|
Post your DISC quality scans here 2
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
27. June 2008 @ 21:52 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by cincyrob:
dang im getting beatup in every thread i goto today...
i'll have the new FW wheni get home and do about 20 burns real fast. use some of them F16 and R05 ritek's..
you big kidder. lol.
You'll have to be up past your bedtime for that type of burning.... hehehe. :) So how is the NEW burner working?? The AD-7200S that is. :D
bout to add some more scans for fun. :D
....gm
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
27. June 2008 @ 22:28 |
Link to this message
|
well i did the FW flash. it said it was successful but it still didnt booktype. got a good scan off it though
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
27. June 2008 @ 23:06 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by cincyrob:
well i did the FW flash. it said it was successful but it still didnt booktype. got a good scan off it though
Well I just checked to see if mine was bitsetting, and it's NOT... hmmmmmmm. This may be the first burn with a DVD+R on the AD-7200S. ;)
Used a MCC 004 and it seems to be scanning ok... NEED to find out what's going on with this f/w. WILL report back!!
....gm
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
27. June 2008 @ 23:09 |
Link to this message
|
Loco & GM,
Quote:
*hits RedRob in the back of the head* :P
Quote:
/me hits redrob in the front of the head.
Oh! A two channel Equalizer! Is it easy to get him balanced? ROFLMAO! What do you do about his side to side balance? LMAO!!
Russ :<)(>:
GigaByte 990FXA-UD5 - AMD FX-8320 @4.0GHz @1.312v - Corsair H-60 liquid CPU Cooler - 4x4 GB GSkill RipJaws DDR3/1866 Cas8, 8-9-9-24 - Corsair 400-R Case - OCZ FATAL1TY 550 watt Modular PSU - Intel 330 120GB SATA III SSD - WD Black 500GB SATA III - WD black 1 TB Sata III - WD Black 500GB SATA II - 2 Asus DRW-24B1ST DVD-Burner - Sony 420W 5.1 PL-II Suround Sound - GigaByte GTX550/1GB 970 Mhz Video - Asus VE247H 23.6" HDMI 1080p Monitor
 |
AfterDawn Addict
|
27. June 2008 @ 23:34 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by theonejrs:
Loco & GM,
Quote:
*hits RedRob in the back of the head* :P
Quote:
/me hits redrob in the front of the head.
Oh! A two channel Equalizer! Is it easy to get him balanced? ROFLMAO! What do you do about his side to side balance? LMAO!!
Russ :<)(>:
We leave that up to his wifey. ;) She's quite the balanced type. :)
...gm
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
28. June 2008 @ 00:08 |
Link to this message
|
greensman,
Quote:
We leave that up to his wifey. ;) She's quite the balanced type. :)
Keep up the good work. You'll pound that round peg into that square hole yet! LOL!!
Russ
GigaByte 990FXA-UD5 - AMD FX-8320 @4.0GHz @1.312v - Corsair H-60 liquid CPU Cooler - 4x4 GB GSkill RipJaws DDR3/1866 Cas8, 8-9-9-24 - Corsair 400-R Case - OCZ FATAL1TY 550 watt Modular PSU - Intel 330 120GB SATA III SSD - WD Black 500GB SATA III - WD black 1 TB Sata III - WD Black 500GB SATA II - 2 Asus DRW-24B1ST DVD-Burner - Sony 420W 5.1 PL-II Suround Sound - GigaByte GTX550/1GB 970 Mhz Video - Asus VE247H 23.6" HDMI 1080p Monitor
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
28. June 2008 @ 00:19 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by greensman:
Originally posted by cincyrob:
well i did the FW flash. it said it was successful but it still didnt booktype. got a good scan off it though
Well I just checked to see if mine was bitsetting, and it's NOT... hmmmmmmm. This may be the first burn with a DVD+R on the AD-7200S. ;)
Used a MCC 004 and it seems to be scanning ok... NEED to find out what's going on with this f/w. WILL report back!!
....gm
Just d/l Liggy's 1.05 f/w for the AD-7200S and it's bitsetting to DVD-ROM. I'll see what I can find out about the 1.06 f/w. Seems strange to me that it wouldn't bitset.... /me scratches head..
I'll post a scan or 2 in a bit. ;)
.....gm
create disc 18X
imgburn 12X AD-7200S
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 28. June 2008 @ 01:05
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
28. June 2008 @ 08:34 |
Link to this message
|
|
|
Moderator
1 product review
|
28. June 2008 @ 08:50 |
Link to this message
|
I don't have any problems with 1.06 booktyping...
Quote:
I 14:41:30 Destination Device: [2:0:0] Optiarc DVD RW AD-7200S 1.06 (G:) (ATA)
I 14:41:30 Destination Media Type: DVD+R (Disc ID: MCC-004-00) (Speeds: 4x, 6x, 8x, 12x, 16x, 18x)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I 14:41:36 Book Type Setting: DVD-ROM
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I 14:51:15 Operation Successfully Completed! - Duration: 00:09:44
I 14:51:15 Average Write Rate: 7,925 KB/s (5.7x) - Maximum Write Rate: 8,641 KB/s (6.2x)
I 14:51:15 Cycling Tray before Verify...
W 14:51:23 Waiting for device to become ready...
I 14:51:34 Device Ready!
I 14:51:38 Operation Started!
I 14:51:38 Source Device: [2:0:0] Optiarc DVD RW AD-7200S 1.06 (G:) (ATA)
I 14:51:38 Source Media Type: DVD+R (Book Type: DVD-ROM) (Disc ID: MCC-004-00) (Speeds: 4x, 6x, 8x, 12x, 16x, 18x)
Are you actually setting the booktype in Binflash?
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
28. June 2008 @ 09:35 |
Link to this message
|
where did you get binflash from loco?
i had to DL something else to get it to flash for me? well something that i could understand.
when i DL the FW flash it didnt have a installer with it
EDIT.
never mind i did that..lol but i also did the same thing in nero
EDIT again:
just used dvd-rebuilder on the spiderwick chronicles. thats a pretty big movie.movie and menu 6.35gb i riped out warnings and such sillyness. 2 passes grand total of 41 mins... that is so sweet.. ill have the scan with the new NEC shortly.
EDIT Again:
been messin with the 7200s. doing the scans it has the same scanning as the Benq's. plus you can choose the intervels it scans at 8ECC or 1ECC. ive found that @1ECC it will have the same standards as the liteons do.well maybe not the same but right along the same lines at them.doing the scan now of that dvd-reb job.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 28. June 2008 @ 10:49
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
28. June 2008 @ 11:11 |
Link to this message
|
and its booktyped....nice
|
Moderator
1 product review
|
28. June 2008 @ 11:53 |
Link to this message
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
28. June 2008 @ 12:24 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by LOCOENG:
I don't have any problems with 1.06 booktyping...
Are you actually setting the booktype in Binflash?
I'm a frikkin idiot!!! Sorry RedRob, there's your answer... I don't know where me brain has been lately but I've been OUT THERE for about a week now. I'll pull it out of the dark and have it cleaned for good measure. lol.
What's strange is that Liggy's 1.05 f/w auto bitset right off.... hmmmmmmmm. Well back to the 1.06 version and then to the "burning" board. :D
...gm
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
28. June 2008 @ 14:31 |
Link to this message
|
looking pretty good with this drive, burnt this one @16x not BAD at all.
was lookin real sweet right up to the end there. this was disc 2 disc with clonedvd2
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
29. June 2008 @ 12:02 |
Link to this message
|
ok did a few more lastnight with the 7200S. theses are MCC004's burnt at 12x
The signal
Now this is one sick gorey off the wall movie
The Ruins
This one will make you look at alot of things different....lol
pretty good scans so far. im sure they will get better. im gonna scan these agian with a litey
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 29. June 2008 @ 12:06
|
Moderator
1 product review
|
29. June 2008 @ 19:25 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
The Ruins
This one will make you look at alot of things different....lol
It made me look at the clock differntly...because that is 1.5 hours I'll never get back. :)
|
|
dutch44
Newbie
|
29. June 2008 @ 21:46 |
Link to this message
|
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
29. June 2008 @ 21:51 |
Link to this message
|
|
dutch44,
that second one is terrible!!! It has NO pretty colors and it seems the test finished.. why would you want that?? hehehe. j/k..
Very nice burn on the MIS and good results too!! To bad you had to trash those MII DL's. :(
....gm
add: btw getting ready to up some scans.. :D
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
29. June 2008 @ 23:52 |
Link to this message
|
Hey got some scans for you to look at. :) Got the RITEKF1's and RicohJpn-R03's for $7.99 each 50 pack. :) The MCC 004's are MIT and the old packaging. ;)
All burned at 12x with imgburn on the AD-7200S. ;)
...gm
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
30. June 2008 @ 03:12 |
Link to this message
|
I just did this scan. The first one at 10x is fine, the one at 8x is also good too. But the 4x is a "Horror Show". Can anybody explain why. Same drive, same disk, but still it's a 0!
10x
8x
4x
I know it says Maximum for the 10x but the highest it goes with this media is 10x. Different media will let me scan at 16x. Don't know why!
Best Regards,
Russ
GigaByte 990FXA-UD5 - AMD FX-8320 @4.0GHz @1.312v - Corsair H-60 liquid CPU Cooler - 4x4 GB GSkill RipJaws DDR3/1866 Cas8, 8-9-9-24 - Corsair 400-R Case - OCZ FATAL1TY 550 watt Modular PSU - Intel 330 120GB SATA III SSD - WD Black 500GB SATA III - WD black 1 TB Sata III - WD Black 500GB SATA II - 2 Asus DRW-24B1ST DVD-Burner - Sony 420W 5.1 PL-II Suround Sound - GigaByte GTX550/1GB 970 Mhz Video - Asus VE247H 23.6" HDMI 1080p Monitor
|
Moderator
1 product review
|
30. June 2008 @ 07:38 |
Link to this message
|
@GM
The MCC scan looks like the ones I've been getting alot lately, but the RicohJpn is very nice. I'll definately be picking up a tub or two of them.
@Russ
Basically nowadays with the combo's of quality drives and quality media the roles have been reversed a bit. Sometimes it can be just as bad to burn too slow and it was once bad to burn too slow. Seems to me that anymore you get better results burning faster than you should as opposed to burning sloooooooooow. If you have a modern drive with updated firmware you should burn at the rated speed of the blank and if that makes you queasy I wouldn't go below 8X...that's just my slant on it all and there may be a better explanation out there somewhere. :)
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
30. June 2008 @ 08:52 |
Link to this message
|
Russ IIRC the ASUS drives aren't really known for scanning. I trust the BENQ's and Litey's for scanning. You should scan at 8x and 4x respectively.
All that assuming you meant the scan speed NOT the burn speed. I've found that most of the newer drives with the newer media a 12x sweet spot for burning. I get some really good results at 16x too. I know, I know every one has been on this DON'T go over 8x and all that crap... BUT with the NEWER tech in both DVDRW's and Media the speed is greatly improved with both. To tell you the truth I haven't burned a disc below 12x the last few months. LOL. I've been getting consistent 95's and it doesn't get much better than that. :P
Keep asking and we'll keep responding. :) Hopefully we answer your question. ;)
....gm
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
30. June 2008 @ 08:55 |
Link to this message
|
LOCO
i dont think Russ ment he burnt the disc at thse speeds its the speeds he ran the test at..
Russ
the slower you do the test the closer it is to what your player is gonna read the discwhen your playing it. Id say if you chose the 2x speed it would look even worse(for that disc).
your results there are kinda oppisite from what i get with my litey's the slower i test it the better the results in your case the faster your testing it the better the results.
here is one of the new ritek disc i just got.F16's scaned with the 7200S also burnt with it.
im doing the scan with my litey now.
heres the litey scan @4x doing it again @8x
i dont like these disc at all.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 30. June 2008 @ 09:11
|
Moderator
1 product review
|
30. June 2008 @ 09:22 |
Link to this message
|
|
Yeah...I misread it.
/me bangs head on wall mumbling "your so stupid"
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
30. June 2008 @ 09:29 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by LOCOENG:
Yeah...I misread it.
/me bangs head on wall mumbling "your so stupid"
Finally accepting your faults!!! It's the FIRST step... hehehe. :P
RedRob you might try burning those at 16x and see what happens. :)
....gm
btw I don't like them as well as the Ricoh's either. :D
|
