Originally posted by Bigperm88:

---

Haha.

With a name like PS4life, do you expect anyone to take you seriously??
You are a sad sad fanboy. Kthxbye.
How about this.

In recent news Gamespot did a side by side comparison show games like NFS carbon (developed for both platforms, not a port) ,tiger woods (Again, not a port), Madden 07 (Again, developed for both platforms) and guess what. They look suprisly similar. Note the 360s lack of jaggies in the last xmen shot, but note the increased detail in the trees of tiger woods. And of course there is the lighting differences.

And look at this.

Hmm, ps3 does'nt lack memoery, XDR memory is how fast?
psr's memory is 256MB
XDR Main RAM @3.2GHz
256MB GDDR3 VRAM @700MHz

while 360's is
? 512 MB of GDDR3 RAM
? 700 MHz of DDR
-unified

This guy is wrapped up in the numbers game. You cannot even compare these two systems with the numbers game, its impossible. Just compare the textures used ingame, compare the frame rates, and compare amount of particles on screen. And you will get the same answer 99% of developers are saying. The systems are on par, or very close to it.

And the argument about not being able to tap the power of the cell is also very foolish. Each console has not been extensivly developed for. to think that the ps3 will become leaps and bounds better than the 360 in a year is rubbish. The facts are right now is that the ps3 has worse textures and frame rate on every multiplatform game, well except tiger woods. The majority of 360 games are only using one core, and the 360 excells in parallel code.

Both systems are going to be amazing next year, as long as Sony can get you that console. Becasue we all know the Sony product will sell. Heck, im buying one. But to think that one will be leaps or the other is nonsense.

---

Originally posted by Bigperm88:

---

Well IMHO the whole, "they only had the dev kits for a couple months is BS". The PS3 dev kits have been released since the final specs were released a year ago.

Games like Project 8, COD3 and tiger woods had the exact same dev time. They will get better, but i will say again, each system will be on par with earch other.

Look at NBA07 developed by SCEA. This true 1080p, 60fps looks very sub par. And plays very sub par. I expect more from a Sony made exclusive.
Fight Night Round 3 was said to be the X360 killer. It was said to have true 1080p, better lighting, and many other features. EA spent an extra 9 months! on the PS3 version. And look at the results, when compared to the 360 version its lacks detail, proper lighting, and IMHO they made it worse.

Im done waiting on Sony false hopes and promises. I have every sony console including my PSP. But i will not be buying a PS3 until they can prove its not a dud. Final Motorstorm is looking a lot better, but its not all rendered, much like GT HD. Its just tracks built around hi res pictures, which again IMO is not acceptable, and proves how much they over hyped and under delivered this gen. Then there is the scaling issues,controller issues, BC games look horable, and even with less textures and detail, the games still shutter more than the 360 couterparts. Everyone should buy what they want, but do your own research, and dont just buy on namesake.

---

Originally posted by Oner:

---

THAT kids is what it boils down too, the 360 is probably close to 90% MAXED out already!

---

Originally posted by Rokz0r:

---

I still don't understand why some of you keep insisting on the "developers havent had enough time" statement? Which is complete and utter crap and there is proof all over the internet about when the dev kits where released/revealed to developers.

---

Quote:

---

"...I think the biggest difference is that the 360 has been in our hands longer, and I'll be totally honest that Microsoft's development tools are better, so you can compile faster, you can debug quicker. PS3 is catching up though ? PS3 tools are already better than the PS2 ones.

---