|
Intel P4 vs AMD
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
4. February 2006 @ 08:42 |
Link to this message
|
Sophocles,
Here's my old memory bandwidth at 3.60
Here's the same with the new memory and settings
I included the memory settings for both memory. I did a little bit of searching on the internet and set the memory settings in the bios. That's where I got the 2 2 2 6 setting from. I tried locking the memory at 400Mhz after I finished the settings but the computer would not boot. Would you suggest backing down the fronside bus in small increments to see if it will become stable and boot? Or would you recomend relaxing my memory settings, say to 2.5 3 3 8? I'm trying to find the right balance between cpu speed and memory speed. By the way, I am using the Manual settings in the bios, not the 20% automatic.
theonejrs
GigaByte 990FXA-UD5 - AMD FX-8320 @4.0GHz @1.312v - Corsair H-60 liquid CPU Cooler - 4x4 GB GSkill RipJaws DDR3/1866 Cas8, 8-9-9-24 - Corsair 400-R Case - OCZ FATAL1TY 550 watt Modular PSU - Intel 330 120GB SATA III SSD - WD Black 500GB SATA III - WD black 1 TB Sata III - WD Black 500GB SATA II - 2 Asus DRW-24B1ST DVD-Burner - Sony 420W 5.1 PL-II Suround Sound - GigaByte GTX550/1GB 970 Mhz Video - Asus VE247H 23.6" HDMI 1080p Monitor

This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 4. February 2006 @ 18:53
|
|
Advertisement
|
  |
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
1 product review
|
4. February 2006 @ 09:19 |
Link to this message
|
|
theonjrs
That's a significant gain, but you will really see it grow when you go AMD because AMD's handle memory a lot better than Intel does.
" Please Read!!! Post your questions only in This Thread or they will go unanswered:
Help with development of BD RB: Donations at: http://www.jdobbs.com/.
|
|
Triock
Account closed as per user's own request
|
5. February 2006 @ 15:01 |
Link to this message
|
|
Completely of topic i know.. But where should i put my thermal sensor for my computer?
Thanx, And nice to see everyone is still here! :)
And i have herd that on toms Hardware, they used a 3.6 and did a test over and over again, And the stats got worse and worse.. Because of the heat with the stock heat sunk and fan.. :0 Is this true info?
Thanx again,
Ryan
Triock
|
Senior Member
|
5. February 2006 @ 15:23 |
Link to this message
|
|
Yes. The more a chip heats the paths start to expand and resistance starts to grow..thus you lose performance. The best place for a thermal sensor is right smak dab between the cpu heat sink and cpu.
epox mobo EP-9NPAJ
amd 3700+ san diego core oc to 2.50
antec true power 430 watt dual +12 volt rails @ 18 amps each
bfg geforce 6800 gt oc edition
dragon case
2 x 512 DUAL CHANNEL ELIXOR RAM
Ibm P260 dvi & vga 21 inch crt monitor 1600 x 1200 @ 85 htz Oh yeah!!
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
6. February 2006 @ 05:13 |
Link to this message
|
Sophocles,
I finally figured it out. I was trying to use the thumbnails. Here's my Asus Probe under full load.
These temps are running the Burn-in Wizard math test continuosly at 100% CPU load. I think the Zalman 9500 is a winner!
theonejrs
GigaByte 990FXA-UD5 - AMD FX-8320 @4.0GHz @1.312v - Corsair H-60 liquid CPU Cooler - 4x4 GB GSkill RipJaws DDR3/1866 Cas8, 8-9-9-24 - Corsair 400-R Case - OCZ FATAL1TY 550 watt Modular PSU - Intel 330 120GB SATA III SSD - WD Black 500GB SATA III - WD black 1 TB Sata III - WD Black 500GB SATA II - 2 Asus DRW-24B1ST DVD-Burner - Sony 420W 5.1 PL-II Suround Sound - GigaByte GTX550/1GB 970 Mhz Video - Asus VE247H 23.6" HDMI 1080p Monitor

This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 6. February 2006 @ 05:16
|
|
afire77
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
7. February 2006 @ 10:52 |
Link to this message
|
|
Hi Sophocles I am new to this and was wondering if you had any advice about switching from a 2.8HT p4 800 mhz fsb to a AMD 3700+, would I see a differance in gaming and overall performance for my computer? Please help...
Bodycount
|
AfterDawn Addict
1 product review
|
7. February 2006 @ 11:35 |
Link to this message
|
|
afire77
Hell yes!! Overclock it and you'll think you just dumped an old celeron. LOL
" Please Read!!! Post your questions only in This Thread or they will go unanswered:
Help with development of BD RB: Donations at: http://www.jdobbs.com/.
|
|
afire77
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
7. February 2006 @ 14:44 |
Link to this message
|
|
SOPHOCLES....THE SYSTEM I CURRENTLY HAVE IS A 2.8 P4 HT , 160 GB HDD , ATI X800XL AGP, THERMALTAKE SOPRANO CASE 430 WATT PWR SUPPLY , 1GB PC3200, HOPING A SWITCH TO AMD WILL GIVE ME THE WOW FACTOR ....
Bodycount
|
AfterDawn Addict
1 product review
|
7. February 2006 @ 15:00 |
Link to this message
|
|
afire77
Unless you're angry for some reason, drop the caps. The 3700 at stock speeds would wipe out your 2.8 P4 and would give you a sginificant gain in frames per second. Overclock and it'll make your system look like a dated laptop.
" Please Read!!! Post your questions only in This Thread or they will go unanswered:
Help with development of BD RB: Donations at: http://www.jdobbs.com/.
|
|
afire77
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
7. February 2006 @ 15:48 |
Link to this message
|
|
lol sorry about the caps
Bodycount
|
AfterDawn Addict
1 product review
|
7. February 2006 @ 16:33 |
Link to this message
|
|
No problem I didn't think that you meant anything by it.
" Please Read!!! Post your questions only in This Thread or they will go unanswered:
Help with development of BD RB: Donations at: http://www.jdobbs.com/.
|
|
kronos288
Newbie
|
7. February 2006 @ 16:49 |
Link to this message
|
|
Hey guys, 3700+ or 3500+? Its like 10 or 20 dollars more. I know that the 3700+ has 1 mb cache, but doesn't support dual channel. Does the 1 mb cache beat out the performance of dual channel mem controller?
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 7. February 2006 @ 16:50
|
Member
|
7. February 2006 @ 17:52 |
Link to this message
|
|
Sohocles,
I finaly got the the pci bus locked and have been bumping it up slowly testing playing games etc. Heat seems to be a non issue with my p-4 prescott. I am up to 3.6 now and temps are about 41 idle and gets up to abot 55-57 full load. But now i am getting a drop out every once and a while playing games. are there any more tweeks that can be done?Mushkin extreme perfomance dual channel ram
Frequency: 400MHz Latency: 2-2-2 Parity: Unbuffered
Voltage: 2.5V-2.8V Pins: 184
Density > > > Module: 64Mx64 Chip: 32Mx8
Abit ic7-g motherboard
p-4 3.2 800fsb prescott
Dino your humble student
|
AfterDawn Addict
1 product review
|
7. February 2006 @ 18:14 |
Link to this message
|
|
Drop it to about 3.5-3.55 whatever is closest and run it a while and see how well it works.
" Please Read!!! Post your questions only in This Thread or they will go unanswered:
Help with development of BD RB: Donations at: http://www.jdobbs.com/.
|
AfterDawn Addict
1 product review
|
7. February 2006 @ 18:14 |
Link to this message
|
|
kronos288
Get the 3700 it has more L2 cache.
" Please Read!!! Post your questions only in This Thread or they will go unanswered:
Help with development of BD RB: Donations at: http://www.jdobbs.com/.
|
|
kronos288
Newbie
|
7. February 2006 @ 18:16 |
Link to this message
|
|
So the dual channel capability of the 3500+ doesn't make it match the 3700+'s performance?
|
Member
|
7. February 2006 @ 19:31 |
Link to this message
|
|
Sophocles
will do that. i drop it to 3.50 then i'll bump it up ina couple of days thanks
|
Senior Member
|
7. February 2006 @ 20:35 |
Link to this message
|
|
All athlon 64 amd chips have intergrated mem controllers. I know. I own a 3700 athlon 64 san diego.
epox mobo EP-9NPAJ
amd 3700+ san diego core oc to 2.50
antec true power 430 watt dual +12 volt rails @ 18 amps each
bfg geforce 6800 gt oc edition
dragon case
2 x 512 DUAL CHANNEL ELIXOR RAM
Ibm P260 dvi & vga 21 inch crt monitor 1600 x 1200 @ 85 htz Oh yeah!!
|
AfterDawn Addict
1 product review
|
8. February 2006 @ 02:12 |
Link to this message
|
|
The 3700 and the 3500 only differ by their L2 cache. The 3700 has the same core and L2 cache as the FX57.
" Please Read!!! Post your questions only in This Thread or they will go unanswered:
Help with development of BD RB: Donations at: http://www.jdobbs.com/.
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
8. February 2006 @ 12:14 |
Link to this message
|
|
The 3700 does support dual channel, why wouldn't it?
|
|
brobear
Suspended permanently
|
8. February 2006 @ 14:54 |
Link to this message
|
|
baltekmi
You may think temps are a nonissue with your Prescott. However, they are the known "firecracker" of Intel CPUs. Follow Theonejrs' example and improve the cooling. You'll probably notice improvements, if nothing else, you'll be able to keep the system stable at higher OCed settings.
|
|
novicebb
Member
|
8. February 2006 @ 15:15 |
Link to this message
|
|
To Sophocles:
Do you think that the Opteron 146 is a good option since zipzoomfly.com offers it for 189 bux? Also is this cpu considered very overclockable and is it a 939 socket cpu? I ask because zipzoomfly has it as a socket 939 but other sites say it is so cheap because it is a sock 940 800mhz fsb cpu.
|
AfterDawn Addict
1 product review
|
8. February 2006 @ 15:45 |
Link to this message
|
|
It's a good chip and it over clocks well(all opterons are good for over clocking). It's going down in price to make room for single chip dual core opterons. It's a socket 940 so it won't work in socket 939 boards. The number in an opteron (IE 175 equals a single socket board) tells you how many you can socket in a single board. If the first number is a 1 then you can socket 1 and if its a two then 2. If you're just looking for a single chip solution and you have the right board for it then go for it but if you have a 939 board with a single chip then I would recommend the AMD 64 3700 for a little more in price, it has the same core and L1 and L2 cache as the current opteron models and is just about as overclockable. Plus you would have the benefit of a slighly higher clock multiplier (11 times versus 10 times).
" Please Read!!! Post your questions only in This Thread or they will go unanswered:
Help with development of BD RB: Donations at: http://www.jdobbs.com/.
|
|
MESMD
Member
|
8. February 2006 @ 15:52 |
Link to this message
|
|
Hello Sophocles,
I'm planning to buy a new computer and would love your expertise on the following: Which cpu to get, Intel's fastest, or the Amd fastest 64 dual 2x 4200 or (Amd's top of the line)? Although, I am just a novice, play simple games like flash and 19.95 downloads, I still want to have the fastest computer cpu that I can see the speed. Currently, I have a Pentium 4, 2.4 mhz cpu with 512mb ram, 7200 rpm 80 gb hard drives, and a cheap 256 mb generic video card. I would appreciate your opinion and any further thoughts you may have for a novice, regarding this. Also, if a stock system exists that you can recommend as I can't really do overclocking, etc.
Thanks so much for your opinion. I only wish I could learn 1% of what you know about computers.
Sincerely,
Miles E. Stone, M.D.(retired)
|
|
Advertisement
|
  |
|
Member
|
8. February 2006 @ 17:39 |
Link to this message
|
|
brobear, I didn't meant temps were not an issue at all. I do have a real good cooling system even though it is air. I have tried the zalman 9500 which was a wee better then the thermal take polo 735 vs2.
so I then went with thermal take pipe101 with a VANTEC TD9238H tornado 82 mm fan with 119 cfm. idle to me is downloading a file from the internet while searching throught the web, while lisiting to sirius radio. if i just let it set doing nothing I get temps below 35. noisy as all get out, but when your playing Call Of Duty 2 with 7.1 sound going on you really do not notice. I would really love to go water cool, but my extra money comes from snowplowing in the winter. It started off with a bang, but fizzled out like a p-3! Just a lil note to all. I have been reading all the post. And you guys are making me a beliver in AMD. You guys never seem to have the same issues (as much) as a intel. So when I get ready to do another build, i will certainly ask for help and it will be amd.
To sophocles, nice choice on mother board!
|