|
The Official PC building thread - 4th Edition
|
|
|
ddp
Moderator
|
27. May 2011 @ 20:41 |
Link to this message
|
Mr-Movies, don't double post as per forum rules.
12. Repeated posts to increase total number of posts is not allowed. Especially if your message is the last in the thread, edit it rather than post a new message.
http://forums.afterdawn.com/thread_view.cfm/2487
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
rick5446
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
27. May 2011 @ 20:42 |
Link to this message
|
Well their is that good old fashioned way ! Write a letter and let the postman deliver it
YA KNOW WHAT WE DID B4 CELL PHONES ( WE HAD FUN, & ENJOYED OURSELVES of course their was that old fashion answering machine waiting on ya when you got home )But at least you could enjoy your dinner out and a whole movie...Now a days you can't sit through a movie without someone around you talking and disturbing you with there PHONE...Ya ask them to please move or quit talking and your the Motherfu#$er. They are the ones who feel they have been inconvenienced, and push it off on you
|
Senior Member
|
27. May 2011 @ 21:57 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by sammorris: Yeah I've got a hotswap dock for hard disks, it's really handy. The whole point of hard disks though is that you don't have them lying around where they can be thrown, dropped etc. :P
With them all in a PC you never need to ever leave anything lying around, it's all internal. If you want proper power-isolated redundancy, just find a cupboard to leave them in, check them every few weeks/months save for the drive you're backing up new data to and you're fine. It honestly is less hassle than optical media...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sammy lol, you don't have kids, you put nothing pass nothing with them, maybe one day you will know what I mean. Today when I got approached by somebody that's pregnant, I don't say congratulations, I offer them my condolences.
|
Senior Member
|
27. May 2011 @ 22:01 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by Mr-Movies: Originally posted by FredBun: fragile optical media, Hmm, let me think about this for a moment, I have seen my kids throw, scratch, stain and do almost everything else less wipe their butt with them, and they could still play, try and do that with a hardrive.
We went thru this before lol, we all know disc's if properly taken care of will outlast hardrives 10 fold, I mentioned before, I think I got close to 4000 movies, sure it would be a lot easier to stack them on hardrives, but after doing all the work getting them, not to mention the cost, and they are important to me and my family, and have the option to let whomever watch what they want to watch in whatever room using a dvd player is very accessible and easy, other wise you would need a pc in every room in the house.
I had this discussion with Russ one time, I told him the day I stop using disc's would be the day I could insert an external hardrive into a dvd player like a disc, but would still worry about the longevity.
But he got me on this one, he said Fred you can almost already do that, I think he mentioned a docking station or something to that nature, sent me a link to view one, I was flabbergasted, didn't even know something like that was available, so my argumentative ammunition with Russ almost came to a halt, like I said he got me on that one, but still, maybe because of fear, about the longevity etc, so for now I'll still stick with what I'm doing.
Right on Fred but Russ isn't totally right about a docking station as you can pooch a hdd in a docking station if you remove the drive when you shouldn't or a virus decides to attach itself. Again a hard drive is vulnerable how often have you screwed up an optical disc pulling it out without safe releasing it or just popping it out in mid play? How about never!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Makes sense to me Stevo, good point.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 27. May 2011 @ 22:02
|
Senior Member
|
27. May 2011 @ 22:29 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by ddp: Mr-Movies, don't double post as per forum rules.
12. Repeated posts to increase total number of posts is not allowed. Especially if your message is the last in the thread, edit it rather than post a new message.
http://forums.afterdawn.com/thread_view.cfm/2487
Sorry DDP, that wasn't my intent I could careless how many posts or threads I have but I'll be more carefull next time.
Stevo
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
28. May 2011 @ 03:44 |
Link to this message
|
I think this conversation has run its course. If you have kids and you let them mess around with everything, sure perhaps optical discs are more robust. If you actually have some form of control though, mechanical storage is a lot easier. I find the idea that a virus would never end up on a DVD laughable, but that's another story.
|
Senior Member
|
28. May 2011 @ 10:49 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by sammorris: I think this conversation has run its course. If you have kids and you let them mess around with everything, sure perhaps optical discs are more robust. If you actually have some form of control though, mechanical storage is a lot easier. I find the idea that a virus would never end up on a DVD laughable, but that's another story.
So you are coming around to the point that optical is more safe, which is true, and hdd's are the easier path but again not so safe. Very good Sam we are making progress.
My point has always been this what is more safe, not easier, but you have tried to say that mechanical media is safer and easier which is flat out wrong. Some day you'll get hit by copying data to another drive for backup finding out that some of the data is corrupt and then loosing your original drive, then you'll be screwed. It's happened to me and most people I know or deal with it is just a matter of time and lazyness.
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
28. May 2011 @ 10:50 |
Link to this message
|
Quote: So you are coming around to the point that optical is more safe, which is true
That's not what I said...
|
Senior Member
|
28. May 2011 @ 11:15 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by sammorris: Quote: So you are coming around to the point that optical is more safe, which is true
That's not what I said...
Quote: sure perhaps optical discs are more robust
I think that is what you said even if you were not conscience of it!
You coming around you're just not aware of it. LOL
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
28. May 2011 @ 11:58 |
Link to this message
|
Well, by all means take half my sentence so you can spin what I said out of context. The rest of the sentence illustrated that optical discs are more robust for a specific example. The rest of the time though...
|
Senior Member
|
28. May 2011 @ 12:11 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by sammorris: Well, by all means take half my sentence so you can spin what I said out of context. The rest of the sentence illustrated that optical discs are more robust for a specific example. The rest of the time though...
That example works in all instances sorry but you can't have it both ways...
|
Moderator
|
28. May 2011 @ 12:23 |
Link to this message
|
It's Deja Vu around here.
I used to swear by optical media, bought & burnt 1000's of the pesky things, loved them.
Then there were so many of them that i realised it had become a fad, and not a good one. Plus the time taken looking for a particular film, documentary or whatever became extremely irritating. Granted, a very good storage system solves a lot of this frustration.
What stopped working for me, personally (and i know Sam will concur on this), is that i have so much media, so many documentaries (something like 1TB of those so far), so many tv series, never mind so many movies and frightening amounts of music, that optical media just couldn't hack it it (for me) anymore.
So i converted most of my movies to AVI, stored on large hard drives (with separate, external, manually maintained backup drives), along with ahem, downloaded AVI's. I then took great pleasure in destroying large amounts of optical discs, though the annoying thing is that i still have stupid amounts of optical discs to sift thru and convert, then destroy.
There's at least one PC and an old type xbox in every room so media watching couldn't be easier, just fire up XBMC or VLC player and watch whatever we want with zero messing about looking for optical discs (everything's networked). Yes there was a huge amount of work converting things to AVI but no more than how much of my life was wasted ripping/copying/burning optical media so it's all good. Now i have masses more convenience in viewing stuff and very good security as everything is on separate, external hard drives. If both copies of a drive were to be wiped or damaged, sure it would be a huge loss but maybe one day i'll get a 3rd copy ie a 3rd external hard drive for each set of data, but it's overkill i think. I must get around to selling my dvd players, (tv) dvd recorder and (tv) hard-drive recorder, they haven't been used in years.
Each to their own as i always say, but aside from CD's that proved invaluable in the very early days ie music cd's and home-burnt "utility/program update cd's" (and home-copied game cd's and dvd's), optical discs to me now are highly irritating and far more trouble than they're worth ; they were invaluable in their day but those days are long past now. About the only purpose they have now is for building new machines at work, install cd's/dvd's, stuff like that, plus i have put together a couple discs of drivers for many types of Dell machines, stuff like that. And when cleansing systems of viruses you can't beat optical discs, though we always keep around large amounts of flash drives that can be used/reused for this task too.
Main PC ~ Intel C2Q Q6600 (G0 Stepping)/Gigabyte GA-EP45-DS3/2GB Crucial Ballistix PC2-8500/Zalman CNPS9700/Antec 900/Corsair HX 620W
Network ~ DD-WRT ~ 2node WDS-WPA2/AES ~ Buffalo WHR-G54S. 3node WPA2/AES ~ WRT54GS v6 (inc. WEP BSSID), WRT54G v2, WRT54G2 v1. *** Forum Rules ***
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 28. May 2011 @ 12:40
|
Senior Member
|
28. May 2011 @ 13:22 |
Link to this message
|
There is no doubt that hard drives can be easier than burning discs every time you add to your library. I too use them for storage and normal usage and have no problem with others that do so. And to each his own on how you want to roll the dice too. We all gamble to some degree but a smart man knows when he is taking a gamble and anytime you use mechanical anything over a non-mechanical device you are gambling to some degree. Of course optical media has its hazards too but they are much more limited than any mechanical drive, obviously or it should be obvious.
So when someone argues against physics and nature it becomes quite lame, this is where I have issue.
|
AfterDawn Addict
7 product reviews
|
28. May 2011 @ 13:28 |
Link to this message
|
Oh people will find faults in anything. I look at both technologies cautiously. What I mean is, either could fail. It's a matter of preference, habit, and knowledge. A person that has had a lot of trouble with Optical media, and not with hard drives, is likely to trust HDD's more. A person who has had trouble with HDD's is gonna trust optical media more. Myself, I've acquired a comfort with both technologies. I have an intimate trust in both technologies. The damn velociraptor is gonna make me nuts though! I think I have another one being finicky. I'll probably find out this weekend. What I plan on doing is dumping one of my 1Tb drives, onto a 2Tb drive, and cloning my Velociraptor to the 1Tb drive, and running it that way for a time. I believe i'm getting a kind of intermittent connection. Eliminating the V-Raptor could allow me to discover a problem ;)
To delete, or not to delete. THAT is the question!
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
28. May 2011 @ 13:30 |
Link to this message
|
Well yeah, creaky hit the nail on the head. DVDs and Blurays are fine for small to medium amounts of data, while not necessarily better than hard disks they're no worse. However, once you go beyond a certain point, for example the 13.5TB of data currently stored on my server, optical media just becomes completely impractical. The argument that optical media's more reliable than mechanical storage is flawed, end of story. Where people get confused is from experiencing mechanical storage done wrong, i.e. not backed up. If I lose a drive that's been backed up, I just put the backup in, then buy a replacement disk, or RMA the bad one. Fortunately, I haven't ever lost a drive to one failing (though I have damaged disks in the past due to faulty cables - again no data was lost as it was backed up!)
|
Senior Member
|
28. May 2011 @ 13:45 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by omegaman7: Oh people will find faults in anything. I look at both technologies cautiously. What I mean is, either could fail. It's a matter of preference, habit, and knowledge. A person that has had a lot of trouble with Optical media, and not with hard drives, is likely to trust HDD's more. A person who has had trouble with HDD's is gonna trust optical media more. Myself, I've acquired a comfort with both technologies. I have an intimate trust in both technologies. The damn velociraptor is gonna make me nuts though! I think I have another one being finicky. I'll probably find out this weekend. What I plan on doing is dumping one of my 1Tb drives, onto a 2Tb drive, and cloning my Velociraptor to the 1Tb drive, and running it that way for a time. I believe i'm getting a kind of intermittent connection. Eliminating the V-Raptor could allow me to discover a problem ;)
One fails more than the other and it is always a matter of preference that's a no brainer. It is true that if you buy crappy media and your the type to close your disc in the drive when it is not fully in the tray you are going to have issues, but that really is preventable and should not happen often. But also has nothing to do with backup storage as that is produced and put away, not used on a day-to-day basis.
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
28. May 2011 @ 13:49 |
Link to this message
|
Well it does, because if you have backups, there is no consequence to your main storage failing, thus the argument about reliability is rendered completely irrelevant...
|
AfterDawn Addict
7 product reviews
|
28. May 2011 @ 13:54 |
Link to this message
|
To delete, or not to delete. THAT is the question!
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
28. May 2011 @ 13:56 |
Link to this message
|
I don't see any flames? :S
|
AfterDawn Addict
7 product reviews
|
28. May 2011 @ 13:58 |
Link to this message
|
I was simply reminding(Not my job) that this is the building thread. I humbly backdown though. I suppose we've only skewed off a little.
To delete, or not to delete. THAT is the question!
|
Senior Member
|
28. May 2011 @ 14:17 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by sammorris: Well it does, because if you have backups, there is no consequence to your main storage failing, thus the argument about reliability is rendered completely irrelevant...
No because your backup can fail or be corrupted more so than optical media so it is relevant, most certainly.
Kevin, backups are a part of building PC's, at least it is for most of us including HP and other manufactures, so we really aren't off track.
I understand your frustration though...
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
28. May 2011 @ 14:22 |
Link to this message
|
That's why you check it? The odds of two HDDs with corresponding data failing at the same time are very low, far lower than the odds of an optical disc failing.
|
Senior Member
|
28. May 2011 @ 14:47 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by sammorris: That's why you check it? The odds of two HDDs with corresponding data failing at the same time are very low, far lower than the odds of an optical disc failing.
Sam, I just had a drive go down and had a second drive that was a backup of that drive. The backup drive had corrupted files on it, from copying one-to-the-other, even though it was supposed to be 100%. It was not but fortunately I had a better backup so I lost nothing but if I hadn't I would of lost about 20% of my programs.
|
AfterDawn Addict
7 product reviews
|
28. May 2011 @ 15:08 |
Link to this message
|
Perhaps the drive that went down, was already doomed, when you transferred files? Reminds me of some optical drives. Believe it or not, there are optical drives that will ignore read errors. Contrary to some believing that is impossible. It is not impossible. It simply requires certain circumstances/variables to be met.
To delete, or not to delete. THAT is the question!
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
Senior Member
|
28. May 2011 @ 15:17 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by omegaman7: Perhaps the drive that went down, was already doomed, when you transferred files? Reminds me of some optical drives. Believe it or not, there are optical drives that will ignore read errors. Contrary to some believing that is impossible. It is not impossible. It simply requires certain circumstances/variables to be met.
Nope, it wasn't but I was waiting for that response! It also was a BRAND NEW drive I backed up to with the same format sot that also isn't the issue. This isn't the first time by any means that this has happened to me or others I know either. Also I always check file numbers and size to assure a good copy and did so here but again it was not a 100% good backup. I've never had these kinds of issues and others I haven't even brought up here with optical media and it was optical media that save my buttisk!
Say what you want to support lazyness but facts are facts! Just to bring this into scope I too prefer to take the lazy route as well, but when it comes to importance I try to be smart, it doesn't always pan out but the attempt is there. LOL
|
|