User User name Password  
   
Thursday 20.2.2025 / 18:39
Search AfterDawn Forums:        In English   Suomeksi   På svenska
afterdawn.com > forums > pc hardware > other pc hardware > the official oc (overclocking) thread!
Show topics
 
Forums
Forums
The Official OC (OverClocking) Thread!
  Jump to:
 
NO Fanboy comments needed
Posted Message
AfterDawn Addict
_
31. August 2008 @ 02:09 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Originally posted by baltekmi:
come on I am using the zalman and idling at 49c I need a better cooler for oc.
So what kind of cooling do you have right now? A Zalman what? What's your case like? How are your fans situated? It's difficult to recommend a cooler when we know so little. Sorry if you've posted before about it but I can't remember and going thru more than a couple of pages is to much work for me. lol. :P

....gm

[img]quoted from creaky, "I think i need a break away from this thread, you are just talking absolute and utter nonsense now. Im off to ban myself and hit myself repeatedly with blunt objects. And if im still conscious after that im going to install Windows Me."[/img]
PC build thread blank media thread Ultimate DVD Backup resource thread what did binkie7 do to me???
Advertisement
_
__
Senior Member
_
31. August 2008 @ 02:54 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Originally posted by greensman:
boozer you know better than saying something like that. ;)

I wish I was his "friend" that got his cpu culls. lol. ;)

So honestly im... what are you gonna do with the "extra" cpus you have laying around??

....gm
overclock them...
i do sell stuff on ebay but i really like the e6700
these are some CPUs that I have collected (not being used) over the years and I dont wanna sell off:
AMD Duron 750MHz (x1)
Intel Celeron 1100MHz (x2)
AMD Athlon X2 4200+ (x1)
Intel Pentium 4 3.2GHz Northwood (x3)
Intel Celeron 380 (x1)
Intel Pentium 4 2GHz Northwood (x1)
Intel Pentium 4 3GHz Prescott (x1)
Intel Pentium 4 3.2GHz Prescott (x1)
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 (came out of a laptop that I upgraded to a T7200) (x1)
Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 (x1) - overclocks to 3.1GHz on 1.15v and a CNPS9500
Intel Core 2 Duo E6700 (x1) - never overclocked it!

but yea, as you can see, i dont have too many "newer" CPUs laying around

i did kill an e6400 when it first came out (~Aug of 2006)
i put wayyyy tooo much voltage into that sukka

to finally answer ur question, i am doing NOTHING with them HEHE

-im1992

I was born naked, wet, and hungry. Then things got worse.
AfterDawn Addict
_
31. August 2008 @ 03:05 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
well if you decide to sell the E6700 or the Q6700 lemme know. ;) PM's are fine. :D

baltekmi when you get the chance let us know so we can assist you better. ;)

...gm

[img]quoted from creaky, "I think i need a break away from this thread, you are just talking absolute and utter nonsense now. Im off to ban myself and hit myself repeatedly with blunt objects. And if im still conscious after that im going to install Windows Me."[/img]
PC build thread blank media thread Ultimate DVD Backup resource thread what did binkie7 do to me???
AfterDawn Addict
_
31. August 2008 @ 03:09 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
EDIT

GigaByte 990FXA-UD5 - AMD FX-8320 @4.0GHz @1.312v - Corsair H-60 liquid CPU Cooler - 4x4 GB GSkill RipJaws DDR3/1866 Cas8, 8-9-9-24 - Corsair 400-R Case - OCZ FATAL1TY 550 watt Modular PSU - Intel 330 120GB SATA III SSD - WD Black 500GB SATA III - WD black 1 TB Sata III - WD Black 500GB SATA II - 2 Asus DRW-24B1ST DVD-Burner - Sony 420W 5.1 PL-II Suround Sound - GigaByte GTX550/1GB 970 Mhz Video - Asus VE247H 23.6" HDMI 1080p Monitor


This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 31. August 2008 @ 06:32

AfterDawn Addict

4 product reviews
_
31. August 2008 @ 05:40 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
The Q8200 will still cost more than the Q6600, so why not just use that instead? Not only will it probably be faster to start with, it will also probably overclock better.

Baltekmi: Thermalright Ultra-120. Works for me! lmao

Oh, and no, I can't take that face seriously... :P



Afterdawn Addict // Silent PC enthusiast // PC Build advisor // LANGamer Alias:Ratmanscoop
PC Specs page -- http://my.afterdawn.com/sammorris/blog_entry.cfm/11247
updated 10-Dec-13

This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 31. August 2008 @ 05:41

Moderator
_
31. August 2008 @ 06:28 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Originally posted by abuzar1:
lol I TRY to be funny. It helps pass time.
how about you stop posting crap just for the sake of it. Pass the time in some other way. It's bad enough we have to keep seeing that 'expression' on your face on your sig pic without having comments that match the expression.

@baltekmi - this may be the o/clock thread but you haven't specified if you're actually o/clocking. I'm no overclocker but i do use the very good Zalman 9700, on lowest speed unless it's summer, and on medium speed in summer (this is in an Antec 900 btw), all other fans on lowest. At idle the temp can be as low as 31C, under full load it never breaks past 50C.



Main PC ~ Intel C2Q Q6600 (G0 Stepping)/Gigabyte GA-EP45-DS3/2GB Crucial Ballistix PC2-8500/Zalman CNPS9700/Antec 900/Corsair HX 620W
Network ~ DD-WRT ~ 2node WDS-WPA2/AES ~ Buffalo WHR-G54S. 3node WPA2/AES ~ WRT54GS v6 (inc. WEP BSSID), WRT54G v2, WRT54G2 v1. *** Forum Rules ***
AfterDawn Addict

4 product reviews
_
31. August 2008 @ 11:07 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
With my Q6600 at 3.15Ghz, my CPU temps are very similar to Creaky's. Idle temp is between 28 and 31, load temps are in the lowest 50s for normal counts of load, nudging 60 during a burn test, CPU fan at 1000rpm, so probably a similar speed to low on the 9700, and case fans at 1000rpm, similar to the low speed for the fans in the 900, from my recollection of owning one. IIRC the fans on the 900 ran at 1050rpm low, 1600rpm Medium and 2200rpm High for the 120s, and 450/650/850 for the 200mm.



Afterdawn Addict // Silent PC enthusiast // PC Build advisor // LANGamer Alias:Ratmanscoop
PC Specs page -- http://my.afterdawn.com/sammorris/blog_entry.cfm/11247
updated 10-Dec-13
AfterDawn Addict

2 product reviews
_
31. August 2008 @ 11:52 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
OK

P.S. I don't just post crap. I would like to think I have helped plenty of people out at these forums.

This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 31. August 2008 @ 11:57

spamual
Suspended permanently
_
31. August 2008 @ 12:03 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
creaky, unless you were joking that was very rude, and not nice to see from a mod. you could have PMed him if you felt so stongly
Moderator
_
31. August 2008 @ 12:18 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Originally posted by spamual:
creaky, unless you were joking that was very rude, and not nice to see from a mod. you could have PMed him if you felt so stongly
I use dry humour heavily around here, and let's not forget i am very soft when it comes to moderating. I don't think it was rude, it just annoys myself and other regulars (regularly) when 3 of you young un's (abuzar, you and im1992) forget yourselves sometimes and post crap for the sake of it. It's not fair on the wider audience, ie lurkers and visitors, nor is it fair on the regular (including us older) posters. I could indeed do more stuff by PM, but on a site like this there is so much unnecessary crap that's posted regularly, it gets real old real quick (don't forget i'm talking about more than just this one single thread, ie the entire site).
Maybe it's because i grew up before the internet & forums, but i don't believe in posting for the sake of it. I'm a strong believer in the saying "If there's nothing worth posting, don't post".

Anyways, it gets quite annoying having my comments critised, especially when it's by young people who don't seem to respect others. It also gets quite annoying having to justify my comments. There wouldn't even need to be moderators if everyone respected the site and other people.


Now (pretty please) can we get the thread back on track ?? so i don't have to keep posting as a mod and/or justifying those comments...



Main PC ~ Intel C2Q Q6600 (G0 Stepping)/Gigabyte GA-EP45-DS3/2GB Crucial Ballistix PC2-8500/Zalman CNPS9700/Antec 900/Corsair HX 620W
Network ~ DD-WRT ~ 2node WDS-WPA2/AES ~ Buffalo WHR-G54S. 3node WPA2/AES ~ WRT54GS v6 (inc. WEP BSSID), WRT54G v2, WRT54G2 v1. *** Forum Rules ***

This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 31. August 2008 @ 12:21

AfterDawn Addict

4 product reviews
_
31. August 2008 @ 12:25 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
I like to think we've all been helpful here, but I also know we post unnecessary messages. On the one hand, that makes it a more pleasant casual environment, but on the other hand, it does make it a bit of a haystack to pick through for decent information.

On a more on-topic note, which voltages should I adjust to make 3.4Ghz out of my Q6600 stable? (Or close to it). I see CPU Vcore and MCH voltage, anything else?



Afterdawn Addict // Silent PC enthusiast // PC Build advisor // LANGamer Alias:Ratmanscoop
PC Specs page -- http://my.afterdawn.com/sammorris/blog_entry.cfm/11247
updated 10-Dec-13

This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 31. August 2008 @ 12:28

spamual
Suspended permanently
_
31. August 2008 @ 12:33 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
CPU Vcore to about 1.45, NBV to about 1.4, and FBST to 1.4, and CPU PLL to 1.6

that should work sam.

creaky, imsorry if it was a joke, just there were to smilies :D

i agree i post alot of crap, but its always for fun, i mean check out the video card thread(s) (x1950) and you'll see we do post, but its all in fun.
AfterDawn Addict

4 product reviews
_
31. August 2008 @ 12:35 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
1.6? What is that set to by default? It's been a while since I've seen a voltage that high...



Afterdawn Addict // Silent PC enthusiast // PC Build advisor // LANGamer Alias:Ratmanscoop
PC Specs page -- http://my.afterdawn.com/sammorris/blog_entry.cfm/11247
updated 10-Dec-13
spamual
Suspended permanently
_
31. August 2008 @ 12:39 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
should be about 1.5 normally.

actually try 1.5, maybe that should be fine
AfterDawn Addict

4 product reviews
_
31. August 2008 @ 12:40 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
I will have a look in a bit, going out tonight.



Afterdawn Addict // Silent PC enthusiast // PC Build advisor // LANGamer Alias:Ratmanscoop
PC Specs page -- http://my.afterdawn.com/sammorris/blog_entry.cfm/11247
updated 10-Dec-13
AfterDawn Addict

1 product review
_
31. August 2008 @ 12:45 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Quote:
creaky, unless you were joking that was very rude, and not nice to see from a mod. you could have PMed him if you felt so stongly
Whether or not you agree with how creaky made his point, the substance of his point is right on the money. This thread has become filled with empty pointless posts that serves no purpose beyond common chat. Creaky isn't the first person to point this out, but perhaps he will be the one that will end it. If it had been Praetor instead of Creaky making this point some of you would no longer be posting in this thread at all. Creaky is at least giving some of you a warning.


Safety Valve exists just for those types of posts that have choked this thread with drivel so why not move your chats to there?

"Please Read!!! Post your questions only in This Thread or they will go unanswered:

Help with development of BD RB: Donations at: http://www.jdobbs.com/
.

This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 31. August 2008 @ 12:45

spamual
Suspended permanently
_
31. August 2008 @ 12:48 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
my posts on this thread have mostly, if not all, been rleated to OCing.


sam, for me to keep my E2140 at 3.4, i need 1.6 on the PLL. has been liek this for over 4 months, no problems, im just sure the quads would need more.

This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 31. August 2008 @ 16:23

AfterDawn Addict

4 product reviews
_
31. August 2008 @ 13:39 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Wow, 2.6? I never realised you could even go that high...



Afterdawn Addict // Silent PC enthusiast // PC Build advisor // LANGamer Alias:Ratmanscoop
PC Specs page -- http://my.afterdawn.com/sammorris/blog_entry.cfm/11247
updated 10-Dec-13
spamual
Suspended permanently
_
31. August 2008 @ 19:11 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
sam you must be mistaken, who said 2.6?

;)
AfterDawn Addict

4 product reviews
_
1. September 2008 @ 06:05 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Lol. Lrn2type plx...

Anyway, post tidy-up I shall look into these settings and hopefully bump my CPU speed up a bit.



Afterdawn Addict // Silent PC enthusiast // PC Build advisor // LANGamer Alias:Ratmanscoop
PC Specs page -- http://my.afterdawn.com/sammorris/blog_entry.cfm/11247
updated 10-Dec-13
AfterDawn Addict

4 product reviews
_
1. September 2008 @ 07:57 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Used the following settings, at the previously tried 3.24Ghz:

DDR2 Overvoltage: +0.3V (Everest reports 2.18-2.19V)
PCI-E Overvoltage: Normal
FSB Overvoltage: +0.1V
G(MCH) Overvoltage@ +0.1V
MCH Reference Voltage: Normal
DDR Reference Voltage: Normal
DDR Termination Voltage: Normal
Loadline Calibration Control: Off
CPU Vcore: 1.45V

Burn Test crashed the system rather than causing a BSOD - Vcore in Everest was notably 1.39V.

Ran the test again with Loadline Calibration Enabled, and the test finished, but was marked as a failure as only two of the five tests returned the correct result. Vcore in CPUZ switching between the 1.408V seen in Auto, and 1.424V.

If there is an option for PLL voltage control in the BIOS, I don't see it, or it's under a different name. I used my own guesses as to the other voltages, but not sure that they're right.

update: Raised Vcore in BIOS to 1.475V, resulting in a CPUZ Value of 1.440-1.456V during loading and 1.472-1.488V at idle (occasional points of 1.424V). LinPack Testing now passes at 3.24Ghz. Time to try higher, I suppose. The bugbear of all this I think is the instability of the voltage. If 1.44V could be guaranteed, there'd be no need to aim as high as 1.475V but vdroop being what it is, it just ain't that simple with a CPU that draws this much load perhaps.



Afterdawn Addict // Silent PC enthusiast // PC Build advisor // LANGamer Alias:Ratmanscoop
PC Specs page -- http://my.afterdawn.com/sammorris/blog_entry.cfm/11247
updated 10-Dec-13

This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 1. September 2008 @ 08:08

AfterDawn Addict

1 product review
_
1. September 2008 @ 08:45 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Here is a much faster Burn Test that will let you know if you have any errors. It only runs for about 10 minutes. It's based on the tests that Intel uses to test their processors.

http://downloads.guru3d.com/IntelBurnTes...7.html#download



"Please Read!!! Post your questions only in This Thread or they will go unanswered:

Help with development of BD RB: Donations at: http://www.jdobbs.com/
.
AfterDawn Addict

4 product reviews
_
1. September 2008 @ 08:48 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
That's the one I'm using. :)



Afterdawn Addict // Silent PC enthusiast // PC Build advisor // LANGamer Alias:Ratmanscoop
PC Specs page -- http://my.afterdawn.com/sammorris/blog_entry.cfm/11247
updated 10-Dec-13
Member
_
1. September 2008 @ 08:59 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Thanks a lot!!! sam




Originally posted by sammorris:
The Q8200 will still cost more than the Q6600, so why not just use that instead? Not only will it probably be faster to start with, it will also probably overclock better.

Baltekmi: Thermalright Ultra-120. Works for me! lmao

Oh, and no, I can't take that face seriously... :P


p-4 3.2 prescott HT curently at 3.6/Abit IC7-G (Abit rule!)/2 Gig Mushkin extream 2.5-2-2-6
LG 20.1 FLATRON WIDESCREEN/BFG 6800 ultra@450 mgz/2 wd raptor 150 raid/Ultra 500 watt Direct connet ps
NZXT GUARDIAN CASE(BLUE)
Advertisement
_
__
 
_
AfterDawn Addict

4 product reviews
_
1. September 2008 @ 09:06 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
No problem.

Got 3.33Ghz at the moment, however, this speed rebooted on burntest at 1.475V. Now using 1.481V, which is as high as I really want to go. Will run the test again shortly.



Afterdawn Addict // Silent PC enthusiast // PC Build advisor // LANGamer Alias:Ratmanscoop
PC Specs page -- http://my.afterdawn.com/sammorris/blog_entry.cfm/11247
updated 10-Dec-13
 
afterdawn.com > forums > pc hardware > other pc hardware > the official oc (overclocking) thread!
 

Digital video: AfterDawn.com | AfterDawn Forums
Music: MP3Lizard.com
Gaming: Blasteroids.com | Blasteroids Forums | Compare game prices
Software: Software downloads
Blogs: User profile pages
RSS feeds: AfterDawn.com News | Software updates | AfterDawn Forums
International: AfterDawn in Finnish | AfterDawn in Swedish | AfterDawn in Norwegian | download.fi
Navigate: Search | Site map
About us: About AfterDawn Ltd | Advertise on our sites | Rules, Restrictions, Legal disclaimer & Privacy policy
Contact us: Send feedback | Contact our media sales team
 
  © 1999-2025 by AfterDawn Ltd.

  IDG TechNetwork