|
Experiencing Difficulty Using DVD RB and CCE? If So, Then Ask Your Questions Here.
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
23. September 2005 @ 16:30 |
Link to this message
|
|
I know it is a 2 layer disk that has a main title of 2 hr and 10 minutes with 47% compression which just does not make any sense to me, unless there is something else going on with this video. When I did Pirates of the Caribbean it was somewhere like 2 hrs and 20 some minutes and only came out to 74%.
|
|
Advertisement
|
  |
|
|
|
brobear
Suspended permanently
|
23. September 2005 @ 16:36 |
Link to this message
|
|
Are you sure? Recheck the POTC DVD compression level with the same software you're using for the DVD you're wanting to encode now.
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
23. September 2005 @ 16:48 |
Link to this message
|
From Clone
From Shrink on compression Clone reports at less
|
AfterDawn Addict
1 product review
|
23. September 2005 @ 16:54 |
Link to this message
|
|
Hmm!
" Please Read!!! Post your questions only in This Thread or they will go unanswered:
Help with development of BD RB: Donations at: http://www.jdobbs.com/. This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 23. September 2005 @ 17:00
|
AfterDawn Addict
1 product review
|
23. September 2005 @ 16:59 |
Link to this message
|
|
Wrong!
" Please Read!!! Post your questions only in This Thread or they will go unanswered:
Help with development of BD RB: Donations at: http://www.jdobbs.com/. This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 23. September 2005 @ 17:01
|
|
64026402
Senior Member
|
23. September 2005 @ 17:55 |
Link to this message
|
|
Different movies can have different levels of compression for the same length of time so the compression levels for encoding will vary.
DVDrebuilder should do fine at this level.
Brobear,
The timings referred to previously: "AMD CAS 2-2-2-5 while putting CAS 3-3-3-8 in the P4 board" were for DDR2 on the P4 which is faster with looser timings. This is not unusual. The P4 actually had 533 to the 400 of the AMD.
Donald
|
|
brobear
Suspended permanently
|
23. September 2005 @ 18:44 |
Link to this message
|
Donald
In case you missed it the first time, the Intel-AMD discussion has been disccontinued on this thread. It's moved into an irrelevant stage at this point. We know faster processors equal faster encodes.
Quote:
Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now let's end the PC discussions here or move it to the hardware forum. -Sophocles-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you want to talk Intel vs AMD, go here http://forums.afterdawn.com/thread_view.cfm/235934 . I started a thread in the Hardware section for you.
|
|
brobear
Suspended permanently
|
23. September 2005 @ 18:53 |
Link to this message
|
|
Arniebear
From that screen capture, the total size comes to less than 4.3GB, unless there is something you didn't show us. That means it wouldn't need to be compressed at all.
|
|
64026402
Senior Member
|
23. September 2005 @ 19:17 |
Link to this message
|
|
I didn't miss it. Just responding breifly to a comment as everyone else has.
Donald
|
AfterDawn Addict
1 product review
|
23. September 2005 @ 21:44 |
Link to this message
|
|
Hitch Hikers guide is still a Mystery.
For those of you that are hardware challenged I'm going to make myself available to you so that you don't look foolish.
" Please Read!!! Post your questions only in This Thread or they will go unanswered:
Help with development of BD RB: Donations at: http://www.jdobbs.com/. |
|
brobear
Suspended permanently
|
24. September 2005 @ 02:10 |
Link to this message
|
|
Hmmm? For the hardware biased? Seems I remember someone whose dream machine not long ago was a dual Intel Xeon processor and not an AMD. ;) And the Hardware section would be the perfect place for an open discussion on the topic, wouldn't it? ;)
How bout that Hitch Hikers guide? LOL
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 24. September 2005 @ 02:10
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
24. September 2005 @ 04:50 |
Link to this message
|
The ripped file was 7.7g and had 7 VOB files. I went ahead and used RB it showed compression at 54.9%. Did a two pass and it came out pretty good, could still see some noise in the background on some scenes.
|
|
brobear
Suspended permanently
|
24. September 2005 @ 06:03 |
Link to this message
|
|
Things can vary, but I've had little trouble with background noise on DVDs in the 8GB range. Was there any background "noise" in the original? Also, what kind of "noise" was it? I just backed up an old version of Conan and it was 7.82GB (ripped), it came out excellent.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 24. September 2005 @ 06:06
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
24. September 2005 @ 06:24 |
Link to this message
|
|
What I see is a grainy appearance in the background. However, this video is part documentary and part dance video. The older clips that are incorporated are probably not all digital. Lot of them were shot in lowlight onto concert stages. The later dated clips come up perfect. So in this case it is the source video. RB did a good job with what it had and I have no complaints. Completed it in 137 minutes which is a good time. I know you can use the AvsEditor to the UnDot.dll but I have not gotten it to work, I do not think I am putting in the correct path, but I will keep experimenting with it.
|
AfterDawn Addict
1 product review
|
24. September 2005 @ 06:40 |
Link to this message
|
|
arniebear
Try undot on movies that have noise, it can clean some of it up.
" Please Read!!! Post your questions only in This Thread or they will go unanswered:
Help with development of BD RB: Donations at: http://www.jdobbs.com/. |
AfterDawn Addict
1 product review
|
24. September 2005 @ 12:44 |
Link to this message
|
There has been some minor questioning about the encode speeds that I've recently posted using my new machine. As we all know clock speed is the only benefit that Intel has over AMD, and even then its not that significant. If one can produce an AMD system that can come close to Intel's clock speed then Intel really hasn't any advantages left. AMD is better at just about everything else.
Encoders are among those few applications that benefits from Intel's clock speeds. But! What if AMD can approach Intel on its strengths, While leaving Intel behind on AMD's strengths? This has been my thesis and direction for building my latest PC. I think that if Intel doesn't get with the game, it's going to fall behind AMD in a major way.
To support my speed gains I did an encode of a fairly large DVD and I'm providing screen captures that are difficult to doctor.
The movie and DVD Decrypter.
RB after the movie was encoded.
Sorry I was seeing the image so I didn't know that others couldn't. Let me know if this works!
" Please Read!!! Post your questions only in This Thread or they will go unanswered:
Help with development of BD RB: Donations at: http://www.jdobbs.com/. This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 24. September 2005 @ 17:01
|
|
UncasMS
Member
|
24. September 2005 @ 13:54 |
Link to this message
|
|
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 24. September 2005 @ 13:59
|
AfterDawn Addict
1 product review
|
24. September 2005 @ 14:45 |
Link to this message
|
|
If you don't see the image then let me know.
" Please Read!!! Post your questions only in This Thread or they will go unanswered:
Help with development of BD RB: Donations at: http://www.jdobbs.com/. This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 24. September 2005 @ 14:48
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
24. September 2005 @ 15:01 |
Link to this message
|
|
@UncasMS
Thanks for the link, will try out those filters.
@Sophocles
Thank you for the advice given on the other forum in regard to the AviSynth version I was using. I had the 2.56 from AD but downloaded the 2.54 put that in and tried HC again and it came out perfect, no lines no unplayable disk. That was the problem all along.
|
AfterDawn Addict
1 product review
|
24. September 2005 @ 15:34 |
Link to this message
|
|
Arniebear
Glad to hear that you've worked it out.
What forum was it?
" Please Read!!! Post your questions only in This Thread or they will go unanswered:
Help with development of BD RB: Donations at: http://www.jdobbs.com/. |
AfterDawn Addict
|
24. September 2005 @ 15:41 |
Link to this message
|
|
I believe I was at DVD Rip, could have been Hounds it was a frustrating night when I did it. But no matter you gave out sound advice and it worked. Again thanks :)
|
AfterDawn Addict
1 product review
|
24. September 2005 @ 15:45 |
Link to this message
|
|
That's enough, and it's knowing that something worked that makes it all worthwhile and a learning experienced.
" Please Read!!! Post your questions only in This Thread or they will go unanswered:
Help with development of BD RB: Donations at: http://www.jdobbs.com/. |
|
brobear
Suspended permanently
|
24. September 2005 @ 16:28 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
There has been some minor questioning about the encode speeds that I've recently posted using my new machine.
Where and who? All I've seen is a sales pitch for AMD. ;)
|
AfterDawn Addict
1 product review
|
24. September 2005 @ 16:37 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
Where and who? All I've seen is a sales pitch for AMD. ;)
Since I'm not making any money from this, and I am telling the truth, exactly what is it that I'm selling for profit?
That was an unkind statement, it suggests that I have a monetary gain from winning this debate.
Genuine debates depend on the discovery of what's true, I only posted what I can prove to be true.
" Please Read!!! Post your questions only in This Thread or they will go unanswered:
Help with development of BD RB: Donations at: http://www.jdobbs.com/. |
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
1 product review
|
24. September 2005 @ 16:38 |
Link to this message
|
The truth caried forward.
There has been some minor questioning about the encode speeds that I've recently posted using my new machine. As we all know clock speed is the only benefit that Intel has over AMD, and even then its not that significant. If one can produce an AMD system that can come close to Intel's clock speed then Intel really hasn't any advantages left. AMD is better at just about everything else.
Encoders are among those few applications that benefits from Intel's clock speeds. But! What if AMD can approach Intel on its strengths, While leaving Intel behind on AMD's strengths? This has been my thesis and direction for building my latest PC. I think that if Intel doesn't get with the game, it's going to fall behind AMD in a major way.
To support my speed gains I did an encode of a fairly large DVD and I'm providing screen captures that are difficult to doctor.
The movie and DVD Decrypter.
RB after the movie was encoded.
Sorry I was seeing the image so I didn't know that others couldn't. Let me know if this works!
" Please Read!!! Post your questions only in This Thread or they will go unanswered:
Help with development of BD RB: Donations at: http://www.jdobbs.com/. This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 24. September 2005 @ 17:02
|
