|
Post your Nero cd/dvd speed quality scans here
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
13. November 2006 @ 09:00 |
Link to this message
|
|
YUDEN000T2s burn really nice! I get high scores on these, also!
|
|
Advertisement
|
  |
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
13. November 2006 @ 09:57 |
Link to this message
|
|
Ihoe, I envy you! YUDEN000T02s! I'd love to have some of those :P
lol
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
13. November 2006 @ 11:09 |
Link to this message
|
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
13. November 2006 @ 11:48 |
Link to this message
|
|
I'm in the UK :(
Not rly wanting to ship them over... lol
|
|
pahick
Junior Member
|
13. November 2006 @ 14:33 |
Link to this message
|
Just picked up some Sony +R's, code as D21. Even though the score is a little lower, the burn pattern is much more stable compared to the Verb's I burnt....BTW, burnt@16x.

X2 3800@2.4 Epox MGF6100-M 1G GSkill pc6400 (2)NEC 3550A's 74G Raptor 160G Hitachi Audigy 4 Enermax Liberty 400w PSU MicroFly case
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 13. November 2006 @ 14:34
|
Moderator
|
13. November 2006 @ 15:03 |
Link to this message
|
@gary431
Good scan!
To post it in the thread follow Ripper's advice by put the UBB codes before & after the link (when you click reply - also has instructions)
Here's the scan:

@pahick
I haven't had any problems w/ Sony made media either. That's a good scan burned at 16x. I haven't noticed much a drop in scan scores or quality (playback) burning at 16x speed either. Been experimenting more burning at that speed. I'll check them in a few months :)
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
13. November 2006 @ 15:16 |
Link to this message
|
|
well now that i went and bought a bunch of 8x media seems like they have worked oyut the bugs on the 16x media. go figure..lol i get myself in the mode of burning slower and now i can burnm faster and dont have any 16x media..lol well i have about 8, 16x-r sony(mij)..
i will say im tired of looking at scans right now..LMAO....
i read a link from teflonmyks page about pi/pif errors to much for me to take in..
except you dont want any pi errors over 280, and anything over 500 you shouldnt be able to play. the reason i say shouldnt is because i scanned one of my first ever burns and had a few of them over 800. but it played fine. that was burnt in feb 06....
|
|
pahick
Junior Member
|
13. November 2006 @ 15:22 |
Link to this message
|
|
@Binkie7
I get a 93 and ole Gary gets a 97...WHAT A RIP!! lmao..jk. But look at the numbers. As said before though, as long as they play....
@cincyrob
If I stick to +R's i get much better scores. I dont think ill buy any -R's again.
X2 3800@2.4 Epox MGF6100-M 1G GSkill pc6400 (2)NEC 3550A's 74G Raptor 160G Hitachi Audigy 4 Enermax Liberty 400w PSU MicroFly case
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 13. November 2006 @ 15:23
|
Moderator
|
13. November 2006 @ 15:34 |
Link to this message
|
|
See I'm a cheapy :)- I probably burn 60% -R and 40% +R.
Reason - I use the inkjet printable ones and they are cheaper in the -R format.
Maybe one day online stores will do like the b&m stores and price them the same.
@IHoe - almost forgot Sorry about the Giants (not!!! hehe)
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
13. November 2006 @ 16:00 |
Link to this message
|
|
the -r'si have are TY's i havent had any problems out of them i guess its just urban legend or what ever ya call it why people tend to use the +r's more. when i got the -r's i didnt really want to get them but they were on sale and now im gld i got them...
@binkie7 i think i might try some of them -r printables (hub)
|
Moderator
|
13. November 2006 @ 16:12 |
Link to this message
|
@cinryrob
I've been using the TY hub & non hub printables -R's for about 2 years. They have stood the test of time ;) (well so far at least!)
@pahick
Quote: As said before though, as long as they play....
Ah so very true!
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
13. November 2006 @ 16:33 |
Link to this message
|
@Binkie...... I'm over the loss in the Giant game! oh well! Live with it!
one thing about my TYG03s...... I did a Qscan from QSuite that came with my BenQ 1655 drive. It told me that the best speed to write to the TYG03s would be 12x..... but the burning times actually are more than the 8x burning times! I found this to be weird as I always have burned to 8x before I got the 16x TYG03s..... and yet the scans prove that I can burn a DVD with AnyDVD and CloneDVD in 15mins at 8x, but if I do the same DVD with AnyDVD & CloneDVD at 16x it takes me over 20-25mins! It should be less!!!! After about 25 from a 100 pack of TYG03s..... I have to admit that the 8x burns are not only faster but the scans are even better! Does anyone else find this same thing happening to their drive?
|
Moderator
|
13. November 2006 @ 16:51 |
Link to this message
|
|
Too funny IHoe - I have the opposite problem - well not really a problem.
Verb +R 16x take me longer burning at 12x or higher than the TY -R 16x.
Though the Verbs maybe 10 mins at higher speeds - roughly 7 mins for 8x TY's & under 6 for 16x.
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
13. November 2006 @ 17:17 |
Link to this message
|
|
I guess it all depends on the burner....... my BenQ is really nice and burn the YUDEN00T2s just fine with great scans and burns fast at 8x within 15mins for a full DVD...... the TYG03s burn faster at 8x than at 16x! go figure!
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
14. November 2006 @ 04:26 |
Link to this message
|
|
i just got out my series of the Star Wars movies 1-6. i burnt them back in march just after i got into burning. thats when i was puting, i dont want to say this word, memorex adhesive covers on top of those wonderful 8x+r verbs. i wasnt able to check the QS on them back then cause i only had my HP burner so i dont know what ihad back then.gonna post the results when i get them done.all 6 of these movies have the adhesive cover on the disc...:(
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
14. November 2006 @ 04:33 |
Link to this message
|
well i guess this i what i get for being stupid.....would i be able to rerip this and reburn? im gonna try..
 
please people do not put these things on your disc such a waste. i have about 100 disc with these things on them
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
14. November 2006 @ 04:50 |
Link to this message
|
heres starwars 2 no were near as bad
 ] 
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
14. November 2006 @ 05:09 |
Link to this message
|
this is starwars 3. im not gonna waste my time doing the other 3 just gonna try and rerip one and scan it to see the outcome.
 
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
14. November 2006 @ 05:32 |
Link to this message
|
|
Ouch Cincy, those are some bad scans :P
They're on MCC003 though..? What did you do wrong?!!
Lol
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
14. November 2006 @ 06:05 |
Link to this message
|
|
put them damn adheasive covers on top of the disc like a fool
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
14. November 2006 @ 06:11 |
Link to this message
|
|
Argh!
/me slaps cincy with his adhesive covers :P
Seems like you learnt that hard way then :(
I suppose you could try re-ripping; but to be honest, it's not going to work...IMO.
Might aswell try to rerip anyway! :)
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
14. November 2006 @ 07:01 |
Link to this message
|
|
well i tried everyway i know how and its a no go at this station(wow deja-vu thought i was in the army again)...guess im gonna have to break out the real deal and rip from it... i hate doing that. i got the complete triolgy and all 3 of the recent movies(4,5,6) and have only been played 3 times.guess its gonna be a 4th
gotta learn how to spell
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 14. November 2006 @ 07:03
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
14. November 2006 @ 07:28 |
Link to this message
|
|
Aww shame they wouldn't rip :(
And yeah ripping from originals, that are yours, hurts ;-)
|
Senior Member
|
14. November 2006 @ 14:16 |
Link to this message
|
|
soak the disks in warm water with a little dish detergent in them, will soften up the adhesive and let you remove the labels, you'll get better results ripping them again.
Been there, done that, bought the time share in label land Rob.
|
|
Advertisement
|
  |
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
14. November 2006 @ 14:44 |
Link to this message
|
|
ill give that a try Blivet. i did try the tooth paste on one once. that was a total waste scratched the disc even more...
|