PS3 vs Xbox 360
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
23. February 2006 @ 11:19 |
Link to this message
|
those pict5ures were ok looking, but they seemed like cutsceens being at odd angles and no crosshairs. it doesnt look too interesting of a game really. looks like but looks like id get bored after a bit of play like with quake 4.
But they all do sort of the same thing, and that is rearrange what you thought was real, and they remind you of the beauty of very simple things. You forget, because youre so busy going from a to z, that theres 24 letters in between... You turn on... tune in... and you drop out...
PS3 Username: Anubis66
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
HOWJORD
Member
|
23. February 2006 @ 12:01 |
Link to this message
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
23. February 2006 @ 13:17 |
Link to this message
|
the thing imma hate about this new gen is with the new detail and new abilities comes more thought needed to see and understand things, and tyo process it well. ittl just talk some getting used to.
But they all do sort of the same thing, and that is rearrange what you thought was real, and they remind you of the beauty of very simple things. You forget, because youre so busy going from a to z, that theres 24 letters in between... You turn on... tune in... and you drop out...
PS3 Username: Anubis66
|
rabbity
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
24. February 2006 @ 01:38 |
Link to this message
|
zelda lost plannet is looking very close to gears of war but it comes out like 6 mounths after gears of war so i think when it will come out it will look a lot better.
in terms of best looking games that are coming out on xbox 360, well at this momment in time i can not really say mainly b/c games have not showed us much, like too human, strangle hold and mass effect.
but from what i have seen so far, in my opinion it starts at mass effect, 2 days to vegas, gears of war/huxley (i am sure that unrealT WILL BE ON PAR), lost plannet, killing day, battle field 2, ghost recon and sooooooo many more i can not think offf right now.
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
24. February 2006 @ 03:27 |
Link to this message
|
yeah jesus crist have you all seen ut2007 graphics? this pictures are from realtime, and if you dont believe me ill post some links to videos.
the last one is in lo res, but you get the point.
But they all do sort of the same thing, and that is rearrange what you thought was real, and they remind you of the beauty of very simple things. You forget, because youre so busy going from a to z, that theres 24 letters in between... You turn on... tune in... and you drop out...
PS3 Username: Anubis66
|
rabbity
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
24. February 2006 @ 04:28 |
Link to this message
|
yeah i think its looking good and by the time it comes out in late 2006 it will look much better i thknk, but even then at the momment gears of war looks beter than those pics.
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
24. February 2006 @ 05:57 |
Link to this message
|
i dont agree too much. from what ive seen in pics atleast. im yet to see it in action.
But they all do sort of the same thing, and that is rearrange what you thought was real, and they remind you of the beauty of very simple things. You forget, because youre so busy going from a to z, that theres 24 letters in between... You turn on... tune in... and you drop out...
PS3 Username: Anubis66
|
rabbity
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
24. February 2006 @ 07:20 |
Link to this message
|
ok comepare your unrel T 2007 pic where the black dude is standing there, holding his gun to this one.
http://www.gamespot.com/xbox360/action/gearsofwar/screenindex.html
ok check out the screen where you seem him from front view, its under sep 16 05.
personally i think they look very similar but that UT7 will probably over take it b/c its coming out like 5 mounths later.
|
zelda64
Senior Member
|
24. February 2006 @ 10:24 |
Link to this message
|
I dont know? They both look quite on par with one another esspecialy when they use the same engine and part of the same company.
I would have to agree with your post a while back Rabbity about the games your list in order of graphic quality.
Anubis why in one post you mention that the pictures we have seen of Gears of War are not in game becuase of no cross hair and behind view then you post a picture of exactly the same standard for UT2007 and suggest it as real time?
I do know the picture you post of UT2007 is real time like I know some of the Gears of War pics are real time even though they have no cross hair or behind view but are generated through the real time engine as a demonstration. I know becuase I have seen that long video that every one talks about on gametrailers.com.
Dont Hassle the Hoff
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
24. February 2006 @ 12:33 |
Link to this message
|
those pics are. ill even find some accual gameplay ones if you'd like. but with those higher quality pics id say they are on par.
But they all do sort of the same thing, and that is rearrange what you thought was real, and they remind you of the beauty of very simple things. You forget, because youre so busy going from a to z, that theres 24 letters in between... You turn on... tune in... and you drop out...
PS3 Username: Anubis66
|
zelda64
Senior Member
|
24. February 2006 @ 21:41 |
Link to this message
|
If you read what I say I do not doubt those picture's are real. I know they are real you dont have to prove it. I was just pointing out somthing you said about the Gears of War pictures.
|
HOWJORD
Member
|
24. February 2006 @ 23:32 |
Link to this message
|
why are you still saying that the gears of war pics look like they arent gameplay after i posted this link showing actual gameplay video
http://www.gametrailers.com/gamepage.php?id=1650
is it just because anubis is a ps3 fanboy and unreal 2007 will be a ps3 launch title exclusive, and gears of war is xbox360 only
|
zelda64
Senior Member
|
25. February 2006 @ 00:34 |
Link to this message
|
Unreal Tournament is fortunatly not a PS3 exclusive. It will be coming to the Xbox 360 aswell just like Gears of War which will be an Xbox 360 exclusive.
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
25. February 2006 @ 02:50 |
Link to this message
|
again nothing is confirmed about wheather it will be ready on launch with ps3, or if it will be released at the same time on both systems. all epic has said is "ittl be out when its finished, nothing more i can say."
But they all do sort of the same thing, and that is rearrange what you thought was real, and they remind you of the beauty of very simple things. You forget, because youre so busy going from a to z, that theres 24 letters in between... You turn on... tune in... and you drop out...
PS3 Username: Anubis66
|
Jkhmmr
Member
|
25. February 2006 @ 02:59 |
Link to this message
|
True but I do remember something on gamespot saying it's PS3 exclusive. And even if it's not there on launch it won't matter much.
|
rabbity
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
25. February 2006 @ 04:56 |
Link to this message
|
well if i remeber correctly, i saw a video interview at e3 of the guy who is making UT 2007 and he said it was going to be on xbox 360, he did not mention anything about ps3, but i supose he expected everyone to know that it would feature on ps3. and the interview was under the xbox 360 section on ign.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 25. February 2006 @ 04:57
|
Jkhmmr
Member
|
25. February 2006 @ 05:05 |
Link to this message
|
Well I checked up and it's due to be released on all of those platforms. They did say however that it might be ready for PS3 launch but no official announcement yet.
|
rabbity
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
25. February 2006 @ 05:14 |
Link to this message
|
zelda i watched the stranglehold trailer, it was really good and seems like a lot of fun, but i think what i saw off of ign was not hd, so i want to watch it again when it comes on gametrailers. also its not releasing till end of 2006, so i am guesing that it will look a lot better.
also check out the new nintynine nights trailers its awesome. its got like obivion graphics in my opinion.
oh and here are some new pics of UT 2007
http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/unrealtournament2007/screeninde...
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 25. February 2006 @ 05:22
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
25. February 2006 @ 06:02 |
Link to this message
|
why the hell does this site suck a$$ for news now, they have about 3 things ever other week...
and i hate half life now, it f***ing blows a$$. the last level where you kill nihilanth or w/e is waaaay to confusing/impossible.
But they all do sort of the same thing, and that is rearrange what you thought was real, and they remind you of the beauty of very simple things. You forget, because youre so busy going from a to z, that theres 24 letters in between... You turn on... tune in... and you drop out...
PS3 Username: Anubis66
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
25. February 2006 @ 06:17 |
Link to this message
|
But they all do sort of the same thing, and that is rearrange what you thought was real, and they remind you of the beauty of very simple things. You forget, because youre so busy going from a to z, that theres 24 letters in between... You turn on... tune in... and you drop out...
PS3 Username: Anubis66
|
rabbity
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
25. February 2006 @ 11:15 |
Link to this message
|
ok check this out, its the patch for call of duty, which will solcve the xbox live facilities and this backs what i have said for a long time, that its up to the game devs to use the full power of xbox live and just b/c a game has crap xbl does not mean xbox live itself is crap.
http://www.jameswoodcock.co.uk/?p=208
but the thing is, now that battle field and ghost recon on their way shortly have cod 2 devs left it too late.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 25. February 2006 @ 11:24
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
25. February 2006 @ 11:27 |
Link to this message
|
wow. alot of those are very basic things i would have thought it already had. sad... does it have free joining servers? or is your server autoselected?
But they all do sort of the same thing, and that is rearrange what you thought was real, and they remind you of the beauty of very simple things. You forget, because youre so busy going from a to z, that theres 24 letters in between... You turn on... tune in... and you drop out...
PS3 Username: Anubis66
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
25. February 2006 @ 11:36 |
Link to this message
|
i would like to add something. why does everyone put the cell and bluray prices so high? if sony helped develope the cell with funds, and if they developed and own bluray, dont you think that will ruduce costs alot? i could see the cell costing no more than 100 and the drive no more than 100. i do not see why people estimate these things so high. sure its new, but that doesnt mean its gunna cost a god damned fortune. i highly doubt if these parts cost as much as people want to say they do, that sony would be willing to drop 400-500 a pop. its not probable nor sensable. what do these analysts thing they are guessing? the price of the parts in canadian, even then so inflated?
But they all do sort of the same thing, and that is rearrange what you thought was real, and they remind you of the beauty of very simple things. You forget, because youre so busy going from a to z, that theres 24 letters in between... You turn on... tune in... and you drop out...
PS3 Username: Anubis66
|
HOWJORD
Member
|
25. February 2006 @ 13:07 |
Link to this message
|
yeah but just beacause they come up with a new product doesnt mean the materials magically appear. and new technology costs more. and the shelf price will be more than the 360 cos thats the way sony do it, the ps2 is still priced higher than the xbox and game cube. But they will be aiming higher sales just based on their past. but if the same game, with the same graphics, same sound and quality comes out for both machines they will probably go for the cheaper one. many people switched from ps2 to xbox so there is a chance sony may lose the next gen fight, thats if they ever get their ass in gear and release it.
sure it will probably be slightly better than the 360 but with the amount of extra fiddling time and no final specs out they have probably changed it to be superior.
but we will all have to carry on waiting to see. i will probably still go for the 360, the games look very impressive, i think sony has got a much longer term console with the 1080i, and blue ray, more of a future thing, as theres not many 1080i tvs out there, and they are very expensive, and the dual screen thing i think i totally pointless.
no one will have two 1080i tvs and sit them next to each other, well unless they are loaded.
most of the ps3 games in development only run at 720p anyway so i think microsoft have gone the right direction with thier machine, using the DVD-R discs and offering the possibility for a blue ray or hd dvd drive later.
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
25. February 2006 @ 14:01 |
Link to this message
|
the parts are not hard to come by or it would not have been an option. they would see that if they couldnt. there are alot of factories out there that can do anything with the slightest mod.
and they switched just just it looked better. but no sh*t since the xbox came out almost 2 years after the ps2, yet the xbox did significantly worse over all. those 2 years dont make up for the 70million less sold consoles.
But they all do sort of the same thing, and that is rearrange what you thought was real, and they remind you of the beauty of very simple things. You forget, because youre so busy going from a to z, that theres 24 letters in between... You turn on... tune in... and you drop out...
PS3 Username: Anubis66
|