|
NOVEMBER 2008 BAN WAVE !!! - no posts of "Oh POOR ME I'M BANNED", Stop it already, just the facts
|
|
|
Homesick2
Suspended permanently
|
12. November 2008 @ 18:03 |
Link to this message
|
|
maybe they are looking for modchips? what about the other guy are you flashing or chipping?
|
|
Advertisement
|
  |
|
|
|
Razorub
Newbie
|
12. November 2008 @ 18:26 |
Link to this message
|
I suggested this on the xboxscene forums however their site server is currently being bombarded. Perhaps the root of the bans are due to way the backups are being created. C4eva even posted that the same type firmware checks as last year were still being used by Microsoft this time. It is possible that the bans are stemming from flagged warnings off the disks that have been created. I know it's possible to create a 360 backup using multiple types of software and hardware, it's possible that even though games still play on people's systems, some of those games are not being burned correctly.
Think about how many different dvd burners and software methods people are using to create their backups. That could explain why someone who hasn't played GOW2 or SaintsRow2 can get banned, and someone who has can get banned as well. That could also explain how someone who has only gone online once or months ago could get banned as well. Possibly all the backups being created on some people's systems are flagged as not legit just due to the method and hardware used to create them. It is just now that MS decided to act upon it.
Firmware: iXtreme 1.41
Burner: Sony DRU810
Speed: 12x
Media: Verbatim
Software: ImgBurn
Status: Currently not banned
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 12. November 2008 @ 18:35
|
|
Valenth
Junior Member
|
12. November 2008 @ 18:39 |
Link to this message
|
I have also theorized that it could be due to how long ago the systems were modded. From a quick look, it seems the the people who had modded their consoles longer ago are the ones getting banned. I've only been modded for about a month, and am unbanned.
I have played Gears of War 2 and Fable 2 online, both backup copies.
|
Senior Member
|
12. November 2008 @ 18:41 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by Razorub: I suggested this on the xboxscene forums however their site server is currently being bombarded. Perhaps the root of the bans are due to way the backups are being created. C4eva even posted that the same type firmware checks as last year were still being used by Microsoft this time. It is possible that the bans are stemming from flagged warnings off the disks that have been created. I know it's possible to create a 360 backup using multiple types of software and hardware, it's possible that even though games still play on people's systems, some of those games are not being burned correctly.
Think about how many different dvd burners and software methods people are using to create their backups. That could explain why someone who hasn't played GOW2 or SaintsRow2 can get banned, and someone who has can get banned as well. That could also explain how someone who has only gone online once or months ago could get banned as well. Possibly all the backups being created on some people's systems are flagged as not legit just due to the method and hardware used to create them. It is just now that MS decided to act upon it.
Firmware: iXtreme 1.41
Burner: Sony DRU810
Speed: 12x
Media: Verbatim
Software: ImgBurn
Status: Currently not banned
thats actually not a bad theory. it would make sense. the really bad part is that with all the different variables involved such as media/brand type, burner type, burn speed, and on and on it would be very difficult to get it narrowed down to what is good and what is bad.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 12. November 2008 @ 18:43
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
12. November 2008 @ 18:43 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by Razorub: I suggested this on the xboxscene forums however their site server is currently being bombarded. Perhaps the root of the bans are due to way the backups are being created. C4eva even posted that the same type firmware checks as last year were still being used by Microsoft this time. It is possible that the bans are stemming from flagged warnings off the disks that have been created. I know it's possible to create a 360 backup using multiple types of software and hardware, it's possible that even though games still play on people's systems, some of those games are not being burned correctly.
Think about how many different dvd burners and software methods people are using to create their backups. That could explain why someone who hasn't played GOW2 or SaintsRow2 can get banned, and someone who has can get banned as well. That could also explain how someone who has only gone online once or months ago could get banned as well. Possibly all the backups being created on some people's systems are flagged as not legit just due to the method and hardware used to create them. It is just now that MS decided to act upon it.
Firmware: iXtreme 1.41
Burner: Sony DRU810
Speed: 12x
Media: Verbatim
Software: ImgBurn
Status: Currently not banned
I have the exact same fw/burner/speed/media/software as you and neither of my 2 Elite consoles are banned. BENQ drive in both BTW.
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
12. November 2008 @ 18:45 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by Valenth: I have also theorized that it could be due to how long ago the systems were modded. From a quick look, it seems the the people who had modded their consoles longer ago are the ones getting banned. I've only been modded for about a month, and am unbanned.
I have played Gears of War 2 and Fable 2 online, both backup copies.
A monkey wrench in this theory is both of my consoles have been modded since the original halo3 beta banhammer and neither have been banned yet.
|
|
mazz0310
Member
|
12. November 2008 @ 18:46 |
Link to this message
|
This is the way I look at it, I have a Benq flashed 1.41 and have had it flashed approx 6 months. I think that say I play 3 bad games, thats 3 flags, and maybe you need 5 red flags to get banned. So I may not be banned this time around, but when the next ban comes I may have 6 red flags and it will be my turn.
So like someone above said, the people that have had the flashed boxes longer are getting banned because it was more time for them to rack up some flags, where as the people that are just recently flashed don't have enough flags yet to be a ban.
|
|
tavek
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
12. November 2008 @ 18:58 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by mazz0310: This is the way I look at it, I have a Benq flashed 1.41 and have had it flashed approx 6 months. I think that say I play 3 bad games, thats 3 flags, and maybe you need 5 red flags to get banned. So I may not be banned this time around, but when the next ban comes I may have 6 red flags and it will be my turn.
So like someone above said, the people that have had the flashed boxes longer are getting banned because it was more time for them to rack up some flags, where as the people that are just recently flashed don't have enough flags yet to be a ban.
ROFL
not to flame, but a coment like that shows why your a newbie,
NO theres no flaging for banning, 1 flag 2 flag 3 flag ban.
Your flaged, your flaged, comon sense says YES some people will have games before actual release dates (testers, devs etc) SO the legality of baning a console is BAD business, but if the sytem shows youris is modified, then your cought. 12x to 5x speeds down to using a chip or bad Stealth. But last I checked 1.3 and 1.4 protected u from playing BAD ss games? Then again theres THOSE who just HAD to have the new dashboard, why in the world would u do that.
Thats like handing out crack outside a jail when people just got released.
Internet gangster
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 12. November 2008 @ 19:02
|
|
dvbranton
Junior Member
|
12. November 2008 @ 18:59 |
Link to this message
|
|
Just throwing this out there I know this may sound like such a NOOB question. But would the volume of games played on a console throw up a flag for a ban? More or less if you system has shown you have played a lot of the 360 game library and it logs everytime you play a game at different times during the year. (unlike most people that rent usually they play then buy or don't play game again after period of time) I am not banned but I only own 15 backups and never got one before release date and I have always gotten my backups from 1 person. I know this sounds like a stupid question ( sorry about that) but just was wondering. I am not banned.
I have a:
Sam drive
iextreme 1.2
backups from one supplier
15 games
all backed up on verbatim
Silver account
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
12. November 2008 @ 19:13 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by dvbranton: Just throwing this out there I know this may sound like such a NOOB question. But would the volume of games played on a console throw up a flag for a ban? More or less if you system has shown you have played a lot of the 360 game library and it logs everytime you play a game at different times during the year. (unlike most people that rent usually they play then buy or don't play game again after period of time) I am not banned but I only own 15 backups and never got one before release date and I have always gotten my backups from 1 person. I know this sounds like a stupid question ( sorry about that) but just was wondering. I am not banned.
I have a:
Sam drive
iextreme 1.2
backups from one supplier
15 games
all backed up on verbatim
Silver account
Check my gamertag for a hole in that theory as well. Triple Xposed is the GT.
|
Senior Member
|
12. November 2008 @ 19:24 |
Link to this message
|
Quote: Chancer Yesterday, 10:29 PM Post #3
He Who Posts Alot...
Group: Head Moderator
Posts: 17885
Joined: 31-October 03
From: Yorkshire. UK
Member No.: 71217
Xbox Version: v1.6
360 version: v3 (falcon)
I also think that this runs deeper than the theory of early releases.
I mean playing a game weeks or a long while before it hits the shops is risky but as official release dates get near, it is well known that people get legit copies earlier and play them. i doubt MS would ban for this.
I hope they are not banning people for putting on their own HDDs as it seems a step too far.
Be interesting if one of the people with no flashed drive has actually replaced their HDD in this way and copped a ban for it.
Strange thing is on the 10th November I got this post from a new member. Quoted in full but no name put in it as requested.
I thought at the time , just another wind up but now.
QUOTE
Hi mate, i thought i would tell you so you can forward this to the relevant coders. The next dash update will have a hidden ban hammer within it, and from what im told from my friend who works at M$ it has all the current firmwares incorporated. So none of the current firmwares are safe from the ban. not that im saying thats what is proclaimed but i thought i would give this info to you to pass on to who ever is in the ned to know. IF you do publish this info please do not use my name. Im known with this username by many and fingers will point at me so i dont want any of that. But take this info as you will. As of last thursday this was told to me so i would becareful. Im now passing on this info so hopefully something can be done to prevent the banning of consoles.
This post has been edited by Chancer: Yesterday, 10:46 PM Quote: all the text above was taken from xboxscene, anyone have any comments on what his "anonymous" mate said? I hope its a crock of *.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 12. November 2008 @ 20:48
|
|
CawkFour
Member
|
12. November 2008 @ 19:38 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by bd911:
all the text above was taken from xboxscene, anyone have any comments on what his "anonymous" mate said? I hope its a crock of shit.
i wouldn't be the least bit surprised if there was a banhammer included in the next update. microsoft isn't stupid and i'm sure they have a well educated team dedicated to this matter. the only thing to do now is wait and see.
C.R.3.A.M.
|
Member
|
12. November 2008 @ 19:48 |
Link to this message
|
Well it must be in the second update, cause I have the leak version and Im not banned as of yet.
And the dash on the 19th must be diff than the current one, cause there is people on Xbox Scene that got in the NXE early program with modded Firmware,And Far as I know None of them are banned yet.
So heres to hopeing it's Crap.
|
|
CawkFour
Member
|
12. November 2008 @ 19:52 |
Link to this message
|
|
i'm guessing that a banhammer will come toward the end of december or start of the year. that'll give microsoft a good month or so to collect the data they need.
C.R.3.A.M.
|
|
utubr18
Newbie
|
12. November 2008 @ 20:00 |
Link to this message
|
Tryed to connect to Xbox Live today and says my account is banned. Microsoft won't say why but I think I know why. Oh well.
|
|
CawkFour
Member
|
12. November 2008 @ 20:08 |
Link to this message
|
here's a question i haven't seen....
during the last banhammering...
1)was there a firmware (ixtreme) update afterwards?
2)if so... did it change the way that you backed up your games?
C.R.3.A.M.
|
|
Valenth
Junior Member
|
12. November 2008 @ 20:35 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by mazz0310: This is the way I look at it, I have a Benq flashed 1.41 and have had it flashed approx 6 months. I think that say I play 3 bad games, thats 3 flags, and maybe you need 5 red flags to get banned. So I may not be banned this time around, but when the next ban comes I may have 6 red flags and it will be my turn.
So like someone above said, the people that have had the flashed boxes longer are getting banned because it was more time for them to rack up some flags, where as the people that are just recently flashed don't have enough flags yet to be a ban.
This is what I was thinking, I'm probably going to discontinue burning games from now on, I really wish I could just fix all this by reinstalling my original firmware.
I'm not banned yet, but now I'm paranoid.
|
|
CawkFour
Member
|
12. November 2008 @ 20:42 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by Valenth:
This is what I was thinking, I'm probably going to discontinue burning games from now on, I really wish I could just fix all this by reinstalling my original firmware.
I'm not banned yet, but now I'm paranoid.
you can't tell us that you thought you were 100% safe this entire time did you?
C.R.3.A.M.
|
|
turkish17
Newbie
|
12. November 2008 @ 20:47 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by yzrider22: Well it must be in the second update, cause I have the leak version and Im not banned as of yet.
And the dash on the 19th must be diff than the current one, cause there is people on Xbox Scene that got in the NXE early program with modded Firmware,And Far as I know None of them are banned yet.
So heres to hopeing it's Crap.
Correct me if im mistaken, those people who were decided it to apply the NXE update, as far as im aware after the update has been applied you wont be able to sign into Live untill the realease on the 19th. In order to get banned, you have to sign in to Live to be told that you the wrath of the ban hammer has been brought down on you, so if your not able to sign in, how are these people telling these people that they havnt been banned?
One last thing, I have an elite with a benq drive flashed with iExtreme 1.41, i ALWAYS disconnect my network cable before playing my backups and NEVER play online with my back ups. Are there reports of people like me getting banned or is it just people who are playing on Live with back ups?
|
|
mazz0310
Member
|
12. November 2008 @ 20:59 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by tavek: Originally posted by mazz0310: This is the way I look at it, I have a Benq flashed 1.41 and have had it flashed approx 6 months. I think that say I play 3 bad games, thats 3 flags, and maybe you need 5 red flags to get banned. So I may not be banned this time around, but when the next ban comes I may have 6 red flags and it will be my turn.
So like someone above said, the people that have had the flashed boxes longer are getting banned because it was more time for them to rack up some flags, where as the people that are just recently flashed don't have enough flags yet to be a ban.
ROFL
not to flame, but a coment like that shows why your a newbie,
NO theres no flaging for banning, 1 flag 2 flag 3 flag ban.
Your flaged, your flaged, comon sense says YES some people will have games before actual release dates (testers, devs etc) SO the legality of baning a console is BAD business, but if the sytem shows youris is modified, then your cought. 12x to 5x speeds down to using a chip or bad Stealth. But last I checked 1.3 and 1.4 protected u from playing BAD ss games? Then again theres THOSE who just HAD to have the new dashboard, why in the world would u do that.
Thats like handing out crack outside a jail when people just got released.
The only reason I say this is because it seems as if the people that have had a flashed xbox longer are the ones being banned, I don't literally mean they are sitting there like oh hey he played 1 bad game, lets wait until he plays another. But they can't just pull the ban hammer on anyone they like MIGHT be violating the TOS, they need a good piece of proof, and I may be a noob as far as posts but I've been on the website for a while. Just a theory I am thinking of.
And as far as being able to ban based on how many games you play, it may be possible, but I dunno, everytime I am about to play a new game my other friend is already playing it (he doesn't have a flashed box) so it may be hard to decide upon that (and I play ALOT of games).
|
|
turkish17
Newbie
|
12. November 2008 @ 21:11 |
Link to this message
|
By the way has everyone seen the Hitler banned from xbox live video, my eyes were streaming!!!! lol
|
|
vttsi
Newbie
|
12. November 2008 @ 21:13 |
Link to this message
|
alot of people are saying they think it was the review copies of games that started the ban. "IE saints 2" but the review copy logged you off live comepletly while playing. it wasnt that you couldnt play the game online the game logged your GT off. so i dont think it was the reviews that started this. I also think its funny how some ppl are freaking out about this ban trying to figure out how to reverse the process of there updated firmware. they obviously didnt think this whole process through
|
|
Razorub
Newbie
|
12. November 2008 @ 21:14 |
Link to this message
|
|
The Hitler banned is awesome!
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
12. November 2008 @ 21:30 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by vttsi: alot of people are saying they think it was the review copies of games that started the ban. "IE saints 2" but the review copy logged you off live comepletly while playing. it wasnt that you couldnt play the game online the game logged your GT off. so i dont think it was the reviews that started this. I also think its funny how some ppl are freaking out about this ban trying to figure out how to reverse the process of there updated firmware. they obviously didnt think this whole process through
Bad thing about this is that your xbox still sends the game info to xbox live the next time you DO connect.
|
|
Advertisement
|
  |
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
12. November 2008 @ 21:32 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by CawkFour: here's a question i haven't seen....
during the last banhammering...
1)was there a firmware (ixtreme) update afterwards?
2)if so... did it change the way that you backed up your games?
1. Yes
2. No, but people started ripping games with the split video instead of it all being on one layer, it's split on 2 like an original. Don't think that'sa factor here though.
|