|
|
|
007 casino Royale
|
|
|
unolord
Member
1 product review
|
10. April 2007 @ 15:20 |
Link to this message
|
|
Like I said, I've never had a problem with my JVC playing anything before. TYs, verbatim (my media of choice), Sonys even some old Riteks I've burned a couple of yrs ago. Doesn't matter if it's -R or +R. Only issue I ever had prior to this was with a crappy RCA I bought in 2000 that wouldn't play anything that wasn't store bought.
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
|
PacMan777
AfterDawn Addict
|
10. April 2007 @ 19:56 |
Link to this message
|
|
The new Casino Royale/DVD player thread. LOL
Casino Royale isn't much of a problem when using the right software. And most DVD players aren't picky. We hear more about problems that come up because forums are where people come to complain. Just think of all the people who don't have problems and say nothing. ;)
|
|
vmo1701
Newbie
|
11. April 2007 @ 12:42 |
Link to this message
|
|
Still having trouble with chapters 6 through 8.
I ripped and burned the dvd following the directions on this board, but all I get is coasters.
Very frustrating.
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
11. April 2007 @ 12:57 |
Link to this message
|
|
Post a burn log.
99% of all problems are between the computer and the chair.
|
|
vmo1701
Newbie
|
11. April 2007 @ 18:49 |
Link to this message
|
====== *** NeroAPI, History File *** ======
xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx*
Windows XP 5.1
IA32
WinAspi: -
ahead WinASPI: File 'C:\Program Files\Ahead\Nero\Wnaspi32.dll': Ver=2.0.1.74, size=164112 bytes, created 10/26/2004 12:35:32 PM
Nero API version: 6.6.0.17
Using interface version: 6.3.1.4
Installed in: C:\Program Files\Ahead\Nero\
Application: ahead\Nero - Burning Rom
Internal Version: 6, 6, 0, 17c
Recorder: <LITE-ON DVDRW SHW-160P6S>Version: PS08 - HA 1 TA 0 - 6.6.0.17
Adapter driver: <atapi> HA 1
Drive buffer : 2048kB
Bus Type : default (0) -> ATAPI, detected: ATAPI
=== Scsi-Device-Map ===
DiskPeripheral : Hard Drive 1 atapi Port 0 ID 0 DMA: On
DiskPeripheral : Hard Drive 2 atapi Port 0 ID 1 DMA: On
CdRomPeripheral : LITE-ON DVDRW SHW-160P6S atapi Port 1 ID 0 DMA: On
CdRomPeripheral : PLEXTOR CD-R PX-W4012A atapi Port 1 ID 1 DMA: On
CdRomPeripheral : HP2155Q CJY800E 2.0B vaxscsi Port 2 ID 0 DMA: Off
=== CDRom-Device-Map ===
LITE-ON DVDRW SHW-160P6S D: CDRom0
PLEXTOR CD-R PX-W4012A E: CDRom1
HP2155Q CJY800E G: CDRom2
=======================
AutoRun : 1
Excluded drive IDs:
WriteBufferSize: 83886080 (0) Byte
ShowDrvBufStat : 0
BUFE : 0
Physical memory : 1023MB (1047992kB)
Free physical memory: 238MB (244564kB)
Memory in use : 76
Uncached PFiles: 0x0
Use Inquiry : 1
Global Bus Type: default (0)
Check supported media : Disabled (0)
11.4.2007
NeroAPI
6:48:24 PM #1 Phase 112 File APIProgress.cpp, Line 276
DVD-Video files reallocation started
6:48:25 PM #2 Phase 114 File APIProgress.cpp, Line 276
DVD-Video files reallocation completed (no file modified)
6:48:25 PM #3 Phase 111 File APIProgress.cpp, Line 276
DVD-Video files sorted
6:48:26 PM #4 Text 0 File Reader.cpp, Line 127
Reader running
6:48:26 PM #5 Text 0 File Writer.cpp, Line 122
Writer LITE-ON DVDRW SHW-160P6S running
6:48:26 PM #6 Text 0 File AudioCompilationImpl.cpp, Line 842
DRM: StartDrmRecording(RealRec:1, ImageRec:0, Copies:1)
DRM: Beginning burn process.
6:48:26 PM #7 ISO9660GEN -11 File geniso.cpp, Line 3309
First writeable address = 0 (0x00000000)
6:48:26 PM #8 ISO9660GEN -11 File geniso.cpp, Line 3309
First writeable address = 0 (0x00000000)
6:48:26 PM #9 Text 0 File Burncd.cpp, Line 3233
Turn on Disc-At-Once, using DVD media
2:15:32 AM #10 Text 0 File DlgWaitCD.cpp, Line 270
Last possible write address on media: 2295103 (510:01.28, 4482MB)
Last address to be written: 2286111 (508:01.36, 4465MB)
2:15:32 AM #11 Text 0 File DlgWaitCD.cpp, Line 282
Write in overburning mode: NO
2:15:32 AM #12 Text 0 File DlgWaitCD.cpp, Line 2483
Recorder: LITE-ON DVDRW SHW-160P6S, Media type: DVD+R
Disc Manufacturer ID: CMC MAG, Media Type ID: M01, Product revision number: 0
Disc Application Code: 0, Extended Information Indicators: 7
2:15:32 AM #13 Text 0 File DlgWaitCD.cpp, Line 448
>>> Protocol of DlgWaitCD activities: <<<
=========================================
Insert empty disc to write to.
(Medium in drive: unknown. Medium required by compilation: DVD+R/RW, DVD-R/RW, DVD-R DL, DVD+R DL.)
2:15:32 AM #14 Text 0 File ThreadedTransferInterface.cpp, Line 838
Setup items (after recorder preparation)
0: TRM_DATA_MODE1 ()
2 indices, index0 (150) not provided
original disc pos #0 + 2286112 (2286112) = #2286112/508:1.37
relocatable, disc pos for caching/writing not required/ required, no patch infos
-> TRM_DATA_MODE1, 2048, config 0, wanted index0 0 blocks, length 2286112 blocks [LITE-ON DVDRW SHW-160P6S]
--------------------------------------------------------------
2:15:32 AM #15 Text 0 File ThreadedTransferInterface.cpp, Line 1051
Prepare recorder [LITE-ON DVDRW SHW-160P6S] for write in CUE-sheet-DAO
DAO infos:
==========
MCN: ""
TOCType: 0x00; Session Closed, disc fixated
Tracks 1 to 1:
1: TRM_DATA_MODE1, 2048/0x00, FilePos 0 0 4681957376, ISRC ""
DAO layout:
===========
__Start_|____Track_|_Idx_|_CtrlAdr_|_RecDep__________
0 | lead-in | 0 | 0x41 | 0x00
0 | 1 | 0 | 0x41 | 0x00
0 | 1 | 1 | 0x41 | 0x00
2286112 | lead-out | 1 | 0x41 | 0x00
2:15:33 AM #16 Phase 24 File APIProgress.cpp, Line 276
Caching of files started
2:15:33 AM #17 Text 0 File Burncd.cpp, Line 4120
Cache writing successful.
2:15:33 AM #18 Phase 25 File APIProgress.cpp, Line 276
Caching of files completed
2:15:33 AM #19 Phase 36 File APIProgress.cpp, Line 276
Burn process started at 16x (22,160 KB/s)
2:15:34 AM #20 Text 0 File ThreadedTransferInterface.cpp, Line 2661
Verifying disc position of item 0 (relocatable, disc pos, no patch infos, orig at #0): write at #0
2:15:34 AM #21 Text 0 File Cdrdrv.cpp, Line 8892
---- DVD Structure: Physical Format Information (00h) ----
Layer: 0, Address: 0 (0 h), AGID: 0; Length: 2050
Book Type: DVD+R (10), Part Version: 1.0x (1)
Disc Size: 120 mm, Maximum Rate: <not specified> (F h)
Number of Layers: 1, Track Path: Parallel Track Path (PTP), Layer Type: recordable
Linear Density: 0,267 um/bit, Track Density: 0,74 um/track
Starting Physical Sector Number of Data Area: 30000 h (DVD-ROM, DVD-R/-RW, DVD+R/+RW)
End Physical Sector Number of Data Area: 26053F h
End Sector Number in Layer 0: 0 h (LBN: FFFD0000 h, 4193920 MB)
Data in Burst Cutting Area (BCA) does not exist
Disc Application Code: 0 / 0 h
Extended Information indicators: 7 h
Disc Manufacturer ID: CMC.MAG.
Media type ID: M01
Product revision number: 0
Number of Physical format information bytes in use in ADIP up to byte 63: 56
Media Specific [16..63]:
00 00 07 43 4D 43 20 4D - 41 47 00 4D 30 31 00 38 ...CMC.MAG.M01.8
23 54 37 18 00 3E 6E 00 - 70 62 15 15 0B 0B 08 08 #T7..>n.pb......
01 19 1B 0B 0B 0E 0F 01 - 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
2:15:34 AM #22 Text 0 File DVDR.cpp, Line 5814
Drive: LITE-ON DVDRW SHW-160P6S
Book Type request [LO], rev 3: DVD-ROM
Changing the Book Type was finished successfully, return code 0
2:15:34 AM #23 CDR -1211 File DVDR.cpp, Line 5235
Book Type set to: DVD-ROM
2:15:34 AM #24 Text 0 File DVDPlusRW.cpp, Line 665
Start write address at LBA 0
DVD high compatibility mode: Yes
2:22:12 AM #25 Text 0 File WriterStatus.cpp, Line 116
<LITE-ON DVDRW SHW-160P6S> start writing Lead-Out at LBA 2286112 (22E220h), lenght 0 blocks
2:22:12 AM #26 Text 0 File ThreadedTransfer.cpp, Line 228
all writers idle, stopping conversion
2:22:34 AM #27 Text 0 File DVDR.cpp, Line 5814
Drive: LITE-ON DVDRW SHW-160P6S
Book Type request [LO], rev 3: DVD+R
Changing the Book Type was finished successfully, return code 0
2:22:34 AM #28 Phase 37 File APIProgress.cpp, Line 276
Burn process completed successfully at 16x (22,160 KB/s)
2:22:35 AM #29 Text 0 File AudioCompilationImpl.cpp, Line 867
DRM: DRM burn session terminated.
2:22:35 AM #30 Text 0 File AudioCompilationImpl.cpp, Line 896
DRM: Closing entire DRM handling. Bye.
Existing drivers:
File 'Drivers\CDRALW2K.SYS': Ver=8.0.0.212 , size=2560 bytes, created 1/30/2007 1:03:34 AM
File 'Drivers\PXHELP20.SYS': Ver=3.00.43J, size=36624 bytes, created 1/30/2007 1:03:34 AM (Prassi/Veritas driver for win 2K)
Registry Keys:
HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\WinLogon\AllocateCDROMs : 0 (Security Option)
====== *** NeroAPI, History File *** ======
|
|
PacMan777
AfterDawn Addict
|
11. April 2007 @ 19:56 |
Link to this message
|
|
Burning 16X on a CMC Magnetics disc is a sure invitation to trouble. That's the same company that ruined Memorex. Get some good media, Sony +R, Taiyo Yuden, or Verbatim. Get Made in Japan if you see it on any of the labels. Sony +R (MIJ) is TY. Taiwanese Sony +R is by Sony and also a good media. Get some of the good stuff and try a slower burn at 4 to 8X. You can try slowing the burn down on the CMC first, but I don't trust that media.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 11. April 2007 @ 20:18
|
|
vmo1701
Newbie
|
11. April 2007 @ 22:21 |
Link to this message
|
I use Verbatim DVD+R discs as previously stated.
At least that is what it says on the DVD disc itself. I'm not sure why it would say something else.
|
|
PacMan777
AfterDawn Addict
|
11. April 2007 @ 22:51 |
Link to this message
|
|
From your log:
Extended Information indicators: 7 h
Disc Manufacturer ID: CMC.MAG.
Media type ID: M01
Product revision number: 0
If that's the log for the Verbatim +R it is still CMC manufactured and CMC has a bad rep. I'd heard CMC had made some media for Verbatim, but hadn't run into any before. What country are you in?
By the way, Verbatim is just a brand name. The media is manufactured by different companies. MCC is Mitsubishi, TY is Taiyo Yuden, and Ricohjpn is Ricoh. Those are good media manufacturers who are or have manufactured media for Verbatim.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 11. April 2007 @ 22:54
|
|
vmo1701
Newbie
|
11. April 2007 @ 23:10 |
Link to this message
|
|
I'm in the US. These DVD+Rs are probably about 6 months-1 year old. I purchased them at Wal-Mart in the US.
What brand names and/or stores do you recommend?
|
|
PacMan777
AfterDawn Addict
|
11. April 2007 @ 23:29 |
Link to this message
|
|
I'll have to be more careful when I buy Verbatim in the future. At Wal Mart I usually purchase the 50 pack of Sony +R (not -R), either Japanese or Taiwanese. As I mentioned, both are good and MIJ is TY and MIT is Sony. I've not kept track of the other brands. Fuji 16X made in Japan used to be TY. If you can find name brands with made in Japan on the label, you're usually in luck. Taiyo Yuden and Ricoh are also good brands. Those are usually found online. Meritline has a decent rep. I've ordered media from Best Buy and other big vendors, but I used to know more about what media was being sold under different brand names. That's hard to keep up with, so I started using Sony and probably will as long as they keep the quality up on the formats I use.
If I were you, before doing a lot of other things, I'd try some different media and burn at a slower speed, something like 4 to 8X. 8X should be okay with good 16X media. Have you tried a 4X burn with the media you have?
|
|
vmo1701
Newbie
|
12. April 2007 @ 00:03 |
Link to this message
|
DVD Shrink gives me the option to burn at 1x, 2x, and 2.4x.
Should I keep Book type DVD-ROM and "Burn at least 30mm" checked?
I'll try first with the media I have.
|
Moderator
|
12. April 2007 @ 00:18 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by vmo1701:
Still having trouble with chapters 6 through 8.
I ripped and burned the dvd following the directions on this board, but all I get is coasters.
Very frustrating.
- i'm not dismissing the other replies, just going to dissect the logfile to see what i can see.
Quote:
Nero API version: 6.6.0.17
- that's a very good version, i myself still swear by 6.6.0.18 (and i'm not budging LOL)
Quote:
Recorder: <LITE-ON DVDRW SHW-160P6S>Version: PS08
- burners' firmware is a few versions out of date - http://forum.rpc1.org/dl_firmware.php?download_id=2175 (though i do see further down the log that the media is recognised by the firmware. i'd still recommend updating the firmware)
Quote:
Physical memory : 1023MB (1047992kB)
Free physical memory: 238MB (244564kB)
Memory in use : 76
- that's not good, not a gread deal of free memory left, and that's only at the start of the burn
Quote:
Recorder: LITE-ON DVDRW SHW-160P6S, Media type: DVD+R
Disc Manufacturer ID: CMC MAG, Media Type ID: M01, Product revision number: 0
Disc Application Code: 0, Extended Information Indicators: 7
- as i said further up the reply, the firmware can definitely recognise the discs ok, just doesn't mean it likes them :) I've mooched around and can't see what's changed in the firmware but it's always good to keep updated. My feelings on CMC media aside, i've yet to read much positive info anywhere about these particular 16x discs..
Quote:
>>> Protocol of DlgWaitCD activities: <<<
=========================================
Insert empty disc to write to.
(Medium in drive: unknown. Medium required by compilation: DVD+R/RW, DVD-R/RW, DVD-R DL, DVD+R DL.)
- see previous comment
Quote:
Burn process completed successfully at 16x (22,160 KB/s)
- ouch, 16x with virtually no free memory left, try 8x
also, i just noticed that the burn seemed to take a huge amount of time ???, snippet here -
Quote:
6:48:26 PM #9 Text 0 File Burncd.cpp, Line 3233
Turn on Disc-At-Once, using DVD media
2:15:32 AM #10 Text 0 File DlgWaitCD.cpp, Line 270
Last possible write address on media: 2295103 (510:01.28, 4482MB)
Last address to be written: 2286111 (508:01.36, 4465MB)
- look at the time difference there, good grief, did the burn really take this long ?
Main PC ~ Intel C2Q Q6600 (G0 Stepping)/Gigabyte GA-EP45-DS3/2GB Crucial Ballistix PC2-8500/Zalman CNPS9700/Antec 900/Corsair HX 620W
Network ~ DD-WRT ~ 2node WDS-WPA2/AES ~ Buffalo WHR-G54S. 3node WPA2/AES ~ WRT54GS v6 (inc. WEP BSSID), WRT54G v2, WRT54G2 v1. *** Forum Rules ***This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 12. April 2007 @ 00:19
|
|
PacMan777
AfterDawn Addict
|
12. April 2007 @ 01:02 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by vmo1701:
DVD Shrink gives me the option to burn at 1x, 2x, and 2.4x.
Those are default speeds, with the DVD in the drive, will Shrink let you choose 4X?
Should I keep Book type DVD-ROM and "Burn at least 30mm" checked? Yes
I'll try first with the media I have.
|
|
vmo1701
Newbie
|
12. April 2007 @ 21:30 |
Link to this message
|
|
I burned it at a slower speed and...voila! It worked!
Lessons: Burn at a slower speed and/or
Get better media...perhaps Sony DVD+Rs
Thanks for everyone's help...especially PacMan's.
|
|
PacMan777
AfterDawn Addict
|
13. April 2007 @ 06:11 |
Link to this message
|
|
You're welcome. Out of curiosity, what speed did it work at?
|
|
theshiz11
Junior Member
|
13. April 2007 @ 06:46 |
Link to this message
|
|
VMO,
Maybe you should think about freeing up more resources instead of burning at slower speeds. Faster speeds are always desired. Close some applications while burning or get more memory.
|
|
res2cue
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
13. April 2007 @ 07:59 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by theshiz11:
VMO,
Maybe you should think about freeing up more resources instead of burning at slower speeds. Faster speeds are always desired. Close some applications while burning or get more memory.
excuse me? Don't think so.... You get less problems burning at lower speeds. If you look you'll see that alot of experienced people in here still burn at lower speeds...
Hiram 319
AF & AM |
|
theshiz11
Junior Member
|
13. April 2007 @ 08:08 |
Link to this message
|
|
Ha! Of course you get less problems but if they come out with a 52X DVD burner are you really going to keep burning at 2.4 or 4X to be safe? I don't think so. If you have all the resources dedicated to the burning such as lots of free memory and a powerful processor, you will not have to always burn at slower speeds. I keep at least 400 MB memory free and turn off most other apps while burning at 18X and have not had one failed disc. I had many apps and little to no memory available on a burn once and the burn failed. That teaches a lesson that you don't have to worry about bad burns at higher speeds as much, as long as you have dedicated resources. You're cracking me up basically stating that we stay a couple of years behind technology so we have little risk.
|
|
res2cue
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
13. April 2007 @ 08:17 |
Link to this message
|
|
ok know-it-all... do it your way. Can't say I've ever seen 18x speed dvd media though, but if you can burn at 18x on a 16x media... have fun... what do the rest of us know? (and just so you know I burn at half the rated speed of the blank media)
Hiram 319
AF & AM
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 13. April 2007 @ 08:21
|
|
theshiz11
Junior Member
|
13. April 2007 @ 08:25 |
Link to this message
|
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
13. April 2007 @ 08:26 |
Link to this message
|
|
What's the rush?
I'd rather burn at a lower speed than trying to figure out why the disc won't play. I'm in no hurry.
There's an old saying, Good things come to those who wait.
99% of all problems are between the computer and the chair.
|
|
theshiz11
Junior Member
|
13. April 2007 @ 08:33 |
Link to this message
|
res2cue,
I will give you your props for being a slysoft man though.
Are there really that many people out there that are creating Coaster after Coaster? I must say I am clueless as to the amount of coasters that currently get produced. At top speed burn, I get about 1 Coaster out of every 200 burns and I can always point to having low resources for that odd burn.
My hurry is that I burn a lot, I guess if it was just the occasional burn like once every other week, I would not care if it burnt at 1X if it burnt during the middle of the night, but I am busier than that. Why get a faster processer? Why get a quad core? What's the hurry? This is what I am hearing from these posts.
|
|
PacMan777
AfterDawn Addict
|
13. April 2007 @ 09:19 |
Link to this message
|
theshiz11
Though the Core 2 Duo is faster than my poor old AMD, I'm not suffering with my dual core running 2.8-3GHz (OC). I'm fast, but not the fastest in town. LOL
I concentrate on quality when it comes to video work. I usually use a slow reading program when it ocmes to heavy copy protection. I like to make sure I get a good read for the rip. So far my methods have been a sure thing. Most of the time I use Rebuilder Pro with CCE SP set to 3 passes. Usually 1 pass more than needed, but I like that edge for security. When it comes to burning speed, it doesn't increase geometrically. 16X isn't twice as fast as 8X. Normally I burn at 6X. With the media I use and the burner, I've burned at 16X and had no problems. Since I'm not saving much time with a faster burn from an already long recording process, I opt for the slower speed as a comfort factor. I don't advocate burning fast, nor do I suggest creep speeds either. If a person wants to burn high speed crank it up. Just remember to back off when/if errors start to creep in. A poor batch of media can cause it and even the better media, such as Verbatim, can come up a little short on quality sometimes.
The system resources, particular drive, and media play a significant role. It would be nice if everyone had optimal conditions all the time. Most of the time part of the equation comes up short. That's why a slower speed is often recommended. It sounds as though you pride yourself in the hardware and racing to save the last second. For one so impatient, all I can say is go for it. ;) But, excuse me if I don't suffer the same need for speed. I'm more quality oriented and like the sure deal and being comfortable I'll get repeated high quality backups. I've got a big screen and I don't want to settle for less.
I used to burn at 4X, but with faster drives and better media I've moved up 2 to 4X. Who knows, when those burners and media get good enough to go 24X, I may be ready for 12. LOL
|
|
res2cue
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
13. April 2007 @ 09:47 |
Link to this message
|
|
well said PacMan!
Hiram 319
AF & AM
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
theshiz11
Junior Member
|
13. April 2007 @ 10:03 |
Link to this message
|
Well, as you know, I don't have a quad or a duo. I am still running on an athlon 1.4, but I respect the innovators that get the latest and greatest. I only stay with a 1.4 because of cash concerns. My system works great so I have no reason to rock the boat right now. To be honest with the prices of dual layer getting cheaper and cheaper, I see us all converting to DL media pretty soon anyway, which will make most of this conversation moot. Right now, I am seeing it for $1 per disc. As soon as it gets to .50, I will be on board.
You are right about me with my need for speed though. I had let you know previously that I burn about 3 discs per day, sometimes up to 7 or 8 in a day, so burning speed is key for me. I just wish I could afford a new motherboard and processor of the high end dual core so my ripping and comression speeds would speed up. Every minute counts when you are doing a lot of movies and with CloneDVD, you get the most excellent quality every time :)
|
|
