|
Post your Nero cd/dvd speed quality scans here
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
21. March 2007 @ 16:23 |
Link to this message
|
@bigwilly,
Nice scan there buddy. Low PIF's. Is that a copy or did you re-do the disc? :)
A few scans for your perusal. LOL.
Good scan for a Ritek R03. Burned at 4X on the LH-18A1P.
GREAT scan for a Prodisc, again burned at 4X. Labeled FUJI DVD+R 16X.
I'll add some more later. Hope everyone is doing well. :)
....gm
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
21. March 2007 @ 17:15 |
Link to this message
|
|
if it aint to late when i get home i might try and do Eragon and post it. not a bad scan greensman. you got any cases to put them in?????ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
21. March 2007 @ 17:28 |
Link to this message
|
|
Don't get cheeky!!!! ROFLMAOPM!!!! Figure that one out. hehehe. WEll if I don't maybe I can make a bag or box haul like some SOB I know. hahaha.
Back in a bit with some scans. Lazy day for me, all the way around. hehehe.
....gm
|
|
aabbccdd
Suspended permanently
|
21. March 2007 @ 17:45 |
Link to this message
|
|
be back soon guys the flu is kicking my ass!!
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
21. March 2007 @ 17:50 |
Link to this message
|
|
@aabbccdd
hey get that junk out of your system brother.wouldnt wish the flu on anyone..
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
21. March 2007 @ 21:07 |
Link to this message
|
Got 3 of them to add. I ripped these on the HDD the other day and forgot all about it. LOL. Got 2x 250GiB WD's and sometimes loose stuff on there. j/k, actually got CRS syndrome. hahaha.
YUDEN T02 with less than desirable results. I think that I need to defrag this drive. :) NOt all bad just not my typical burn on the Pioneer 112 as far as PIF's. :)
MCC 004 burned on the Pioneer 112. Pretty typical burn for the MCC 004.
MCC 004 burned on the LH-18A1P. I little bit better. Actually used CloneDVD2 to 'shrink' the movie and write. Good program for the money. :)
btw these were all burned at 8X. :)
...gm
|
|
bigwill68
Suspended permanently
|
21. March 2007 @ 23:30 |
Link to this message
|
|
@greensman
that's a copy off a old mcc-002 data life verb 4x'x.I first did back in 2004..i scaned it first..came hi so i re ripped to a ty -r 8x's full speed and came out with a better scan..
run with it brother.. do your thing.. good 1..like the scan..also
Done out of Here!
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 21. March 2007 @ 23:34
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
22. March 2007 @ 07:01 |
Link to this message
|
heres the first burn of Eragon.not a bad scan not good either. you all know me in want my pif's 2 or less..lol
low amount of PIE's but the PIF's are high(total)
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
22. March 2007 @ 10:28 |
Link to this message
|
@cincyrob,
Nice scan buddy, but look at this. LOL.
You might recognize this, just be patient. hehehe.
Honestly I can't remember which drive did this one. It was either the Pioneer or the LITE-ON. I did about 6 last night and was swapping back and forth on drives. Good results doesn't matter which drive did it. :)
.....gm
btw if anyone knows how do you get the Nero scan thingy to recognize the drive you recorded the disc on? Sometimes mine works and sometimes it doesn't which makes ZERO sense. :)
|
Moderator
1 product review
|
22. March 2007 @ 11:20 |
Link to this message
|
TY +R 8X burned at 8X...and scanned with Benny, just can't seem to make it under 100 failures.
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
22. March 2007 @ 14:39 |
Link to this message
|
|
@LOCO
i dont think i have seen a scan from a benq that had pif's lower than a 100. i might be wrong and someone please correct me. but the way benq's do there scans, there requirements are different than say a liteon or a pioneer. if you have one of those drives try and scan your disc on those and see if you get any under 100.
|
Moderator
1 product review
|
22. March 2007 @ 14:48 |
Link to this message
|
|
My two drives are an NEC and BenQ...I've seen at least one with scores below 100. I've never been able to get there though. I'll look up the link if I can find it.
|
|
lundy1987
Newbie
|
22. March 2007 @ 16:28 |
Link to this message
|
Hi, im using 16x verbatim discs and have a Pioneer Model: DVR-111D writer
i only had time do do a quick scan but may do a full one and show the results tommorow, but from this pic, you can see my pi errors max are much higher (150ish)than everyone elses..
does this meen my burns are low quality, and if so what can i do to improve them??
thanx
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
22. March 2007 @ 16:46 |
Link to this message
|
@lundy
first of all welcome to AD and the crazy Nero scan thread..lol
you have a good burner and are useing good quality media.
first what speed are you burning at? i would recomend 8x for those 16x verbs. woulndt go over 12x. ive gotten some good score at 12x but its pushing it.
from what i know about the pioneer drives(which isnt alot) they arent that good of a scanning drive. awsome burner but not that good of a scanner. your not doing any multy tasking when burning are you?
where im at right now i cant see your scan. but how is your PIF's those are what i look at the most. you get a high number of those and its makeing of a bad disc.
@greensman. you have the 112d pioneer got any pointers here?
|
Moderator
|
22. March 2007 @ 16:49 |
Link to this message
|
|
@lundy1987
Good scan - 99 quality score 16 total pif's - got me beat :)
@cincyrob
Check the scan out when you get home - lundy1987 may have the record in this thread for lowest pif's & almost burning to the edge!
|
|
lundy1987
Newbie
|
22. March 2007 @ 16:53 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by cincyrob:
@lundy
first of all welcome to AD and the crazy Nero scan thread..lol
you have a good burner and are useing good quality media.
first what speed are you burning at? i would recomend 8x for those 16x verbs. woulndt go over 12x. ive gotten some good score at 12x but its pushing it.
from what i know about the pioneer drives(which isnt alot) they arent that good of a scanning drive. awsome burner but not that good of a scanner. your not doing any multy tasking when burning are you?
where im at right now i cant see your scan. but how is your PIF's those are what i look at the most. you get a high number of those and its makeing of a bad disc.
@greensman. you have the 112d pioneer got any pointers here?
erm ye i am doing them at 16, as far as the pi errors go im getting 140 max pi errors when burning at 8x compared to 160 max at 16x, so not that much of a difference, i havnt had one single test thats had over 2 for pi failures...
but now and again i will have discs that may jump or skip and wanted to improve the reliability of my copies
oh and no mate im leaving the pc alone while burning and disabling my anti virus software
|
|
lundy1987
Newbie
|
22. March 2007 @ 16:58 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by binkie7:
@lundy1987
Good scan - 99 quality score 16 total pif's - got me beat :)
@cincyrob
Check the scan out when you get home - lundy1987 may have the record in this thread for lowest pif's & almost burning to the edge!
erm am doing a full scan now n am getting more pifs lol, doesnt seem to pick up hardly any on a full scan, thats was only a quick i posted a pic of, what i was wondering about was the pi errors....why are mine about 150 max and everyone else on here seems to get 15 odd and low numbers like that?
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
22. March 2007 @ 17:07 |
Link to this message
|
ELLO cincyrob,
Waiving and smiling atcha!! lol
@lundy1987,
Please tell me that's not the year you graduated. ;-)
Like cincyrob said you should burn no higher than 12X IMO. I get the best results across the board burning at 8X on all media that is rated 8X or higher. I have a Pioneer DVR-112L, a BENQ DW-1650, and a Lite-On LH-18A1P and they are burn like a champ.
In all fairness I only do the quality scans on the Lite-On because they are the most widely accepted scanners out there. BENQ's are next but the strategy for scoring is very different. I've found with the new Pioneer it scans very similarly to the BENQ. Don't hold me to that but the few scans I've done on the Pioneer look much like the BENQ scans. :)
I think the first thing you should do to compare your scans to ours (or at other forums as a general rule) is scan at 4X. Next uncheck the QuickScan feature and see what happens. That would more closely resemble what we're doin here and at CDF as well. I've been reading a little on the Jitter test and there are some that believe it may be more important than the PIF's but if you have BAD PIF's you may have a bad Jitter. JM2C on that. :)
The next thing to check is the f/w version on your Pioneer 111. I would recommend looking at this website for f/w's o the Pioneer, these guys are great and really know their stuff. The latest version of STOCK f/w is 1.29 and you can choose whichever BUFFALO you want and give that a try. :) I would problably try the 8.26 or 8.29 INT if you have an internal drive. ;-)
I hope this does something for you and answers some questions. :):)
...gm
TO ADD:
HI binkie7,
You getting ready for some much needed rest from school??? hehehe.
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
22. March 2007 @ 17:14 |
Link to this message
|
|
I'm gonna let you finish your scan and see what your getting. :)
Yeh that seems high for max PIE's. My Pioneer 112L and Lite-On LH-18A1P normally give very low PIE's, like less than 15K total.
Another thing to look at for now is the DISC cleanup feature and DISC defrag feature both available with WinXP.
.....gm
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
22. March 2007 @ 17:19 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by binkie7:
@lundy1987
Good scan - 99 quality score 16 total pif's - got me beat :)
@cincyrob
Check the scan out when you get home - lundy1987 may have the record in this thread for lowest pif's & almost burning to the edge!
wow 16 max pif's thats awsome, but.....UNJUST still has that record. only 6 max pif's.lol still 16 is way to sweet.
@lundy
the reason your getting the skipping and freezeing is cause you burned them at 16x's. slow them down to 8x, maybe 10x if the pioneer will allow that speed.yor not gaining alot in speed burning them that fast. slow it down and i bet anything you will see a big difference in quality when watching your backups....
|
Moderator
|
22. March 2007 @ 17:27 |
Link to this message
|
|
@greenman
Sh*t I wish :) Too friggin busy - just taking a break before do some research for work - seems never ending right now - ugh!
Is 1987 the year you graduated?
@lundy1987
Good advice from the guys per usual!
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
22. March 2007 @ 17:31 |
Link to this message
|
|
@binks,
YEP!!! and you????
....gm
Man that seems like a lame answer and I'll do some fill just to make this look like a longer post. hehehe.
@cincyrob,
Sent you a PM. ttyl buddy. :)
|
|
lundy1987
Newbie
|
22. March 2007 @ 17:32 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by greensman:
ELLO cincyrob,
Waiving and smiling atcha!! lol
@lundy1987,
Please tell me that's not the year you graduated. ;-)
Like cincyrob said you should burn no higher than 12X IMO. I get the best results across the board burning at 8X on all media that is rated 8X or higher. I have a Pioneer DVR-112L, a BENQ DW-1650, and a Lite-On LH-18A1P and they are burn like a champ.
In all fairness I only do the quality scans on the Lite-On because they are the most widely accepted scanners out there. BENQ's are next but the strategy for scoring is very different. I've found with the new Pioneer it scans very similarly to the BENQ. Don't hold me to that but the few scans I've done on the Pioneer look much like the BENQ scans. :)
I think the first thing you should do to compare your scans to ours (or at other forums as a general rule) is scan at 4X. Next uncheck the QuickScan feature and see what happens. That would more closely resemble what we're doin here and at CDF as well. I've been reading a little on the Jitter test and there are some that believe it may be more important than the PIF's but if you have BAD PIF's you may have a bad Jitter. JM2C on that. :)
The next thing to check is the f/w version on your Pioneer 111. I would recommend looking at this website for f/w's o the Pioneer, these guys are great and really know their stuff. The latest version of STOCK f/w is 1.29 and you can choose whichever BUFFALO you want and give that a try. :) I would problably try the 8.26 or 8.29 INT if you have an internal drive. ;-)
I hope this does something for you and answers some questions. :):)
...gm
TO ADD:
HI binkie7,
You getting ready for some much needed rest from school??? hehehe.
it is saying available target not found when i try and use the 8.29 INT one, should i just use the 1.29? iv done that one but now my pi errors are about 170 max, so theyve gone up
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
22. March 2007 @ 17:41 |
Link to this message
|
|
1987 thats a good year to graduate....20 year reunion comeing up
1987 amost as good as 1969 ;)
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
22. March 2007 @ 17:43 |
Link to this message
|
|
I just thought I was leaving. hehehe.
@lundy1987,
Try the 8.26 and see what happens. You do have everything out of the drive and nothing running that would conflict with the flash right?
If all else fails go back to the 1.26 and see what you get, it's all about getting the best result from the drive with whatever f/w gives you the that best result. Is that confusing? lol.
I don't understand why it is giving you that "error message". You did dl the right f/w right? NOT calling you silly or anything but I've done it. LOL. I had 3 lite-on's running at one time and never could remember which one I wanted to update. hehehe.
Anyway check those things and I'll be on later tonight. A card game awaits my $$$. LOL.
.....gm
EDIT:
@cincyrob,
I like 1987 and 1968 a little better myself. LOLOLOLOL. TTYL rob, have a good night at work. :)
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 22. March 2007 @ 17:44
|
