|
PS3 Games Without Rumble Feature how does it hold up?
|
|
|
sprit0ln
Junior Member
|
6. December 2006 @ 11:06 |
Link to this message
|
|
Interested to know as I like shooters, boxing etc and will seem weird with no force feedback
|
|
Advertisement
|
 |
|
|
|
sam1dog
Member
|
6. December 2006 @ 12:22 |
Link to this message
|
|
Thats a huge drawback is no rumble feature. Any game that is out for both PS3 and Xbox 360 I would purchase for Xbox 360 over this feature alone. I can't imagine playing Call of Duty without rumble.
|
|
sprit0ln
Junior Member
|
6. December 2006 @ 12:26 |
Link to this message
|
|
Have you got a PS3?
I really cant imagine playing certain type games without the rumble, it must take away 50% of the gameplay experience
|
Senior Member
|
6. December 2006 @ 12:31 |
Link to this message
|
|
I have a Playstation3 and it really doesn't bother me. My 2 PS2 controllers from launch must have been defective because the rumble never worked. I guess it may just be because im not used to the feature.
|
|
sprit0ln
Junior Member
|
6. December 2006 @ 12:36 |
Link to this message
|
|
@ ibjaredu
I remember when the rumble feature was added to my N64 it really did change my gaming experience totally.
I dont know why Sony took it out for this motion sensor thing, it just doesnt compete should have had both
|
Moderator
16 product reviews
|
6. December 2006 @ 12:39 |
Link to this message
|
|
Wow a little "rumble" is what sells games huh....whatever. I myself like how light the controller is without it and how long the controller stays charged (especially without the $50 additional charger like a 360).
And it was taken out because of a stupid company "claiming" they had a patent on it when it was all BS and Sony out of principle decided not to pay future royalties (which I agree on).
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 6. December 2006 @ 12:42
|
|
sprit0ln
Junior Member
|
6. December 2006 @ 12:43 |
Link to this message
|
|
Oner you have to admit the rumble feature added immensly to gameplay, shooters, fighting, driving in fact nearly all games!
You can 'feel' when you take a hit or crash etc etc
You really prefer this new controller to the old one?
|
|
sprit0ln
Junior Member
|
6. December 2006 @ 12:44 |
Link to this message
|
|
Oh btw Oner Sony and principles dont go together!
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
6. December 2006 @ 12:49 |
Link to this message
|
|
Rumble was an ok addition but it wasent that amazing. Even in some games thta used rumble I found myself turning the rumble off because it was annoying and screwed me up..... Besides I would rather have the six-axis controller, wirless, motion sensing blu-tooth controller then just a controler thta rumbles.
|
Senior Member
|
6. December 2006 @ 12:52 |
Link to this message
|
|
I think the Sixaxis was the best controller modification since the Dualshock for PS1.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 6. December 2006 @ 12:52
|
|
sprit0ln
Junior Member
|
6. December 2006 @ 12:53 |
Link to this message
|
|
Suppose it depends on how the motion sensing works on the PS3 and if it is really utilised or turns out to be the rushed add on.
|
Senior Member
|
6. December 2006 @ 12:54 |
Link to this message
|
|
it seems to work really well on Motorstorm. I don't see why everyone makes such a big deal out of the Wiimote if PS3 can do the same.
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
6. December 2006 @ 12:55 |
Link to this message
|
|
Yeah I always found that I liked the sony controller the best it seemed to be the most organized in button arrangement.
Also the motion sensing is fine, I found that heir is no problem to it.
EDIT: The wii motes are cool and all but it gets so annoying and tiring after a while because your moving all around and stuff. But those controllers are cool and all but I dont really want the "in-the-game" experience. I would rather just sit down and play normally.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 6. December 2006 @ 12:57
|
|
TwoHitter
Suspended permanently
|
6. December 2006 @ 17:01 |
Link to this message
|
|
Could you imagine Goldeneye for the N64 with no rumble??
Me either....
Sony fans are fooling themselves if they think losing rumble wasn't a big deal. When some "real" games come out for the PS3 is when your gonna miss it the most.
Metal Gear will not be the same without the rumble feature, thats for sure.
|
Senior Member
|
6. December 2006 @ 18:29 |
Link to this message
|
|
i hope people see the trend here which is those who actually OWN the ps3 happen to be fine and like the current controller, features and all. i too own the system and don't mind or feel like anything is lost without rumble. i don't know, but when i played F.E.A.R. on my pc i didn't feel that anything was taken from the game because guess what, the keyboard and mouse didn't support rumble either!
i think some are a bit desperate on this argument...
|
|
Cinch
Member
|
6. December 2006 @ 18:53 |
Link to this message
|
|
Sony had to discontinue the 'rumble' because they were sued over patnent rights violation. Can't remember who sued them or the details, but that's why it is no longer on anything Sony.
|
|
emachine
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
6. December 2006 @ 18:55 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by hade:
i hope people see the trend here which is those who actually OWN the ps3 happen to be fine and like the current controller, features and all. i too own the system and don't mind or feel like anything is lost without rumble. i don't know, but when i played F.E.A.R. on my pc i didn't feel that anything was taken from the game because guess what, the keyboard and mouse didn't support rumble either!
i think some are a bit desperate on this argument...
I think people are exaggerating on both ends. sony fan boys are acting like there was no rumble to begin with and ms fan boys are acting like its the end of the world.
One question why do you want to argue which console is better constantly? It drives me CRAZY!!!!!!!! Whats the big deal??!?
|
|
cazer
Member
1 product review
|
6. December 2006 @ 19:34 |
Link to this message
|
|
your hands vibrating is nothing. try your whole body now that would be something. rumble feature was nothing, didnt even notice it most of the time. and the n 64 rumble pack sucked. at least the ps2 controler had the moters in your palms not in front and hanging down below your hands. Sixaxis is nice.
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
6. December 2006 @ 20:36 |
Link to this message
|
|
i like the controller. i go so long before ever wondering about vibration, hours even. it doesnt really effect gameplay. give the sixaxis time, there are no game out that really display its potential.
But they all do sort of the same thing, and that is rearrange what you thought was real, and they remind you of the beauty of very simple things. You forget, because youre so busy going from a to z, that theres 24 letters in between... You turn on... tune in... and you drop out...
PS3 Username: Anubis66
|
|
The_Fiend
Suspended permanently
|
6. December 2006 @ 22:54 |
Link to this message
|
|
I kinda miss the vibration...
Socom 2 - vibration = getting Pwned :-(
Not to mention wireless sucks.
irc://arcor.de.eu.dal.net/wasted_hate
Wanna tell me off, go ahead.
I dare ya !
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 6. December 2006 @ 22:56
|
|
bzkilla
Junior Member
|
7. December 2006 @ 07:19 |
Link to this message
|
|
well i have a ps3 and yeah at first i missed the rumble plus the control felt too light. but oh well i got used to it i dont really feel the difference. the motion thing is really cool. u can pistol whip someone in call of duty 3 if u actually do it with the control. so its alot better. when u are on fire in resistance u have to shake the hell out of the controller to put it out. its fun. as for the rumble. later on sony will add it on to it in order to make more green green. trust me. just like the ps one. with the first controls and then with the analog ones dual shock. sick huh.
Wat it do yo
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
7. December 2006 @ 08:18 |
Link to this message
|
|
rumble was great in high tention games, it gott a little repetative in almost any other game, and kinda just faded into the backround of a world i creat when gaming.
But they all do sort of the same thing, and that is rearrange what you thought was real, and they remind you of the beauty of very simple things. You forget, because youre so busy going from a to z, that theres 24 letters in between... You turn on... tune in... and you drop out...
PS3 Username: Anubis66
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
7. December 2006 @ 11:14 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
Not to mention wireless sucks.
Really? Why?
Also good point hade no PC games rumble with a mouse and it never took away from the experience I had.....
|
Senior Member
|
8. December 2006 @ 07:36 |
Link to this message
|
|
yeah, why does wireless suck?
i think somebodys on crack...
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
Member
|
8. December 2006 @ 08:06 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by sam1dog:
Thats a huge drawback is no rumble feature. Any game that is out for both PS3 and Xbox 360 I would purchase for Xbox 360 over this feature alone. I can't imagine playing Call of Duty without rumble.
u must be kinding, u gotta be an idiot to buy a condole just because it has rumble. i personaly don't like rumble that much infact almost all the time, i always check if its turned oof before i play a game cuz it really piss me of.
buying a console cuz it has rumble is like buying a car cuz it has springs that alows it to bounce( a car looks cool boucing but u really don't need it to bounce, do u)an average car would still so the job(traveling)
goodmen |
