Originally posted by greensman:

---

The holder of that MULTI-PASS is a Goddess... :)
SORRY guys i have to disagree on this one. the ckicken i had for dinner lastnight had more meat on it then she does.. whats the Aerosmith song? DUDE LOOKS LIKE A LADY

great scanning progie if you ask me.. but this is the Nero scan thread... dang OP limited the scanning progie.. JERK.... hehehehe. :p
whats wrong with this threads NEW name?

the lowest total PIF total I've ever seen or had is a 6... I erased mine by ejecting the disc like a DA.... it was before I really knew that would happen... dang ROOKIE move. LOL. ;) Unjust had one too... but NONE of us saved it... it was a beautiful burn/scan!!! :)
best damn scan i ever seen. 6 total PIF's had 4 spike up to 1 totaling 6 total pif's and was like only 4200 pie's i think. i will try and find it again..lol

Well the Novella is finished.... read and comment... I likes it. :)

---

Originally posted by omegaman7:

---

Here's a Falcon +R DL 8X burned at 4X on 7200A 1.06Bt. This 7200A is a burner I haven't used nearly as much. It's actually been sitting for quite some time, waiting for my secondary to be up and running. Now it can burn again LOL! Not bad for the media! Its been burned as an AVCHD disc. So with any luck, much like the Verbatim disc I did, it will play in the living room BD player. Lets see if it likes the Ricoh discs as well.

Looks like there are stutters only a few minutes into the video. And as you can see, there are damn few errors in that area. Not sure yet if thats due to the BD players ability to playback the disc, or if there is some burned problem. I know my lite-ons have never caused that. Perhaps lite-on is a wiser choice for these discs. I respect Optiarc, but lite-on has the learning capabilities :D

---

Originally posted by cincyrob:

---

that is the 1954 version of shutter island. how am i gonna get a movie that has just been put out in the theaters??? hmmmm?

well i was wondering how long it would take someone to accuse me of that...lol i know my post go over looked alot thats why i reposted it. as myself i find it hard to believe some scans that are posted as well.

as for the score your right overall it was a 29 total pif's around the 2.5 mark there was a few more spikes up to 1. i just removed them along with the 2 in front of the 9. it is that easy to do. gotta prove the point there is more than one person that can alter their scans..lmao..

---

Originally posted by omegaman7:

---

Here's a Falcon +R DL 8X burned at 4X on 7200A 1.06Bt. This 7200A is a burner I haven't used nearly as much. It's actually been sitting for quite some time, waiting for my secondary to be up and running. Now it can burn again LOL! Not bad for the media! Its been burned as an AVCHD disc. So with any luck, much like the Verbatim disc I did, it will play in the living room BD player. Lets see if it likes the Ricoh discs as well.

Looks like there are stutters only a few minutes into the video. And as you can see, there are damn few errors in that area. Not sure yet if thats due to the BD players ability to playback the disc, or if there is some burned problem. I know my lite-ons have never caused that. Perhaps lite-on is a wiser choice for these discs. I respect Optiarc, but lite-on has the learning capabilities :D

---

Originally posted by garmoon:

---

@Russ that would be I that said: pick your speed, pick you score. That 2X scan above would not be as pretty scanned at 16X. The scan above is great and should be a 98. You should be able to get a 98 if you have 2or 3 -2peak PIF and 20 -1peak PIF. But a scan with 800 1 peak PIF gets that 98.-UNFAIR. LOL

---

Originally posted by theonejrs:

---

Originally posted by garmoon:

---

@Russ that would be I that said: pick your speed, pick you score. That 2X scan above would not be as pretty scanned at 16X. The scan above is great and should be a 98. You should be able to get a 98 if you have 2or 3 -2peak PIF and 20 -1peak PIF. But a scan with 800 1 peak PIF gets that 98.-UNFAIR. LOL

---

garmoon,
That's very true, but the slower speed is more representative of actual performance than scanning at 4x or 8x, since the drive doesn't go over 2x when playing DVDs. Personally I don't even care about the scores that much to begin with, but you can get a much better idea of how good a burn is at 2x. I've had some of the Yuden 8x -Rs with big red spikes in the PIFs, and they don't look any better at 2x. I don't see anything unfair about 2x scans at all. It doesn't improve the very bad PIFs, and is much more representative of the actual burn quality.

Best Regards,
Russ

---