost that is noticeable, e.g.the HD3870 to the 8800GTX, it's not sufficiently much for an upgrade, and consequently, it's not sufficiently much to be worth panicking about.




Afterdawn Addict // Silent PC enthusiast // PC Build advisor // LANGamer Alias:Ratmanscoop
PC Specs page -- http://my.afterdawn.com/sammorris/blog_entry.cfm/11247
updated 10-Dec-13
AfterDawn Addict

15 product reviews
_
27. March 2008 @ 05:52 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
ck5134, Thanks for the article :P

Ok, now I see what you guys are getting at. But the differences are not significant and are not crippling to the look of the game in any way. For the most part this is just ATI doing what it does best. Better overall textures and IQ. Am I wrong?

I honestly would not see most of the quality differences between ATI and Nvidia if they were not shown to me. As most of you guys have probably noticed, I'm not a stickler for IQ. But I can notice and appreciate the differences where it counts. For me, that is AF quality and ever-annoying screen jaggies. Nvidia handles both of these well enough, so it is a non-issue for me right now.

But I am hoping for an ATI card in the future as I have enjoyed more than a year of use from my X1800XT and the change from ATI to nVidia did leave me feeling a bit weird on games that I originally played on ATI cards.

The big draw that ATI has for me is the 2D image quality and video acceleration. Smoother lines and crisper pictures. This is more important to me because I actually do more movie watching than game playing. I find ATI's video quality to be not only better than, but superior to Nvidia's.

But if I were really a big movie buff and 3D performance didn't matter, I would use neither brand. I would be using an(older) S3 Chrome S27. Best HTPC card made so far.

Quote:
Estuansis: I quite agree with the entirity of that post. Whilst you can say going for an image quality boost that is marginal in some games is purile, so is going for a frame rate boost you're not going to see. Even a frame rate boost that is noticeable, e.g.the HD3870 to the 8800GTX, it's not sufficiently much for an upgrade, and consequently, it's not sufficiently much to be worth panicking about.

That's what I mean. While I support both brands equally, ATI is my current top pick. (gonna say it again)Barring a few games where Nvidia's performance lead is a major advantage, most games play incredibly on the HD3850 and HD3870. So while Nvidia has better performance, it is inconsequential to choose ATI because both brands of cards will play the game smoothly at the same settings.



AMD Phenom II X6 1100T 4GHz(20 x 200) 1.5v 3000NB 2000HT, Corsair Hydro H110 w/ 4 x 140mm 1500RPM fans Push/Pull, Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5, 8GB(2 x 4GB) G.Skill RipJaws DDR3-1600 @ 1600MHz CL9 1.55v, Gigabyte GTX760 OC 4GB(1170/1700), Corsair 750HX
Detailed PC Specs: http://my.afterdawn.com/estuansis/blog_entry.cfm/11388

This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 27. March 2008 @ 06:01

AfterDawn Addict

4 product reviews
_
27. March 2008 @ 06:00 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Heh, well indeed, but best compromise?
I've not watched anything with intense scrutiny on an nvidia card so I wouldn't know the difference, but if ATI have a significant advantage there too, I'm definitely sticking with them for the near future.



Afterdawn Addict // Silent PC enthusiast // PC Build advisor // LANGamer Alias:Ratmanscoop
PC Specs page -- http://my.afterdawn.com/sammorris/blog_entry.cfm/11247
updated 10-Dec-13
AfterDawn Addict

15 product reviews
_
27. March 2008 @ 06:14 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
ATI's video acceleration is much better than Nvidia's IMO. But Nvidia cards do it adequately enough, so it comes down to personal preference. Performance or IQ?

Here's how it is in my eyes:

Nvidia = Overkill power, more mainstream like MS vs Apple, Lower but still adequate Nvidia IQ standard means that most people won't know the difference.

ATI = Less powerful but adequate, a little less mainstream and less popular than Nvidia, but higher IQ standard and more dedicated user base.



AMD Phenom II X6 1100T 4GHz(20 x 200) 1.5v 3000NB 2000HT, Corsair Hydro H110 w/ 4 x 140mm 1500RPM fans Push/Pull, Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5, 8GB(2 x 4GB) G.Skill RipJaws DDR3-1600 @ 1600MHz CL9 1.55v, Gigabyte GTX760 OC 4GB(1170/1700), Corsair 750HX
Detailed PC Specs: http://my.afterdawn.com/estuansis/blog_entry.cfm/11388

This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 27. March 2008 @ 06:20

AfterDawn Addict

4 product reviews
_
27. March 2008 @ 06:20 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
That is effectively what it boils down to, and that goes for the marketing as well. One of the reasons you don't see so many ATI fanboys as nvidia fanboys is the way the products are marketed. A famous quote from one of ATI's big cheeses before the AMD merger was "nvidia market ***t like gold and we market gold like ***t"...




Afterdawn Addict // Silent PC enthusiast // PC Build advisor // LANGamer Alias:Ratmanscoop
PC Specs page -- http://my.afterdawn.com/sammorris/blog_entry.cfm/11247
updated 10-Dec-13
Advertisement
_
__
 
_
AfterDawn Addict

15 product reviews
_
27. March 2008 @ 07:04 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Quote:
"nvidia market ***t like gold and we market gold like ***t"
lol

sammorris, I just got a call from Grampa. You were right. The P5N-E SLI is locking up when he tries to install Windows. lol

I'm going with him today(my day off) to get a refund and pick out a better board. ASUS is really seeming to suck lately.

If it makes you feel any better, I DID listen to you. I told him to expect problems, but he figured it would be worth a shot to see if this one worked.

I'm just gonna steer him to a Gigabyte board and see if he has any problems. Probably gonna end up showing him the GA-P35-DS3 as it is the same store where I got mine.

I also found out why the P5N-E SLI was good and is now crap. They switched chipsets from nForce 570 to nForce 650i. The first one was just okay, but when they made the jump they screwed it up. Seems most of the 650i versions are defective right out of the factory.

Quote:
I used to trust the THG VGA charts, and I still trust their articles, but the recent VGA charts are a crock of ***t, because all of the nvidias outperform all of the ATis, a 6600GT beating an HD3870? Give me a break. Look for the individual articles on the 8800s and HD3800s for better testing.
This is a little old but I had to comment. ALL of the games there seem to be "Nvidia Optimized." It's really sad because I just realized that, lol. Only a few moments ago I was wondering why they don't include full 3dmark 06 scores or any NEW games. Then I saw that they were all "The Way It's Meant to be Played."

Granted, Nvidia still has a sizable performance advantage over ATI. But a few of those tests are ridiculous. a 6800GT beating an HD3850 in Flight Simulator X? Pure bull, lol.


Now for more news.

http://forums.techpowerup.com/showthread.php?t=44484

Read this and tell me what you think.



AMD Phenom II X6 1100T 4GHz(20 x 200) 1.5v 3000NB 2000HT, Corsair Hydro H110 w/ 4 x 140mm 1500RPM fans Push/Pull, Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5, 8GB(2 x 4GB) G.Skill RipJaws DDR3-1600 @ 1600MHz CL9 1.55v, Gigabyte GTX760 OC 4GB(1170/1700), Corsair 750HX
Detailed PC Specs: http://my.afterdawn.com/estuansis/blog_entry.cfm/11388

This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 27. March 2008 @ 07:33

 
afterdawn.com > forums > pc hardware > building a new pc > the official budget-conscious dream machine!
 

Digital video: AfterDawn.com | AfterDawn Forums
Music: MP3Lizard.com
Gaming: Blasteroids.com | Blasteroids Forums | Compare game prices
Software: Software downloads
Blogs: User profile pages
RSS feeds: AfterDawn.com News | Software updates | AfterDawn Forums
International: AfterDawn in Finnish | AfterDawn in Swedish | AfterDawn in Norwegian | download.fi
Navigate: Search | Site map
About us: About AfterDawn Ltd | Advertise on our sites | Rules, Restrictions, Legal disclaimer & Privacy policy
Contact us: Send feedback | Contact our media sales team
 
  © 1999-2024 by AfterDawn Ltd.

  IDG TechNetwork