The Official Graphics Card and PC gaming Thread
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
12. August 2009 @ 12:12 |
Link to this message
|
To be honest, I can understand your parents being surprised, it's not exactly common for a child to reject their name entirely at such a young age.
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
Member
|
12. August 2009 @ 13:00 |
Link to this message
|
I decided I was going to do it eventually so it made sense to do it when I wasn't working. Stop making me feel so young :P Actually You've just reminded me of all the little stuff I've never bothered to change it on.
I could put something funny here but I cant be arsed. Now GO AWAY!
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
12. August 2009 @ 14:01 |
Link to this message
|
MGR (Micro Gaming Rig) .|. Intel Q6600 @ 3.45GHz .|. Asus P35 P5K-E/WiFi .|. 4GB 1066MHz Geil Black Dragon RAM .|. Samsung F60 SSD .|. Corsair H50-1 Cooler .|. Sapphire 4870 512MB .|. Lian Li PC-A70B .|. Be Queit P7 Dark Power Pro 850W PSU .|. 24" 1920x1200 DGM (MVA Panel) .|. 24" 1920x1080 Dell (TN Panel) .|.
|
Member
|
12. August 2009 @ 14:08 |
Link to this message
|
That it ace! Does it come with the man that pours Liquid Nitrogen or do you have to buy one separate?
I could put something funny here but I cant be arsed. Now GO AWAY!
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
12. August 2009 @ 14:11 |
Link to this message
|
What doubts? I never said the MARS would be a bad card, but for 40% odd over the hd4870x2 and a 320% higher price, no thanks!
|
Member
|
12. August 2009 @ 16:03 |
Link to this message
|
I just did a 1,549 article on which web browser offers the best performance. It's amazing what you can achieve when your bored:
linkage (Adobe's online document thing is purty but links don't work!!!)
I'm liking Photoshop CS4 on 64-bit I opened pretty much all my screenshots and wallpapers before it came up something about not being able to open that many files at once even though I was only opening one, It was using 3GB of RAM at this stage so then I turned a screenshot from the Sims 3 into a ring and painted it red with minimal lag. I was testing it honestly I was errm seeing what it was capable of..
I don't have any gaming based stuff to report because I've still not reconnected my DVD drive to begin re-installing stuff.
Edit: AD doesn't automatically link to encrypted pages...
I could put something funny here but I cant be arsed. Now GO AWAY!
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 12. August 2009 @ 16:08
|
AfterDawn Addict
7 product reviews
|
12. August 2009 @ 16:10 |
Link to this message
|
CS4 eh. I'm currently running CS3. Awesome piece of software! Probably my favorite. Next to my games of course ;) If I continue playing with it at the rate I am, I could be considered a photoshop Pro within a year. No joke! I like the software that much. I spend a great deal of waking hours with it.
To delete, or not to delete. THAT is the question!
|
Member
|
12. August 2009 @ 16:32 |
Link to this message
|
I got CS4 Extended instead of re-installing CS3 when I swapped to 64-bit. They've got rid of the easy finder thing which is a pain but now its easier to make stuff black and white and one colour or as in this picture several not (I can't remember the name of the effect).
The lovely welsh countryside on RBR :-) Smashed in rally cars are common place.
I could put something funny here but I cant be arsed. Now GO AWAY!
|
AfterDawn Addict
7 product reviews
|
12. August 2009 @ 16:51 |
Link to this message
|
To delete, or not to delete. THAT is the question!
|
AfterDawn Addict
15 product reviews
|
12. August 2009 @ 16:58 |
Link to this message
|
Hey just got done playing Call of Juarez: Bound in Blood. So here's a review.
Gameplay: 8/10
This is a sweet departure for an FPS. CoJ:BiB is a western style game like the classic Clint Eastwood movies. It takes place during and after the civil war. You play as two brothers and may freely choose which one to play in each chapter; whichever fits your fighting style. There are lots of sweet shootouts in saloons and deserted frontier town streets. The gunplay is very tight and intuitive. You can pick your own loadout and each gun has its own strengths and weaknesses. There is a somewhat awkward but very serviceable cover system that take a little practice to use. But once you learn it, it feels quite intuitive. And occasionaly you get to make use of the quick-draw mechanic as well. The gun duels can be tense. It does get a bit repetitive though and none of the weapons are especially exciting. Old western repeater rifles and six-shooter pistols. Fun to use, but lever action gets old fast. There are gatling gun rail sequences but they feel forced. The story is rather good though, if kinda hokey at times. Some interesting characters.
Graphics: 6.5/10
The game is generally pretty sharp with a nice visual style overall. The character models are fantastic but could use some much better lip-syncing and facial animations. There are a lot of little details like visual clutter(items on shelves, rocks, etc) and foliage strewn about, but this stuff has a terrible pop-in about 20-30 feet away from you. Not a problem at all in towns but really makes the otherwise gorgeous open plains and deserts feel fake. This is the main reason the game scores so low in graphics. This is inexcusable in the year 2009. Not when oblivion did a way better job of managing pop-in in '05. There are also a few crap textures here and there but overall the texture work is pretty nice. You can quite literally see the black heads in the characters' skin, lol. AFAIK it supports AA but is also pretty much perfectly crisp and jaggie free without it. Also there is a heat wave effect which seems buggy against some outlines and stuff, like pixellated.
Basically what looks good about it looks really awesome. But what looks bad about it looks like crap.
Sound: 8.5/10
Sound is also another nice part of this game. Good distance and occlusion sound effects with great 3D positional on my headset. Sound helps a lot in the hectic firefights when your being attacked from all sides by pistol wielding Mexicans :P
Nothing truly spectacular but well up to the established standard of good sound quality.
Performance: 10/10
Plays at a pretty constant 60-70FPS on my 9800GTX with all settings maxed. 1680 x 1050 8xQMSAA, 16xAF. Enough said.
I assume Crossfire works due to the FPS on my Crossfire rig but I never bothered to check it with one card.
Overall: 7.5/10
I really like this game and had a lot of fun playing it. But I doubt I'll ever play through again. It took me 7 hours to beat on hard difficulty and was a fun play but overall was pretty forgettable. The eye-twitching pop-up was really a killer. It had a dramatic effect on my experience. I think if this issue and a few others had been taken care of it might have been worth another look later on.
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T 4GHz(20 x 200) 1.5v 3000NB 2000HT, Corsair Hydro H110 w/ 4 x 140mm 1500RPM fans Push/Pull, Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5, 8GB(2 x 4GB) G.Skill RipJaws DDR3-1600 @ 1600MHz CL9 1.55v, Gigabyte GTX760 OC 4GB(1170/1700), Corsair 750HX
Detailed PC Specs: http://my.afterdawn.com/estuansis/blog_entry.cfm/11388
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
12. August 2009 @ 17:01 |
Link to this message
|
Oblivion only did a better job of pop-in after 3rd party mods. Oblivion is still the worst game in history for draw distance failures until you mod it. 1600x1200 textures in front, dropped to i think it was 240x160 beyond about 10 metres.
Quote: Basically what looks good about it looks really awesome. But what looks bad about it looks like crap.
Sounds a lot like Crysis, but without the demanding-ness.
In other news I had my first windows 7 complete network structure failure today. Not a good sign, even vista too longer to fail than that.
Example of network structure failure (this particular example):
Bandwidth cap (incoming and outgoing) of 1.5KB/s for extended periods
10 second waiting period for DNS requests
followed by complete rejection of fixed DNS addresses.
Not as terminal as the vista failure as it didn't require a reformat, or even a reboot to fix, but I am now stuck with a dynamic IP address, until I reformat and dynamic DNSes are unreliable.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 12. August 2009 @ 17:10
|
AfterDawn Addict
7 product reviews
|
12. August 2009 @ 17:16 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by sammorris:
In other news I had my first windows 7 complete network structure failure today. Not a good sign, even vista too longer to fail than that.
Example of network structure failure (this particular example):
Bandwidth cap (incoming and outgoing) of 1.5KB/s for extended periods
10 second waiting period for DNS requests
followed by complete rejection of fixed DNS addresses.
Not as terminal as the vista failure as it didn't require a reformat, or even a reboot to fix, but I am now stuck with a dynamic IP address, until I reformat and dynamic DNSes are unreliable.
Sorry to hear that buddy. My experience with Windows 7 has been smooth for the most part. Probably about 95% efficient. Some minor little bugs that would probably irritate the layman LOL! Slight challenge getting the printers going, since there is no dedicated driver for windows 7 yet. Otherwise, more than likely, I will be in line when it hits the shelves. :D
To delete, or not to delete. THAT is the question!
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
12. August 2009 @ 17:18 |
Link to this message
|
To be honest, apart from the little needless glitches, windows 7 still has the most fundamental issues that vista has, as it's the same operating system really, so it will suffer from the same issues that are the fault of the OS' design, rather than the software on top of it.
|
harvrdguy
Senior Member
|
13. August 2009 @ 00:19 |
Link to this message
|
Sam - you're right of course - and I found a Freezer 7 pro open box at newegg - the whole thing with tax and shipping is only $22. I hope I don't get screwed by the open box - they'll let me return it if I have to. This whole thing is Jeff's fault.
I can't tell you how good this p4 is looking to me with those new air filters - it looks so efficient! And I didn't run the stress test yet - the weather has been coolish - but I jacked the gpu clock way up above the 695 - even past the 702 to about 724 where I once had it - and I can't get it to overheat - won't climb above 60 - the vf1000 just kills the temps. And my cpu is breathing so much better with the dust off the sink - it won't even get to 60 so far. So the freezer 7 pro will work really great with all the ventilation in this case.
Originally posted by keith, or jon??: I was Jonathan and am now Keith.
Sounds suspicious mate. Are you CIA?
Wow, call of juarez again. The great thing about the demo was riding the horse! Nice professional review Jeff.
Hey guys - Call of Duty world at war is half price on steam 2 days only through tomorrow at $25. Should I do it?
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
13. August 2009 @ 00:21 |
Link to this message
|
http://www.pureoverclock.com/article794.html
Quote:
Summary
When we first set out to tackle this article, we weren't quite sure what to expect. We've seen both the Phenom II and Core i7 up close and personal, and have a healthy respect for each platform. However, we are performance junkies around here and pride ourselves as overclocking enthusiasts that try to extract maximum performance from our systems, regardless of platform. And we have been suitably impressed by the overclocking prowess of the Core i7 lineup, as have many other enthusiasts the world over. But we also know that very few people are also able to take advantage of much of those increases in real world tasks that can truly harness that power to a great degree.
We've seen the pendulum swing from Intel to AMD, and back and forth, and as gamers, we had assumed that the strengths of the Core i7 platform would prove too much for a Phenom II to overcome in terms of gaming performance. So today's investigation set about not to prove a certain viewpoint, but to try to illuminate the facts of the unknown differences, not the least of which were our own experiences. And as we must admit, we were rather surprised at the results.
There are a few conclusions we can now definitively draw after today's exploration, plain and simple. It is fact that a Core i7 gaming rig will give you better overall performance in terms of absolute numbers and framerates; the difference isn't very much, but it does exist. It is also fact that such a system will cost considerably more money as well for what is essentially almost the same performance. When the results are then applied against those cost differences, it is also fact that the Core i7 system then becomes a very expensive option, costing hundreds of dollars more for little to no performance increase in most games.
Where things get really interesting is when you equalize the costs between the platforms and look at what you get for gaming performance in return. For a current difference of $215, you can purchase a second Radeon 4890 to go with a Crossfire setup in your Phenom II system and it will utterly crush a Core i7 gaming setup that will have only one graphics card. And we must admit, that provides a very compelling reason to consider an AMD gaming system, especially when we consider that a Phenom II X4 can overclock very well and also easily handle just about any regular use application. Unless you're doing a ton of video encoding or workstation renderings and animations, the cost for performance difference is very difficult to justify, particularly for a gaming setup.
As we said at the outset, passion can be a good thing when harnessed. And in this instance, using the gaming value presented by an AMD Phenom II setup can effectively let gamers harness far more additional graphics horsepower for their hard-earned money.
MGR (Micro Gaming Rig) .|. Intel Q6600 @ 3.45GHz .|. Asus P35 P5K-E/WiFi .|. 4GB 1066MHz Geil Black Dragon RAM .|. Samsung F60 SSD .|. Corsair H50-1 Cooler .|. Sapphire 4870 512MB .|. Lian Li PC-A70B .|. Be Queit P7 Dark Power Pro 850W PSU .|. 24" 1920x1200 DGM (MVA Panel) .|. 24" 1920x1080 Dell (TN Panel) .|.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 13. August 2009 @ 00:22
|
AfterDawn Addict
15 product reviews
|
13. August 2009 @ 02:11 |
Link to this message
|
Quote: Oblivion only did a better job of pop-in after 3rd party mods. Oblivion is still the worst game in history for draw distance failures until you mod it. 1600x1200 textures in front, dropped to i think it was 240x160 beyond about 10 metres.
Nope Oblivion did it much better at stock as it only had bad fade-in with textures. Call of Juarez does it with like 50% of the geometry. So tell me which was worse :S
Quote: Sounds a lot like Crysis, but without the demanding-ness.
It reminded me of Crysis slightly in that regard but no. Crysis' worst points are way better than Call of Juarez'. But CoJ's best points are damn near as good as Crysis'. Like I said, what looks good looks awesome. On average though Crysis whoops it hardcore.
Quote: This whole thing is Jeff's fault.
Wait so I'm at fault for what? Got aftermarket cooling frenzy? :P
Quote: I can't tell you how good this p4 is looking to me with those new air filters - it looks so efficient! And I didn't run the stress test yet - the weather has been coolish - but I jacked the gpu clock way up above the 695 - even past the 702 to about 724 where I once had it - and I can't get it to overheat - won't climb above 60 - the vf1000 just kills the temps. And my cpu is breathing so much better with the dust off the sink - it won't even get to 60 so far. So the freezer 7 pro will work really great with all the ventilation in this case.
VERY NICE ON THE TEMPS!!!!!!! Wow what a difference :D
Quote: Wow, call of juarez again. The great thing about the demo was riding the horse! Nice professional review Jeff.
Haha thanks :)
It's a fun game but it's not really great. One thing I'll say is your system could probably max it at 1920 with a decent framerate.
Quote: Hey guys - Call of Duty world at war is half price on steam 2 days only through tomorrow at $25. Should I do it?
If you really like WWII games it's completely worth a buy. I liked it quite a bit but it wasn't as good as CoD2, one of my older and most beloved PC games of all time :)
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T 4GHz(20 x 200) 1.5v 3000NB 2000HT, Corsair Hydro H110 w/ 4 x 140mm 1500RPM fans Push/Pull, Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5, 8GB(2 x 4GB) G.Skill RipJaws DDR3-1600 @ 1600MHz CL9 1.55v, Gigabyte GTX760 OC 4GB(1170/1700), Corsair 750HX
Detailed PC Specs: http://my.afterdawn.com/estuansis/blog_entry.cfm/11388
|
Member
|
13. August 2009 @ 06:43 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by Rich: Sounds suspicious mate. Are you CIA?
Somehow I don't think the CIA have agents in Yorkshire pit villages.
Sorry I didn't make it clear in that image probably because the thing I'd decided should stay colour was quite grey. What you do is you double up your layers and desaturate the bottom layer then mask the top one...
I could put something funny here but I cant be arsed. Now GO AWAY!
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
13. August 2009 @ 07:28 |
Link to this message
|
Open box is usually fine for a cooler, but it might not come with thermal paste attached, or a manual. Since you need no manual or screws to install a bog-standard 775-mounted cooler, you should be fine if you have some arctic silver lying around.
COD:WAW is up to you, I didn't like it that much, but as a die-hard WW2 fan, it's worth picking up. Personally, I find WW2 games dull, which may be part of the reason I didn't finish it (the othe reason is that it will only play properly on a single GPU or SLI system)
As for the i7 vs AMD article, I personally think it's crap. What they've done is compare a mild i7 overclock that took absolutely no skill or fault-finding, and put it up against a Phenom II running flat out with no room for further overclocking. Congrats, if you overclock a cheap CPU to the hilt, it can match an expensive one not overclocked very far. We've already established the i7 isn't designed for dominating games anyway.
|
Member
|
13. August 2009 @ 08:28 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by sammorris: To be honest, apart from the little needless glitches, windows 7 still has the most fundamental issues that vista has, as it's the same operating system really, so it will suffer from the same issues that are the fault of the OS' design, rather than the software on top of it.
Sorry for rather posting in a weird order and stuff but I must say I've had about as many problems and so on with 7 RC that I had with XP (I was to stubborn to even try Vista). The 7 beta weirded out a couple of times but a quick transfer file and re-install later and all was well. It must be the best OS there is at the moment.
I could put something funny here but I cant be arsed. Now GO AWAY!
|
AfterDawn Addict
7 product reviews
|
13. August 2009 @ 12:28 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by keith1993: I must say I've had about as many problems and so on with 7 RC that I had with XP
LOL! Sounds about like me. Xp was rough at first. In fact, there are still kinks with its code. I suppose that could just be me LOL! But windows 7 performs just about as well as the XP champ. I must admit, I'm disappointed about OC'ing in 7. Much like vista, its touchy. But then, that could be a good thing. Perhaps the OS is picking up on a nasty OC calculation, that could become a problem later...
To delete, or not to delete. THAT is the question!
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
13. August 2009 @ 12:30 |
Link to this message
|
Windows 7 is no better or worse than XP, but for different reasons - this is mainly due to the fact that Windows 7 has more nice features than XP, but these new features are offset by the fact that it has bigger problems. I'm curious to see if the RTM release has these.
|
Member
|
13. August 2009 @ 14:12 |
Link to this message
|
I've discovered something awesome on FUEL! If you run the game windowed a right-click menu becomes accessible allowing you to drive off the map without being re-spawned on it but the screen is filtered orange. You can then drive on forever as the terrain is generated automatically by the game engine albeit with no roads or water or anything but a massive surprise is that it can generate canyons, hills, vegetation, buildings.
Its really cool just take a look at what it can produce, All by it self!!!!
See what I mean about the orange filter :-(
Imageshacks bulk uploaders sooooo much faster then doing them through the web site.
Erk I forgot to activate Windows....
I could put something funny here but I cant be arsed. Now GO AWAY!
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 13. August 2009 @ 15:17
|
harvrdguy
Senior Member
|
13. August 2009 @ 18:30 |
Link to this message
|
Hahaha, Jon, that orange thing with the hills reminds me of the secret game the original excel developers built into the code - behind a big hill was like a movie theater with the names of everybody who worked on the project. That looks very entertaining (for about 3 or 4 minutes, lol.) Interesting find.
I got the open box freezer pro and - yes, you're right, missing the thermal paste - but it did have the instructions. Yes, I have arctic silver 5 lying around which I used on Jeff's vf1000. Everything else seems to be there - I popped off the pwm fan and I am going to plug it into the mobo and run it (for just a couple seconds so I don't burn up my cpu) to see if it works so I don't have to return the cooler. It looks like I saved a bunch of $$$.
The shaff article was quite interesting - when you can spend the identical money and get two 4890s for the savings from athlon to i7, hopefully that will keep AMD from going under, so they can keep developing good stuff on the ati side of the house.
Edit:
Quote: Rich, $80 is so much for a CPU that gets you such a piffling performance upgrade. The E5200 in my work PC is $66, and per-core is literally double the performance of the P4, and there's two cores not one.
Sam this is where I'm confused. The 5200 has a front side bus of 800, like the p4. The 5200 is 2.5ghz - the p4 670 is 3.8 ghz. The 5200 has 2mb L2 cache, like the 670. The 5200 is 64 bits, the 670 P4 is 64 bits. The 5200 has two complete cores - the P4 has two cores but not two data paths and therefore uses hyperthreading, which I disable for gaming - so I am using one core. On games, being single-threaded for the most part, except for newer ones, you will only be running the game on one core of the 5200.
How can one core of the 5200 be twice as powerful as one core of the P4 - what am I missing? L2 cache=same, 64 bits=same, speed same by overclocking 5200, fsb same. This is where I need help understanding processor speed as related to running games. Thanks
Rich
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 13. August 2009 @ 19:01
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
13. August 2009 @ 18:32 |
Link to this message
|
Once again, it's irrelevant because the CPU comparison is worthles...
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
harvrdguy
Senior Member
|
13. August 2009 @ 19:00 |
Link to this message
|
Hey sam you were posting as I was editing, so I know you didn't read my edit yet - please comment on 5200 vs 670 when you have the chance.
|